The Science of Success Podcast

  • Get STARTED
  • The Podcast
    • The Best Of
    • SHOW NOTES
    • EPISODE LIST
    • BLOG
  • ABOUT US
    • Our Mission
    • Team
    • Our Partners
    • CONTACT
  • Evidence-Based Growth
  • Rate & Review
  • BOOKSHELF
  • Shop
  • Search
Nir-01.png

How You Can Use Behavioral Design To Create Any Habit You Want with Nir Eyal

October 26, 2017 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity

In this episode we discuss How To Use “Mind Control” Techniques to Create Any Habit You Want, why we are driven much more by pain than pleasure, the “hook” model for describing human behavior, how to hack your rewards to change your behavior, the power of tiny amounts of friction, and much more with Nir Eyal. 

Nir Eyal is an expert in “behavioral design” having worked in both advertising and video gaming helping companies build and create more engaging products. Nir is the Wall Street Journal bestselling author of the book Hooked: How To Build Habit Forming Products and has been featured in Forbes, Psychology Today, and more. Nir is an active angel investor and currently writes to help companies create good habit and behaviors in their users on his blog NirandFar.com.

We discuss:

  • Persuasion, mind control, and behavioral design

  • What is a habit and how do you define it?

  • How we can leverage technology to build healthier habits

  • How 50% of your actions take place with little or no unconscious thought

  • Internal vs External triggers

  • There is only one reason you use a product or service - to modulate your mood - that’s it

  • Our behaviors are driven NOT by seeking of pleasure, but rather the quelling of a unconformable emotion

  • Figure out what your frequently occurring internal triggers are

  • We are driven more by PAIN than by PLEASURE

  • There’s no end to what we can accomplish if we can understand that pain is our primary motivator

  • Even seeking pleasure = satisfying the PAIN of WANTING

  • The power of the unknown to draw us in

  • The 4 stages of the “Hook” Model on how Habits are formed and sustained

  • Rewards are actually wanting to quell the “stress of desire”

  • Discomfort drives us to action

  • How the same mental hardwiring behind addiction also underpins love and desire

  • The easier you can make a behavior the more likely people are to do it

  • The biggest thing that drives people to adopt technology is making life EASIER

  • Reward itself doesn’t have much impact on your brain, its the anticipation of the reward that drives us

  • 3 Kinds of Variable Rewards

  • Rewards of the Tribe

    1. Rewards of the Hunt

    2. Rewards of the Self

  • The power of adaptability

  • Belief is as much of a factor in addiction as physical dependency itself

  • How making a behavior just a little bit easier can have dramatic results

  • How to put the hook model in reverse and destroy bad habits

  • How putting space between steps in your habit loop can create massive changes

  • Even small amounts of friction can change the marginal decision and make a habit much harder

  • How can you make bad habits more difficult, take longer, or be harder to do?

  • How you can use “temptation bundling” to break the hold of variable rewards in your habit loop

  • Never do something when you don’t have the end in sight - do things that have a finite END so that you don’t get hooked

  • Key question you must ask yourself: Is this technology serving ME, or am I serving IT?

  • One simple piece of advice to implement the ideas discussed in this interview right away

  • How to leverage technology to combat technology that is distracting you

iTunes Button.png
Stitcher Button.png
Android Button.png
YouTube.png

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that).

SkillShare.png

This Episode of The Science of Success is brought to you by our partners at Skillshare! For a limited time, Skillshare is offering our listeners One Month of UNLIMITED ACCESS ABSOLUTELY FREE! Just go towww.skillshare.com/success to redeem your free unlimited month NOW!

Are you a professional looking to get a leg-up at work? Or just someone who just loves learning new things? Are you looking to do your job better?

Want to add some impressive skills to your resume? Skillshare is an online learning community with over sixteen thousand classes in design, business, and more. You can learn everything from logo design to social media marketing to street photography. Unlimited access to all of this for a low monthly price – never pay PER class again!

Again, Skillshare is giving our listeners a month of unlimited access - absolutely FREE! Go to
www.skillshare.com/success to redeem your free month!

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Article] Skinner - Operant Conditioning by Saul McLeod

  • [Wiki Article] B. F. Skinner

  • [Personal Site] Nir & Far

  • [Calendar] Nir’s Meeting Scheduler

  • [App] 7 Cups: Anxiety & Stress Chat

  • [App] Pocket

  • [App] Byte Foods

Episode Transcript


[00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to The Science of Success introducing your host, Matt Bodnar.

[0:00:11.8] MB: Welcome to the Science of Success; the number one evidence-based growth podcast on the internet with more than a million downloads and listeners in over a hundred countries. 

In this episode we discuss how to use mind control techniques to create any habit you want. Why we’re driven much more by pain than pleasure. We look at the hook model for describing human behavior, talk about how to hack your rewards to change your behavior, look at the power of tiny amounts of friction, and much more with Nir Eyal.

I’m going to give you three reasons why you should join our email list today by going to successpodcast.com and signing up right on the homepage. First; you’re going to get awesome free guide that we create based on listener demand, like our popular guide; How to Organize and Remember Everything. You can get that for free along with another awesome surprise bonus guide that you go to sign up to find out by joining the email list today. 

Next, you’re going to get a curated weekly email from us every week called Mindset Monday. Listeners absolutely love this email. It’s short, sweet, simple. It's basically topics, ideas, things that we've come across that have us excited that we're talking about, that we've come across that we find interesting. 

Lastly, you’re going to get an exclusive chance to shape the show; vote on guests, give your input for guest questions. In fact, in our Mindset Monday in the last two weeks, we've sent out emails asking for specific questions for an upcoming guest. You got to be on the email chain to find out who that guest is and to submit your questions, but this is a great opportunity to get involved, shape the content, figure out what we’re going to be asking the guests, vote on things like the new into we rolled out last month. All kinds of chances to shape the show and become part of what we’re doing. You get all of these if you join and sign up for the email list, which you can go to successpodcast.com and sign up right of the homepage, or if you're on the go right now, if you don't have a chance to go to the website, just text the word “smarter”, that's “smarter" to the number 4222 on your cell phone. That’s “smarter” to 44222 and you can get signed up that way. 

In our previous episode we discussed what happened when our guest; the astronaut, Chris Hadfield, went blind during a spacewalk and how he made it out alive. We talked about the mental toughness necessary to survive extremely dangerous situations. We discussed in depth how astronauts deal with fear, looked at the vital importance of having training to deal with powerful risks, and much more with Chris Hadfield. If you want to learn how to crush through any fears standing in your way, listen to that episode. 

[0:02:52.2] MB: Today we have another awesome guest on the show, Nir Eyal. Nir is an expert in behavioral design, having worked in both advertising and vi9deo gaming helping companies build and create more engaging products. He is the Wall Street Journal best-selling author of the book Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products, and has been featured in Forbes, Psychology Today and more. He’s an active angel investor and currently writes and helps companies create good habits and behaviors in their users on his blog nirandfar.com. 

Nir, welcome to the Science of Success. 

[0:03:25.9] NE: Thanks so much, Matt. Great to be here. 

[0:03:27.2] MB: We’re very excited to have you on here today. For listeners who may not be familiar with you and some of your background, tell us your story and how you got started down the path of behavioral design. I'm curious, especially, I’m a huge gamer myself, so I'd love to hear especially kind of about the video gaming side of your world. 

[0:03:45.7] NE: Sure. The last company that you mentioned they was at the intersection of gaming and advertising, and that company gave me a lot of insights into persuasion, mind control, behavioral design, whatever you want to call it, that those lessons I found were very powerful and very effective. I saw my clients using them time and time again and I became fascinated with these techniques, but what I found was that there wasn't a book out there. There wasn't like a resource into how to use these techniques, and in fact many of the gaming companies that I worked with and the clients, the advertising clients I worked with, they just use these techniques because they worked. They didn't know what they were called. Certainly, they didn’t know the psychology behind these principles. They just kept using them again and again and again because they produced better results. 

I really became fascinated say with how these technologies persuade us, and I came to a hypothesis that technologies of the future will be the ones that are able to persuade us to form these long-term habits. Originally I wanted to learn these techniques for my next company. My company was acquired and I wanted to figure out what to do next. 

When I started doing research into, “Okay. I'm going to figure out how to compile all these into a resource that I would use into my next company,” I started blogging about what I was learning. I spent a lot of time in the Stanford Library. I started to spent a lot of time talking to people who are building these technologies, folks at Twitter and Instagram and Facebook and WhatsApp and I just learned so much from them and the more I blogged about it the more interest there was in people reading my blog and learning more. One thing kind of led to another. The blog became a class at Stanford that I taught for many years, and then that class turned into the book that you see today, which is called Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products. 

[0:05:30.7] MB: Let's start with something really simple. How do you define habits? What are habits? 

[0:05:38.2] NE: Right. Habits are defined as the impulse to do a behavior with little or no conscious thought. It’s about half of what you do every single day is done purely out of habits, and these habits are by and large very good for us. It’s just another form of learning that human beings have evolved. Many animals have evolved habits, where our brain is able to put these tasks into automatic mode if you will, so that we don’t have to think about it while we’re doing these behaviors. 

These repetitive tasks that you do day-in and day-out without really thinking about why you're doing them, those are our habits, and my contention is that we can actually use the psychology of habits to help us live better lives. In fact, technology can facilitate those healthy habits. Now, of course, technology can also facilitate a bunch of unhealthy habits as well. Many of us feel that we are overly dependent on our devices that many times these habits can be bad habits as well, but I think it's imperative to understand the psychology of habits so that we can hopefully, as business people, design products and services that create healthy habits in our lives, helping people stay connected and helping people save money and helping people exercise more and eat better. We can do all these things through these miracles of today's technology, but then also understanding how these technologies hook us. We can also make sure that we put technology in its place to make sure that we control the technology and that the technology doesn't control us. 

[0:07:05.8] MB: I think one of the most important things that you said is this notion that the habits are unconscious, right? I forgot the exact percentage, but like 50% of everything we do takes place unconsciously. We’re not consciously thinking about it. Some sort of random queue or trigger from our environment sends us into this habit loop, which I find fascinating. 

[0:07:28.3] NE: Right. By and large, these things are great for us. We benefit from having all these habits. You can see from an evolutionary basis, if every time there was danger, you had to think as a caveman a hundred thousand years ago, “What should I do when this sabertooth tiger is charging after me?” If you deliberated, you’d be dead. That branch of the human evolutionary tree died off. Whereas the people who had these instincts, who had these quick response behaviors, who had these learned responses that they didn't have to deliberate, these were the people who had survived and became us. 

[0:08:04.3] MB: Let’s dig into how do habits get formed, and what are some of the components that go into creating habits.

[0:08:13.1] NE: Sure. The basic habit loop that a lot of people know about is a trigger, something that queues us to action habits are environmentally dependent. These are things that occur with little or no conscious thought based on our environment, so there's always some kind of trigger, some kind of queue. Then there is the action, and then there's the pay off, some kind of reward. 

Now, what I’ve changed in that model, looking into the research that I did, is not so much how do habits form in our day-to-day lives. I think that’s pretty well understood stuff. I think what I wanted to push the field forward in a direction of how do we build products and services, or how do products and services build habits within us. What I added to that model is a few things. One is this idea of internal and external triggers, that when it comes to the products and services we use, there is only one reason that you use any product or service, one reason, and that reason is to modulate our mood. I don't care what the product is. You use that product to feel something different. 

The internal trigger, meaning external triggers you know all about. External triggers are things in our environment that tell us what to do next; your phone dings, or you get an email, or friend tells you to do something. These are all external triggers, they tell you what to do next. 

What we also have are what’s called these internal triggers that when we are in a certain situation or routine around certain people or places or when we feel certain things, before we even understand what's going on, we already have the itch. We already have this unconscious trigger to get us to do something. 

For example, when you're feeling lonely, you check Facebook or Tinder. When you're feeling uncertain about something, before you scan your brain to see if you know the answer, you're already Googling it. When you're feeling bored, before you even ask yourself what you're feeling, your brain is already telling your fingers to type in New York Times, or Reddit, or YouTube, or something else to ease that boredom. 

This is a very important thing to understand, that our behaviors are driven not by the seeking of pleasure per se, but the quelling of an uncomfortable emotion. What I call this internal trigger. That’s one very important thing to understand both when we’re designing products and services. When I advise Silicon Valley companies on how to build more habit-forming technology, part of my advice is you’ve got to figure out what that frequently occurring internal trigger is. 

Then from a personal development standpoint, we have to understand that we are driven by pain, right? That it’s not the pleasure principle that Freud espoused that everything we do is for the pursuit of pleasure and the denial and quelling of pain. It's just pain all the way down. Everything we do is just to avoid pain in as much as even when we think we are driven by pleasure, we’re not actually driven by pleasure. We’re driven by the urge to satisfy the pain of wanting the pleasure, and this is a really important point, because, really, the superpower that we all have within us is to understand that we are driven by pain and find ways to deal with that pain. There is no end to what we can accomplish when we can deal with our dissatisfaction, with our pain. 

Anyway, that’s one important addition. Another important addition has to do with the next what I call the action phase of the hook. In my book I talk about the hook model. the action phase; we see this manifested in all sorts of products we use, that what’s happened today, the reason so many of our technologies are so habit-forming is that they have become so much easier to use. Meaning they’ve made the action way easier to do. 

The fact that I can open an app with one tap, that I can scroll a feed, that I can watch a video anywhere at any time with very little effort makes that behavior more likely to occur. The more friction is removed the easier the behavior is to do. Then the third part of the hook model is what I call the reward phase, which is not just the reward, it's a variable reward. This comes straight from Skinner. We know that variable rewards, when it comes to Skinner's famous experiments with his pigeons, when he gave them a food pellet as a reward. When it was on a predictable schedule of reinforcement, they clicked X-number of times when it was on a variable schedule of reinforcement, meaning sometimes when the food pellet came out, sometimes it did, sometimes it didn’t. When there was variability, when there was an intermittent schedule of reinforcement, Skinner observed the pigeon clicked on the little food pellet dispenser many, many more times. 


Variable rewards are everywhere. We’ve thought traditionally in psychology as variable rewards being something that is only about food pellets, but it turns out it's everywhere. It's what makes slot machines  so enticing. It what makes the news, right? Why are we all glued to the news these days, because we all want to know what the next stupid thing that's going to come out of the president's mouth, is that we want to know what's going to happen next. The first three letters of news is new. We watch a movie, we want to know what's going to happened at the end of the movie. It’s all about the unknown. 

When you think about online, scrolling the newsfeed and scrolling and scrolling and searching and searching, is it uses the exact same psychology as pulling on a slot machine. They’re both variable schedules reinforcement.

Finally, the last part of the hook, which has never been articulated before, but I've kind of added to the conversation when it comes to habit-forming design is the investment phase. If you think about all these technologies, what’s really special about technology today and why it's particularly habit-forming, is that we are co-creating the technology with the manufacturers. Now, that's never been possible before. If you're Henry Ford in the production line, you decide how to make the model T. You design it on paper that you tool it, then you create the machines to build the machines. This takes years, or at least it used to take years. Now, that’s gone. 

Now, that’s gone. Today we are co-creating products with the manufacturers. When you think about Facebook, every time you like something, you add a photo, you friend someone, you comment on something. You are giving them data to modify your feed in the future. You are making the product better and better with use, so that if you were to log into my Facebook account, it would be super boring for you. It would make no sense, because it's been tailored to my needs based on my data. Now, that’s super special. 

When we think about habit-forming technology today, the four key steps are trigger, an action, a reward, and finally an investment, and it’s through successive cycles through these hooks, this is how consumer preferences are shaped and how our product habits are formed. 

[0:15:15.2] MB: There’s a lot I want to unpack out of that. Before we start, I want to explore more deeply this idea that we only seek to avoid pain. Tell me more about that. 

[0:15:24.2] NE: Yeah. When you look at the biology of what's actually going on in our brains, a lot of people think that we do things because we want to feel good, but that's not actually biologically true. When you think about the reward system, when you think about what's happening inside the nucleus accumbens, it’s not the pursuit of pleasure per se. It's the need to quell the wanting, what we call the stress of desire. That’s the way the reward system operates, is it creates this itch, this psychological state of hetero stasis where there is an imbalance, where there's some discomfort that drives us to action. This is when we are most focused. This is when we are most engaged, and this is when we pursue something, is to quell that feeling of wanting. 

Wanting doesn't feel good. If you think about some of the things that we think are driven by pleasure. Let’s think about love and sex. It’s not actually the orgasm itself. It's not the love affair itself. It’s the pursuit, right? That’s what makes us lovesick, and if you think about, in fact the language of love, it’s very similar to the language of addiction, that when you think about someone that — I could spout off song ballad after song ballad of how love hurts, and many people will describe this longing that they have for another person in very similar terminology. In fact, there are scientists out there who believe that the same mechanism that drives addiction today comes from the hardwiring that drives love, that drives sexual desire, is basically the same hardware that is hijacked by someone looking for a sensation, looking to quell some kind of negative sensation, but through other means. That a very important understanding. When it comes to driving our own behavior and how we shape what we do in life, is understanding that it's really all about the dealing with pain. 

By the way, this is fancy psychology terminology dropped on something that has been a knowledge that people have had for thousands of years. Every major religion, Buddhism comes to mind first and foremost, has ways to deal with the pain of this world through different means. 

[0:17:48.5] MB: Let's get into — I think this is a really interesting discussion of how triggers function. I want to kind of move into the next phase of the hooked model. Tell me more about the action phase. 

[0:18:02.4] NE: Sure. The action phase is really about making the behavior as easy as possible. This is really been the innovation that we’ve seen from personal technology over the past several years, is making it as easy as possible to do the intended behavior. The easier you can make the behavior, the more likely people are to do it. What seems trivial to people outside the industry has a huge impact on how people will do something. 

Just the positioning of a button, or which button comes before a different button, or the color of the body, or the contrast of the button. All of these things make a profound impact on how likely you are to do a particular behavior, and I know because we test these things all the time. There are armies of people behind the apps you use every day who are there to do nothing but make that behavior easier to do. Now, that’s nothing new. Technology has always been defined as the process by which a behavior becomes easier to do, and I don’t care if it’s the cotton gin to the iPhone. Every technology we use is adopted because of the work it saves us. 

Now what we’re seeing with this manifestation through personal technologies is that companies are investing all sorts of ways, some of them seem trivial, but fact turn out to be quite persuasive to make the job easier to do. When you think about how we went from desktop. to laptop, to mobile phones, now to wearable, and now to voice interfaces, like the Amazon Alexa or the Microsoft Cortana, what we’re seeing is the technology is helping us make the day-to-day tasks of our life even easier. 

Again, it seems trivial when you first interact with some of these technologies, but what happens is that people adopt them because of these small bits of effort that they save us. I can ask my Amazon Echo what the weather is, and that will save me a couple taps over going to my iPhone, that will successfully change my habit over time. 

[0:20:09.2] MB: That's a great example, because my wife and I have actually two Amazon Echoes in their house because. 

[0:20:14.8] NE: Oh, they got you. 

[0:20:15.9] MB: Recording everything that we say and do. It’s so funny, because that's probably the biggest use that I have for it, is just asking it, “What's the weather today?” It's great, because if you’re in your closet getting ready, you can kind of shout at the Alexa and it will tell me as supposed to having to dig out my phone and fidget around and figure out and look at the weather app. 

[0:20:35.6] NE: Right, and you think to yourself, “What’s the big deal?” If you compare that to the way we use to get weather a generation or so ago, the iPhone is way easier, right? It used to be, if you want to know whether, you had to wait for the weatherman on television to tell you what the weather was going to be like. There was no magic tablet that we could just touch and instantly know all these information or our fingertips. 

If you take the perspective of a few decades, certainly, a generation, these things are magical. We couldn’t have imagine these things are real today when we were children. Yet even they aren’t easy enough. Even now there are opportunities to make that behavior even easier to do with these new technologies that are just becoming widely adopted. 

[0:21:21.8] MB: This may be kind of leading into the next phase of the hook model, but tell me about the idea that — And this is something you've written about and spoken about, this notion that when we complete the action is not actually when we get the reward, but it’s more in the anticipation itself. 

[0:21:41.0] NE: Right. This whole idea of pain versus pleasure, what these products often stimulate is not the reward itself. What keeps us coming back is the anticipation of the reward. When we think about how the reward system is structured in the brain, it’s back to that stress of wanting, that pain of desire. That's what keeps us coming back. 

The reason you are waiting for Alexa to tell you the weather, is that there’s unknown there. There’s uncertainty. There’s variability. In that period of time, you’re not going to do anything else in that second. It’s the same reason why when you pull the handle of a slot machine, you're going to want the results, because there’s uncertainty about what you might get. 

In a softer form, this is what keeps us engaged to all sorts of things, is this variability, this uncertainty, this mystery around what you might find next. 

[0:22:37.2] MB: Tell me more about the different kinds of rewards that can impact us and how — Let’s dig into, and I’d love actually to talk even maybe as a starting point a little bit more about Skinner's work with pigeons and the power of variable rewards, and then kind of dig in to the different types of rewards you’ve seen be really effective at driving human behavior. 

[0:22:59.5] NE: Sure. The type of verbal rewards that I identify in my book, they come in three forms. There are rewards of the tribe, rewards of the hunt, and rewards of the self, and you’ll see these in all sorts of products and services that you use every day both online and off-line. 

My book is mostly around technology products, but the same exact rules by the way apply to all sorts of things. If you think about spectator sports, if you think about what makes books and movies interesting, why we watch the nightly news, why we subscribe to a particular religion. They all have hooks embedded in them. They all have these elements of variability. 

Rewards of the tribe are things that feel good, that come from other people and have this element of variability. When you think about — We talked about what makes Facebook so habit-forming. You’ve got this endless stream of information in your newsfeed and it’s all about your friends, what are your friends doing. Are they going on vacation? Did they post pictures of their kids or their puppy or an interesting news article? There's uncertainty around what you might find when you keep scrolling that newsfeed. Of course, all about your friends, all about information about people you really know. 

In a workplace, when you think about Slack, or email for that matter, it's all about information from other people. That's rewards of the tribe. This is also the base of what makes romance romantic, right? That romances is romantic in the beginning of a relationship when it's uncertain. Now, I’ve been married for over 15 years now, I know that other things become what keeps a couple together. To be honest with you, very few couples who been married for any lengthy period of time still feel the butterflies that they felt the first time they held hands or the first time the kissed. That uncertainty, that variability, that mystery is extremely exciting and extremely engaging. It's almost a high that you don't get later in life when you know everything about your partner. 

Of course, it doesn't mean that you can't stay in love certainly, but it’s a different type of engagement. It’s a more intellectual type of engagement. You have to remind yourself, “This is why I'm here,” as opposed to this love sickness that is a mindless kind of attraction. That's rewards of the tribe. Competition is another form of rewards of the tribe, cooperation. These are all forms of things that feel good, that have an element of variability and come from other people. 

Then you have rewards of the hunt. Rewards of the hunt stem from our primal search for food and other material possessions. In modern society we get these things in the form of money. When you think about a retention bonus, a year-end bonus, why does a year-end bonus key people retain? Why do they keep coming to work for a year-end bonus, also known as a retention bonus? Because there's uncertainty there, “How big is my bonus going to be? How well did I do?” That’s all about this uncertainty, and that's why it works to keep employees engaged. 

If you think about the stock market, people play the stock market as day traders, although anybody who specializes in the science of how to make money in the stock market will tell you that day trading is a fantastic way to lose money. That playing the markets, you might as well be playing on a slot machine. Of course, that metaphor is very apt, because it's the same exact psychology the keeps people playing. The ups and downs of the stock market, it's a variable reward. There’s uncertainty there, so that's why day traders do what they do not because it makes money, but because it's as habit-forming and sucks us in as engaging as a slot machine.

If you think about sports, for example, why are we obsessed with a little bouncing ball going back and forth on the field? It might as well be a pachinko machine. It's the same exact thing. It’s uncertainty, it’s variability, it's these things keep us engaged. If you were to go into a sports bar during the World Cup or during March Madness, there’s a reason they call it March Madness, because it is madness. It doesn't make any logical sense why we do this, but it's fun, it's engaging. It has this element of mystery around who is going to win. In the moment, it’s incredibly important to us. Of course, if I told even the most diehard March Madness fan who won five years ago, who won three years ago, it’s going to take them a minute to remember. In the moment, it was everything to them. 

All of these comes from terrible rewards of the hunt. That's variable reward of the hunt. Of course, we see the same exact phenomenon online and we talked about the slot machine, effect of scrolling on a newsfeed, whether it's Facebook or Twitter or LinkedIn. So many products these days have this newsfeed element, because scrolling on this newsfeed, hunting for information, is this reward of the hunt. Searching and searching and never down searching for that next interesting bit of content. 

Finally, we have rewards of the self. Rewards of the self are things that feel good that have this element of variability, but don't come from other people and aren’t about these information or material rewards. These are things that feel good in and of themselves. The search for mastery, consistency, competency, control all examples of variable rewards of the self. 

When you think about gameplay, for example, online games, you may not win anything in terms of material possessions when you play Angry Birds or Candy Crush or one of these online games. You don’t really win anything. Most of these you don't even play with other people, but there's something fun and exciting about getting to the next level, the next accomplishment, the next achievement. Those are all rewards of the self. 

We also see this online when it comes to email, for example. Checking those unread messages, finishing the to-dos in your to-do-list, or tapping on an icon on your home screen that has a little message that says something is waiting for you, all examples of variable rewards of the self. The search for competency, consistency and control. 

[0:26:57.9] MB: I’m sure if you're listening to this show, you’re passionate about mastering new skills and abilities, and that's why I'm excited to tell you once again about our sponsor this week, Skillshare. Skillshare is an online learning community with over 16,000 classes in design, business and much more. You can learn everything from logo design, to social media marketing, to street photography, and you can get unlimited access to the entire catalog for a low monthly price, so you don't have to pay per class like many other sites. 

They have some really cool courses on there. They have a course on Evernote mastery. You know how much I love Evernote. Evernote runs basically my entire life and I highly recommend using it as a tool, but also checking out their course on how to do it. They have a really cool course on productivity planning and they have a course on mind maps. Mind maps are awesome. I have a mind map sitting on my desk that I'm looking at right now for the Art of Learning, by Josh Waitzkin. I love my mind maps. It’s an incredible strategy that speaks directly to your brain and your subconscious and it's a really cool tool to remember things. 

There're so many fascinating courses on Skillshare, and the cool thing is they’ve been so kind to the show, they've been an incredible sponsor, and they're giving all of our listeners a free month of access, so get in there. You can get free classes for up to a month completely for free. You can check out all of these courses, just go to skillshare.com/success to redeem your free month. 

[0:30:25.7] MB: This is something we talk about a lot on the show, but I think it bears repeating, and I love the verbiage you’ve used on here, the rewards of the tribe, the rewards of the hunt. These psychological tendencies are baked into the human brain by evolution. One of the most powerful things about the hooks model and something the more broadly we talk about on the show all the time is that the more you align yourself with the inmate sort of way that evolution has shaped our brains. The more you align yourself with those forces, powerful things can happen, but the more you try and fight them, the more you try to challenge and refuse to accept natural biases and the way that our brains are structured, you're fighting a serious uphill battle. 

[0:31:09.7] NE: Right. I think understanding this is incredibly important. Now, I think the worst thing we can do — One of the worst cognitive biases that we have is when we learn helplessness. A lot of critics of technology — If you listen to what I've just said or you read my book, one interpretation is that these companies are out to get us. They are using our psychological tendencies to get us to buy more junk and to get us to use their apps. That is all true. They are doing that. They have always done that. Persuasion has always been about changing behavior. If you dress a certain way to impress a mate, that is persuasion, and that has happened for 200,000 years of human evolution. 

Now, what's beautiful about the human species, what makes us so special, one of things that makes us so special is that we are adaptable. If I took a Siberian tiger and I put them with their cousin, the Indian Tiger, in the middle of the Indian forest, that Siberian tiger would die because it can't adapt to its environment. Human beings who can adapt to every single continent on the planet and they can even adapt to life outside the planet, in outer space. We are the only species that can do that. 

The lesson here is that we need to use that adaptability. The reason I wrote this book is twofold. One; I want people to build technologies that help change our habit, because I really do believe that we can use this new generation of technology to help people live better lives. The second reason I wrote the book is because I want us to understand how these technologies change our behaviors so we can do something about it. 

I don't want people to think that these technologies are somehow taking away your agency, that you're powerless to resist them, because that is in fact the worst thing that you can believe. There’s been some great studies that have shown that — There was a study back in 2015 that found that alcoholics who believe they were powerless to resist the temptation of alcohol were much more likely to relapse after treatment. In fact, there are beliefs about powerlessness, were as much of a factor as the physical dependency itself. That should stop everybody in their tracks. Think about that. Their beliefs about the addiction and their powerlessness relative to temptation was as much of a factor as the physical dependency itself. 

The lesson here is that as an adaptable species, I have never found any technology to date that makes us powerless. There is nothing I can show you on a screen. There’s even nothing I can inject into your body that turns you into a zombie. What that means is that we need to be aware of how these technology work, how these products and services can potentially hook us and sometimes addict us, so that we can do something about it. So that we can put these products in their place. 

Now, most of the time, these products and services serve us, we love them. They help improve our lives. Of course, sometimes we can go overboard with all sorts of different bad habits, and so this is an instruction manual just as much to help people build healthy habits as it is to help us break unhealthy habit that don't serve us. 

[0:34:35.6] MB: Let's unpack each of those, maybe starting with building healthier habits. What are some specific recommendations or habits that you talk about that maybe somebody listening could use the hooked model to create healthier habits for themselves. 

[0:34:51.3] NE: Sure. The book is really about products. I will give you a few examples of a few different products. Now, I have to state for full disclosure, I've invested in some these examples that I’m going ot share with you, so I just want to get that out of the way, because I want to invest in companies that are using my techniques for good. One product that I'm particularly proud of is a product called Bite. Bite is this — It tackles this problem of food deserts. food deserts happen when there are people located in areas where they cannot get access to healthy food. 

This particular company tackles the problem of folks who work in office buildings, and many times the only options for accessible food are vending machines. Think about nurses that are working late, or people in office buildings maybe in more rural settings where they can just walk downstairs to a cafeteria that’s serving fresh food. Literally, millions of people are stuck in these effective food deserts where the only food they can get if they didn’t bring something from home are Cheetos in the vending machine and soda. 

The current thinking around the obesity epidemic is that people don't eat healthy, because they don't understand. I see this over and over and over again, that many people the first knee-jerk reaction as to why people don't change their behavior is because, well, they just must not know. It turns out that’s almost never true. That people know more than you think. That people generally know what is healthy and what is unhealthy. That a bag of Cheetos and a Coca-Cola are not as healthy as a fresh salad.Tthere's very few people who don't know that, so why don't people eat better? 

It turns out it's really about availability. It's about access to these food items. In fact, making that behavior just a little bit easier can have dramatic results. We talked about the action phase of a hook. We have seen that there are — We can dramatically change people's behavior just from moving the access to food a little bit closer, and sometimes I'm talking about just a few floors closer can have dramatic effects. 

In fact, there was a study done at Google that have found that just moving unhealthy food in the snack room a couple of shelves up so that people had to reach for the cookie dramatically reduce the amount of cookies eaten and increase the number of healthy snacks chosen instead that were placed at reach level. 

This company that I started to tell you about, Bite Foods, they basically took these refrigerators, the size of vending machines. They slapped an iPad on top of each one of these vending machines so that all you have to do is swipe your credit card, the machine unlocks, and you take out of this vending machine farm fresh foods; salads and fresh made food that was made that day that's delivered from local restaurants, and this has dramatically increased the number of people who are eating healthier and losing weight and getting their bodies in better shape just because they made it easier to access these foods. That's one example of a company that I've invested in that’s using the hook model. They’re also, of course, using variable rewards, because the food changes regularly. Also using investments, because the products — They will bring you more of products that you are consuming, so they you’re your preferences. If you like yogurt and you rated it as something you like, they’re going to bring you more of that Greek yogurt next time or the salad or whatever it is that your preferences are. They are using the hook model in that way. 

Another company that's building healthy habit that I've invested in is called 7 Cups. 7even Cups was started by a psychotherapist by the name of Glenn Moriarty, and Glenn called me a couple of years ago. On my website, many people read my book and they'll ask for time with me. They want to figure how to build a habit-forming product or they have a question about the book. I actually give out time for free. Anyone can call me just by going to my website. 

Glenn booked time with me a couple of years ago and he said, “Look. I’m a therapists, and I know that there are far more people who could benefit from therapy that don't get it, because that’s too hard. There's social stigma. There is expense. There’s time involved. All these things that make getting therapy something that people don't do because it's too darn hard.” 

Glenn built this beautiful app called 7 Cups, that is essentially something that whenever someone's feeling down, let’s say it’s a parent of a child with a disability or a soldier suffering from PTSD or just someone who’s feeling down and need someone to talk to. With the click of one button, that’s the action phase, a click of a button. The internal trigger by the way is loneliness, that negative emotion. The action is clicking with one of the button. The variable reward is that you are instantly connected to another human being, and the investment is that the more you participate with this product, the more you use it, you are actually offered the opportunity to invest in the platform by learning how to become a trained listener yourself. 

It turns out that people who do this find the service to be as effective as traditional psychotherapy, which is really amazing, because it’s a free service that I think right now is in a 140 countries and they’re doing 180,000 sessions a week. These are two great examples of companies that are using the hook model to build healthy habits in people's lives. 

[0:40:14.3] MB: We’ll make sure to include those in the show notes so that listeners can check them out. On the flipside of the coin, what are some strategies we can use to break negative habit loops that we get stuck in? For example, looking at Reddit or constantly checking Twitter, something like that. 

[0:40:30.9] NE: Yeah. Basically what we do is we put the hook model in reverse. The idea is that we want to break the hook. Habit-forming products of all sorts — By the way, we talked a lot about technology. Again, there's just as many habit-forming technologies off-line as there are online. What we want to do is put space between the steps of the hook. 

For example, the simplest thing you can do is to remove the triggers. Let's say you got a bad habit of checking Facebook too much. The simplest thing you can do is to remove the Facebook app from your cell phone. How about this? Take 15 minutes and adjust your notification settings. About two thirds of people with smartphones never adjust their notification settings. That’s madness. Take a few minutes and just make sure that the app makers are not interrupting you, are not triggering you on their schedule. Make sure that only the apps that are important to you can notify you, can send you those triggers. Remove unwanted triggers. 

The best thing you can do if you're on a diet and you find yourself eating unhealthy food, is to remove those foods from your house, for God sakes. If you're trying to cut down on sugar, don't have cookie and ice cream all over the house, because it's too powerful of a trigger. You have to remove them. 

In my house, for example, we’ve dramatically cut down on our sugar consumption. There’s doctor in America that's going to tell you sugar is good for you and you should eat more of it. The science there is pretty darn ironclad, that we don't need more sugar. We still eat dessert from time to time, but we don't eat it in the house. What a simple rule. If we really want something sweet, we have to go outside, go to a restaurant and go but it. 

Just that added friction has dramatically reduced how much of that thing that we don't want to consume we actually consume in our lives. Just removing the trigger, the next step is of course making the action more difficult. We talked a little bit about how now that added effort of having to go get a dessert outside the home, that's increased friction. 

When it comes to technology, for example, how could we make the action more difficult? Here's what I do in my house. I was finding that every night I was spending more and more time online as supposed to being with my wife, someone I love very much. Our relationship was suffering. Our sex life was suffering because we were spending more time fondling our iPhones than actually being together. We did something very simple. I went to the hardware store and I bought myself a $10 outlet timer, and that outlet timer every night at 10 p.m. turns off my Internet router. 

Now, I could go over and take out the Internet router and unplug it from the timer and re-plug it in. I could do that, but of course now that requires more effort. I just inserted a bit of friction to make the action a little bit more difficult to do. Why? Because now it gives me this moment of mindfulness to say to myself, “Wait a minute is this really important right now? Do I really need to be online, or do I need to get to sleep, or do I need to spend some quality time with my wife?” That bit of mindfulness, that’s what we’re looking for, just a moment of reflection to stop a mindless habit. 

When it comes to the variable reward phase, I use a technique called temptation bundling. What you want to do here is to make sure that these variable rewards are not something that keep pulling you in. What I do is use a technique, and it’s been well studied now, called temptation bundling, which is when you take something you want and you couple it with something that you don't really want to do. 

Here’s what I do. Here's a bad habit I tried to break, where particularly with new administration, with the elections, I was reading the news all the time and that was not healthy for me. I just kept wasting time. I’d read one article and then I’d see a link for another article and another article and I’d be pulled in and 45 minutes later I was scrolling the web and I didn’t get anything done. 

Instead I have a rule that whenever I see an article that looks interesting I save that article to an app called Pocket, and there're other apps like it. I think previously there is another app that does this. Basically, you can save that article into an app. Then there're variable rewards there. What's in the article is the variable reward, the content itself. I want to know what the story is about. Instead of reading it right then and there where it's going to be a big waste time, I have this rule that I don't read on my desktop. Instead, I only can read that content when I'm on the treadmill, or I use this other app called VoiceStream that will literally read what's in my pocket queue to me. I can go on a walk. I can ilft weights. I can do something that I want to do, but it’s a little bit more difficult to do, I need some extra motivation, so I’ve put it in my headphones. I can listen to these articles, and I’ve removed the reward from that immediate circumstance and then coupled it with something that I want to get done, namely; workout in the gym. 

Finally, when it comes to the investment phase, the fourth step of the hook, you want to make sure not to invest. Here's the rule; never do something that you don't have the end in sight. I like video games. I like movies, but I don't play social games and I don't watch series. I had this terrible experience. Do you remember the Series 24? Did you ever watch 24? 

[0:45:38.1] MB: Oh, yeah. I remember 24. 

[0:45:40.0] NE: All right. With Kiefer Sutherland. He got me bad. Kiefer Sutherland got be real bad. I went with some friends to a ski retreat and somebody brought 24, and we sat there the entire weekend and we watched every episode of this stupid show and we didn’t do any skiing, it was horrible, because of this stupid show. 

From that day forward I decided I will never watch one of those serialized shows. I'm sorry. Maybe I'm a dork that I don't know what happens in Games of Thrones. I don’t know what happened with the House of Cards. That's okay to me. You know why? Because I like movies, I like things that have an end. I like things that have two hours, and then I know that’s how much time I’m putting into it, but I don't start things that go on and on and on and on. Why? Because they are designed. There are thousands of people at that studio trying to figure out how to keep you coming back. Every episode ends with a cliffhanger, and that emotional investment of your of wanting to know what happens next is what keeps you watching the next episode and the next episode and the next episode. Do not invest in things that you don't have the end in sight. 

[0:46:47.1] MB: Very good recommendations, and especially Pocket. Pocket is something that I personally love using and recommend to people all the time as a great way to stop a random article from disrupting the middle of your workload. Just save it to Pocket and then have that time set aside to actually look into it. That's when you go and you sort of batch that time to read articles or you use dead time, like time when you're waiting in line or somewhere. 

What would be kind of one simple piece of homework that you would give a listener as a starting point to implement some of the ideas that we’ve talked about today? 

[0:47:23.8] NE: Sure. If you're trying to build a healthy habit, maybe if you're trying to build a habit-forming product, that you want to make sure that you have a hook built into that product. If you're working at a company and you need to form a customer habit, you want to make sure that you have trigger action reward and investment built into the product design. It’s not that every product has to have a habit. It’s that every product that needs a habit has to have a hook. That’s if you're trying to build a habit. 

Now, if you're trying to break a habit, the first thing to ask yourself — I think this is something that we’re going out to become more and more familiar with, is this simple question of; is this technology serving me, or am I serving it? 

We all need distractions. Distractions are something that human beings have had forever. Socrates and Aristotle debated the nature of a crazy, this tendency to do things against our better interest. In fact, distractions can be very useful in life. They help us cope with uncomfortable situations. However, when we rely on distraction to escape an uncomfortable reality and we never learn how to deal with that pain, well then the person who can alleviate that pain can take advantage of us. Whether it’s drugs, whether it's television, whether it's watching too many sports, frankly, whether it’s listening to this podcast. If we’re using a distraction to escape something that we don't want to deal with, and that goes on for an extended period of time, that can harm us. 

The real question here is when does a distraction serve us and when are we serving it? By asking us that critical question, that’s the homework, is to ask ourselves that critical question. Then we can start to categorize, “You know what? This technology actually does serve me. I enjoy it. I like this distraction. I'm not serving it.” A way you can test that is to disconnect for a little while. What would happen if you didn’t use Facebook for a week or two? What would happen if you stop watching sports for a week or two? How would you deal with that? If the answer is, “It’s no big deal,” then that’s probably not addiction. It's not something that causes you any kind of long-term harm. If you find that, “Wow! This is really difficult for me to cope with, or I'm unable to cope with,” then you might need to bring out the heavy artillery and understand with the deeper needs are, what the deeper reason. What kind of pain are you really escaping from?

For the most part, what you'll probably find if you're not actually addicted, there is a portion of the population that is actually addicted, but it's a very small proportion. If you're like most of us, you're not struggling with addiction. You're struggling with distractions. The key question here is to understand when is the distraction serving you, when are you serving it, and then to put technology in these distractions in its place by adapting your behaviors around these technologies and distractions and adopting new technologies.

We talked about how you can use these other technologies. Like I told you the story about that router that shuts off the Internet — The outlet timer that shuts off my Internet router. There are literally thousands of apps and technologies that you can use to shut off technology during certain times of the day so that you can focus, so that you can get the kind of work done that you want to get done. 
We talked about Pocket, all these new technologies that help put technology in its place. Lots of solutions out there if you ask yourself this critical question of; is this serving me or am I serving it? 

[0:50:42.2] MB: For listeners who want to dig in more, where can people find you and your book and your blog online? 

[0:50:48.0] NE: Sure. My website is called nirandfar.com. Nir is spelled like my first name, N-I-R, so nirandfar.com, and my book is called Hooked: How to Build Habit-Forming Products and it’s available wherever books are sold. 

[0:51:00.7] MB: Nir, thank you so much for coming on the show and sharing all these wisdom. I know listeners are going to get a lot out of this and to have some really concrete strategies to both implement using technology to build better habits, but also how to combat negative habits and distractions. 

[0:51:13.7] NE: Awesome, it is a real pleasure. Thank you so much for having me. 

[0:51:16.7] MB: Thank you so much for listening to the Science of Success. We’ve created this show to help you, our listeners, master evidence-based personal growth. I love hearing from listeners. If you want to reach out, share your story or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email is matt@successpodcast.com. That's matt@successpodcast.com. 

I’m going to give you three reasons why you should join our email list today by going to successpodcast.com and signing up right on the homepage. First, you’re going to get an exclusive weekly email from us called Mindset Monday. This is packed full of interesting links and articles in short, sweet, easily digestible. Things that are interesting to us, things we’ve been talking about, reading, discussing internally here that we wanted to share with the listeners. 

Next, you’re going to get a chance to shape the show, vote on guests, guests’ questions. We actually have a guest coming up that’s a guest we’re super excited about and we’ve been asking the email list for the last couple of weeks to give us feedback and questions for this particular guest. 

Lastly, you're going to get an awesome for a guide. It’s a free guide we created based on listener demand. It's our most popular guide, it’s called How to Organize and Remember Everything. You can get it completely for free along with a sweet bonus guide, that's a surprise. All you have to do is sign up and join the email list. You can do that right at our website, successpodcast.com, sign up on the home page, or if you're on the go right now, just text the word “smarter”, that's “smarter” to the number 44222. 

Remember, the greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend either live or online. If you've enjoyed this episode, please leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes. That helps more and more people discover the Science of Success. 

Don't forget, if you want to get all the incredible information we talked about in this episode; links, transcripts, everything we discussed and much more, be sure to check out the show notes. If you go to the website, successpodcast.com, you can find the show notes, just hit the show notes button right at the top. 

Thanks again, and we'll see you on the next episode of the Science of Success.


October 26, 2017 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity
CHARLESDuhigg-01.png

Break Your Phone Addiction (& Your Other Bad Habits) With Charles Duhigg

September 14, 2017 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity

In this episode we discuss habit loops, how they form, and what they are, we look at why you can’t stop picking up your phone (I know that’s definitely a challenge for me), the habits and routines that research shows are most correlated with success, how to bake mental models into your brain, and much more with Charles Duhigg.

Charles is a Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist and senior editor at The New York Times. Charles is the author of “The Power of Habit,” which spent over two years on the New York Times best-seller list, and more recently “Smarter Faster Better,” also a New York Times best seller. Charles graduated from Yale University, Harvard Business School and has been featured in This American Life, N.P.R, Frontline, and much more.

We discuss:

  • Habit Loops, what they are and how they form

  • 40-45% of what we do every single day is not a decision its a habit

  • Emotional cue for checking your phone and "novelty seeking"

  • How your brain makes that behavior automatic, becaues its delivering a reward

  • How to break habits

  • What Reward are you seeking? Get as specific as possible

  • Figure out the REWARD, then reprogram the HABIT

  • Keystone habits and how they can transform your identity and create a chain reaction

  • Why it's that the most successful people work harder, they just think differently

  • The rituals and habits of people who are more productive

  • Why its not being smarter, its not working harder, its not going to the right schools - the research shows that what correlates the MOST with success is that the people who are most successful tend to have “contemplative routines”, habits in their lives that push them to think more deeply

  • Journaling is a great example of a contemplative routine that can make you be more productive

  • Being busy and being productive are not synonymous

  • Thinking has alwasy been the killer "productivity app"

  • The story of Quantas Flight 32

  • Maintaining focus while in the middle of a crashing airplane and how to cultivate situational awareness

  • How Firefighters develop ESP

  • Building a story, a mental model of a situation, and how that can shape your situational awareness

  • The vital importance of building mental models

iTunes Button.png
Stitcher Button.png
Android Button.png
YouTube.png

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that).

unnamed-1.png

This weeks episode of The Science of Success is brought to you by our partners at Brilliant! Brilliant is math and science enrichment learning. Learn concepts by solving fascinating, challenging problems. Brilliant explores probability, computer science, machine learning, physics of the everyday, complex algebra, and much more. Dive into an addictive interactive experience enjoyed by over 4 million students, professionals, and enthusiasts around the world.

You can access courses online for free right now! however, Brilliant is offering The Science of Success Listeners 20% OFF THEIR FULL SUITE of classes and course simply go to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess in order to claim your discount and start learning these incredibly important skills today!

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Wiki Page] Charles Duhigg

  • [Book] Smarter Faster Better: The Transformative Power of Real Productivity by Charles Duhigg

Episode Transcript


[00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to The Science of Success with your host, Matt Bodnar.

[0:00:12.5]MB: Welcome to welcome to the science of success, the number one evidence-based growth podcast on the internet with more than 1 million downloads and listeners in over a hundred countries. In this episode we discuss habit loops, how they form, what they are, and we look at why you can't stop picking up your phone. I know that’s definitely a challenge for me. We talk about the habits and routines that research shows are the most correlated with success, and we talk about how to bake mental models into your brain and much more, with Charles Duhigg. 

I’m going to give you three reasons why you should join our email list today by going to successpodcast.com and signing up right on the homepage. The first is exclusive curated weekly emails from us including Mindset Monday, which listeners have been loving. The second is that you get to listener exclusive content and a chance to shape the show. That means voting on guests, changing our interim music. Yeah, if you're on the email list, you have an opportunity to vote on the song that we use for the new intro in the episode today, and you get awesome free guides that we create based on listener demand, like our most popular guide; how to organize and remember everything, which you can get for free along with another sweet bonus guide that you have to sign up to find out what it is by joining our email list today. Again, you can go to successpodcast.com and join the email list right on the homepage, or if you're on your phone, just text the word “smarter” to the number 44222. That's “smarter” to the number 44222. 

In our previous episode we discussed how you can fall into cycles of self-sabotage and constantly reset your happiness down to where you think it should be. We discussed lessons learned from coaching over 20,000 people. Talked about how to crush your upper limit problem and break through the beliefs that are holding you back. We look at the questions you need to discover and live in your zone of genius and much more, with Dr. Gay Hendricks. If you want to flush self-sabotage, listen to that episode. 

You know how much we talk about the concept of mental models on the show and I think it's an incredibly important and super vital strategy to build a toolkit of mental models that can help you be successful and achieve your goals. That's why I'm once again excited to tell you about or sponsor for this week, brilliant.org. 

Brilliant is a math and science enrichment learning tool that makes mastering the fundamentals of math and science easy and fun, and there's something special there for Science of Success listeners which you can get by going to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. Mastering the fundamentals of math and science is a super important component of building a powerful toolkit of mental models, and Brilliant is an incredible way to get started with that. 

Now, for the episode. 

[0:02:51.5] MB: Today we have another incredible guest on the show, Charles Duhigg. Charles is a Pulitzer prize-winning columnist and senior editor at the New York Times. He’s the author of The Power of Habit and Smarter, Faster, Better, both of which are New York Times bestsellers. Graduated from Yale and Harvard Business School and has been featured in This American Life, NPR, Frontline and much more. 

Charles, welcome to the Science of Success. 

[0:03:13.1] CD: Thanks for having me on. 

[0:03:14.5] MB: We’re very excited to have you on here. To start out, I'd love to — I know both of your books cover such fascinating topics and I want to get as much out of this conversation as we can. To start out, tell me a little bit about — Let’s start with the power path. Tell me about habit loops. How are habits formed and how can we change our habits? 

[0:03:33.6] CD: One of the big insights that’s happened in the last 15 years in neurology is really understanding what a habit is. I think we tend to think of a habit as sort of one thing, right? It’s that instinct that I have to eat cookies when I don’t need to, or to bite my nails. What researchers have discovered is that every habit has three components. The first part of a habit is the cue, the trigger, that sets off this urge, this instinct to almost do something automatically. 

Then after that trigger, the cue, there comes that routine, which is the behavior itself. Then, finally, there’s a reward, and every habit has a reward, and that reward is why your brain latches on to this behavior and makes it automatic. 

This happens all the time. In fact, there was a woman named Wendy Wood at Duke University who followed around hundreds of people for an entire year and what she found was that about 40% to 45% of what we do every single day is not a decision, it’s a habit, right? When you are backing your car out of the driveway and you’ve done it so many times you don’t really have to pay attention to it. That’s a habit. When you remember leaving home and you’re at your desk but you can’t exactly remember the drive along the freeway because you were thinking about something else. That’s because you were able to do that by habit. 

We have mental habits that occur almost every minute. Habits are how we as species have survived and have thrived so well. In every single one of those habits, there’re thousands of little habits that come into play every single day, almost half of what we do, all of them have a cue, a routine, and a reward.  

[0:05:15.0] MB: Tell me about each of those. What is the cue, what is the routine, what is the reward and how could we leverage that knowledge to change our negative habits or to build positive habits? 
 
[0:05:27.0] CD: It’s different for every single habit, right? What habit do you have that you struggle with? 

[0:05:32.3] MB: I’d say a good one might be maybe checking my phone too frequently or checking Reddit or something like that and wasting time on social media. 

[0:05:39.3] CD: Okay. When you feel that urge to check your phone, what’s going on? Paint a picture of what’s happening. For instance, where does it usually happen? 

[0:05:52.1] MB: I would say all over the place, right? To me, maybe I’m reading too much into it, but it feels like my brain is screaming out for some sort of novelty dopamine, give me something new. Give me something exciting, and I’ll kind of pick up my phone and then wake up 15 minutes later and be like, “What have I just been doing?” 

[0:06:11.1] CD: All cues for the most part fall into one of that categories. It’s usually a particular place, a certain time of day, the presence of certain other people, a particular emotion or a preceding behavior that’s become ritualized somehow. It sounds like, for you, what the cue for checking your phone is, is it’s probably a particular emotion, which in this case would be kind of boredom, right? What psychologists would call novelty seeking, that you’re feeling like you need like a burst of something interesting. When you have this fair moment, when you feel a little bit bored, you feel this certain emotion, you pick up and you check your phone. We’ve got the cue diagnosed. 

The activity is pretty much the same way every single time. You pick up the phone, you kind of turn it on. Do you find that you tend to go to the same apps on your phone? 

[0:07:01.2] MB: Yeah, absolutely. Probably Reddit is one that is a huge time sync.

[0:07:05.9] CD: Okay. We’ve got the routine down. You’re grabbing your phone, you’re hitting the Reddit app or you’re opening up a browser and you’re checking Reddit. Then now the question becomes; what is the reward? Because we know that every single habit has a reward. Sometimes those rewards are hard to identify. Sometimes they’re very subtle, but the only reason your brain makes that behavior automatic is because it is delivering some kind of reward and without knowing what the reward is, you can’t begin to diagnose and therefore change the behavior. 

What reward do you think it’s delivering when you check Reddit? 

[0:07:44.3] MB: I think it’s, as you said, sort of novelty. It’s new information. It’s kind of some — I don’t know. It’s hard to describe. It’s like dopamine. I always want to know what’s the new thing, what’s going on? It’s kind of the same impulse of checking the news, right? 

[0:07:57.7] CD: It’s definitely not dopamine, right? Because we know that neurotransmitters are very, very complicated, that what actually happens inside your brain can’t be reduced to just sort of one neurotransmitter. 

Now, the other thing you said is you said it could be novelty, it could be — I think you said you wanted to learn something new. Those are actually two different rewards, and understanding exactly what’s going on is important at really trying to figure out how to fix this. Typically, if had more time, what I would say is, “Look, you should start experimenting.” The next time you feel the urge to check Reddit, you should, for instance, just check YouTube and look for something dumb on YouTube. Something that doesn’t have any informational value, whatsoever, but it’s just kind of visually entertaining. Figure out, does that satisfy that craving, because then you know that the reward that’s driving these habits, it’s novelty seeking. 

Then I would say the next experiment is maybe instead of checking Reddit, go to like CNN and read some kind of dry article and see if that satisfies the craving, because if that does, then it means it’s not novelty seeking that’s driving this habit, it’s instead sort of this thirst for knowledge, for learning something new. Then you can even get smaller and smaller and smaller. 

If it is novelty seeking, my guess is that it’s novelty seeking. My guess is that you would not be a satisfied going to, for instance, like the American Journal Pediatric Surgery as you would be going to Reddit, because Reddit sort of has things that are more fun and more interesting, and it’s not exactly news you need to know. It’s just news that’s kind of interesting. 

My guess is that novelty is a huge part of it, then you can get even more specific and you can try and figure out, “Okay, is it just that you need like something completely different?” If you conducted an experiment and you went to YouTube instead of Reddit and you just watched flashing lights, which are very, very novel, or picture or videos of penguins, which is very novel. Would that satisfy the urge, or does it need to be something that’s kind of funny. Does it need to be something that’s kind of interesting? 

The goal there is to figure out what exactly are you actually — What reward is this habit delivering for you? Get specific as possible in what kind of reward this is [inaudible 0:10:18.9]. Now, it might be that you’re totally wrong, that it has nothing to do with the content, with the value of the content. That it doesn’t matter if it’s funny or if it’s newsy. Actually, all that you need is you just need some way to like kind of catch of breath and stop thinking about whatever problem you’re trying to solve and you’ve fallen into the habit of looking at Reddit as kind of a mental reset, and you could look at anything for that matter. 

Once you understand what reward that habit is delivering, then you can reprogram the habit. Then you could say, “Okay. Look.” I’m just going to make this up, but let’s say what’s going on here is that when I feel a cue of boredom, I turn to Reddit, and the reason why I turn to Reddit is because Reddit delivers me some type of reward that makes me feel smart. It doesn’t feel like procrastination. It feels like I’m learning something. 

Then the next question becomes, “Okay. What else can you do that would correspond to that old cue and deliver something similar to that old reward, but it actually more healthy.” Is it something that you feel like is quite as much a waste of time? What would that be? 

[0:11:31.6] MB: Yeah. I think that’s a great analogy. I can answer that for myself, but I want to focus on delivering value to the listeners, and I know we have tight time constraints in this interview. I want to kind of advance beyond this. Tell me a little bit about, just briefly, what is a keystone habit and how are those important in terms of shaping and kind of impacting the behavior? 

[0:11:55.2] CD: A keystone habit is a habit that seems to set off a chain reaction when it begins to change itself. For many people, exercise for instance, is a keystone habit. When people start exercising, they tend to start eating differently often times without even thinking about it. For most of us, I think that makes sense, because for whatever reason we feel like, “Oh, I went for a run this morning, and so it’s easier to eat a salad for lunch rather than a hamburger.” 

What’s interesting is that according to studies, when people start exercising habitually, they also start doing things like using their credit cards less. They tend to do their dishes earlier in the day. They procrastinate less at work. Then there’s something about it for many people, not for everyone, but for many people, that exercise is a keystone habit that changes how they see themselves. As a result, it sets off a chain reaction that changes other patterns in their life. 

For you, this habit of checking Reddit. If it’s something that you find sort of really bothers you, right? It’s something that seems to dominate your day. You find yourself doing it and, “Oh, God! Why am I doing this again? I wish that I could stop.” Then that might very well be a keystone habit for you. We tend to identify keystone habits. Again, a keystone habit is different for each person by the emotional content of it rather than merely by the role that it plays in our life. 

[0:13:24.4] MB: One of the biggest things that I’m a huge fan of on the show are mental models. You’ve heard me talk a lot about mental models and how critically important it is if you want to be successful to build a toolkit of mental models that can help you better understand reality. 

One of the topics and many of the topics actually that are critical to developing an amazing and rich toolkit of mental models is a deep understanding of mathematics, science, physics, chemistry, etc. The hard sciences are some of the backbones of the most useful and effective mental model toolkits, and that's why I'm super excited to announce that our sponsor for this episode is brilliant.org. 

Brilliant.org is a math and science enrichment learning website where you can learn concepts by actually solving fascinating and challenging problems. I'm really, really excited about this, because I'm a huge fan of STEM learning; science, technology, engineering and math, and I think that it’s something that America in general needs to do a better job of and it's something that I really want you, the listeners, to be improving and getting these skills and getting better at things like science and math. 

Too many people in our society have lost the ability to quantitatively understand reality, and the mental models from a hard sciences are some of the most powerful in describing what happens in the real world. I personally am super psyched about Brilliant. The courses on there are amazing, and I'm going to through and take a bunch of them to re-up my understanding of things like probability, games of chance, problem-solving and they even have some really cool stuff, things like machine learning. 

Right now brilliant.org is offering our listeners an additional 20% off of their premium plan. This discount is only for Science of Success listeners and you can unlock it by going to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. That’s brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. You can sign up using our custom link and then you’ll get the 20% premium membership which comes with all of their courses and you can use this to learn about probability. You can increase your mathematics abilities. You can learn more about the hard sciences, like physics and chemistry. If you want to build a toolkit of powerful mental models, I cannot recommend enough using something like brilliant.org to improve your quantitative understanding of the world and how it works. Again, you can go to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess to get this 20% discount.

[0:15:40.6] MB: Let’s dig into some of the lessons from Smarter, Faster, Better. Tell me about — One of the core concepts of that book is the idea that it’s not that most successful work harder, it’s that they do things differently. Tell me about that idea.  

[0:15:52.7] CD: It’s not that they do things differently. It’s that they tend to think differently, right? 

[0:15:58.8] MB: Yeah. Exactly. Sorry. Maybe I’m mis-phrased that. 

[0:16:02.0] CD: In general, the most productive people, they tend to be people who think more deeply than everyone else. They spend more time thinking about the choices that they’re making. They’re trying to figure out why they have certain priorities and how to focus on those priorities. How to motivate their teams and how to motivate themselves. 

That’s what the book explains, is that there are these mental habits that prepare us to think more deeply about the choices we’re making, particularly when thinking is hard. 

[0:16:30.1] MB: What are some of the thought patterns that people who think differently that are more productive follow and implement? 

[0:16:38.1] CD: Do you feel like you’re a pretty productive guy? 

[0:16:41.9] MB: I mean I’m decently productive. 

[0:16:43.8] CD: Why do you think you’re productive? What do you do to help yourself become productive? 

[0:16:48.5] MB: I think it’s a lot of the things you talked about in the book, right? I spend a lot of time — I carve out and cultivate space in my life for thinking about what I’m doing for setting my goals, for creative time that is outside of kind of the constant churn of responding to emails and doing busy work. I constantly trying to cultivate that sort of quadrant of important, but not urgent work and spending time on that, spending time journaling and thinking. I hope that even though those activities seem like they’re sort of not getting things done, in many ways they refocus on what you do in such a way that it’s actually much more high-leveraged than just seeming like you’re busy all the time. 

[0:17:28.2] CD: Yeah. I think that’s exactly right. Do you set aside time for that? Do you have a block of hour, an hour to set aside on Sunday? Do you do it when you’re feeling like it? How do you structure creating that time? 

[0:17:40.1] MB: Yeah. I try to cultivate that time every morning. I set aside time in the mornings before I have meetings, then I can sort of think, journal, think about big picture things and try to figure out what can I do to be more effective. 

[0:17:54.1] CD: Yeah. I think that this is the big insight that we’ve learned from research into productivity about why some people in some companies, but people in particular, why some people get so much more done than other people do. Why they seem to succeed faster? 

The conventional wisdom has always been, “Oh, those people must work much harder. They chain themselves to their desks,” or maybe that they’re much smarter or that they went to the right schools and so they have more advantages. 

What the research shows is that doesn’t tend to be true. Certainly, working hard is great and going to the right schools doesn’t hurt, but that doesn’t seem to correlate with success. That what actually seems to correlate with success is that the people who are most productive and most successful, they tend to have what researchers refer to as contemplative routines, as habits in their life that push them to think more deeply. 

You mentioned journaling. Journaling is a great example of this, because the act of journaling often times forces us to sit down and to try and make sense of how we spent our time recently. What our goals actually ought to be as supposed to what we happen to just get obsessed with or fixated on right now, and how we should arrange our life so that those priorities, so that our energy and our activity is actually focused on our priorities rather than instantly responding to life’s many sort of busy work request. 

The basic insight here is that, particularly now, being busy and being productive are not synonymous. You can spend an entire day being busy. You can spend an entire day replying to emails and not getting anything important done. That’s kind of a new thing, right? As late as the 1960s and 1970s, busy and productive were kind of similar, but that’s changed in this economic revolution that we’re living through. They’ve now become disjointed. 

The people who are most successful are the ones who recognize that and who say, “Look! I need these routines in my life.” I need these habits in my life that push me to think about what my goals should be. Whether I need to change my priorities today. Whether I’m actually spending time on my priorities, or instead I’m just doing stuff because it’s the easiest thing to do, because it makes me feel productive instead of actually be productive.

One of the things that the core of Smarter, Faster, Better is that Smarter, Faster, Better walks through these eight parts of life that seem to be most deeply correlated with productivity and success and sort of unpacks, okay. What is the habit that you need to build that allows you to think more deeply about things like, for instance, generating motivation when you most need it? What do we know about the neurology of motivation? What do we know about remaining focused at work? What is that habit that people employ so that they don’t get distracted by minutia, that they don’t get distracted by things that don’t matter, so that they set priorities actively and push themselves to think about those priorities rather than getting complaisant and just looking at your to-do-list and doing whatever comes next even if that’s not the most important thing. 

What do we know about why some teams succeed more than others, and therefore how do we empower leaders of those teams to create the right team habits that makes success more likely? At the core of each of these is this basic principle, it’s hard to think, right? It takes time and energy and work and it’s easy to forget to think. 

Throughout history, thinking has always been the killer productivity app. The key is to build these routines, these habits into your life that push you to think a little bit more deeply about the things that matter, like goals and teams and innovation and to think in certain ways so that you’ll end up being more successful. 

[0:21:55.4] MB: Tell me the story of Qantas Flight 32. 

[0:21:58.7] CD: Qantas Flight 32 is a flight that took off from Singapore Airport, headed towards Sydney, Australia. They had a midair catastrophic mechanical injury and the pilot ended up prevailing because he was able to shift his mental model. He was able to shift the story he was telling himself inside his head that helped him think about how he ought to harness his attention in the right way. 

Did you read the story? 

[0:22:29.6] MB: I listened to a recent speech of yours when you talked about it. I thought it was riveting and it was a fascinating story, that’s why I wanted to dig in to some of the lessons from what happened. 

[0:22:40.9] CD: Why parts of it stood out to you? 

[0:22:43.2] MB: I think one that sort of a narrative structure of being in the midst of this plane malfunction and how they were able to recover from it. Specifically, the concept of situational awareness and how they sort of practiced these routines and even before the accident, even the car right over there kind of rehearsing and talking about what are we going to do when and if something goes wrong. You mentioned that the flight recording of the cockpit, it almost sounds like a rehearsed scripted play even in the midst of what seemingly is a crisis. 

[0:23:21.2] CD: Yeah. One of the big important things that we know about how people marshal their attention and don’t get distracted, why some people are able to maintain focus, whether you’re in an emergency in an airplane cockpit or whether it’s just a busy day at work and you’re sitting at your desk and there’s emails coming in and there’s phone calls and there’s people asking you to come to some meeting unexpectedly. 

The people who are able to maintain their focus the best are the ones who kind of have some story in their head, some story that they’re almost telling themselves about what’s going on as it occurs. We know these about firemen for instance, the best firefighters. There’s always firefighters that almost seem like they have ESP. They could almost detect what’s going to happen in a burning building before it occurs. 

As researchers have gone and talked to those folks and they’ve asked them how they do that, what they tend to say is the same thing over and over again. They say, “When I walk into a burning building, I start telling myself a story about what I expect to see. I walk into a room and I expect to see flames in one corner, because corners always burn faster than everything else. I know there’s a staircase off to the left and I expect to see a lot of flames on top of that staircase, there’s usually an air gap under staircases and so they burn fast. Then when I walk into a room and the story in front of my eyes, it’s different from the story inside my head. For instance, there’s less flames than I expect to see on that staircase. It causes me to suddenly take a second and say, “Wait, something is wrong. Pay attention to that staircase. Don’t go over there. There’s something off about that.” 

The reason why they know where to focus and what they can ignore is because they have this story inside their head, right? Psychologists call this the act of building mental models, and mental models are how our brain almost unconsciously decides what to focus on and what to ignore. All of us do this. This is like second nature for one degree to another. Most of us, when we think about our day, we think like, “Oh, I have a meeting at 10 o’clock and then I’ve got to meet Jim for lunch at 11:30, so I need to leave by 11,” and we build these mental models or we play out a conversation that we’re going to have, a tough conversation in our head. 

We have a natural instinct to create mental models, but the people who are most successful, they tend to build mental models that are just half a degree more specific than everyone else. Instead of saying, “I have a meeting at 10 o’clock, I need to leave by 11.” They say, “Oh, I’ve got a meeting at 10 o’clock and it’s probably going to begin with Jim saying that dumb idea that he brings up at every meeting. Then Mary, Mary is probably going to disagree with him, because Mary hates Jim, so she always want to disagree. You know what I should do? Then I should jump in with my idea, because, I’ll be you, everyone will be relieved to hear me bring up something sensible at that point. I’ll kind of win the meeting.” 

That’s what the most productive people do. They build these mental models, these kind of visualizations of what they expect to have unfold that are just a little bit more detailed than everyone else. It doesn’t take much time. It takes 30 seconds, maybe two minutes to envision your entire day that way. 

What it does is it builds a mental model that allows your brain to anticipate what’s going to happen. More importantly, focus on what really matters and not get quite as distracted as small little details from everything else.  

[0:26:49.2] MB: Charles, thank you so much. I know you’re tight on time today, but we really appreciate you coming on the show and sharing all of your wisdom. 

[0:26:56.3] CD: Thanks for having me on. 

[0:26:59.0] MB: Thank you so much for listening to the Science of Success. We created the show to help you, our listeners, master evidence-based personal growth. I love hearing from listeners. If you want to reach out, share your story or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email, which I give out at the end of every episode, is matt@successpodcast.com. That's matt@successpodcast.com. I read and respond to every single listener email. 

I’m once again going to give you three reasons why you should join our email list right now by going to successpodcast.com and signing up at the top of our homepage. First, you’re going to get exclusive curated weekly emails from us every single week including a Mindset Monday which listeners have been raving about. Next, you’re going to get listener exclusive opportunities to change the shape of the show, vote on guests, change our interim music, questions that we’re going to ask for guests and give us feedback that help shape the direction of the Science of Success. The new intro that you heard today was voted on by our listeners who are on our email list. 

Lastly, you’re going to get awesome free guides that we build based on listener demand, like our most popular guide; How to Organize and Remember Everything, which you can get for free for signing up on the email list along with another sweet bonus guide that you have to sign up to find out what it is by joining our email list today. You can join at successpodcast.com right on front of the homepage, or if you’re on your phone, just text the word “smarter”, that “smarter” to the number 44222. Again, that’s “smarter” to 44222. 

The greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend either live or online. If you enjoyed this episode, please, leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes. That helps us more and more people discover the Science of Success. 

Lastly, don’t forget, if you want to get all the incredible information we talked about in this show, links, transcripts, everything we discussed, and much more, be sure to check out our show notes which are also at successpodcast.com, you can just hit the show notes button at the top. 

Thanks again, and we’ll see you on the next episode of the Science of Success. 

September 14, 2017 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity
89 - The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong with Eric Barker(3)-01.png

The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong with Eric Barker

August 24, 2017 by Lace Gilger in Best Of, Focus & Productivity, Decision Making

In this episode we ask what really produces success by looking at what separates truly successful people from the rest, we examine many common and conflicting “success maxims” and look at what the data actually says really works, we dig deep into the vital importance of knowing yourself and your own strengths, look at the power of aligning your work with your environment, and discuss the dangers of constantly overcommitting your time with Eric Barker.

Eric Barker is the creator of the blog “Barking Up The Wrong Tree” - with over 290,000 subscribers.  His work is syndicated by Time Magazine, Business Insider and he has been featured in the Wall Street Journal, The New York Times and more. Just recently, his new book Barking up the Wrong Tree: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success Is (Mostly) Wrong was named a Wall Street Journal Bestseller.

  • The future is already here, its just not evenly distributed

  • How Eric took a myth-busters approach to success maxims and figured out what really works

  • Vital importance of knowing yourself and your strengths

  • Why you need to align with a context and environment that rewards your skills

  • What really produces success? What separates the very successful from the rest of us?

  • We take alot of the common maxims we hear that conflict about success and look at what the DATA actually says about them

  • What are intensifiers and why should you know about them?

  • When are negatives positives? How can you know when it’s important?

  • Context really reveals when and how these maxims work or not

  • Do nice guys really finish last? What does the science say?

  • Why, in some contexts, being a jerk can pay off (and when it can backfire)

  • Strategies to improve self knowledge and know yourself more deeply

  • Pursuing your passion doesn't always lead to happiness, but pursuing what you’re good at more frequently does lead to happiness

  • Research is clear - focus on what you’re good at - and find a way to compensate for your weaknesses.

  • Understanding your strengths allows you to plan the right way to go about achieving your big picture goals

  • Deluding yourself is often worst situation of all and you frequently end up working against yourself

  • Do quitters never win? Should we quit or persevere? How do we think about Grit?

  • The vital importance of opportunity cost - we only have so much time in the day - we have to focus in on the biggest things

  • Strategically quitting is not the opposite of grit, but enables you to focus in on the most important things

  • People consistently over-commit their time and don’t understand how little time they have

  • We consistently make the error that in the future we think we will have more time

  • Find a balance - look at what’s producing results - show grit with those things - things that aren’t producing results

  • Why you should absolutely dedicate 5-10% of your time to what Peter Simms calls “little bets”

  • The key litmus test on whether or not you should apply GRIT or QUIT

  • What research reveals (Richard Wiseman in the UK) on how you can improve your luck!

  • How do we “walk the tightrope” between confidence and delusion? How often should we “believe in ourselves”?

  • Confidence as a whole is a problematic paradigm, confidence follows success, it doesn’t lead to success - it has NO effect on outcomes, only impact on trying to build confidence is that it increases narcissism

  • Confidence is often either delusional (detached from reality) or contingent (which can crash your self esteem)

  • Self compassion provides all the benefits of self confidence with none of the drawbacks

  • How to change the way you talk to yourself and cultivate self compassion

  • The simplest and easiest cure for the “plague” of procrastination you can use right now!

  • The more you work, if you’re actually doing deliberate practice, the better you do

  • What’s more important HUSTLE or work life balance?

  • There is an, essentially linear, relationship between time and skill development

  • 10,000 hours alone is proof of nothing - its all about deliberate practice - our current understanding of skill development is grossly oversimplified

  • Difference between obsession and passion?

  • In living a truly successful life - relationships, alignment, and fulfillment are essential

  • And much more!

iTunes Button.png
Stitcher Button.png
Android Button.png
YouTube.png

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that).

Brilliant Logo 4_1.png

This weeks episode of The Science of Success is brought to you by our partners at Brilliant! Brilliant is math and science enrichment learning. Learn concepts by solving fascinating, challenging problems. Brilliant explores probability, computer science, machine learning, physics of the everyday, complex algebra, and much more. Dive into an addictive interactive experience enjoyed by over 4 million students, professionals, and enthusiasts around the world.

You can access courses online for free right now! however, Brilliant is offering The Science of Success Listeners
20% OFF THEIR FULL SUITE of classes and course simply go to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess in order to claim your discount and start learning these incredibly important skills today!

SUCCESS LIVE logo.png

SUCCESS Live: Learn. Develop Achieve.  SUCCESS believes success is possible for every person who seeks it.  Find it at SUCCESS Live, a two-day event, open to the public, taking place in Long Beach, California on September 8th & 9th 2017. SUCCESS Live features some amazing guest speakers including Keith Ferrazzi, Peter Diamandis, Jocko Willink, and More

Ticket packages are still available to the public at
https://www.successliveevent.com/! Don't miss the chance to learn the inner workings of your mind, reignite your passions, and become a better leader by becoming a better YOU! JOIN US, members of The Science of Success team at SUCCESS LIve by going to https://www.successliveevent.com/ today!

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Personal Site] Barking Up the Wrong Tree

  • [Book] The Effective Executive: The Definitive Guide to Getting the Right Things Done by Peter F. Drucker

  • [Book] Barking Up the Wrong Tree by Eric Barker

  • [Audiobook] The Luck Factor: The Scientific Study of the Lucky Mind by Richard Wiseman

  • [HBS Faculty Profile] Boris Groysberg

  • [Stanford Faculty Profile] Jeffrey Pfeffer

  • [Website] Authentic Happiness

  • [SoS Episode] Why You Shouldn’t Follow Your Passion & The Rare Value of Deep Work with Cal Newport

  • [HBR Article] Managing Oneself by Peter F. Drucker

  • [HBR Article] How Leaders Become Self-Aware by Anthony K. Tjan

  • [Stanford Faculty Profile] Robert I.Sutton

  • [Wiki Article] Gabriele Oettingen

  • [Article] The Luck Factor by Richard Wiseman

  • [Website] Self-Compassion with Dr. Kristin Neff

  • [Personal Site] Sam Harris

  • [Article] The 75-Year Study That Found The Secrets To A Fulfilling Life By Carolyn Gregoire

  • [Article] Good genes are nice, but joy is better By Liz Mineo

  • [Stanford Course] Life Course Studies Program

Episode Transcript


[00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to The Science of Success with your host, Matt Bodnar.

[0:00:12.6] MB: Welcome to The Science of Success. I’m your host, Matt Bodnar. I’m an entrepreneur and investor in Nashville, Tennessee and I’m obsessed with the mindset of success and the psychology of performance. I’ve read hundreds of books, conducted countless hours of research and study and I am going to take you on a journey into the human mind and what makes peak performers tick with a focus on always having our discussion rooted in psychological research and scientific fact, not opinion. 

In this episode we ask what really produces success by looking at what separates truly successful people from the rest. We examined many common and conflicting success maxims and look at what the data actually says about what really works. We dig deep into the vital importance of knowing yourself and your own strengths. We look at the power of aligning your work with your environment and discuss the dangers of constantly overcommitting your time, with Eric Barker. 

The Science of Success continues to grow with now more than a million downloads, listeners in over a hundred countries, hitting number one New and Noteworthy and more. I get listener comments and emails all the time asking me, “Matt, how do you organize and remember all these incredible information?” 

A lot of her listeners are curious about how I keep track of all the incredible knowledge I get from reading hundreds of books, interviewing amazing experts, listening to awesome podcasts, and more. Because of that, we’ve created an epic resource just for you, a detailed guide called How to Organize and Remember Everything, and you can get it completely for free by texting the word “smarter” to the number 44222. Again, it's a guide we created called How to Organize and Remember Everything. All you have to do to get it is to text the word “smarter” to the number 44222 or go to successpodcast.com and join our email list, that’s successpodcast.com and join our email list. 

In a previous episode we discussed why people struggle to reach outside of their comfort zones and why it’s so critically important that you do. We explored the five core psychological roadblocks stopping people from stepping outside of their comfort zones. We went deep on how you can become tougher, more resilient and embrace discomfort and how you can master the art of small talk, what you need to cultivate the skill of global dexterity and much more, with Dr. Andy Molisnky. If you want to finally make progress on something that's been holding you back, listen to that episode. 

Also, don't forget. If you want to get all the incredible information we talked about in this show, links, transcripts and much more, and believe me, there's a ton of short notes for this episode. Be sure to check out or show notes that success podcast.com. Just hit the show notes button at the top. 

Lastly, you know how much I talk about the concept of mental models and how vital it is to build a toolkit of mental models in order to be successful and achieve your goals. That's why this week I am super excited to tell you that one of our sponsors, brilliant.org. Brilliant is a math and science enrichment learning tool that makes mastering the fundamentals of math and science easy and fun. They’re offering a special promotion for Science of Success listeners, and can get it at brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. Mastering the fundamentals of math and science is such an important component of building to toolkit of mental models, and Brilliant is a great way to get started on the path. 

[0:03:16.6] MB: Another sponsor for this episode is the Success Live Summit, which as we hinted at, is not actually the Science of Success, but Success Magazine puts on an awesome live summit and they’ve been kind enough to sponsor this episode as well as hook us up with some sweet guest speakers, which will be coming on the show in the next couple of weeks. But this event is actually pretty awesome and I'm kind of bummed out that I'm not going to get to go to it. I have an immovable schedule conflict, but my producer, Austin, who’s here in the studio with me will be able to attend it and he’s going to be there. 

[0:03:45.7] A: Yeah, we’re super excited. If anybody who’s listening to this right now wants to meet up, shoot me an email, austin@successpodcast.com. We’d love to chat, shake hands, take pictures. It’d be awesome. I think it’s really important for people that are striving to become more successful, to become more fulfilled, looking into the science of success to be around other people with those same goals. 

This time around the event, it’s two days. It’s in September 8th and 9th in Long Beach, California. There’s ticket packages available and they’ve got some amazing speakers, Matt. 

[0:04:10.7] MB: They really do. There’s people like some of my favorite authors, Keith Ferrazzi, Never Eat Alone, which is literally sitting on my desk right here. I constantly keep it in front of me because it’s probably the greatest book ever written about networking. They’ve got Peter Diamandis, incredible thinker and leader. People like Brendon Buchard, Mel Robbins. Really phenomenal lineup. 

[0:04:28.7] A: Yeah, it’s going to be greatest, and they’re speaking on a ton of things, from success, how to become a better leader, find balance in your life. If you’re a CEO of a company, you really got to find time to recharge, time to hit the gas. Just finding balance and mental strategies to making yourself bigger and better and your business bigger and better. Really hitting on all cylinders here. It’s going to be a great, great event. 

[0:04:47.7] MB: You can learn more and get tickets at successliveevent.com. That’s successliveevent.com. Definitely check it out. If you're in Long Beach, I would highly recommend checking it out, if you're looking for a really cool event, September 8th and 9th, Long Beach, California, successliveevent.com, you can find all the information you need. 

[0:05:06.6] A: Success Live: Learn, Develop, Achieve. Go to successliveevent.com today to get your ticket.

[0:05:11.9] MB: Now, for the episode. Today, we have another amazing guest on the show, Eric Barker. Eric is the creator of the blog Barking Up The Wrong Tree with over 290,000 subscribers. His work is syndicated by Time Magazine, Business Insider and he's been featured in the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times and much more. Recently, his new book, Barking Up The Wrong Tree: The Surprising Science Behind Why Everything You Know About Success is Mostly Wrong was named a Wall Street Journal bestseller. 

Eric, welcome to the Science of Success. 

[0:05:42.2] EB: Thanks so much. It’s great to be here.

[0:05:44.0] MB: We’re super excited to have you on. As I was telling you kind of before we got started, I’ve been a long time reader of your blog and a big fan. I got to ask you at the beginning, how do you pronounce the name of it and what's the story behind the actual kind of — I'm going to botch it terribly, like bakadesuyo or badakaseyo. I don’t know how to say it. Tell me the story behind what that is and why you initially named the blog that. 

[0:06:06.7] EB: I started the blog on a lark. I didn’t even really know what I was doing with it at first. Basically, I took Japanese as my language in undergrad and I found out the first day of class that my last name means moron in Japanese, so I’ve been to Tokyo three times. I’ve never had a Japanese person forget my name. 

Basically, in the Japanese language you usually use last names, what [inaudible 0:06:33.0] means I am Barker. What [inaudible 0:06:36.4] that’s also means I’m an idiot. They’re the same exact sentence. Basically, from a URL, that is either me emphatically saying my name or me emphatically saying I’m a moron. However anybody chooses to interpret it. Perhaps not the best marketing choice on my part for a URL, but definitely has a fun back story. 

[0:06:56.6] MB: That’s awesome. I didn’t know that story, so that’s really funny. Tell me a little bit about how did you initially kind of get involved in this path and what drew you to really wanting to understand the science behind what makes people successful. Obviously, that’s the name of this podcast, and so I think there’s a ton of synergies between what you write about and what we love to dig into on the show. 

[0:07:18.7] EB: Yeah. I’ve been doing a blog now for about eight years and basically I started just coming through the RSS feeds of academic journals and kind of broadened it out. I was just looking for, initially, interesting stuff, and then eventually stuff that we could use to kind of improve our lives, because there’s a great William Gibson quote I love where he said that, “The future is already here. It’s just not evenly distributed.” I think that’s true. A lot of questions we ask ourselves about success, about life, we think they’re mysteries. The truth is a lot of these things have been solved by scientific studies, most of those are not terribly fun or pleasant to read. 

I started doing that for a number of years and then I was lucky, blog kind of took off and people encourage me to write a book. I’ve had a very unconventional career of myself. I was a screenwriter at Hollywood. I worked in the video game industry, then I was a blogger, and I just saw that a lot of the ideas we have about success, these pithy little maxims we hear, like nice guys finish last, and it’s not what you know, it’s who you know. I saw that in a lot of situations these just didn’t apply to my career. I didn’t think they necessarily applied to other people or at least they were incomplete. 

Given that my blog was focused on personal development and success in many areas of life, everything from happiness, to productivity, to relationships and negotiation, I kind of wanted to tackle those head on and give them the Mythbusters treat and basically kind of look and see were they true, were they not true, and trying to get both sides of the story almost like a court case and hopefully make it fun and tell some engaging stories that people can relate to while trying to break down these myths. That was kind of the path I was on. 

[0:08:56.3] MB: I think that’s a great approach, and I love the structure of the book, which is as you said, to kind of take all of these maxims that we hear and people kind of casually toss out and say, “Hold on a second, is that even true?” In many cases, these maxims are directly contradictory. What does the data actually say? What is the research say about these strategies? That’s a genius approach to kind of cracking that walnut. 

[0:09:20.9] EB: It was really interesting for me, because in some — Maybe in a prior era, these things were more true, but now life is so complicated. We have so many options, so many possibilities that it’s hard to believe one pithy sentence, like nice guys finish last, is really going to sum up — is going to just include the sum total of anything. There’s definitely some insight in a lot of these, but I wanted to really look at what the experts and the academics had to say. It was educational for me as well and my intention here was to write the book I wish I had 15 years ago and to kind of have fun with it, because with everything I write on the blog, my attitude with everything is just try and — It’s like it better inform me or it better entertain me and preferably it’d better be both. 

[0:10:10.4] MB: You opened the book with a question of what separates the truly successful from everybody else. What did you see when you actually looked at the research and the data and figured out what are those key things. What are the differentiators that separate someone who’s really successful from someone who doesn’t achieve that?  

[0:10:30.4] EB: What I found was really interesting. Some insights that came from — The 10,000 foot overview were some insights that came from Gautam Mukunda and Boris Groysberg, two professors at Harvard Business School. The kind of the basic formula being, first, to know thyself. It’s really understanding your signature strengths, and that’s a funky academic term for knowing what your unique skills are, what you can really bring to the table that makes you standout. Knowing your interest, knowing your passions, knowing your signature strengths. Then aligning that with an environment that rewards those, those incentivizes those, because you can be really good at something, but if you’re not at a place that respects and values that, you’re probably not going to be very successful. 

On the flipside, you might work for a great company or a fantastic organization, but if you don’t really bring something to the table that’s unique and stands out, again, you’re probably not going to do so well there either. Once we look at those signature strengths and we find a place that rewards them, believes in those, you can really use something. 

What’s interesting there, and I discussed this in both the introduction and the first chapter, is what Harvard professor Gautam Mukunda calls intensifiers, and those are basically qualities that in general are negatives, but in the right environment can actually be positives. They can actually be the incredible competitive advantages. The example I used in the book is I want to talk about the story of Jure Robič who was the dominant participant in the Race Across America, which is this bicycle race that literally goes from Atlantic City to San Diego. They crossed the entire United States. Unlike the Tour de France, which has breaks, the Race Across America does not stop. The minute the clock starts, it does not stop, meaning if you stop to go to the bathroom, if you stop to sleep, if you stop — Anything, your competitors can pass you. People usually complete the race in 9 to 12 days. Two people have died trying to do this. It is just a relentless monster of an event. Outsize Magazine just declared it the most grueling ultra-endurance event there is. 

Jure Robič was the most dominant athlete in this sport, and the reason that he was so dominant is he would literally lose his mind. He would actually go crazy. He would hallucinate. He would become paranoid. He just start crying. He would hop off his bike and get in fist fights with mailboxes. He would lose his mind, but that disassociation allowed him to cope with just the unimaginable pain and discomfort of riding a bike for 9 days straight and he was so dominant he would actually — The difference between him and first place and the guy in second place was 11 hours. Literally, he would pass the finish line and you’d have to wait half a day to see number two cross the finish line. 

I think when I was a kid, my high school guidance counselor didn’t tell me that losing my mind and getting in fist fights with mailboxes was a path to success if anything. That’s where we get into the complexities of it where it’s just not so simple as played by the rules, get good grades, eat your Wheaties and everything is going to work out for you. We need to look at those times where when our negative is positive, and that’s why, like I said, when I talk about knowing yourself and finding the right environment, that doesn’t necessarily mean the typically prescribed things, like good grades and be sweet and nice. It’s that alignment between who you are and where you are that really produces success, and it doesn’t necessarily have to be those things that we were all told in elementary school. Sometimes the most biggest of negatives, like losing your mind, can actually be a positive, and that’s where I think we need to broaden how we think about what results in success, because when we talk about qualities like stubbornness, and stubbornness is a negative. 

If you’re an entrepreneur trying to do something really difficult, stubbornness is called grit and all of a sudden we think it’s fantastic. Grit and stubbornness can be the same exact thing, but that quality in you when you align it with the right environment, it’s a fantastic positive. For entrepreneurs, it’s probably essential. When you put it in a wrong environment, like a typical corporation where a group think is really a big thing, being stubborn and difficult can be problematic. It’s more about alignment in the big picture than it is about the positives or negatives of any particular quality in the abstract.  

[0:15:03.9] MB: I love that nuance and that story really highlights the example that context is vitally important. Another story that you’ve talked about is the story of Pixar, which I thought was really powerful. 

[0:15:16.3] EB: Yeah, basically it was right after Finding Nemo and Steve Jobs was concerned that they were going to lose their edge. That they had broken new ground. They had stepped aside from the typical animation, animation way of doing things, like Disney and the others, and they’ve been phenomenal, and they brought in Brad Bird to direct the next movie and he wanted to do things differently and try and make sure that they stayed innovative and they stayed edgy, and he didn’t do that by bringing in new people. He didn’t do that by only taking the top tier talent. He did that by telling the heads of Pixar, Steve Jobs and Ed Catmull. He said, “Give me all the black sheep.” He said, “Give me all the people who want to do things differently. Give me all the people who are probably headed out the door or going to get fired.” 

With those guys, Brad Bird, they managed to do things the studio had never done before they managed to accomplish things more cheaply. They did it quicker. In the end, they ended up making the film The Incredibles which not only grossed, I think, over $600 million, but also won The Oscar for best animated feature. Again, they did this by embracing the different attitudes that some of these people had rather than looking at them through the typical corporate lens of, “Oh, those guys are difficult.” No. Those guys might have a very different but good way of looking at things. Now, that doesn’t mean that different is always good. Different can definitely be bad, but we need to be very careful about just labeling anything that is outside the norm or doesn’t align with the current values of upper management as bad, because I think that’s something we’re seeing now more than ever is just corporations love to talk about, “Oh, we want to innovate.” “Oh, we went outside the box.” Yeah, but we also don’t want to change. That doesn’t really work. Being able to look at what the qualities are, sometimes qualities that on the surface seem like negatives in the right environment can be positives.  

[0:17:16.9] MB: I think the point about context too really reveals why many of these traditional success maxims are so limited, because as you pointed out, in a specific context that skillset or that ability might be really powerful, but in many other contexts it could dangerous, it could be disastrous or it could be problematic. It could be inhibiting you from achieving what you’re trying to achieve. 

[0:17:41.3] EB: No, absolutely. I think that’s a lot of — One thing I was very cognizant of when I was writing a book was I just didn’t want it to be this — We’ve seen a lot of business books that just hold up one concept and they say, “This is the and all be all answer. This quality is always good in every situation everywhere for the rest of time. It has no downsides. No negatives. No side effects, so all we need to do is have this one thing and everything is going to be great and live happily ever after.” Life doesn’t work like that. Plain and simple, life doesn’t work like that. 

For instance, when talking about the research in terms of nice guys finish last. A huge distinction is short term versus long term. In the short term, being a jerk can really payoff, and anybody who has seen a jerk get promoted or a jerk become CEO knows this at least in their heart of hearts. In the short term, you see this and so many experiments that have been done in terms of theoretical constructs, like the prisoner’s dilemma, a lot of Robert Axelrod’s research, you see that in the short term being bad can be very, very good. You see things like Jeffrey Pfeffer’s research at Stanford Graduate School of Business where kissing your boss’s ass, the research shows is far more effective than actual hard work. Again, that’s in the short term. Over the long term, we gain a reputation. Over the long term, that reputation is going to affect you. It depends on that context, again, where used car salesman doesn’t expect to see you again, and that’s why they have the reputation they do and why they use the methods they do. Your mom hopefully is going to be with you the rest of your life, and that’s why moms have the reputation they do. They’re really looking out for you. 

It’s critical to understand, when we try to make everything one-size-fits-all, one simple answer, that’s usually not the case, but to understand, “Well, gees! I’ve seen good guys get ahead and I’ve seen bad guys get ahead. Is it just random?” No. It’s not random. In that particular case, it’s usually often an issue of short term versus long term. 

I think to understand nuance, to understand the importance of context really allows us to really start to get our brain around how success really works in the real world. 

[0:20:02.0] MB: I think the other characteristic that you identified about what makes the successful standout and the vital importance of knowing yourself, that’s something we delve into a lot on the show and one of the most recurrent themes received from across the board, even looking at people like Buddhist teachers, meditation teachers, etc., it's so critical to understand yourself. 

[0:20:25.7] EB: Yeah. I think that it's something we pay a lot of lip service to, but I don’t think it’s something that a lot of people really to sit down and think about. Hey, our brands are filled with cognitive biases and many of us can be overconfident or not so self-aware, but to sit down and actually think about that, you look at the research in terms of self-awareness has some really powerful advantages to it. There are ways to go about it. Management guru, Peter Drucker, talked about feedback analysis where taking the time to make predictions and then see how they work out in terms of, “Am I going to do this well? Am I going to do that well?” 

Overtime you’ll see patterns, you’ll see trends, or if you’re a little bit more brave and are a little bit more thick skin to do an informal survey of your friends, of those closest to you, to get an idea. Of course, with friends who you believe will be honest with you, to get an idea of what they see your strengths and weaknesses are, because if you ask, say, 10 friends, yeah, there’s going to be some randomness, some noise in there. My guess is in terms of strengths and weaknesses, you’re going to hear a handful of things over and over again. Those are the things that you should really kind of hone in on because it not only does it make us obviously more successful to do things we’re good at. That’s pretty intuitive. 

On the flipside, when you look at the research at University of Pennsylvania on signature strengths and surveys done by Gallup, both of them show that the more time you spend on things that you are good at, the happier people are, the more respected feel. There’s just overall in terms of subjective well-being increases dramatically. Past that, if you look at some of the work by Cal Newport at Georgetown, you see that our passions — Many people have the typical passions. They want to be a professional athlete. They want to be a singing success. There’s not a lot of spots for those things. Pursuing your passions doesn’t always lead to happiness. 

However, there’s a good body of research that shows that when you pursue the things you’re good at, that you become happy, that passions don’t necessarily lead to success, but when you do things that you are successful, you become passionate about that. You become happy that you’re doing and you enjoy them more. 
Those are definitely some tips we can use there in terms of the power of self-awareness. 

[0:23:00.4] MT: How do you think about balancing the kind of advice to focus primarily on improving your strengths versus improving your weaknesses and repairing your weaknesses. 

[0:23:11.7] EB: The research is pretty consistent on that one. Again, Peter Drucker wrote a fantastic piece to the Harvard Business Review a number of years ago that you’re going to do much better by trying to improve on your strengths and trying to bring up your weaknesses. Your first goal, it’s going to be easier. You’re probably more passionate about it and you’re going to spend time on it. It’s going to be much — You’re going to see bigger gains, larger marginal returns. Beyond that, also bringing up your weaknesses is going to be very difficult. 

If you look at Drucker’s book, the Effective Executive, which is a fantastic book in general, he says that it’s much better to focus on the things you’re good at and then find a way to compensate for the things you’re bad at. In other words, if you are extremely creative and dynamic and innovative and you’re always coming up with really powerful new ideas, but you are a complete disorganized mess, it’s far better for you to double down on being creative and coming up with interesting ideas and to hire an assistance to keep you organized than it is for you to sit down and study a bunch of productivity books and trying to do something that is just completely kind of going against the grain. 

To point to specific examples, Bob Sutton, a professor at Stanford’s Graduate School of Business, when I interviewed him he talked about the fact that this is exactly what many successful chief executive officers have done including Steve Jobs and Mark Zuckerberg is they didn’t say, “Oh, I’m going to bring up my weaknesses and try and be this incredibly well-rounded renaissance man.” 

What they did was they said, “I’m going to focus on what I’m good at, and when I round out the rest of my senior management team, I’m going to make sure that they fill in those gaps that I’m not so good at so that those things are being addressed, but I’m not the one who has to address them.” 

[0:24:56.9] MB: I think the great word there is compensate, right? People might get confused when they think about focusing on the strengths versus focusing on weaknesses. If you find a way to compensate for your weaknesses, then that enables you to focus deeply on your strengths. 

[0:25:11.1] EB: Absolutely. Any system or tool that you can leverage to do that is fine. Where if you see people who, because of their time at an organization or with a particular boss or mentor or maybe their time in the military, they develop certain good habits and they might not be the most organized person, but because they were at an institution or in the military that thought them a number of habits, then they can pick those thing sup. Training yourself in terms of habits can be a personal way to compensate for your weaknesses. They use certain technology, tools, or aps that help you compensate. 

Again, if you’re an entrepreneur or if you’re an organization where you have direct reports, you can be cognizant of this and hire to attempt to deliberately compensate for your weaknesses, because you’re going to see in general much greater returns from focusing on your assurance. 

[0:26:09.4] MB: That’s circles back to the importance of knowing yourself. Again, if you really have a clear understanding of where you’re strong and where you’re weak, it’s that much easier to say, “Hey, I suck at being organized, or I suck at this particular piece of the business. This is what I need to find somebody. Their skillset is exactly this.” 

[0:26:28.1] EB: Yeah. It’s funny you say that, because that’s exactly what Drucker says in Effective Executive where he says, “WE all know those people who they just — They’re few and far between, but we all know someone who is able to take on a project and pretty much they may not know what they’re doing, but they know how to approach it. They go ahead and it seems they’re always a phenomenal success and we’re envious of these people. 

Drucker says one of the reasons that people can do that is because once you are really aware of your strengths and weaknesses, you’re very quickly able to diagnose a situation and say, “Oh! This naturally aligns with my strengths, so I’m just going to sit down and do what I usually do,” or “This is not so aligned with my strengths, but knowing that my strengths are, then I can find the right kind of solution to this. I can get help from the right people because maybe I’m a better communicator than I am researcher. Okay, well then. I’m going to get on the phone and I’m going to talk to some experts who really — Or maybe I’m a bookwork, but I’m not a great communicator. Okay, well then. I’m going to real all the great books on this and I’m going to focus on putting something like this down on paper as supposed to merely talking to people.” 

Just understanding your strengths allow you to plan the right way, to go about achieving a goal, because there’s many different strategies you can take. Once you kind of know the meta goal, what’s the overall big plan, there’s often many different ways to get there. When you know your strength, you’re able to better plan. When you don’t know your strengths, you’re kind of rolling a dice. If you’re diluting yourself, then you actually might be in a worst situation of all, which is maybe you actually working against your best interests. 

[0:28:13.4] MB: I’m super excited today to tell you about our sponsor for this episode, brilliant.org. Brilliant.org is absolutely awesome website that’s focused on math and science learning and making it super easy and approachable. You know how big of a fan I am of mental models and building a toolkit of mental models. In many ways, one of the core word things driving this show is helping you build a toolkit of mental model so that you can better understand the world so that you can master the art of decision-making. That's why brilliant.org is so awesome, because you can integrate a lot of these mental models around probability, math and science into your day by using something like brilliant.org. I've got my producer, Austin, here to join us and talk a little bit about brilliant. 

[0:28:58.4] A: Yeah. I’ve been taking some of the courses and I’ve been diving in. It’s absolutely great. You say math and sciences and a lot of people, you have an idea on your head about this course and you’re going to be like, “They’re fun. They’re interactive and they keep you going. They have streaks.” Probability is one of the course that really caught my mind. They sort of approached it from what’s one of the foundations of probability, which is games of chance. Things like poker, rolling the dice, casino blackjack, things like that. 

The way they framed all of these math and science, framed it in a way that you can kind of understand it and apply it in real life. It’s not just memorizing equations and numbers, but still very impactful. 

[0:29:32.2] MB: I'm a big poker player, which you’ve heard me talk about sometimes on the show. I’ve been on a few poker podcast and that kind of thing. Austin sometimes comes to my poker game that I host, and I can tell you he definitely needs to brush up on some of these probability courses. 

[0:29:47.4] A: That’s why I’m going with brilliant.org to learn more how I can come here and take your money. We have one tonight even. 

[0:29:52.0] MB: We do. I don’t know if you’re coming to the game or not. 

[0:29:53.5] A: We’ll see. 

[0:29:55.7] MB: Yeah, it’s amazing. Again, I think it's so important and so few people really understand math and science, and America is falling behind in those categories. I don't want you to be left behind, and that's why I think something like brilliant.org is such a great sponsor for this show. We’re super excited to have them, and it's an incredible place where you can go and brush up and build these science and math skills. 

The cool thing is they’re actually offering 20% off of their premium plan to anybody who’s a Science of Success listener. You can get that at brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. That's brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess. I highly recommend checking it out. You know how important math and science skills are, and if you want to build a toolkit of mental models, understanding things like chemistry, physics and probability are some of the cornerstones of that and I'm definitely going to be spending a lot of time on Brilliant brushing up on some of these fields that I already have a pretty good understanding of, but you can always use a refresher. 

[0:30:53.4] A: Yeah. There’re already four million students, professionals and enthusiasts, just like you all out on Brilliant learning, brushing up on these skills and taking advantage of the software. 20% on their premium plan when you go to brilliant.org/scienceofsuccess.

[0:31:06.5] MB: Alright, back to the episode. 

Let’s segue into some of the other lessons from the book. One of the ones that we hear about all the time is the idea of persevering, should we stay with it? Do quitters never win, or is grit the important factor, or should we cut our loses, move on quickly and find things that are successful? 

[0:31:30.4] EB: Yeah, I think it’s really interesting, because grit is kind of having a moment now. It’s kind of its time in the sun, and there’s a good reason for that. Obviously, a lot of people do have trouble persisting with their goals over the long term, so that is critical. I think we do a disservice by acting like grit is the answer to everything, because if that was the case then I would still be in tee-ball and playing with action figures, because that’s what I was doing when I was seven and I decided to stick with that. 

No. We all change. We all grow. We all evolve, and increasingly the modern work world, people are having multiple roles in completely different careers, in completely different industries, so adaption is critical. 

Grit is really powerful, and we can see the research from Martin Seligman and others that shows that optimism promotes grit. That taking things and perceiving them, using a frame, a game-type frame where it’s a game of sorts can help promote grit. On the flipside, we need to look at the advantages of quitting. We need to see. If you look at the economic principle of opportunity cost, we all only have 24 hours in a day and if you just keep being gritty with things and you keep adding new skills, well eventually you’re just not going to have time for them all. 

The truth is that strategically quitting is not the opposite of grit. It is complementary to grit, because the more things you quit, the more time, energy, money resources that you have to devote to the things that you want to be gritty with, that you want to focus on, because there’s research, one of the studies in the book where when you ask people, people are consistently conservative with estimating money. People don’t think that they’re going to be a millionaire tomorrow. They’ll be conservative in terms of committing themselves to spending lots of money. 

However — And this is the opposite of the time equals money perspective. However, we don’t look at time like that. People will consistently overcommit in terms of how much time they have. If something seems further away, if I ask you to do something three months from now, well you just seemed sure and positive that in three months you’re going to have more time where it’s probably much more realistic, unless it’s an exception. It’s probably more realistic for you to look at your last week. Think about how busy you were, and it’s probably how busy you’re going to be three months from now. Yet, we consistently make the error that in the future we’ll have more time. In the future, sadly, the days are still going to have 24 hours. In a week, there’s still going to have 7 days. We really need to be cognizant of those timing issues and use that to our advantage when we’re planning, we’re trying to figure out how to be successful. 

[0:34:12.6] MB: So true. Literally, just thinking about it now, I feel like I will have more time in three months, and it’s very hard to kind of dislodge that bias from my mind, but logically I know that that’s probably very unlikely. 

[0:34:27.5] EB: No. It’s critical to think about that, because time used is really big in terms of grit. You’re not going to have more than 24 hours in a day. Being able to quit, being able to think. So what it comes down to really, what I recommend in the book, is finding a balance where it’s looking at what’s producing results. What’s not producing results? The things that producing results are getting you where you want to go, that’s where you want to show grit. The things that aren’t producing results, and sometimes those are hard to face. You want to try and like go up, but you always want to be devoting five to 10% of your time to what Peters Sims calls little bets, and that is little low-cost investments to kind of see what can work out. See what might be able to come of that and be trying new things, because the world is changing fast, so we need to be changing with it, and to find that new opportunity, that new hobby, relationship, whatever, we always need to be trying new things. 

Another thing that people can use that’s really powerful, a research by Gabriele Oettingen at NYU, she talks about a great little acronym called WOOP, and what that is is wish, outcome, obstacle, plan, and that is whenever we’re dreaming about something we want, some goal we have in the future, to walk through those four steps. To first, think about what you’re wishing for. The second is to think of the concrete outcome, what you would actually like to happen specifically. The third, and this is critical, is to think about the obstacles. What’s in the way, so that you’re not merely wishing and dreaming. You’re not daydreaming. You’re thinking about the obstacles. What’s in the way? Fourth is to make a plan based on that. That really helps people be much more realistic about their goals and create a plan to get to them. 

What is fantastic, really interesting, is that a secondary effect that she found with this research was that it actually became a litmus test for whether to apply grit or quit. When people went through the WOOP plan, when people went through wish, outcome, obstacle, plan, if they felt more energized afterwards, if they’re walking through it, if they felt like, “Wow! This is great. I can certainly do this.” Then that was probably something that they should apply grit too over the long term. 

However, if people went through it and they felt a little down. They felt de-energized, then the plan probably wasn’t realistic and it’s probably either a goal that they needed to discard or a goal that they needed to kind of reframe, that they needed to think about what the meta goal was and find a different way to go about achieving it. 

[0:36:53.2] MB: I love the idea of little bets. You know, it’s funny. I was thinking about I know this podcast basically came out of a little bit. I had a buddy suggest to really put a few episodes out on the internet and kind of slowly took hold. As you said at the start of the interview, your blog started out the same way. These are two very concrete examples of how you should always be out there trying new little things and dedicating a little bit of time to sort of low-risk opportunities and activities that may take off and they may not. That’s why I always kind of had an issue with the idea that you should never quit, because I think you should be testing lots of little things and seeing what’s getting some traction and what’s not and then double down your bets and the things that are actually working. 

[0:37:39.9] EB: That’s critical. When people talk about luck, what’s interesting is there’s research on luck. Now, I don’t mean luck in terms of magic, but luck in terms of seemingly random good things, positive things happening to you. Richard Wiseman, a professor in the UK did some research and he found a few things that you can actually do to improve luck. 

One of them was the idea of being open to new experiences, trying new things, because it’s intuitive. We don’t usually think about it, but it’s only rational intuitive. If you lock the door to your house, don’t answer the phone, don’t go on the internet, how many random good things are going to happen to you? Not too many. Versus if you’re out there exposing yourself to possibilities, yeah, negatives can happen, but playing positives can happen as well. That’s the kind of thing we need to be thinking about is trying new things, exposing ourselves to new experiences, because you can’t guarantee that great things are going to happen to you, but there are certainly things you can do to increase or decrease a possibility of those little serendipitous moments occurring. 

One of the best ones is little bets, little low-cost, low resource, low time investment, things that could produce great results. I dare to say that in the modern era, that is sort of essential, because the world is changing. We’re going to have to change, and that’s something that we need to keep doing a certain percentage of our time just to make sure that we’re keeping up with the natural changes in the world. 

[0:39:12.2] MB: Tell me about what are the other topics that you wrote about that I thought was really interesting was how do we, as you put it, walk the tight rope between confidence and delusion, and how often should we really focus on believing in ourselves? 

[0:39:26.9] EB: It’s really interesting, because confidence is — There’s no doubt that confidence, first of all, makes us feel good. Second of all, confidence has an enormous impact on how others perceive us. Confidence was a really interesting thing to explore, because I’ve never heard anybody say, “I’m trying to decrease my confidence.” 

We don’t see a lot of books about how to reduce your self-esteem in five easy steps. That’s probably because the book wouldn’t sell, but you just don’t hear anybody talking about the downsides of confidence. Part of that is because we have a separate word we use. We’ll talk about narcissism, or hubris, or we’ll call it over confident, but nobody kind of gives less confidence what its due and we — Again, because we have another word for it often, which we often label like humility, which is a positive quality because when we are less confident, we’re open to learning. We’re more open to new ideas. We don’t alienate other people by being know-it-alls.  

When you look at it, what you’ll often find is that confidence as a whole is a problematic paradigm, because when you look at the research, confidence usually follows success. It doesn’t lead to success. When California launched a state initiative to try and increase the self-esteem of students because they thought it would increase grades, decrease drug use, all these other things, what they found is that it had almost no effect at all. In fact the only effect it probably had was increasing narcissism, because confidence usually follows success. It doesn’t always lead to it. 

What we can find is that often that’s because confidence is very often either delusional or contingent. Delusional in the sense that people are overconfident and that usually leads to failure eventually, because eventually reality gives us a kind of market correction in the form of a metaphorical punch in the nose, or confidence is often contingent. Self-esteem is contingent, where basically you have this vision of yourself and in order to realistically maintain it, you feel you need to wake up and slay a dragon everyday so that you can continue to feel good about yourself, and this just keeps you on a treadmill of you keep having to achieving just in order to feel good about yourself. That’s exhausting, but not only is that exhausting, you’re going to have an off day. One day you’re not going to slay that dragon and your self-esteem crashes, and that’s how we end up on this rollercoaster of emotions having to work so hard to feel good about ourselves and then not feeling good about ourselves, and it’s a double down. 

What we see is when you look — Going back well over a thousand years, is the Buddhist concept of self-compassion, which Kristin Neff at the University of Texas at Austin has done a bunch of academic research showing that this isn’t just a philosophical concept. It’s actually a really good kind of alternative to self-confidence is self-compassion. Basically what that is, is rather than with self-confidence or self-esteem, trying to build yourself up to be something greater than you’re not. Self-compassion is seeing the world more realistically and being far more open to forgiving yourself when you’re not Superman, when you don’t achieve. Taking a realistic perspective and then understanding, sometimes you’re going to fail. That’s human, and forgiving yourself and moving on. That keeps us out of that contingent treadmill cycle and keeps us out of delusion. What her research has shown is that self-compassion provides all the benefits of self-confidence without any of the negatives and it’s a very powerful tool that we can all use to get us out of the self-confidence track.  

[0:43:02.2] MB: That’s amazing, and self-compassion is something that we talk a ton about on the show. Again and again it comes up as such a vital skill to cultivate. How do you — From what you saw, what are some of the best ways to cultivate self-compassion? 

[0:43:18.6] EB: The first real step is we all have that voice in our head that’s so critical and we’re quick to beat ourselves up when we make mistakes and it’s really changing that voice. Changing the way you talk to yourself, where instead of being so negative and critical, is to just have more of a grandmotherly sort of forgiving attitude where instead of, “Oh! I get this thing in late, and I’ll — I’m so stupid. How do I do this every time?” As supposed to, “You know what? I made a mistake. It happens. I’ll do my best to correct it, but this happens and it’s okay. It’s not the end of the world,” to take that perspective. 

What’s interesting is you look at the research in terms of something we all suffer from, kind of a plague, is procrastination. We’re also inclined to beat ourselves up for procrastination, but what the studies show is that forgiving yourself for procrastination is actually a much better — It leads to people getting things done and on doing stuff. We feel like we need to punish ourselves, but that kind of keeps us in that loop here we’re punishing ourselves and we see ourselves as procrastinators and we’re still tied up as supposed to letting it go, letting the fear go, letting the concern go and just getting something done. So much of procrastination comes from fear, from this kind of negative anticipation and just taking that voice in your head. When you hear that critical voice, just trying to soften it. Just trying to say, it’s like, “Yes. Hey, I make mistakes. That’s human. That’s natural,” and forgiving yourself again, as supposed to when we take that self-confidence vision of, “I’ve got to be Superman. I’m this awesome super thing.” That can only lead to two places; having that insane, over the top, I’m 150% attitude, that can only lead to you being utterly diluted and completely cutoff from reality, because it’s not who you are. It’s impossible, or to you just crushing your self-esteem because seeing unrealistic standards, and then when you see the results are not 150%, then you feel terrible about yourself. I don’t think anyone of us wants to, A; feel terrible about ourselves, or B; be utterly diluted and cutoff from reality. It’s much better to develop that sort of softer, quitter, forgiving voice in our head and to just catch ourselves whenever we’re too critical, whenever we’re beating ourselves up. That’s a really good first step to self-compassion. 

[0:45:48.0] MB: That makes me think about something that I think about a ton, which is the balance between almost this Buddhist sense of non-attachment with ambition and achievement. How do you strike a balance between those two things? I know you don’t necessarily directly address that in the book, but I’m curious what your thoughts are about how those two things kind of balance each other and how self-compassion plays into that.  

[0:46:12.0] EB: One of the things I do talk about in the 6th chapter of the book is just that hard work really does pay off. Hard work really does payoff in terms of skills and stuff like that. It’s not necessarily rewarded in an organization, but when you look at the greats in terms of any area of skill-based individual achievement, yeah, the more you work, if you’re actually doing deliberate practice, it pays off. What does that mean? That means that somebody who works nine hours a day is going to do better than someone who works eight hours a day. Somebody who works 16 hours a day is going to be — It can almost become a prescription for workaholism and that can be dangerous. 

In the subtitle to the introduction, I talk about the decoding what successful people do so that we can learn to be more like them or so that we can learn why it’s good that we aren’t, because I would say the heights of success, you’re going to find a lot of workaholics and you’re also going to find a lot of people who are extraordinarily successful but not necessarily happy. 

When we look at the idea, the Buddhist ideas of kind of non-attachment, yeah, it’s like you want to reach the heights of success, the extremes. That may not be aligned with a much more modest forgiving, but would you be happy as a millionaire or do you have to be a billionaire? Those are the kinds of questions we need to ask ourselves, and that’s sort of the work-life balance question, because if you take it that there’s a more or less linear relationship between hard work and skill development, that’s going to lead you towards a workaholic attitude. If you take the attitude that, “I need to be enjoying myself. I need to have downtime. I need to have some fun.” Then that is going to take you away from the very, very heights potentially of success. 

It’s a decision we all need to make for ourselves. I quote Sam Harris in the book talking about, “If you want to reach the extremes of success,” he says, “is that align with those kind of Buddhist kind of more mild, not necessarily.” But on the other hand, as Harris says, “But do we need to be torturing ourselves as much as we do? Do we need to be as non-self-compassionate as we are?” The answer to that is probably no. We can definitely glean something from those more moderate detached Buddhist attitudes. In the end, as I talked about in the book, you need to have a personal definition of success. The standards that are presented to us in the media these days are statistical anomalies and not replicable for most people. If we hold ourselves to those standards, it’s almost a prescription for clinical depression. We need to say, “What’s going to make me happy? What is good enough?” That I think is very well-aligned with some of the more Buddhist ideas you’re talking about.  

[0:49:12.5] MB: How do you think about the idea — That I totally understand and agree with the — I’m a huge fan of deliberate practice and that these sort of direct relationship between time spent practicing and skill development. Zooming out or thinking about that kind of a different perspective, how do you think about the application, the 80-20 principle and sort of the nonlinear relationship between results produced and time spent, right? Because it’s not necessarily — If you’re looking at achievement broadly, or financial success, there’s a lot of other factors that go into that than sort of just raw time spent. 

[0:49:46.4] EB: That’s one of the things I think the biggest mistake people make when they haven’t really read the literature. It’s just, “Oh, 10,000 hours.” It’s like, “Well, no. It’s not 10,000.” I’ve definitely driven a car for 10,000 hours. That doesn’t prepare me to go into Formula One or NASCAR, because that wasn’t deliberate practice. I was not actually pushing my limits and trying to get better. I may have spent 10,000 hours washing my hair in the course of my life. I’m not an expert hair washer. 

First and foremost, realizing that 10,000 hours alone is just proof of nothing. It is the issue of deliberate practice. Again, there’s a lot of other factors as well. There are issues. If you’re 5 foot 4, you can spend 10,000 hours. I still don’t think you’ll be in the NBA. There are physical limitations, natural limitations, and also there’s always going to be diminishing marginal returns where the further along you go, the harder it’s going to be to improve your first year or two at anything you’re going to make. If you are using deliberate practice and spending a lot of hours, you’re going to get very good very fast. After those 10 years, it’s going to require enormous amounts of energy and effort and time just to move the needle a recognizable amount. 

I think very often when we’re talking about skill development, it’s grossly over simplified and because that’s what most people want to hear, but it is more nuanced than that and we need to be realistic about some of the limitations and some of what’s involved. I don’t think it’s surprising that many of the people who do reach the heights of skill development and success in arenas, even if they have natural gifts, there is usually a fair amount of obsessiveness involved. It’s seen again and again and again that we love to use more positive-spin words, like “passionate”, but when you look at a lot of the daily routines and habits of people who are extremely successful in sports, music, writing, etc., even science and other areas, the word obsessive rings a lot more true than passionate. When Jeffrey Pfeffer looked at top success executives in business, so you don’t have to be talking about the arts. He said that here’s a number of qualities you absolutely need to be in the top of your game. 

The first thing he listed was energy and stamina, because he just said you’re going to be working a lot. You’re going to be working hard and things are going to be thrown at you and if you don’t have energy and stamina, yeah, there’s a lot of great qualities you can have, but you’re just going to need to keep going. I think we have a lot of illusions about what it takes to get really good, but it’s a lot more nuanced than just a work hard. 

[0:52:40.3] MB: In the conclusion of the book you asked the question, “What makes for a successful life?” I’d love for you to share that wisdom with the listeners. 

[0:52:48.1] EB: In terms of a successful like, it’s like we really need to be thinking about that concept of alignment, of your signature strengths and picking the right environment. We need to really think about relationships. Relationships are really critical, because that is part of that environment, is the relationships you have. When you look at the results of the Grant study, which fall a number of men, I believe started in the 1930s and followed men throughout their entire life, in college, throughout, you saw that George Valliant who led the study for a few decades, when interviewed, he said that the most important thing in life is your relationships, full stop. That was critical. 

When you saw similar results out of a German study, which was another longitudinal study that followed people throughout their entire lives, because it’s very easy to do a sample of 100 undergrads for a month or two, but to follow people from their teen years or their youth all the way throughout, relationships are really critical. 

Obviously, in business, in one of the chapters I talk about networking and how important that can be. In terms of our lives, how you feel about other people. The interesting thing is those people with good relationships who felt loved, who gave love, actually were more career successful as well. That idea of aligning your signature strengths with your environment is really important, but if we’re not thinking about relationships and our connections with other people, we don’t — I don’t think any of us look forward to having deathbed regrets. What you see is when people are on their deathbed, in an informal study, that most of the things were not about work, not about career and financial success. In fact, quite the opposite. One of the top five deathbed regrets was, “I wish I had not worked as hard.” We need to be thinking about those relationships, because in the long term they seem to be much more important than the immediate finance or career successes. 

[0:54:49.3] MB: For somebody who’s listened to this interview and they want to concretely implement some of the advice and the wisdom that you shared, what would be one piece of homework that you would give them as a starting point to do that? 

[0:55:02.0] EB: I would say what we talked about in terms of know thyself. I would say to do an informal survey of your friends. The friends who aren’t just going to tell you what you want to hear. Who you know are — Who, in general, those friends are perhaps a little too honest. They have good news for you now. To ask 5 or 10 friends to tell you what they think your strengths and weaknesses are. Like I said, you’re going to hear some random things, but I think you’re going to hear a number of things repeated. 

Once you start to identify what those are, then you can start to think about your environment, and if you’re up for a career shift, you can think about an organization or a company that might respect those things. If somebody says, “You’re really organized. You’re fantastic with logistics,” then being a painter might not be the best choice. However, working for FedEx or UPS might be a fantastic choice if you’re really organized, time efficient and good at logistics.  

By the same token, to just understand wherever your strengths might lie, if you can align those. In the same way, even at home, with your partner, with family, to realize what you’re good at, what you’re not good at can really help your relationship in terms of dividing duties and tasks around the house or with kids in terms of your partner as supposed to both of you doing things which it’s inefficient for you to be handling when you have advantages elsewhere.

First and foremost, I would try and survey those friends. Try and get an idea of those strengths and then start thinking about who rewards those. What groups, organizations really reward and value those things, and then you can start to see to pick the right pond, to basically find the place where you fit in and you are valued and respected. I think that’s really critical. 

[0:56:58.7] MB: For listeners who want to find you, read of what you’ve written, where they can find you, your blog and the book online? 

[0:57:06.7] EB: Because my URL is a little hard to spell, I think the best thing is to probably either Google Barking Up the Wrong Tree, that’s my blog. Barking Up the Wrong Tree blog, or Google my name, Eric Barker. The best way to keep up with what I’m doing is to join my email list. You’ll get one email a week with my latest post in terms of the research and stuff I’ve been looking at. My book, Barking Up the Wrong Tree is available on Amazon and other retailers. They can find those there. 

[0:57:34.7] MB: We’ll make sure to include all of those in the show notes as well as all the studies that you talked about. There’s tons and tons of notes for this episode that I know listeners are going to want to dig into. 

Eric, thank you so much for coming on the show. As I’ve said, I’ve been a huge fan of your blog for years and years and it’s so great to have you come on and share all these knowledge with our listeners. 

[0:57:52.7] EB: Thanks so much, Matt. It was really a pleasure. 

[0:57:54.1] MB: Thank you so much for listening to The Science of Success. Listeners like you are why we do this podcast. Your support is what drives us and keeps us creating great new content, adding value to the world and interviewing amazing guests each week.

The emails and stories we receive from listeners around the globe bring us joy and fuel our mission to unleash human potential. I love hearing from listeners. If you want to reach out, share your story, or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email is matt@successpodcast.com. That’s matt@sucesspodcast.com. I’d love to hear from you and I read and respond to every listener email. 

The greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend either live or online. If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please, leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes, because that helps more and more people discover The Science of Success. 
	
I get a ton of listeners asking me, “Matt, how do you organize and remember all these information?” Because of that, we’ve created an amazing free guide for all of our listeners. You can get it by texting the word “smarter”, that’s “smarter” to the number 44222, or by going to successpodcast.com, that’s successpodcast.com and joining our email list. 

Don’t forget, if you want to get all these incredible information, links, transcripts, everything we just talked about in this show and, believe me, this particular interview with Eric Barker has a tremendous amount of show notes. Be sure to check out the show notes, you can to successpodcast.com and hit the show notes button at the top. 
 
Thanks again, and we’ll see you on the next episode of the Science of Success.


August 24, 2017 /Lace Gilger
Best Of
Best Of, Focus & Productivity, Decision Making
Pete Mockaitis-01.png

Master The Universal Skills To Become Awesome At Any Job And Succeed At Your Work with Pete Mockaitis

June 22, 2017 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity, Career Development

In this episode we discuss how to master the universal skills required to succeed at work, the counter-intuitive truth of taking more responsibility for your own mistakes, flaws, and screw-ups can help you succeed more quickly, we look at how to cultivate and create accountability in your life, challenge yourself to rise to a higher level, and become more vulnerable, we talk about the Benjamin Franklin effect, and much more with Pete Mockaitis.

Pete Mockaitis is an award-winning trainer focusing primarily on helping professionals perform optimally at work. He’s delivered 1-on-1 coaching to over 700 clients across 50 countries, and every Ivy League school. He currently hosts the How to be Awesome at your Job podcast which has listeners in over 150 countries and has been ranked as a top 5 career podcast on iTunes.

We discuss:

  • The importance of reading to improving your knowledge

  • The book that has had the biggest impact on Pete’s life

  • How you can transform yourself into “peak state” so that you don’t feel scared or unmotivated

  • How to master the universal skills required to succeed at work

  • Grit - what it is, why its so important, and how you can cultivate

  • The concept that had the biggest impact on Pete’s life

  • Why its so important to take a hard look at yourself and your own shortcomings

  • What to do when your paralyzed by fear in your job

  • Why Everything you’ve ever wanted is on the other side of fear

  • How to be a more effective communicator

  • “Answer first communication” and how it can transform how you speak and present

  • How “hypothesis driven testing” can make you a much better communicator

  • Why you should ask: “What things need to be true for this to be a good idea”

  • Numbers galvanize attention and focus for people listening to you

  • If you’re stressed out in your current role, you’re not ready to make the next move up

  • “The time to meet your neighbors is not when your house is on fire”

  • How to cultivate and develop better relationships

  • The power of making the ask and "ask not, have not”

  • The Benjamin Franklin Effect and how it can help you build a powerful network of mentors

  • You can achieve whatever you want in life, if you help enough other people achieve what they want in life

  • How to be courageous

  • How to ask for good feedback and how to give feedback

  • Ask for role models and ideal next steps when asking for feedback

  • Why you should never be afraid to ask for feedback and counterintuitively how demonstrating your weakensses can help you advance in your career

  • The counter intuitive truth of taking MORE responsibility for your own mistakes, flaws, and screw-ups can help you succeed more quickly

  • How to cultivate and create accountability in your life, challenge yourself to rise to a higher level, and become more vulnerable

  • What you should do when your unsatisfied with your career

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that).

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Audiobook] Goals by Zig Ziglar

  • [Book] Unlimited Power : The New Science Of Personal Achievement by Anthony Robbins

  • [Podcast] How to be Awesome at Your Job

  • [Website] How to be Awesome at Your Job

  • [Book] Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance by Angela Duckworth

  • [Book] How to Work a Room, 25th Anniversary Edition by Susan RoAne

  • [Audiobook] The Mastermind by Napoleon Hill

Episode Transcript

 [00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to The Science of Success with your host, Matt Bodnar.
 
[0:00:12.6] MB: Welcome to The Science of Success. I’m your host, Matt Bodnar. I’m an entrepreneur and investor in Nashville, Tennessee and I’m obsessed with the mindset of success and the psychology of performance. I’ve read hundreds of books, conducted countless hours of research and study and I am going to take you on a journey into the human mind and what makes peak performers tick with the focus on always having our discussion rooted in psychological research and scientific fact, not opinion.
 
In this episode, we discuss how to master the universal skills required to succeed at work. The counterintuitive truth of taking more responsibility for your own mistakes, flaws, and screw-ups and how that can help you succeed more quickly. We look at how to cultivate and create accountability in your life. Challenge yourself to rise to a higher level and become more vulnerable. We talk about the Benjamin Franklin effect, and much more, with our guest; Pete Mockaitis.
 
The Science of Success continues to grow with more than 800,000 downloads, listeners in over 100 countries, hitting number one in New and Noteworthy, and more. Do want to stay up-to-date with the latest of The Science of Success? Find out what we've been reading in the quick tips you need to achieve your goals? Be sure to sign up for email list to get our exclusive Mindset Monday email where we share with our listeners quick summaries of a few of the latest research bits, strategies, and more that have us fired up and can help you achieve your goals. All you have to do the sign up is to visit our website; successpodcast.com and join our email list or text the word “smarter” to the number 44222. 
 
In our previous episode, we asked can and should we set aside our emotions to make decisions in huge high-stakes environments. We looked at how to channel and listen to our emotions to make even better decisions. We talked about learning from negative emotions, how historical echoes in her life can create repeated behavior patterns and much more with our guest; Denise Shull. If you want to be able to make the right decision in high-pressure situations, listen to that episode. 
 
Lastly, if you wanted all the incredible information, links, transcripts, everything we’re going to talk about in this show and from our previous shows, be sure to check out our show notes. Just go to successpodcast.com. That's right, we have a new website; successpodcast.com, and hit the show notes button at the top. 
 
[0:02:43.6] MB: Today, we have another great guest on the show; Pete Mockaitis. Pete is an award-winning trainer focused primarily on helping professionals perform optimally at work. He’s delivered one-on-one coaching to over 700 clients across 50 different countries and every Ivy League school. He currently hosts the How To Be Awesome At Your Job Podcast, which has listeners in over 150 countries and has been ranked as a top-five career podcast on iTunes. 
 
Pete, welcome to The Science of Success. 
 
[0:03:13.5] PM: Thanks, Matt. I’m thrilled to be here. 
 
[0:03:16.3] MB: We’re very excited to have you on here today. For listeners who might not be familiar with you and your podcast, tells about your story. 
 
[0:03:26.2] PM: Oh, my story. Yes. It begins as a youngster in the Danville Public Library in Illinois where I grew up, and my dad would always take me there when I knew I wanted to sort of escape the home, getting a little bit of cabin fever. What parent can resist a child saying, “I want to go to the library, daddy.” And so we went. 
 
I got into a little bit of a groove where I would take an interest in a topic, maybe it's photography, maybe it's chess. I would read numerous books on that topic and suddenly I discovered, “Hey, I’m taking better photos.” “Hey, I am suddenly beating my dad at chess.” That kind of cemented this notion early on about books, that knowledge, make you better at stuff and then I discovered this realm of books associated with success and positive psychology stuff. I'm so digging your show and delighted to be on here. I thought, “Whoa! These are books that just make you better at living life.” 
 
That interest sort of stuck forever, and I went on to college and then strategy consulting at Bain and then I left Bain thinking, “You know? What I really want to do is the people development things.” I've been doing training and coaching, and then over the last year, getting going with the How To Be Awesome At Your Job podcast. 
 
[0:04:46.0] MB: When you were a kid or you’ve been maybe a little bit older than that, what was the book that you stumbled upon or read that kind of set you off on this course and really opened your eyes? 
 
[0:04:58.9] PM: It’s funny, I don’t think I can give credit to just one, but I also remember a lot of it was audio. It was in their audiocassette tapes at the time. You could get the CD or the cassette which libraries are often a little behind with some of the latest stuff. I would have a little boombox cassette tape player strapped into the passenger seat of my Chevrolet Celebrity vehicle that I was driving at the time. I think I remember one about goals from Zig Ziglar and he had that southern accent. He’d talked about goals and I was into it. It’s like, “Yeah, that make a lot of sense. I should write them down. I should focus on some things.” Then we get the Stephen Covey and Tony Robbins and it just kept going. 
 
[0:05:45.9] MB: The old Zig Ziglar stuff, and you can actually still find a bunch of it on Audible. It’s just amazing. You can read his books, but it's so much better. He’s such a fascinating speaker and a really interesting guy. I feel like you really get a lot more out of it. Actually, kind of hearing him speak and tell the stories. 
 
[0:06:04.6] PM: Yes, and his voices is just so musical and fun to listen to. It's like, “What else do you got Zig? Let’s keep it going.”
 
[0:06:13.2] MB: You kind of got in to some of these books and they really opened your eyes. What were some of those initial lessons that you said kind of, “Wow! This is really something that has some meat to it.” 
 
[0:06:26.2] PM: I think one of my favorite lessons came from Tony Robbins in his book Unlimited Power. He talked about your emotions are not so much something that just happened, that you're just a victim of your emotions that you can actually exert a degree of control over how you feel in a given moment by holding your body differently, taking up more space and being confident and shoulders back, straight up instead of compressed, by what you're thinking about or visualizing in terms of if you're think about success or terrible memories of failure, and how you're talking to yourself from, “Let's do this. Bring it on. Oh, yeah!” Tony would smack his chest and all the antiques there, or like, “Oh, this is going to be so lame.” 
 
I think I just used that set of tactics probably hundreds of times in high school or college like, “Oh, I’m kind of tired. I'm kind of bored. This is going to be lame.” It’s like, “Well, I don't feel like feeling that way. It’d be more helpful to be pumped up about this, so I'm going to choose to feel pumped up about this.” I was able to kind of pour myself into a lot of stuff and get better results in those things. 
 
[0:07:37.8] MB: What are some of the — I've been to UPW, one of Tony’s events — 
 
[0:07:42.1] PM: Oh, yeah. The Fire Walker. 
 
[0:07:44.0] MB: Yeah, oh yeah. Exactly. What were some of those — For listeners who might not be familiar, what are some of those activities you can do to kind of shift yourself from a state of being disempowered or upset or unmotivated to sort of high-energy state. I forget the exact term that he uses for it. Pig steak. 
 
[0:08:04.7] PM: Yeah, pig steak. It’s funny. If you check out some of those videos from the events and unleash the power within. I mean, Tony got some notoriety from doing a fire walker like over hot coals. It's funny, when I did that, I remember it’s actually raining a lot, so my feet were chilly and I was like refreshing, like, “Oh, that’s nice. Can I just chill here for a second?” because my feet are freezing as opposed to some mighty mind over matter thing. 
 
His take would be to sort of be active and in motion, so maybe jumping up and down, may pounding your chest. He’s going to say things like, “Make your move,” like a power move and have air gushing past. 
 
If you stumble into a video of this, it looks a little bit nuts, like, “Whoa! What is going on here? Is this some sort of cult activity?” It's not. It's just sort of a series of professional personal development tricks to kind of snap your body into a peak state as he would call it. It doesn't have to be outrageous. It can happen a little bit subtly in terms of, “Oh, I’m slumping forward. I’m going to bring shoulders back and take a breath here. I’m going to stretch my neck out a little bit. I am focusing on what I'm afraid is going to happen from doing this thing. I’m going to shift my focus toward what I'd love to see happen with this thing.” Suddenly, you feel better. 
 
I don't know if this has happened you, Matt, but sometimes I just cannot imagine a conversation and how it might go awry with someone. Then I'm almost like having a debate or a fight in my mind with this imaginary conversation like, “If he says this, then I'm going to say that. But if he comes back at this, I’m like, “Oh, no!” I’m going to come back with that.” Suddenly I’m getting worked up. I’m getting anxious about a conversation that isn’t even real just because I am visualizing. You could just take a breath and say, “Timeout. Let's refocus here.” 
 
[0:10:00.2] MB: Let's dig into your podcast. What is the podcast about and what led you to create it? 
 
[0:10:07.7] PM: Oh, sure thing. The title is How To Be Awesome At Your Job. It’s funny, it started out as a little bit of a tagline talking to some branding design people and some prospective listeners such that it was sharpening the universal skills required to flourish at work. I thought, “That’s kind of catchy. That's what I'm up to. I want to produce a show that’ll be useful for anyone who's interested in flourishing in their career. whether they work in sales or accounting or marketing or finance, as supposed to being focused in on a narrow spot.” 
 
As I discovered, looking at the landscape of podcasts, a lot of the development type stuff — Matt, you probably saw the same thing as you’re lunching yours. Had a focus toward entrepreneurship, side hustle, sort of do your thing, live your dream, escape the cubicle world. I thought, “Well, I think a lot of people like their jobs and find meaning and rewards from it and would just like to do them better and to navigate their career well.” 
 
That actually turned out to be a key point of differentiation, and most of the pitches I reject tend to be like from an entrepreneurial story, like find out how so-and-so grew their business from 1 million to 8 million in just 18 months. It’s like, “That’s really cool, but unless we’re focused on some particular skills that apply to folks with “real or normal jobs”, then it's not quite fit.” 
 
I love to talk to people about things like grit, or purpose, or communication, or feedback, or having a good a presence, developing relationships that are mutually advantageous, and those sorts of things. Whether you're working in an high-tech or mining or in finance or marketing, you’re going to need to know that stuff to do well. 
 
[0:12:02.6] MB: It’s such a point, and I feel like both of our shows to some degree are kind of in a different camp. Some of the pitches we kind of turn away from as well are those same entrepreneurial stories. As an entrepreneur, I’m really interested in them. At the same time, I want to really focus on these deeper lessons and these kind of skills that transcend one particular activity and can really be life skills that can help you across the board live a healthier, happier, more successful life. 
 
[0:12:30.4] PM: I agree. I'm into those, and you did a heck of a job sharing those on my show, thanks again for that, when it comes to decision-making. That's something that everyone's got to do and it's very high leveraged as you’d say. 
 
[0:12:44.5] MB: It’s so important to be high leverage. I’d love to dig in to some of these universal skills. Tell me about the first one you mentioned; grit. I think that's something that's so important. 
 
[0:12:54.7] PM: Grit is just this notion that you're going to stick with something. Sort of maybe it's uncomfortable. Maybe it's unpleasant for a period of time. Grit is just the capacity to step up and endure and work through some of that. 
 
We had a guest; Linda Kaplan Taylor, who spoke about this, and Angela Duckworth is kind of the top thinker on the field right now with her TED talk and such. It’s just sort of an undervalued, sort of a capability when many folks would say, “Well, no. It's about your IQ,” or “It’s about your talent. That's what's going to take you far.” 
 
A lot of the studies suggest that it's the capability to pick yourself up one more time to persist, to learn from your mistakes and adjust. That's really going to get the job done more so than being an exceptionally brilliant, a coder or a salesperson. 
 
[0:13:49.7] MB: That’s something that I’ve fundamentally believe in. We’ve had Carol Dweck on the show in the past. She's one of the other kind of people that is not necessarily directly grit, but the lessons of mindset are so vital and so important to developing the ability to bounce back from failure and not let it define you and learn that it's an okay and necessary part of the journey towards whatever you want to achieve. 
 
[0:14:18.0] PM: It certainly. Another thing that I think is related to that is just the courage required to take a hard look at yourself, your skills, your strengths, your shortcomings and to ask for that feedback and to see what's going well, what’s going not so well, and how can you learn and grow and develop. 
 
One theme that’s really popped up across many guests is a lot of folks in their careers, they’re sort of paralyzed by fear. It's like the elephant is in the room and folks, they’re afraid to maybe challenge a manager or a leader if that idea doesn't quite sit right to them. They’re afraid to ask where they can improve or what it takes to win and grow and flourish within this career. They're afraid to step into some conflict with someone in terms of — They say, “Hey, did you do what you said you were going to do? What happened there?” and to go there. 
 
I think there's just massive value being destroyed because folks there — Their natural kind of lizard brain limbic system survival mechanisms are running the show when, ideally, we would take a breath and go to some places conversationally that may require a bit extra dose of courage but can just unlock tremendous opportunity. 
 
[0:15:39.4] MB: There's a quote, this is one of my favorite quotes, and it’s “Everything you’ve ever wanted is on the other side of fear.” 
 
[0:15:44.9] PM: Oh, yes. Well said. 
 
[0:15:47.2] MB: I don't. I don’t remember who that quote is from, but that one was always to me just been so powerful. 
 
[0:15:53.3] PM: I buy it. What’s was fascinating is that this fear is not just for folks maybe at the individual contributor level, but also managers and some upper leaders. There is often fear associated with telling an employee a direct report what kinds of behavior needs to change, and so folks just live with having the same your mistakes crop up over and over again and then kind of fixing or redoing work that are direct report has to offer. Instead of just being able to head on, say, “Hey, I want to have a chat about some things that I’ve been noticing and their impact on us and our team,” and just be able to go there. It’s like, “When you do this, these are the implications of that, and are you up for changing that?” 
 
It could be like a two-minute conversation that just illuminates folks like, “Oh, wow! I had no idea,” or “You’re right. I’m sorry. That’s something that's always been a weakness of mine.” Now you're in an empowered place to go to work and see what you can do to develop, and it's a much more positive fun work experience for everybody. 
 
[0:17:02.1] MB: That example really highlights one of the other themes that talked about, which is communication. It’s so important, and I feel like many people sort of take it for granted or don't even really think about it or think that they’re communicating effectively when they’re really really struggling to communicate. What have you see in terms of some the lessons you've drawn about how to be a more effective communicator? 
 
[0:17:25.3] PM: There are many, and I teach a good number of them in my training programs. I'm going to start with some strategy consulting tools, if I may. One piece of that I’m thinking is just about answer first to communication. The difference is whereas most of us tend to communicate in sort of a chronological fashion. Let's just say that I was doing some customer research and exploring some market stuff, and that's part of my job. I might convey what happened from that research by saying, “You know what? I opened up our customer relationship management database and I ran some filters associated with over the last couple of years where most of our sales have been coming from as supposed to where our marketing spend has been flowing. What was kind of Interesting is the ratios are really all over the place in terms of marketing spend, about revenue retrieved. Ultimately, it seems like it's the mom segment that seems to overwhelmingly give us the biggest return on our marketing dollar investment.” 
 
I’ve told a chronological story of what I did, which is natural, because we’re humans and we like to function with stories. The first part of that, you and listeners might have said, “Okay, where are we going with this? Wait, do I care? What’s the story?” As supposed to if it were answer first you would say,” “Overwhelmingly, our marketing spend toward mothers is the most efficient. I say so for three key reasons. First;” and then you sort of lay it out. That just has an effect to just sort of galvanize folk’s attention and they’re kind of locked in. 
 
If you happen to have a super compelling, engaging, intriguing story with a twist or something, that could be kind of fun to build tension in kind of like a cinematic way. Most the time, when you’re just sort of conveying day-in, day-out business insights, that’s a better way to go. Same thing with your — If you got some PowerPoint in the mix, having compelling slide headlines that just say what's the point as supposed to just labeling the data that are there such as overview of marketing spend and consumer reaction. A better headline would read; mothers are the most efficient segment we should market to, and then they go, “Oh! Interesting. Now I am oriented to what I should be looking at,” and then you sort of cut through a lot of the ambiguity of, “Wait, what am I looking for? What's the take away here?” You get right to the heart of matter in a hurry. 
 
[0:19:58.3] MB: It's a focus on kind of getting to the point much more quickly instead of wasting a lot of time and energy with fluff, essentially. 
 
[0:20:07.6] PM: Certainly. Often, if it's if it's vague, what your point is in a set of data, everyone could just sort of look at it and talk around it. Maybe that's interesting if you’re kind of exploring new ways and new directions and trying to spark a kind of intriguing innovation, but if you're just trying to get the sense for, “Hey, how did our call centers perform last month?” Just go ahead and say it, strong and proud and clear, “Our handle time exceeded all expectations over the last month.” “Okay, got it,” and so we can move on from that slide as supposed to everyone leaning in and squinting for a little bit to see, “What are we trying to say here?” 
 
[0:20:50.1] MB: What are some of the other communication strategies that you've seen or havehave kind of uncovered that have been really effective? 
 
[0:20:57.3] PM: Oh, sure thing. I think part of it kind of flows from what I would call sort of hypothesis-driven thinking within your communication so that rather than just sort of taking a look around and seeing what you see, you sort of convey right up front, “If I want to take an action,” so let's say acquire a company or something. You have in a big strategic meeting about that sort of thing. Well than, it’s often more efficient means of communicating if you just sort of layout right up front, “Okay, well, what things need to be true for this to be a good idea?” Then we get really focused on those things. 
 
Thing one is that the target we’re looking at, it's healthy in terms of profit sales, a growth market position. Thing two is that we can get a reasonable price in terms of the acquisition of it. Think three is that it’ll fit nice complementarily with the other things that we’re doing in this business. By doing that right up front, one; you’d use numbers, which tend to galvanize attention. It's wild if say, “There are three key things to discuss.” Pens click and people write, “Oh, okay. 1, 2, 3.” I’m implicating employees to hear what that is, and that you’ve identified that these are like the key drivers upon which this will hinge, like yes, no, good, or bad news on these will determine if it's a go or no go, then you’ve done a great job of more efficiently communicating as well as more efficiently planning how you’re going to go about thinking and researching this move. 
 
[0:22:33.0] MB: I think that's a great point, and I love the question; what things need to be true for this to be a good idea. I've never heard that before, and it’s definitely something I’m going to implement in my own thought process to sort of clarify what we should be focusing on. 
 
[0:22:47.2] PM: It’s so funny, and now it's so baked into how I think and operate about everything. As we speak, I am standing at my sit to stand desk, and before I purchased it I thought, “Okay, geez. That sounds cool, but I don't want part with $600-ish just for a cool toy. I want this to work out.” There are sort of two key phases as like, “What needs to be true in order for this to be true,” and so I thought through it in and laid those things out like, “Well, one. I’d say the cost of this thing would need to be overshadowed by the benefits. That's got to be true. Two; my space has to be able to work for it, to fit it in just nice, just right and nicely. Three; buying this desk will need to be superior to my alternative options from stacking boxes on my existing desk or just remaining seated.” 
 
So that I say, “Okay, if I could prove those three things, that I’ll know that this is a sensible move, and then I think, “Well, how would I go about approving those?” “Well, for the space, just get a tape measure. For the benefits and costs —” You might dig this science of success, “I went deep in terms of looking at studies that showed worker performance with sit to stand desks and what that meant.” I saw some pretty cool things associated with less fatigue and better mood. I thought, “Shocks! That will just free me up to do a little bit more work which will create more than 600 bucks. That's a great benefit exceeded the cost.” 
 
Then just Googling around for other options. I could see how those stacked up and that this one indeed look like the best. I recommended with folks who are trying to develop some of these thought processes. I’d say anytime you're about to make a purchase, stop and go through those steps and say, “What needs to be true for this purchase to be great?” Then I like amazon.com a lot, and it's like my entire order history represents a series of hypothesis-driven thinking moves. It’s like, “Yes, I proved out the key things I needed, and so that's why I have this bamboo diffuser and limit essential oil, or whatever I’ve bought off Amazon. It really adds up. 
 
[0:25:04.4] MB: Yeah, I totally understand that and I’m on the same page. I feel like I have Amazon boxes arriving my house on almost daily basis. 
 
[0:25:13.0] PM: Totally. 
 
[0:25:15.5] MB: It’s just so much more convenient. Anyway, back on communication. One of the best pieces of advice I've ever heard about communication is really simple. Basically, there's three types of communication; no communication, miscommunication, and over-communication. Somebody once told me that piece of advice and it really stuck out to me and kind of helped me think about, “Okay, a lot of times when you think you've told someone something or you think that they know something. It doesn't hurt to kind of go back and tell them again or reach out and over-communicate, because a lot of times things you think you’ve done or think you’ve said, they didn't really hear what you were saying or they didn't quite get it or they missed it or whatever might be. 
 
[0:26:03.1] PM: Yes, that’s an interesting set up in terms of categories because I noticed none of them were a perfect communication. 
 
[0:26:12.4] MB: Yeah, exactly. You’re either on the spectrum of not communicating, miscommunicating, or you’re on the total other end, which is over-communicating. The reality is a lot of times when you — If you don't feel like you're over-communicating, you're probably not communicating enough, and there's probably wires getting crossed, there’s probably things getting missed. That something we really try to drive home on our teams is you have to constantly be over-communicating, sharing information, telling people what you're up to because it's really easy to kind of get lost in your own world and miss out on those key things you needed to find out or tell somebody about. 
 
[0:26:51.6] PM: Absolutely. I think this also comes back to the courage point in terms of the over-communicating in terms of just understanding what is on each person’s plate, and is it acceptable to say, “No,” or, “Well, in order to do that, I’m going to have to give up A, B, C or D. is that worthwhile, and because this is really the focus.” 
 
What often happens instead is that folks just say, “Yes to everything and then balls get dropped, promises become unkept and you’re kind of rolling the dice with, “Did the really important thing get done?” “We hope so.” Whereas if folks could courageously and openly communicate well in terms of, “These are the demands, and this is the capacity we have to meet those demands,” then you're hitting the right stuff. 
 
[0:27:40.6] MB: That's something that I'm absolutely ruthless about is trying to be as efficient as possible — Or sorry. Trying to be as effective as possible. Key distinction in the sort of the Tim Ferris or kind of essentialism way of thinking about it where it's all about, “How can I do the most important things? The most high leveraged things and kind of let go of all of the minutia that's distracting me?” 
 
[0:28:08.3] PM: Oh, absolutely. To the point, there's something that has really been sticking with me. It was a recent guest. It was my buddy Shannon Clark, and she has very quickly risen to be one of the world's foremost experts in sort of usability human factors design for medical devices before 30, which is cool. 
 
Shannon said that what she's been chewing on lately is this notion that if you are stressed out currently in your role or career, then you will not be able to make the next step up. I thought, “Whoa! That’s a strong statement.” The more I think about it, the more I think it is mostly true. It's like, if you're stressed, that suggests that maybe it's minutia or sort of the totality of demands upon your capacity, your time, energy, attention is such that you’re tapped out. You’re just meeting your demands or you're falling slightly behind on those demands, and that means you don't have the capacity to develop to jump to the next level whether that's building the key relationships, whether that's having the space to have a good fun innovative thoughts, whether that's being able to invest in your own learning growth developments which takes a toll in terms of changing and growing on yourself. If all of your time and energy is zapped just kind of meeting the demands of what's in front of you, in a day, well then you’re going to sort of stay there until you come up with a better way. 
 
[0:29:43.0] MB: That kind of makes me think about one of the other skill sets that you talked about was the ability to develop relationships. I think we both probably agree that that's one of the core components of being really successful, whether it’s in your career, whether you’re an entrepreneur, what it might be. That ability and skill set is so vital. 
 
What are some of the lessons that you’ve uncovered around that skill set? 
 
[0:30:11.1] PM: Sure thing. There’re numerous ones. I’d say the first thing is to start now. I had a guest; Michael Watkins, who had a great quip. I don’t know if he made it up, but he said; the time to meet your neighbors is not when your house is on fire. Well said and visceral. I think that's a common mistake is that sometimes we get caught up in doing stuff. You don't take the time to proactively develop those relationships that you’re going to need until it may be a little bit too late. Then it seems inauthentic. It's desperate. You can’s sort of give them maybe the time they need to help you out in a way that works for them and is fun and uplifting. That’d be the first one is to just start quickly. 
 
Another one is that people actually enjoy helping people, and I think sometimes folks think that networking might be a dirty word in the sense that, “Oh, what can I do for them? I don't want to sort of just take take take. I don’t want to be a bother or inconvenience them.” 
 
Often, if you have a specific targeted request, especially one that is easy to fulfill and can make a big impact, people generally love helping out with that. I love it. One time, I introduced two people. It took me three minutes. They’re good friends. They've done business deals together. They were at each other's weddings. It was like, “Cool. I got to make a difference with such a tiny bit of effort and it feels fantastic to do that.” People really do enjoy helping one another, and there's no shame in making that request. 
 
I had a fascinating observation just a couple of weeks ago, and I think it was — I don't know. Maybe I got to write a blog post about this. I had a friend who just posted on Facebook, “Hey, I'm checking out Facebook's algorithm. Can you tell me what time it is right now where you are.” 
 
Okay, that’s not a very interesting thing to put on Facebook; what time is it? Yet, this person received over 100 commented replies where each person sharing what time it was that I thought, “Oh, this is so brilliant, and it's because it's so easy to do to that. It’s like I could help someone out in less than three seconds by noting the time and typing it in here and pushing enter, I'm in. That’d be the other point, is people do — That they like to help, and it's good. 
 
One time, I had someone reach out to me for some advice about consulting. We chatted, and it was a good worthwhile chat, but I noticed he had an extensive notebook. It says with all the people that he reached out to to get advice about consulting careers. I said, “Whoa! Tell me, how many folks like me said sure?” He’s like, “Well, I could take a look for you.” I said, “Yes, please do.” He crunched the numbers he determined that 28% of folks he reached out to completely cold on LinkedIn were willing to say yes and have a short chat with him about what a career in management consulting could be like. 28% cold. Reach out to four people, odds are one of them will help you. That's awesome. 
 
[0:33:36.6] MB: Just shows you the power of being willing to ask and kind of putting yourself out there, making that ask. You missed 100% of the shots you don't take, and so there’s no downside to just saying reaching out to people whether they’re mentors or people you admire or whatever it is and just saying, “Hey, can I get some advice on this? 
 
[0:33:58.5] PM: Absolutely. What’s interesting, and I think they call it the Benjamin Franklin effect, is when you ask for advice and someone offers you advice, they actually tend to become more invested in you and your success. It's like they've got some skin in the game now and they want know how to go, “Is there anything else I could do to help?” 
 
It’s interesting, you’d think by doing a favor for someone, that would make them like you more. In fact, it goes the other way too. Asking for a favor from someone who then does it makes them like you more.
 
[0:34:30.9] MB: Thank you so much for listening to The Science of Success. Listeners like you are why we do this podcast. The emails and stories we receive from listeners around the globe bring us joy and fuel our mission to unleash human potential. I love hearing from listeners. If you want to reach out, share your story, or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email is matt@successpodcast.com. I’d love to hear from you and I read and respond to every listener email.
 
Remember, the greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend, either live or online. If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please, leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes, because that helps more and more people discover The Science of Success. 
 
Do want to stay up-to-date with the latest of The Science of Success? Find out what we've been reading in the quick tips you need to achieve your goals? Be sure to sign up for email list to get our exclusive Mindset Monday email where we share with our listeners quick summaries of a few of the latest research bits, strategies, and more that have us fired up and can help you achieve your goals. All you have to do the sign up is to visit our website; successpodcast.com and join our email list or text the word “smarter” to the number 44222. 
 
Lastly, if you want to get all the these incredible information; links, transcripts, everything we just talked about in this episode and much more, be sure to check out our show notes. Just go to successpodcast.com and hit the show notes button at the top. 
 
Thanks again, and we’ll see you on the next That's right, we have a new website; successpodcast.com, and hit the show notes button at the top. 
 
Thanks again, and we’ll see you on the next episode of The Science of Success.
June 22, 2017 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity, Career Development
54 - Why You Shouldn’t Follow Your Passion & The Rare Value of Deep Work with Cal Newport-IG-2-01.jpg

Why You Shouldn’t Follow Your Passion & The Rare Value of Deep Work with Cal Newport

December 29, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Career Development, Focus & Productivity

In this episode we discuss why you should not follow your passion, the two biggest pitfalls people struggle with trying to build a career they love, the incredible importance of DEEP WORK, why deep work is so valuable and how we can cultivate it, as well as how you can structure your lifestyle to attain autonomy and mastery with Cal Newport.

Cal is an Associate Professor of Computer Science at Georgetown University, He previously earned his Ph.D. from MIT in 2009. Cal has authored several bestselling books including “So Good They Can’t Ignore You” and “Deep Work” both of which have received deep praise from The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Economist, and many more. 

If you’re looking for some guidance as you plan your new year, listen to this episode! 

We discuss:

  • Why following your passion is bad advice

  • The 2 fundamental flaws of the idea that you should follow your passion

  • There’s a huge difference between what makes you enjoy a hobby and what makes you enjoy a profession

  • The core components of having a happy professional life

  • If we don't follow our passions, how do we end up with a job we are passionate about?

  • The simple, but not easy, path to having a passionate career

  • Importance of building up rare and valuable skills by pursuing an apprecenticeship phase

  • How to cultivate skills to attain leverage to get the autonomy and mastery that will make your work meaningful

  • The right question you should ask if you are unsatisfied with your job

  • The 2 biggest pitfalls people run into trying to find and build a career they are passionate about

  • Why you need career capital and how to cultivate it

  • There are many many paths you can take that could lead to a passionate career

  • We go deep on the concept of DEEP WORK

  • We discuss why deep work is increasingly both valuable and rare

  • How you can produce at an elite level while working fewer total hours

  • How Deep Work is a meta skill that fuels other skills

  • Attention residue and how it can crush your cognitive ability

  • Why Deep work requires zero distraction. A single glance at an inbox or social media account can disrupt an entire deep work session

  • The importance of scheduling deep work far in advance on your calendar

  • Why everyone is an artist, and how that changes what work you should focus on

  • The danger of focuses on “taxes and paint”

  • Deep work is a SKILL not a HABIT and it gets better with practice

  • How to stretch your ability to concrete

  • Lifestyle changes you can implement that create the foundation for deep focus and deep work

  • How to break the cycle of addiction to novel stimuli

  • Why you should schedule all your deep work on your calendar ahead of time

  • Exercises that you can implement right now to train your concentration

  • Why Cal recommends that you should embrace boredom

  • Your deep mental addiction to new stimulus and how you can break it

  • And much more!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that).

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Book] Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World by Adam Grant and Sheryl Sandberg

  • [Book] Give and Take: Why Helping Others Drives Our Success by Adam M. Grant

  • [Website] calnewport.com

  • [Book] Deep Work: Rules for Focused Success in a Distracted World by Cal Newport

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

[00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to the Science of Success with your host, Matt Bodnar.

[00:00:12.4] MB: Welcome to The Science of Success with your host Matt Bodner. Welcome to the Science of Success. I’m your host, Matt Bodnar. I’m an entrepreneur and investor in Nashville, Tennessee and I’m obsessed with the mindset of success and the psychology of performance. I’ve read hundreds of books, conducted countless hours of research and study and I am going to take you on a journey into the human mind in what makes peak performers tick with the focus on always having our discussion rooted in psychological research and scientific fact, not opinion.

In this episode, we discuss why you should not follow your passion. The two biggest pitfalls people struggle with trying to build a career they love. The incredible importance of deep work, why deep work is so valuable, and how we can cultivate it, as well as how you can structure your lifestyle to obtain autonomy and mastery with Cal Newport. 

The Science of Success continues to grow with nearly 700,000 downloads. Listeners in over a hundred countries, hitting number one New Noteworthy and more. A lot of our listeners are curious about how to organize and remember everything. I get tons of listener emails and comments asking me how I keep track of all the incredible knowledge I get from reading hundreds of books, interviewing amazing experts, listening to podcast, and much more.

Because of that, we created an awesome resource for you and you can get it completely free by texting the world “smarter” to the number 44222. It’s a guide we created called How to Organize and Remember Everything. Again, you can get it completely for free by just texting the word “smarter” to the number 44222. 

Listeners are loving this guide, I get emails all the time people telling me how much this has helped them organize their information and keep track of all the incredible things they learn from this show and all the other things in their lives that they’re doing to improve themselves. Again, you can get it by texting “smarter” to 44222 or by going to scienceofsuccess.co and putting in your email. 

In our previous episode, we discussed the incredible power of kindness, showed how kindness triggers the helper’s high and causes dopamine and oxytocin to flow through your brain. Looked at study data from a 136 countries showing the science behind why kindness is so powerful. We walked through several concrete examples you can use right now to take action and be kind to someone today, and much more, with John Wang. If you want to take small, immediate action to make the world a better place today, listen to that episode now.


[0:02:31.5] MB: Today, we have another amazing guest on the show, Cal Newport. Cal is an associate professor of computer science, at Georgetown University. He previously earned his PhD. from MIT in 2009. He’s authored several bestselling books including So Good They Can’t Ignore You and Deep Work. Both of which have received incredible praise form the New York Times, the Wall Street Journal, the Economist and much more. 

Cal, welcome to the science of success.

[0:02:53.7] CN: Hi Matt, thanks for having me on.

[0:02:54.6] MB: We’re so excited to have you on here today. Before we dig in to some of the topics that you’ve written about, for listeners who may not be familiar, tell us a little bit about you?

[0:03:02.9] CN: My day job is I’m a computer science professor. I study sort of the mathematics behind the algorithms that run a lot of the computer systems at the heart of our digital life today and then my sort of side gig, as you might call it, is to actually write books and that’s where I tackle these type of issues around this technologies affect our life and how people can thrive and succeed in this sort of new world.

[0:03:26.0] MB: In one of your earlier books, So Good They Can’t Ignore You, you talk about the concept of sort of pursuing mastery versus pursuing your passion and finding your passion. I’d love to kind of share that with the listeners and for those who haven’t read it, sort of explain to them kind of the core premise of that book.

[0:03:40.6] CN: Yeah, the core idea, which is an idea that got me in some trouble and I like that is that follow your passion is bad advice. That if your goal it to end up passionate about what you do for a living, that advice that you should follow your passion is probably going to reduce the probability that you end up succeeding with the goal. That that career advice that we’re told almost ubiquitously, at least in recent American career conversations and culture, is actually way too simplistic and quite flawed and doesn’t capture the more complicated and more interesting reality of how people actually build careers that are satisfying, that are motivating, that generated a true source of passion.

[0:04:16.0] MB: Why do you say that it’s bad advice to follow your passion?

[0:04:19.5] CN: Well, this idea that you should follow your passion is dependent on two core assumptions being true for it to work. The first assumption that has to be true for this advice to actually make sense is the idea that most people have an identifiable, preexisting passion that they can then use as a foundation for career choices. If you don’t have this clear passion that exist in advance, the advice makes no sense because there’s no passion to follow. 

And it turns out we don’t have a lot of evidence that his is really common, especially for younger people. We don’t have a lot of evidence that most people should be expected, to be hard wired with an identifiable passion that’s somehow relevant to the jobs that happen to be available in the 21st century knowledge economy. That first premise is required for this advice to be true, it’s something that doesn’t necessarily hold up.

The second premise that has to be true, the second assumption that has to be true for this advice to make sense is that if you really like something and then you do that thing for your job then you will really like your job, that sort of passion or interest in a subject will transfer over to a professional engagement in the subject and again we don’t have a lot of evidence that that’s true either. It’s one of these syllogisms that kind of makes intuitive sense when you first hear it, “Oh yeah, I really love this so if I’m kind of doing that for my job, I’ll really love my job.” 

But we don’t actually have a lot of evidence that that’s true. In fact, think about all the clichéd stories we hear about the passionate amateur photographer, or the passionate amateur baker who ends up miserable when they open a professional photography studio or a bakery. Those type of stories alone tells us that what leads people to be satisfied in their work is much more complicated. 

So with those assumptions destabilized, this idea that “oh just figure out what your passion is and do it for your job, and you’ll love your job” goes from seeming like self-evident, great advice to instead being something that seems simplistic and not supported. I think we need to move on to something that’s a little bit more sophisticated if we’re serious about actually crafting meaningful careers.

[0:06:01.5] MB: You know, the second assumption especially kind of rings so true to me that that’s fundamentally flawed. One of my favorite things, one of my favorite kind of hobbies is to play video games. And you know, if I thought about it, if I was forced to play those 12 hours a day and I had to do that in order to kind of earn an income, I think eventually you kind of reach a place where you sort of resent what used to be something that you’re really passionate about and really enjoyed.

[0:06:23.7] CN: Yeah, that’s absolutely true. Because there’s a big difference between what makes you enjoy an activity that you do in your leisure time and what makes people enjoy a profession. What makes you enjoy an activity in your leisure time is its’ own sort of thing, but we have a lot of research on what leads people to find motivation, passion or satisfaction in professional endeavors and it has nothing to do with matching that activity to preexisting interest.

The things we know matter in the professional world is for example, a sense of autonomy. You control what you do, how you do it, when you do it. A sense of mastery is also important. You’re good at what you do, you have a craft that you’re respected for. A sense of impact on the world is very important. A sense of connection to other people on things that matter. These types of traits are what consistently lead people to say, “I’m passionate about what I’ll do,” and you’ll notice that none of those traits have anything to do with you match the job to some sort of preexisting, intrinsic trait you had before you chose the job.

Again, this idea that we’re wired to do something and if you get a job that matches it, you’ll really like that job, it makes sense, it’s intuitive, it’s easy but it really couldn’t be further from the sort of the reality, the psychology of how people actually develop this passionate motivations for their professional endeavors.

[0:07:32.2] MB: I’d love to dig a little bit more into that and kind of the idea of instead of following our passions, I’d love to explore kind of the concepts that you said, what can we do to end up with a job that we’re passionate about?

[0:07:42.1] CN: Once you understand, okay, the types of traits that lead people to love their work or things like autonomy, like mastery, like impact, like relationships and connections, the question then is, “What is the most effective and time efficient way to get those traits in your career?” Now we have a much more specific question that we can actually tackle more technically. If you study this, you study people who have succeeded in obtaining those traits and building passion in their career, you see there are many ways that people get there. 

There’s one path in particular that comes up the most often and is probably the most consistently replicate-able and it’s a pretty simple path, though it’s hard to execute, and it basically says, “Skills are your currency.” Those types of traits that make your job great, the type of traits that make people love their work are rare and valuable. If you want them in your career, no one cares that you want them, it’s not enough to say, “That would be great, how can I get them?” You have to have something valuable to offer in return in a job market that’s almost always going to be rare and valuable skills.

So the most consistent path to building passion your career is to go through an aggressive and intense apprenticeship phase, where you are trying to build up rare and valuable skills, things that are unambiguously valued by the marketplace. Step two is you then use those skills as your currency or as your leverage to obtain in your work, these highly desirable traits that lead people to great satisfaction; the autonomy, the impact, the mastery, the connection with other people and so on. 

So it’s really this kind of two step process. You build skills and then you invest those skills to try to gain more control of your career and steer it towards this traits that we know you really enjoy. So if someone says, “I really don’t like my work,” the right question is not, “Well, let’s do some introspection and see if this is your true passion. If not, you need to switch your job.” The right question is, “Well how much rare and valuable skills do you have? How valuable are you to your field of your marketplace?” 

If your answer is “a lot”, then go out and use that stuff as leverage and if the answer is, “Well, I’m not really that valuable, I don’t have any rare and valuable skills,” then the right answer is not “Switch your job and follow your passion.” It’s, “Well we got to build up that capital quick, we need to get you good at what you do, we need to get you some leverage and authority in the job market place as quickly as possible.” So it’s really a focus on not what does this job or the world offer me, it’s instead a focus on what am I offering to the job, what am I offering to the world of value?

[0:09:52.1] MB: I think that’s such a critical distinction and you hit the nail in the head in the sense that people are often asking the completely wrong question. Sitting there thinking, “Well what about this job that I’m not passionate about, should I be changing?” When in reality, what they really should focus on is, “What can I do to better serve this job so that I can then build leverage and create a job that will give me autonomy and mastery and the things that truly lead to a living and passionate life?”

[0:10:15.6] CN: Yeah, and the hard part about it, the reason why a lot of people fall short is that there is two pitfalls in actually executing the strategy and a lot of people who are sort of aspirational to have a really meaningful job falling to at least one of these two pitfalls. The first pitfall is trying to make a move to get these great traits in your life before you have the skills, or what I sometimes call the “career capital”, to back it up. If you say, “Okay, I want autonomy in my life I want a ton of mastery and connection and impact,” and you’re 21 years old, you have no particular skills built up and you quite your job and go start an ill faded online business venture or some such, without anything to back it up.

Well you say, “If I was really successful at this, I’d have all these traits,” that’s a pitfall. You haven’t built the skill yet, you haven’t built the career capital. On the other hand, something you see just as commonly, is people who build up a lot of really rare skills or invaluable skills but they never step back and use it as leverage. We have how many sort of miserable workaholic lawyers you know for example who are actually incredibly valuable to the world and to the job market place. They have this very valuable skills they built up, but they never stepped back and used them as leverage. They’re good without actually using that to build a good job.

So I think what’s hard about it is avoiding both pitfalls. It’s first of all making sure you have enough skill to actually have real leverage before making the big changes. But then two, when you get there, having the courage to actually pull the trigger on that and use the skills and take them out for a spin and so if you can navigate both those pitfalls then I think you have a pretty consistent path to passion.

[0:11:41.2] MB: So for somebody who is listening now that feels stuck in a job that they kind of feel like they’re not passionate about, your advice would be focus first on developing a truly valuable skill set before you think about kind of getting to the next step of building the pillars of what actually, create a passion and career?

[0:11:58.1] CN: Yeah, that’s right. There are two things you have to have, you have the career capital, which is again my metaphor for these rare and valuable skills; the more skills you have, the more career capital you have. You have to make good investments on the capital once you have it. Those are the two questions you have to ask if you're unhappy in a position, “What are my career capital stores look like and am I ready to be making investments?”

If you have good career capital, you need to start thinking about investments, which is, “How do I use my skills as leverage to change my situation in the way that resonates?” If you don’t have good career capital skill stores, the question is, “What can I do to build those up as quickly as possible?” Now of course, I’ll give you the caveat; it’s not the case that every person can be passionate in every job, but I think the threshold is much lower than we like to think. We like to think right now in our current culture conversation that there’s one job in which you can be passionate. That’s what I think is nonsense. 

I think for most people, there’s many different paths in which if they build and invest career capital, they could be very passionate. That being said, there’s obviously some that aren’t going to be, right? If there’s a job where you hate the people, you’re not going to be able to go passion in that no matter how much per capital you get. If there’s a job that is doing something that is actively against your values. You’re not going to be happy in that no matter how much career capital you have. 

If you have a job in an industry that is not going to allow you to invest career capital, they say, “I don’t care how good you get, this is the path you have to follow and you have no flexibility. There is no investment that you can make in your skills to change things.” You’re probably not going to be able to build passion in it. So not every job is going to be a source of passion but many jobs will. 

So you first kind of want to do this filtering, “Hey, is this a position where if I got really good and use that skill as leverage, I could see a lot of opportunities for me to build compelling paths?” If the answer is yes, that’s good enough. Now you can buckle down and execute this strategy, which is assess your career capital stores, get them large and then start making investments.

[0:13:45.3] MB: So we’ve talked a lot about building skills and developing career capital, I’d love to transition into talking about a skill that you’ve written extensively about, which is deep work. I’d love to kind of begin with how do you define deep work?

[0:13:57.9] CN: Deep work, which is a concept that came in part out of this conversation we just had, sort of a reaction to people asking, “How do I build up career capital really fast?” It is a very specific activity, which is when you’re focusing without distraction for a long period of time on a cognitively demanding task. So you’re giving something hard, your full, completely unbroken mental attention. If you’re doing that, you are executing deep work.

[0:14:23.0] MB: You write about the idea that deep work is both rare and valuable, tell us a little bit about that?

[0:14:27.6] CN: What’s interesting about this activity of deep work in our current moment is that, I think there’s a strong argument to be made that is becoming increasingly valuable in our economy. That is, the better you are at performing deep work, the more intense levels of concentration you can obtain, the more time you’re able to spend in these states of concentration, the more valuable you’re going to be to the economy, especially in the knowledge sector.

The term the economists used was “deep work is like the killer app for the knowledge economy”. At the same time, it’s becoming more rare. People are becoming worse at performing deep work. People’s ability to concentrate is diminishing, people’s tolerance or scheduling ability to actually have long bits of unbroken time is also rapidly going away. So we have an economic mismatch. 

A skill that is becoming more valuable at exactly the same time that it’s actually becoming more rare, which any economist will tell you, means that it’s going to be really, really valued in the marketplace. So I see it as an opportunity that if you’re one of the few to systematically cultivate your ability to do deep work, you’re going to have huge value in the marketplace just like if you’re back in the early 1980’s and getting out ahead of I’m going to really learn computer programming and advanced level.

You’d have a lot of value in the marketplace. You’d be out in front of a trend. I think deep work is that sort of killer app of our current moment. That those who systematically train that skill can take advantage of that economic mismatch and find themselves with a whole bunch of career capital in the marketplace.

[0:15:50.5] MB: So, the implications of this are that for the fact that it’s both increasingly rare and increasingly valuable, it’s something that’s going to become really in demand and people who focus on kind of developing this ability to focus on deep work are going to be rewarded substantially?

[0:16:07.4] CN: Yeah, I believe that to be true. 

[0:16:08.8] MB: So for a listener who kind of thinks about this and says, “Oh, you know, he’s kind of a luddite, he doesn’t really get the importance of social media and staying connected and being plugged in to everything,” how would you respond to somebody like that?

[0:16:20.5] CN: The marketplace is pretty simple. It rewards things that are rare and valuable. If you can do something that people value and not a lot of people can do it, it will reward you. If you can’t, it won’t. There really is no shortcut around it. There really is no way to take something that’s kind of fun and easily replicatable and if you just do a lot of it that it’s going to somehow make you very valuable to the marketplace. 

This, for example, is my issue with social media as being seen as some sort of key to your career. Being on social media, doing hash tags, retweeting things, putting things on the Facebook wall is fundamentally and easily replicatable, low value activity. There is no hard earned skill involved in doing that and you can wave around a lot of terms like network effect and connectivity and serendipity and connection and opportunity.

But it doesn’t change the underlying fact that it’s just an easily replicatable, low value activity and that cannot be the foundation of the marketplace really rewarding you. My observation, especially when I was researching So Good They Can’t Ignore You, I was going out there in all sorts of different industries, all sorts of different fields, to find people who were very passionate about their work who were at the top of their game is that the way they got there is that they built up, systematically and deliberately, a craft or a skill that was very valuable.

As they built up the skill, there is plenty of opportunities, a lot of interesting things happened in their life, they were connected to interesting people, a lot of things came across to trans them. That was not the issue. The hard part was building up the skill and if being on social media is getting in the way of doing that, you have the equation entirely backwards.

Rare and valuable skills is what’s rewarded. Building a craft, applying a craft, that’s what the market wants to see. that’s the foundation of a life of passion and meaning and satisfaction and anything else, it could be fun, it could be diverting, but it’s not going to be at the core of that success.

[0:18:02.9] MB: I’d love to dig into some of the data about why deep work is so valuable.

[0:18:08.2] CN: There’s really two big reasons why deep work has this growing value, the first reason has to do with learning complicated things. So in order to learn something that’s new or complicated, you have to enter a state of deliberate practice. A state in which you’re giving intense concentration to the task at hand because we now know from decades of psychology research that to learn something new, you essentially have to stretch your comfort level with that information just like you would have to stretch your muscle past where it’s comfortable to actually get muscle growth.

That’s a state of deep work. So the better you are at concentrating intensely and maintaining intense concentration, the easier it will be for you to master cognitively demanded or complicated to do things. Now, the ability to quickly adapt and learn complicated new things is crucial in the increasingly competitive knowledge economy. If you can’t keep up with the new systems and ideas, you're going to fall behind. So that’s one where deep work is really becoming more valuable. 

The other is, it helps you produce higher quality work in less time. The amount you produce per hour spent in deep work and the quality of what you produce can be significantly more than if you’re working in a more fragmented state or a state with lots of just checks of inboxes and phones. So if you’re very comfortable concentrating intensely on something, giving something your full or cognitive attention for long periods of time with no distraction, you can produce at an elite level. 

This too is becoming very valuable in the increasingly competitive knowledge economy because if you’re not producing at an elite level and whatever field you happen to be in, you’re going to be at increased danger of being automated, outsourced, or replaced. So deep work is like this meta skill. The meta skill that fuels the more concrete skills that are necessary to stay on the right part of the sort of growing my modal divide in our increasingly competitive knowledge economy, if you want to be on the winning side of this increasing divide, you’ve got to be able to pick up parts quickly, you’ve got to be able to produce an elite level. The better you are deep worked, the more you prioritize it, the better you're going to be at those two things, which we know are going to be crucial to staying ahead.
 
[0:19:58.5] MB: So the idea that you can produce higher quality work in less time, is deep work the kind of thing that you need to be working for 12, 15 hours a day, totally concentrated? Or can it work in shorter bursts?

[0:20:10.6] CN: 90 minutes is about the lower limit where you’re going to start to get a lot of use out of deep work. The reason is that what deep work helps combat is an effect called attention residue, which says when you shift your attention to another target and then back to your original piece of focus, that new target can leave a residue in your head that actually reduces your cognitive performance for a non-trivial amount of time before it clears out.

This is especially true for sort of open loop style targets. So if you shift real quickly and see an email in your email inbox or you know you need to answer and it’s semi-urgent but you don’t want to answer it right now and then you shift back to the hard thing you're trying to do, that’s going to be a sort of a very strong layer of attention residue which is going to, we now know from studies, is going to really significantly decrease your cognitive performance. Your brain is going to be operating at a lower level. You’ll produce less and it’s going to take you longer to produce things and this can take a while to clear out. 

So if you aside 90 minutes for deep work, for example, you might spend the first 20 or 30 kind of clearing out every last vestige of that attention residue and then the next 60 minutes you’re really operating at a high level and actually getting some things done. That attention residue effect, however, is also why deep work requires by definition zero distraction. A glance to an inbox, a glance at a social media feed invalidates that period of work is being deep work, it’s no longer deep work and the reason is, as we know, those quick glances can have an impact for 15, 20 minutes. 

So if you’re glancing like most knowledge workers do, you say, “No, I’m single tasking. I’m just trying to write this thing, I’m giving it my full attention and I’m only just glancing at my inbox every 10 minutes just to make sure nothing important is in there or just glancing at Twitter just to give my brain a little bit of a break,” You’re essentially keeping yourself in a sustained state of reduced cognitive performance. 

It’s like taking an antineurotropic. A drug that’s optimized to make your mind worse or perform at a lower level. So that does it all to keep work, you're not going to get the benefits of high level production. For those reasons, you need at least 90 minutes to do deep work but certainly 15 hours. You absolutely have to be completely distraction free for a period of time to actually count this step and get the true benefits of that.

[0:22:12.0] MB: Personally, how much time do you schedule either sort of daily or weekly for deep work and how do you escape all of the kind of the myriad of distractions, everything from phone notifications, to emails, to colleagues coming down the hallway and asking you a question?

[0:22:27.5] CN: I spend two and a half to three days in a five day work week doing deep work on a typical week. The way I make that happen is I actually schedule my deep work on my calendar about one month in advance. So it’s on their far enough in advance, that time will be protected before people start asking, “Hey, can you do a meeting, can you jump on a call, can you do an interview?” So I know that time is protected but before people are going to start requesting for that time. 

I used to just try to schedule it the week of, but the problem is, by the time you actually got to the week, you would have agreed to a lot of things, each of which is reasonable by itself but spread out enough that you have no unfragmented pieces left in your schedule. So I like to do at least one or two full deep work days where it’s essentially that’s all I’m doing and maybe get another half day of deep work in there as well.

When I’m doing deep work, I’m doing deep work. If someone tries to contact me, they don’t get through to me until I’m done with the deep work and if someone’s like, “Hey, I couldn’t get through to you.” It’s like, “Yeah, I was in a thing and now I’m not. Now I can get back in touch with you.” That’s okay. It could be annoying for some people who are used to working in this sort of reactive way where everyone’s available all the time and you can have these back and forth conversations, too bad.

I guess if that’s your work flow that you require this sort of ad hoc, on demand communication with everyone you work with, you’re not going to work well with me. That’s how I do it. I protect it very seriously. I see it at the core of succeeding on what I do and it makes other things clear. How do I schedule meetings, how do I schedule this other things? Well, if today is not set aside for deep work then it’s fair game for that. So I have plenty of time still available for meetings or for interviews like we’re doing right now or for calls or coffee. I’m not cut off from the world, but it’s a clear division for me. This is when I’m doing deep work, this day is open game for other types of things.

[0:24:06.1] MB: I’d love to look at some sort of successful people who have used deep work and some examples that you talk about in the book of kind of people who leveraged deep work to produce incredible outcomes. Are there any particular stories from the book that jump out at you as kind of some of your favorites?

[0:24:20.6] CN: Well one of my favorites, because it’s kind of close to what I do, is the work habits of the professor and author Adam Grant. He’s a business professor at Wharton but your audience probably knows him from his more popular books like Give and Take and Originals is his current book. The thing about Adam is, in addition to being a very successful and bestselling writer, he’s also a very successful academic.

He became a full professor at a very young age and was the youngest full professor at Wharton and one of the youngest full professors in the history of Wharton. If you wonder how did he do this, how did he become the youngest full professor at the best business school in the country, l at the same time he’s also this bestselling writer? It turns out if you ask him that deep work is at the core of his strategy that he leverages deep work and by doing so is able to produce a lot more than his peers. In particular what he does is at the high granularity level, that’s sort of the high level, he puts all of his courses into one semester. 

So instead of teaching some in the fall and some in the spring, he puts all of his courses typically in the fall. When he’s in the fall, he says, “I’m teaching, I’m there, my door is open, I’m focusing on my classes, my students can come in.” He’s won best teacher award at least once at Wharton, which is very hard to do so it works fine. Then that means the spring and summer that follows can be dedicated much more purely to working on his research, which is the key obviously to success at a school like Wharton.

Within those research periods, what he then does is he’ll put aside periods of time that will be multi days in length where he’ll go deep with zero distraction on whatever the cognitive task is required to make progress on his current research projects. So, “I’m going to go deep, I’m going to figure out this data or I’m just going to write the whole paper. One, two, three, maybe four days in a row.”

During those periods, he puts an out of office responder on his email so that his colleagues will see it as if he’s overseas. “Look, I’m out of office until Thursday, I’ll get back to you then.” So he’s completely unreachable and he just goes deep when he’s working on his research. Now if you actually count up the total number of hours that Adam Grant spends in those sessions working on research, I don’t think it would be more than what sort of his average peer spends on research year round at a competitive or comparable elite business institution. Yet, if you look at Adam Grant’s CV, he’s publishing almost the factor of two more peer view journal articles in the typical professor at a typical elite business university. This is how he became a full professor at such a young age. 

So what’s happening is, because he’s prioritizing deep work, long sessions of completely undistracted time, he is producing more quality and more output per hour spent working? In the same number of hours that one of his peers works, he is producing almost twice as many papers and because he’s focusing on deep work, he wants to concentrate intensely, he protects his ability to concentrate, he does it for long periods of time. He’s getting a lot more out of his time.

[0:27:02.3] MB: The kind of opposite of deep work, you talk about the concept of shallow work. How would you define that?

[0:27:07.8] CN: I just define shallow work to be anything that’s not deep work. So if it doesn’t match the definition of deep work, it is shallow work. There is nothing intrinsically bad with shallow work and obviously almost every job requires different degrees of shallow work just for your position to operate. You don’t do shallow work, you’re going to lose your job. But I think it’s important to make a distinction between deep work and shallow work because they’re not the same thing.
So it’s not just enough to say, “I’m busy. I’m working all the time.” The real question is how much your work is keep work versus shallow work because the right way to look at it is if you work for someone else, shallow work is what’s going to keep you from getting fired, deep work is what’s going to get you promoted. So if you’re busy, that means nothing if what you’re mainly doing is shallow work because you’re actually not doing a type of stuff that’s going to get you ahead. 

If you run your own business, it’s the same sort of idea. Shallow work might be what keeps you from going bankrupt in the next few months, but deep work is what’s going to 10X your revenue over the next year. So the distinction is important not because shallow is pejorative or shallow work is bad, but it’s because you have to treat both type of efforts differently and recognize that shallow work might be necessary but deep work is the whole ball game in terms of moving ahead.

It’s where you master new skills, it’s where you produce those skills in elite level to produce things that are valuable. The stuff that gets you noticed, the stuff that gets you promoted, the stuff that gets your company to grow. So the question is not how busy you are, how much work you're doing. The question is, how much deep work are you able to do in your typical week, because that’s really what’s going to move the needle.

[0:28:29.3] MB: In many ways, that seems very aligned to me, of kind of the concept of urgency versus importance and the idea of that in many cases the kind of not urgent but important items are often the biggest, most high leveraged items that can have the most substantial impact on your life and in your career.

[0:28:46.2] CN: Yeah, it’s the same type of idea that’s come up before. This is actually just getting more specific about what the actual work activities feel like. For an artist, this is obvious. An artist knows the time he or she spends at the canvas is the time that matters, right? Producing art, trying to produce better art, that creative struggle is everything in terms of the artists success. And the other stuff, like doing their taxes or sitting with the catalogs and order new paints and canvass, it’s obviously something, though a necessary evil, is something that they know clearly, “This not helping my career. If I spent all day doing my taxes and ordering new paints and easels I’m not going to get anywhere.”

The reality in the competitive knowledge economy is essentially everyone’s an artist and so you really have to worry how much time am I actually spending struggling with a blank canvass and how much time I’m spending in doing my taxes and ordering the paints? And I think for a huge segment of the knowledge economy, people are spending all of their time on a proverbial taxes and paint ordering side of things. 

Email, meetings, PowerPoint, social media post, engaging with people in social media, that’s all the equivalent of the artist doing their taxes and ordering new paints and brushes. You’ve got to do it at some, but it’s the time that you spend at the canvass the only time that’s actually going to help you produce value, succeed, to grow, to make money, all the stuff that you actually care about. 

[0:29:59.9] MB: And I think you use a phrase in the book where you talk about the comfort of the artificial busyness of shallow work of sitting in your inbox and firing off emails. When in reality, that’s not really creating a lot of value. 

[0:30:11.6] CN: Yeah, it’s not rare and valuable. Anyone can CC an email, anyone can reply to an email, everyone does it. There is over a trillion sent each year. There’s no way that sending emails is going to ultimately lead you to more value or producing more advancements in your career or in your company’s growth. It’s producing things that are valuable require a sort of sustained, intense concentration and the knowledge economy, your brain is the tool you have.  

So using that at a high level is absolutely the biggest return activity you can do and I think our cultural conversation has veered away from this too much and we really love secondary benefits. “Well but if I connect with this person on Facebook and then it could turn out down the road that they become a client and that client becomes a big source of revenue,” and then from that observation suddenly you are spending 99% of your time on Facebook connecting to people, doing things on Facebook and not actually producing things of value. 

I think that focus on secondary benefits is a real issue because their value is being way over emphasized and it way under emphasizes the value of actually producing stuff that requires skill and that pushed your brain to it’s limit. That’s 90% of the whole thing. That’s the whole ballgame in some sense. There’s no amount of seeking out the secondary effects of connectivity and networking and communication and opportunities and all these sort of things. None of that is going to even hold a candle to the value that is produced by doing things that are rare and valuable. Honing your skill, applying your skill that produce things that are valuable. 

So I think we’re in this moment right now where inspired by advances and network technology that we’ve adopted a lot of that terminology in the business world and we are focusing way too much attention on the importance of connections and serendipity and out there selling your services and letting people know what you are and not nearly enough attention on the thing that we’ve known for millennial of skilled labor, like the core to success and satisfaction, which is actually honing the skill and applying it to the produce things that people care about. No amount of social media posting in the world can compensate for “I don’t really have something to offer that is all that rare in value”. 

[0:32:09.1] MB: For somebody who’s listening that is caught up in the world of shallow work and busyness, is it possible for them to train themselves to transition to a world of deep work? 

[0:32:21.3] CN: It is possible and I think the keyword is “train”, because this is something that people often get wrong. People often think about deep work as a habit like flossing their teeth. Something they know how to do is they need to make more time to do it. They’re like, “I should probably turn off my devices more. Do some detoxing, spend more time doing deep work.” The reality is that deep work is a skill much more like playing the guitar. It’s something that gets better with practice, and if you haven’t been practicing it pretty seriously you’re not going to be very good at it. 

So if you take the average American knowledge worker who spends very little time in a state of intense concentration and you whisk them away and you put them in a Faraday cage in a cave somewhere where no electronic signal can possibly penetrate it and you give them, “Here, you’re going to do this one hard thing and you have no possibility of distraction. You’re going to be here all day.” They would probably struggle and probably not produce much because they haven’t actually developed their ability to do deep work. Just like if you took someone off the street and put them on stage with a guitar and said, “Okay play a concert,” they would struggle to do that too because they haven’t practiced the guitar yet. They don’t have any skill at it. 

That distinction is important to make because a lot of people who don’t recognize that dabble with deep work and then it doesn’t go well. It’s uncomfortable. They don’t like it, their attention is fragmented and they say, “I must not be a deep work person,” and they give up on it all together. But if you recognize that it’s a skill that you have to train, then you say, “Well yeah, of course this is uncomfortable and didn’t go well, I’m new to it. How do I get better?” So a long preface to my answer, but you’re asking the right question when you say, “How do you transition or train into deep work?”

And I can tell you the very high level there’s two things involved. One is the active efforts you can do to actively stretch your ability to concentrate. So there’s actual activities you can do such as Pomodoros focused on intense focus. You start at a small amount of time and gradually move them up productive meditation or you go on walks and try to hold a single problem in your head and make progress on it and so on. 

There’s also passive things you have to do, which is changes you make to your lifestyle the sort of set the foundation where it’s possible for you to develop a deep focus ability. So just like if you wanted to be a professional athlete, let’s say you want to be a professional triathlete, there’d be active things you do. Particular training runs, training rides, training swims you do to increase your athletic ability. But there would also be changes you did to your lifestyle so that you would be more generally fit. You would eat well, you would get a lot of sleep, you won’t smoke, for example. 

The same split holds we’re getting better at deep work. The active stuff is important but so is the passive stuff and to me that means restructuring your lifestyle in particular so that you don’t live in this constant exposure to novel stimuli. You have to structure your lifestyle such that you’re bored more often and that you break the cycle of addiction that at the slightest hint of boredom you whip out a phone or a computer screen to get yourself bathed in some sort of quick novel stimuli so you’re not bored for a moment. 

If you do that, if you’re bathing yourselves in this distractions, your keeping these addictions going. It’s like drinking milkshakes or smoking if you’re the professional athlete. It’s the things that you are doing outside of work are making it much harder to succeed with the sort of active things you’re trying to do inside work. So you’ve got to train your ability to do deep work. It’s going to require active activities to stretch your ability but it’s also going to require passive activities, changes to your lifestyle that set the foundation for it to be possible for you to use your brain at a high level. 

[0:35:26.9] MB: What are a few of those active activities? I know you mentioned Pomodoro, what are some of the things for somebody who’s listening that wants to start training their concentration? 

[0:35:35.9] CN: Yeah, so a couple of things I would suggest. One, start scheduling some times on your calendar for doing this deep work training. Don’t just count on the time being right, don’t just count on being, “Hey, I think I don’t have too much to do and I’m in the mood to concentrate.” Don’t count on that. Schedule it in your calendar. At first it doesn’t have to be much. Do two or three hours a week, one or two sessions, put on your calendar, treat it like a meeting or appointment. 

So if someone tries to schedule something during that time, treat it like you have a doctor’s appointment, “Oh, I have a thing from one to 3:30, but we could do it after that or before it.” People already understand the semantics of appointments and schedules and they’ll respect that. Two, during those times you can do a variety of different exercises. The Pomodoro thing is important. The key thing there is increasing the amount of time and during the Pomodoro itself, giving as intense concentration as you can on what you’re doing. 

A key caveat is that even a slightest glance of at inbox means that Pomodoro doesn’t count. That was a failed deep work session and so what you want to see is that you’re having consistent success with a given timeframe. That you are able to do Pomodoros of that duration that are non-failed with no glancing at distraction and which you also kept your concentration high. Once you are regularly succeeding at a given time interval, then add 10 or 15 minutes to it. 

So you might want to start with 20 minutes. If you’re new to it, it might take you a couple of weeks to get comfortable with that and then you go to 30, then you go to 45 and so on. Productive meditation I mentioned, that’s about you go for a walk and you try to hold a single professional challenge in your brain and make progress on it, just in your head. The meditation pieces are referenced to mindfulness meditation, which says if you notice your attention wondering off the problem you are trying to solve, which it will do, you just notice it and bring it back. Notice it and bring it back. It’s pull ups for your brain. Do it for three weeks, you will be surprised by how much more steadier you are able to keep your concentration. 

The final thing I will mention is essentially any activity, whether it’s professional or not, that requires sustained concentration and that you get immediate negative feedback if you are concentration slips, is also like calisthenics for your brain. So playing a musical instrument, playing a skilled sport, playing a skilled board game or card game, anything where you have to really concentrate and if you let your attention slip, you’re going to miss your chord on the guitar or miss the pass in the touch football game, or make a bad bet in the poker game, that’s also training. 

You are training, you are giving your mind practice with focus on something hard, and if you slip your concentration at all, you are going to know about it. So those are three examples of many that I think could actually just like pushups, like pull ups, like going for sprints but for your brain you can see pretty quick improvements to your abilities to sustain concentration. 

[0:38:11.3] MB: So potentially something like a video game could actually be a tool that could help you maintain concentration if it really draws you in and creates a lot of focus? 

[0:38:20.1] CN: Yeah, even a video game could be, right? If it was a cognitively demanding game and you get clear feedback, which you often you do in these games, right? If your attention slips bad things happen. You get killed or your ship crashes or — you can tell I don’t play video games but absolutely. So all of those things can help you actually train your ability to concentrate. 

[0:38:36.5] MB: You touched on the idea of cultivating or embracing boredom. I love to dig into that a little bit more. 

[0:38:40.5] CN: Yeah, so this comes back to this general cognitive fitness idea that you have to set the general background capability for your brain to succeed and perform at a high level and to me, embracing boredom is the cognitive equivalent of living a generally healthy lifestyle in the world of sports and what I mean by embracing boredom is that you need on a regular basis every single day occasions where you’re bored, you would like to see other stimuli and you don’t. So you don’t look at your phone, you don't look at the computer screen you just keep doing what you’re doing and you’re bored. 

Why this is important is that if you don’t do this, your brain will build up this addiction in which it demands and expects stimuli at the slightest hint of boredom. The reason I care about that is because deep work is boring. At least in the technical definition of the term of being an absence of novel stimuli, if you’re focusing on one thing for a long period of time, it’s not novel after the first 15 to 20 minutes. 

So if your brain has learned, it gets a shiny treat when it gets bored when the stimuli gets boring, it’s not going to tolerate deep work. It’s not going to keep its focus on something. It’s just going to refuse. It’s just going to say, “Well, wait a second, we get a cigarette every 15 minutes. Where’s my cigarette? No, I am not going to concentrate on this, give me my tweet or internet break,” and so you have to break that addiction. 

You have to break that addiction if you’re going to succeed with using your brain at the elite level and the best way to do it to give yourself plenty of opportunities to be bored during the day, then your brain loses this association that it always gets stimuli. So it doesn’t necessarily mean that you get rid of your technology. What it means it that your technology no longer gets to be ubiquitous in your life. If, for example, you really like Facebook then great but say when are you going to use Facebook. 

“I really like it and tonight at seven I’m going to go on it and I’m going to check out on what’s going on, I’m going to check up on people, check in on my groups but until I get there, I don’t check it.” If you really like Twitter say, “Okay I’m going to put aside some time in the day to go through my Twitter feed and see what’s going on and check in with people and tweet some stuff,” that’s fine but it is not a background ubiquitous activity. 

If you like web surfing or MLB Trade room or some type of thing that keeps people like me occupied these days, that’s fine but there’s a particular time in which you do it. So it’s not necessarily embracing boredom about rejecting technology but about rejecting the premise that it gets to be ubiquitous presence in your life and say, “I will decide when I’m going to use technology just like I don’t keep a TV with me at all times during the day and turn it on at the slightest hint of boredom. It’s a completely reasonable thing to do and it has very positive consequences. 

[0:41:00.5] MB: Yeah, I think that is something so important and it’s so easy to get trapped in a mental addiction of, “Oh I need to look at my phone. I need to click the newest thing on Reddit. I need to see who’s messaging me.” It’s so easy to, you know, your brain really develops an addiction to these new shiny objects and I think taking a detox from that is something that would benefit everybody. 

[0:41:21.2] CN: Yeah and the key thing here is it’s not about occasionally taking a break from it. In fact I switched the script there. Because imagine we’re talking about losing weight and imagine I said, “Okay, here’s the key. The reason you’re gaining weight is because you are eating all this terrible food and you are not exercising enough. So here’s my plan, you’re going to take one day a week and on that day, you’re going to eat healthy and you’re going to exercise.” 

People say, “Okay, I’m still going to gain weight,” right? It’s like six days out of seven I’m eating crappily and not exercising. It’s the same thing with the addiction of the stimuli. If you say, “Well, every once in a while I want to put away my technology. I’ll take the Sabbath, on Saturday and not use my technology.” That’s not going to cure the problem. You have to flip it and you have to say, “I’m occasionally take breaks from not having all of these stimuli to expose myself to it.” 

So I don’t like the detox term or the digital Sabbath term because it means your standard state is exposing yourself to these addictive stimuli and then you occasionally take a break. That’s not going to change digital addiction any more than taking one day a week to eat healthily is going to change weight gain. It really needs to be your default state is one in which you are not exposing yourself to the stimuli and then like sweets or drinking whisky or something like that, it’s a scheduled activity you do occasionally. It’s the thing that you occasionally do not the thing you occasionally take a break from. 

[0:42:32.0] MB: Putting in that context makes it so clear that it’s so easy to delude ourselves and think it’s okay to constantly be in these mental addiction loops. But when you put it in the context of food and dieting, it becomes fairly obvious that it really is a transition that almost everybody listening would benefit from making. 

[0:42:49.6] CN: Yeah and once you see it that way, I think it becomes a lot more clear but it’s very hard to see these things when they’re new and I think this is the issue. The addiction is strong and I’ve noticed this, it’s the same thing you see when people have addictions in other parts of their lives when you start to push back on it, you sometimes get defensiveness and “it’s not about this, it’s about that” and it’s exactly the reaction I often get when I’ll say like I did recently in the New York Times column, “Hey, I don’t think social media is helping your career as much as you think it is. More people should quit.” 

A lot of people got upset and it reminded me a lot about, you are telling the smoker, “I don’t know if you should be really smoking the cigarettes.” They’re like, “Ah, it’s about this and that and liberty and freedom,” and really it’s “don’t take away my cigarettes”. The same thing happened when I said, “I haven’t seen a lot of evidence that this is helping people’s careers as much as they say it is, and I know the distraction is hurting it, so I really think a lot more people should quit.” 

I got a lot of pushback but very little of the pushback was, “Let me tell you particularly where you’re wrong. Here are the ways in which this is massively helping my career and massively helping other people’s careers.” It was more just sort of “You don’t understand social media and it’s the future and you’ll never know and people are on it and I know this guy who got a book deal,” and it was this frenzy of anger and response. That’s typical with an addiction. I think we should be more scared of this stuff than we are. We’re not going to leave technology behind. I’m a computer scientist for god sakes, but I think we can absolutely say, “I get to determine how I use it and not the other way around”. 

[0:44:07.5] MB: The crux of this argument in many ways is that we’re going through sort of economic transition and a technical transition and we’re still learning how to adapt to it. What groups do you think will be the biggest beneficiaries from this transition and the rising importance of deep work? 

[0:44:26.6] CN: Well certainly people who have embraced deep work is going to be the group that benefits. Now are you asking for where we are going to see like what types of groups are we going to see that split the deepers and non deep happens sort of more pronounced or first? 

[0:44:39.5] MB: Yeah, for sure. 

[0:44:40.6] CN: Yeah, well I don’t know for sure. It’s very hard to predict economic trends but there’s a couple of places where we are going to see this divide happen quickly and I think one of those is going to be in the world of computer programming and software development. Right now, there is not a major emphasis on protecting and cultivating people’s ability to do deep work, especially computer programmers, which are essentially brains your hiring to do this highly skilled thing at the highest possible level they can do it. 

My prediction is we’re going to see a split in the next 10 years or so where there’s going to be a leading edge of companies that really aggressively start to prioritize deep work. Forget open offices and we’re starting to see now. Like Fog Creek Software is really good about this. They build these individual offices that are optimized to increase your ability to concentrate but I think we’re going to see more companies like that. 

And maybe some of the big Silicon Valley companies will make the first shift where they’ll say, “Forget open offices, it’s going to be incredibly quiet private offices, and you know what? Maybe our programmer shouldn’t have email addresses. We can hire someone for your team to handle all incoming messages and they can tell you once a day what you need to know. I don’t want that distraction and forget Slack. I certainly don’t want my programmer with a Slack thing going, right? 

That’s like buying a piece of expensive factory equipment and running it at 10% of it’s capacity because it makes your life a little easier. And a couple of companies I think in that place first are going to make the shift first because you really see, in computer programming in particular, giant differences in ROI depending on how skilled the output is. Really great code is really much better than okay code in terms of the value of the software. That’s where I think we’re going to see this split first. There will be some small companies and followed by a couple of big companies that really push towards more of a deep work-centric approach. 

Suddenly, they’re going to have a much easier time hiring people. They’re going to become much more productive. They’re going to produce more innovative software. They’re going to do so in smaller teams and then there’s going to be this tipping point where 10 years after that, everyone in that industry is going to be better. So that’s the bell weather I am looking through right now is where we’re first going to see some people get huge advantages by embracing these ideas. 

[0:46:36.8] MB: What roles or positions do you think might kind of be the exception to deep work hypothesis? 

[0:46:42.6] CN: Basically any role where honing and applying a cognitively demanding craft is not at the core of the value that you offer. So there’s a bunch of different things that fall into this category. There are a lot of, for example, entry level jobs that fall into this category where you are not hired — right out of college we hire you, you’re an assistant for this group or something like that. You are not hired for a hard one skill that they want you to apply to produce craft. You are there to make everyone else’s life easier. 

So that’s a case where long periods of time spent in deep concentration is actually not bringing any value. However, if you are in one of those positions you should be trying to build up rare and valuable skills on your own time so they can move out of that as quickly as possible. I think high level management positions, it’s debatable the value with deep work. I’ve argued, for example, in the book that CEO’s of large companies are better understood as decision engines.

The right way to understand the role of a CEO in a valuable company is that they have a lot of experience so they have a large base of experience but also they have a consistent vision for the company and then other people bring them decisions, should we do this or should we do that? And based on those experience and that consistent vision they make decisions and that’s probably a more effective use of their time than them actually trying to do the deep work behind the decisions by themselves or spend 10 hours thinking deeply on a consistent basis. 

Also of course, I think people that are in primarily communication oriented roles. I mean if you’re in sales, you’re schedule is going to be fragmented in the sense that it actually calls and touches and contacts the core. Now you can do that deeply in the sense of, “I want to do this as well as possible and really study up on sale success,” but you’re not going to have long periods of unbroken time. There’s other areas as well. There’s a lot of people who do social media professionally. 

All they do all day is social media on behalf of brands. I mean obviously it’s a position in which you’re best serving people by actually just being on social media communicating with people to go on these tools. So there’s certainly jobs where deep work doesn’t help but I think it’s much more rare than people imagine and essentially, the key question is, is the biggest value you can offer to yourself or your organization you applying a hard one craft that produce things that are rare and valuable? If the answer is yes then the more deep work you do, the better. 

[0:48:52.0] MB: What’s one piece of homework that you would give our listeners to implement some of the ideas we’ve talked about today? 

[0:48:57.1] CN: I always tell people to do two things. The first is to drop on your calendar for the next few weeks, those deep work blocks I talked about. Make it like a doctor’s appointment, protect them and just get some practice, two to three hours a week doing deep work. Two, make some passive lifestyle changes and I think one of the most important easiest changes you can make is start scheduling the time that you’re going to spend receiving entertainment or distraction from the internet. 

Maybe at first you are scheduling a lot of time for that, fine. But have some autonomy over it and start scheduling when you’re going to look at social media, when you’re going to look at the internet, when you’re going to stream entertainment and start to gain some control about when you do that, when you don’t. So make that lifestyle change, drop two to three to four hours of deep work into your weekly schedule in your calendar. 

Do that for a month, I think you will lay a good preliminary foundation from which first of all to judge whether you really do want to get serious about deep work and two, you are well suited to actually act on that decision if you decide yes. 

[0:49:50.9] MB: And where can people find you and your books online? 

[0:49:54.5] CN: So I have a website, calnewport.com and you can find about the books there. Also I blog on there about a lot of these ideas. So if you want to explore some of these ideas, you can there. The books themselves are available anywhere books are sold, Amazon, Barnes & Noble, and so on. The one place you won’t find me is on social media because I’ve never had an account. 

[0:50:13.6] MB: Well that makes sense. Well, Cal, thank you so much for coming on here and sharing your wisdom. This was a fascinating conversation and I think listeners who really apply deep work will see huge dividends from focusing on it. 

[0:50:25.7] CN: Well thanks, Matt. I really enjoyed the opportunity to talk about it. 

[0:50:28.3] MB: Thank you so much for listening to the science of success. Listeners like you are why we do this podcast. The emails and stories we receive from listeners around the globe bring us joy and fuel our mission to unleash human potential. I love hearing from listeners. If you want to reach out, share your story or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email is matt@scienceofsuccess.co. I’d love to hear from you and I read and respond to every single listener email. 

The greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend, either live or online. If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please, leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes. That helps more and more people discover the Science of Success. I get a ton is listeners asking, “Matt how do you organize and remember all this information?” Because of that, we created an amazing free guide for all of our listeners. You can get it by texting the word “smarter” to the number 44222. Or by going to scienceofsucess.co and joining our email list. 

If you want to get all of these incredible information, links, transcripts, everything we talked about on this show and much more, you can get all of our show notes at the website, scienceofsuccess.co. Just hit the show notes button at the top. You can also get show notes for all of our previous episodes. If you haven’t been checking that out, there’s a ton of amazing resources on there. I highly recommend getting our show notes and checking them out. 

Thanks again and we’ll see you on the next episode of The Science of Success. 
December 29, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Career Development, Focus & Productivity

The Surprising Truth Research Reveals About What Motivates You with Dr. Dan Ariely

November 17, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity

In this episode we discuss one of the most interesting results ever found in the psychological research of education, why pleasure maximization is a flawed model for human understanding, we go deep into a number of research examples, discuss the massive (and counterintuitive) difference between motivating top performers and bottom performers, and much more with Dr. Dan Ariely!

Dan Ariely is the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at  Duke University and is the founder of The Center for Advanced Hindsight and also the co-founder of BEworks. Dan's talks on TED have been watched over 7.8 million times. He is the author of Predictably Irrational and The Upside of Irrationality, both of which became New York Times best sellers, and he has a newly released book Payoff: The Hidden Logic That Shapes Our Motivations. 

  • How being badly burned and spending 3 years in the hospital radically changed Dr. Dan Ariely's life

  • How good intentions can go terribly wrong in changing behavior

  • The two flawed models of motivation and why neither works

  • I get interviewed by Dr Dan Ariely - he turns the mic on me and starts grilling me!

  • The difference between momentary joy and lasting purpose

  • Why motivation is not about YOU

  • The critical importance of creating, meaning, improvement, and having an impact

  • How money can demotivate and skew your motivation

  • We get into the weeds on some fascinating experiments Dr. Dan Ariely has conducted about how money (doesn’t) motivate us

  • Why bonuses don’t actually work

  • The massive (and counter-intuitive) difference between motivating top performers and bottom performers

  • Why it’s much better to analyze the BARRIERS to good performance and remove them

  • One of the most interesting results ever found in the psychological research of education

  • Why pleasure maximization is a flawed model for human understanding

  • We dig into the the science of motivation itself

  • The difference between social norms and market norms (and why it’s important)

  • Why you would rather move a couch for free, than get paid $5 to do it

  • Ideas for how we can use psychology to change America’s education system

  • Why suicide rate among physicians are climbing rapidly

  • The Crazy Day Care Story (and why its important)

  • How effort and complexity create affinity for things you work on

  • Why Dr. Dan Ariely and I both love legos!

  • We go through half a dozen hilarious and very counter-intuitive findings from Dr. Dan Ariely's research

  • We discuss the quest for symbolic immortality (and why it matters to you)

If you want to deeply understand how motivation really works - listen to this episode!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that). 

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Personal Site] danariely.com

  • [Book] Payoff by Dan Ariely

  • [TEDtalk Profile] Dan Ariely

  • [TEDtalk] Are we in control of our own decisions? by Dan Ariely

  • [Twitter] Dan Ariely

Episode Transcript

[00:00:06.4] ANNOUNCER: Welcome to the Science of Success with your host, Matt Bodnar.

[00:00:12.4] MB: Welcome to The Science of Success. I’m your host, Matt Bodnar. I’m an entrepreneur and investor in Nashville, Tennessee, and I’m obsessed with the mindset of success and the psychology of performance. I’ve read hundreds of books, conducted countless hours of research and study, and I am going to take you on a journey into the human mind and what makes peak performance tick, with the focus on always having our discussion rooted in psychological research and scientific fact, not opinion.

In this episode, we discuss one of the most interesting results ever found in the psychological research of education. Why pleasure maximization is a flawed model for human understanding. We go deep into a number of specific research examples, discuss the massive and counterintuitive difference between motivating top performers and motivating bottom performers, and much more with our incredible special guest, Dr. Dan Ariely. The Science of Success continues to grow with more than 600,000 downloads, listeners in over a hundred countries, hitting number one New and Noteworthy, and more. 

A lot of our listeners are curious about how to organize and remember everything. I get tons of listener emails and comments asking me how to keep track of all the incredible knowledge I get from reading hundreds of books, interviewing amazing guests and experts, and listening to tons of different podcasts. 

Because of that, we’ve created an awesome resource for you. You can get it completely free by texting the word “smarter” to the number 44222. It’s a guide we created called How to Organize and Remember Everything. Again, to get it, just text the word “smarter” to the number 44222, or you can go to scienceofsuccess.co and put in your email. 

In our previous episode, we discussed how our guest went from being wildly unsuccessful, sleeping in a used van, into launching a massive brand. The power of simple gratitude during the  

toughest challenges of our lives. The transformational super powers that can change your life, and the massive perspective shift you can gain from two simple words, with John Jacobs, the founder and chief creative optimist of Life is Good. If you want simple strategies to feel inspired and empowered, listen to that episode.

 [0:02:22.5] MB: Today, we have one of my favorite authors and an incredible psychology thinker on the show. Dr. Dan Ariely. Dan is the James B. Duke Professor of Psychology and Behavioral Economics at Duke University, and is the founder of the Center for Advanced Hindsight, and is also the cofounder of BEworks. Dan’s talks on TED have been watched over 7.8 million times. He’s the author of Predictably Irrational and the Upside of Irrationality, both of which have become New York Times bestsellers. He’s the author of the upcoming book Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes our Motivations. Dan, welcome to the Science of Success.

[0:02:58.6] DA: Lovely to join you.

[0:03:00.3] MB: We’re super excited to have you on here.

[0:03:02.3] DA: With these compliments you gave me in the beginning, I’m more and more excited, and I even though I know you give all your guests great compliments, I believe you, and I like you more now that you’ve given me such nice compliments.

[0:03:15.2] MB: It’s because I’ve read Predictably Irrational.

[0:03:16.6] DA: There you go.

[0:03:17.3] MB: For listeners who may not be familiar, tell us a little bit about your background?

[0:03:22.5] DA: In terms of kind of scientific life, it’s a strange introduction. I was badly burned when I was 18 and I spent- I was burned with about 70% of my body, and I spent about three years in hospital. Life in hospital gave me lots of insights about lots of things about life. I kind of put on to a bed for three years, just kind of observing life but not being part of it, and having 
burns, and scars, and challenges after that.

Beyond kind of just being in the hospital, it made me think about all kinds of aspects of life, and I became interested in experimental science. I became interested in kind of- a questioning and experimenting with our beliefs about all kinds of things in life. About placebos, and about the ways to remove bandages from burn patients, and the question of meaning, and the question of what gets us to continue.

When I started doing experiments, I discovered there’s a way to find out what’s really going on. Most of life, we have intuitions. Especially if you think about the workplace. Most of the things we know are not based on science. It’s very hard to do experiments about what really motivates people, and so because of that, we just function based on our intuitions. We have beliefs about them, but if our intuitions are wrong, maybe we’re setting up wrong incentives for ourselves, for other- we’re setting up wrong environment systems and so on.

I became interested in not just in unnecessary misery in hospital, but all kinds of ways in which we have wrong intuitions about the world. Out of good intentions, we’re actually setting up things in the wrong way, and trying to figure out what actually are the forces that change our behavior, and how can we structure the world in a way that is more compatible with our human nature.

[0:05:14.8] MB: That dovetails really nicely into the next question I had. Tell me a little bit about the complexity of motivation?

[0:05:22.5] DA: We think that people have kind of a pleasure principle, and we think people are just trying to maximize pleasure. That’s kind of one thought, and then we have another thought that says work is all about money, and all we need to do is to reengineer the payment system. It is shocking how much time people spend on trying to figure out exact bonuses, and how to pay people. There is a company in North Carolina recently that I met, that they have a 16-point rating system for employees, and then they give bonuses that are around $3,000 based on this point system. What happened is that somebody that gets 12.25 feels much worse compared to somebody who gets 12.5. The difference in money is very small, but they’re putting so much emphasis on it that people are just really miserable.

The two models people have for human life are trying to maximize pleasure, and then that work is unpleasant. That we don’t like work, and all we’re doing it for the money, but the people who we work for basically are trying to reengineer our lives so that we will work as hard as they want us to work. Like rats in the maze, they put money on our path. We just try to maximize money, and as we try to maximize money, we will do whatever they want us to do. Both of those things are basically wrong.

The first thing about pleasure is- actually, let me ask you. Think about your own life, and think about what are the kind of things that you’re most interested in, or most proud of, or that are representing kind of things that you are- you really want to accomplish. You have some examples?

[0:07:12.0] MB: Me personally?

[0:07:13.1] DA: Yeah.

[0:07:13.5] MB: I mean, we could talk about this podcast as a great example of something that is, for me, very mission driven, and something that I’m really passionate about, and kind of sprung totally by accident, and I’ve really enjoyed doing it.

[0:07:27.6] DA: Okay, let’s take this podcast and you’re saying that you’re enjoying it. Now this joy of doing it, my guess is that there are very few times where you’re doing the podcast and just burst out laughing. If we just thought about pleasure maximizing, you would do things like sitting on the beach, drinking mojitos, or watching some sitcom. That’s how we think about pleasure, getting a massage, or doing something like that.

What you actually choose to do for this podcast is to do things that you wouldn’t describe as pleasure from the outside, right? If an alien came and looked at how you work for this podcast, how you read, how you prepare, try to schedule different people, waking up early, going to sleep late, an alien would not say this is somebody who is just enjoying every moment. 

It’s because the joy that you’re getting is not the momentary joy that you would get from drinking beer or watching a sitcom, it’s a different kind of a joy. It’s a joy, and you mentioned the word 

purpose. It’s a word- it’s a joy that comes from a feeling that you’re doing something useful. This usefulness is really interesting. It’s not about you, it’s about the fact that other people get to listen, and get to think differently, and maybe get to do something differently, and you’re kind of getting a joy by thinking that you’re doing something to help other people do something in a better way.

All of those things don’t fit with the pleasure maximizing rule, because what you’re really maximizing is something very different in life. You’re maximizing a sense of meaning and a sense of control. You’re feeling your creating, you’re feeling you’re probably getting better over time, you’re improving, you’re feeling that you’re having an impact on other people and so on.

That’s the first thing that we need to recognize is that pleasure is a really complex thing. The most extreme example for this is- one of the most extreme examples is mountain climbing. When you read books of people who climb mountains, you would think they describe the thing that they like, but you know what? It’s just shocking. Because all these books describe nothing but pain. It is difficult, and painful, and frostbite, and injuries, and of course it’s a very dangerous sport as well. 

You read those descriptions and you would think, my goodness, these people made a mistake. They will go up to the top of the mountain, and they would recognize that this was a huge mistake with all the pain, and misery, and frostbite, and they will go down and they will say never again. You know what? They go down and then they do it again. Because it’s not just about pleasure as defined by momentary enjoyment, it’s about progress, and conquering, and meaning, and so on. 

That’s the first thing that we don’t understand correctly, what are we trying to maximize. Yes, pleasure and joy are part of the stuff that we try to maximize, but it’s certainly not all of it. Then the second thing is about payment.

People run companies, and they have all kinds of rules about how the divide the money, and how they pay people, and we have, of course, overtime, and we have benefits, and we have all kinds of things like that. People don’t understand how those things work. I’ll give you one example. This is an experiment, we did with a big hotel chain. This was with their call center, okay?

These are people on the phone, they make people call them, they try to settle disagreements, they try to sell people hotel rooms, all kinds of things like that. What’s nice from an experimental perspective is that people in call centers, you can measure what they do, you can measure what the call is about, you can measure how fast they were, you can measure how effective they are, you can measure how productive they are.

We have a measure of productivity, and then they get the bonus of about a third of their salary is based on how good they perform. Okay, that’s the setup. Now, we got data from this company and we looked at the data, and what we found was that it was the same people, basically almost 100%, the same people get the big bonuses every time. 

Matt, think about it for yourself for a second and say okay, if it’s the same people who get the big bonuses every time, why is it? What is causing some people to get bonuses and some not? What will be some hypothesis that you would come up with? Like what could be the cause for this?

[0:11:57.0] MB: It may be incorrect, but maybe the most straight forward hypothesis would be the idea that the best performers are getting the biggest bonuses.

[0:12:04.4] DA: Okay, that’s one theory, right? The good people are getting bonuses, the bad people are not. That’s great. What else could it be?

[0:12:11.8] MB: That the people who have sort of befriended the management the best get the best bonuses?

[0:12:16.8] DA: Okay, some kind of nepotism, yeah, that’s another possibility. You could also think that some people love money and some people don’t, and the people who love money would be more motivated, and people who don’t care so much about money wouldn’t work so much. You could also think that it’s random. That the first time people show up, they either randomly get the bonuses or not, and the people who get the bonuses learn how much- how wonderful they are, and they really want to keep them, so it changes their motivation and people who never get the bonus don’t care and basically never learn how wonderful bonuses are. 

Anyway, there’s lots of different theories that you can explain it. We asked that company for them to give us their data every weekend for us to analyze it, and for us to determine who will get their bonuses using our special algorithms. What kind of algorithms do you think we tried?

[0:13:07.6] MB: I have no idea.

[0:13:09.1] DA: We tried random. Okay now, just to be clear, we didn’t tell people that they were getting paid based on random algorithms, but you see, if you have a particular algorithm to determine bonuses, and you always use that algorithm, you can’t test what will happen if you use the different algorithm. We decide to do it randomly, and then we could compare what happened in all kinds of cases. We ran this experiment for six months, and we got the data every weekend. We calculated random bonuses, people got their bonuses on Monday. They were announced, and we went on for a while. 

We did lots and lots of analysis on this data, but one of the things we looked at was to see, when did the company have a higher return on investment? When they rewarded the top employees, or the bottom employees? What do you think?

[0:14:02.3] MB: I mean, it would seem like maybe rewarding the highest- the top employees would have the best bonus, but perhaps the counterintuitive answer is that rewarding the lowest performers gave the biggest overall boost.

[0:14:13.7] DA: That’s right. You know, given that you’re talking to me, you probably expect that it will be some counterintuitive result, but that’s exactly what we found. We found that the top employees did not change their performance when the bonuses went away, whereas the bottom employees improved their performance. 

Now, what’s happening here? For a bonus to work, you need two things. You need for people to want the bonus, and then you need for them to be able to act on their desire to improve their performance. What happened was at the top employees were kind of already at the top of their game, right? They were just- some people know how to talk on the phone, some people have figured out how to work well, some people, whatever the skills needed, some people just have it. Whether they acquired it or they had it in the beginning, and it doesn’t matter if they get the bonus or not.

I’m a university professor, if you paid me more or less, would I teach differently? I don’t even know, right? If you told me, “There’s a bonus coming up, do something differently.”, what would I do differently? I can drink more coffee, I can try to stay more hours awake, I can try and- but I don’t have a lot of ability to change my teaching. I’m already teaching to the best of my ability, what could I do differently? Whereas the people on the bottom part, they actually had a way to improve their performance, right? Those are people that could learn how to do things differently, they could try harder.

There was all kinds of things that they could- by the way, two things about this. The first thing is just to realize, sometimes when we do field experiments, our recommendations come directly from the field experiments. In this case, we did not recommend to anybody to start paying people randomly. In fact, paying people randomly is incredibly demotivating; it’s a terrible idea. We also didn’t recommend to that company to stop paying the top employees better, because you also want to retain them. 

What we told them is to say look, these top employees are just good solid performers. Bonuses don’t change their behavior. Why don’t you instead give them a promotion, and give them a higher fixed salary. They’ll end up getting the same amount of money, but let’s not call it a bonus. A bonus is something that also increase worry. It’s harder to plan on what you’re going to get. Certainty is lower. Why don’t you just give it to them, because it’s not changing their productivity. Give it to them in a fixed salary, they will be much better for it, and then you can take the bonuses and give it to the other people that actually need it as a role for motivation.

That’s the first thing. The bigger point though, is that when we think about motivation, a lot of people use money as a hammer. It’s a very blunt tool, right? You can always say, “Oh, people don’t perform, let’s just change their bonuses, or give them points, or do something like this”. The problem is it’s very blunt tool, and it’s much better to actually go first and analyze what is the real barrier to good performance.

When you understand what’s the barrier for good performance, then you can think about what to do. I’ll tell you one other story about this. At some point, there was a government of a different country, not of the US, that asked me to come and help them in creating incentives for teachers in schools. The Ministry of Finance in this country had an idea, and their idea was to take the 10% best teachers in every school and give them a bonus.

Take the 10% of best teachers, and forget for a second how you determine it, let’s just assume that there’s a good way to determine it, and the principle will determine it, and those 10% of the people would get a bonus. That was their approach to try and improve the quality of education in the school. When you think about it, at first blush, it sounds reasonable. But then you have to say okay, what is the theory that would suggest that this is a good solution? 

You basically have to say the following, you have to say “Teachers really want money. They’re not doing their best right now, because we’re not paying them enough. They would do their best if we only had the bonus.” That’s kind of assumption number one. Teachers are lazy, and they want money, and we need to put more money in so they would be more interested in working hard. 

Then the second thing you need to say is that all teachers will think that they could get the bonus. Because if only the top 10%, or only the top 20% think they could get the bonus, the rest of the people would not try harder. Everybody needs to believe that they could get the bonus, and not just on year one, but over time. You can ask yourself, how realistic are those assumptions? 

Let me tell you, this is just assumptions, here is something about data. One of the most interesting results ever in education was a result where they showed that one of the best ways to improve performance in schools is to give the top teachers time to teach the not so good teachers. Now think about that. What does that mean in terms of a model for performance? It’s not about not wanting, it’s not about not knowing. That model basically says, you know, some teachers have figured it out and some haven’t. The ones that haven’t figured it out; it’s not because they’re lazy, it’s not because they’re not interested. It’s because it’s very hard to figure out how to teach.

The feedback is random, sarcastic, delayed, we have very different mix of students, it’s hard to learn how to do it well. Let’s take the people who have kind of figured it out, and let them get to help, to help the other kids. By the way, this other country where the Ministry of Finance wants to give the top 10% of the teacher’s bonuses, what would happen if they did that? I don’t think they would improve the quality of education, but the one thing they would do is they would eliminate any interest from the good teachers to help the not so good teachers.

Because now, they would try to basically keep their- it will become a competitive sport, rather than a collaborative endeavor. The point is that when we pay people, it’s not just simple paying, but we need to think more broadly about what is really holding people back. Then we need to think about what’s the right compensation for that. Is it money, is it knowledge, is it a title? Is it the feeling of connection, is it a sense of progress, what is it? 

The science of motivation is actually incredibly interesting, because if you wrote the motivation equation, and you wrote a big M on the left, and you said equal, and then you write money of course is one of the things that motivates people, and maybe happiness. Then there’s a long list of things, and over time, we’re discovering more and more about the pride of creation, and the feeling of progress, and all of those elements that make our life so wonderful.
 
[0:21:21.9] MB: I love that concept, and the idea that it’s much better to sort of analyze and focus on removing the barriers to good performance, as supposed to just adding additional incentives.

[0:21:32.1] DA: Yeah, it’s easier, right? It’s easier to look- I mean, adding performances, adding motivation is good as well, but removing the things that are harming people seem like the first easy step to do.

[0:21:46.3] MB: I think the story of the teachers really drives that point home very concretely.

[0:21:50.5] DA: Yeah. By the way, with the No Child Left Behind, one of the things we found in many experiments that I describe in Predictably Irrational, but also in Payoff, is this thing about social norm and market norms. The finding there was that sometimes we can add money and actually detract from the motivation. One way to think about it is imagine I asked you to do me a favor, asked you to help me change the tire on my car for example.

How likely would you be to do it? Condition and another setup is I ask you to help me change the tire on my car, and I said I’ll pay you $5 for it. What will happen now to your motivation? When we  do experiments like this, we find that motivation actually goes down. When we get people to help us move sofas, or do boring things, or changing tires, we find that people are more willing to do it when we don’t pay them. When we offer a small amount of money, it actually decreases human motivation. The reason it decreases motivation is that when you just help somebody, you say, “I’m a good person.”

When you get $5, you don’t get the I’m a good person in the same way, the I’m the good person feeling goes away. Instead, you get the feeling this is a job, and you say to yourself, “I don’t like working for $5, that’s under valuing my time”. This is what’s called crowding out. Where you can add motivation to the motivation mix, but actually decrease the overall motivation. Sadly, this is one of the things we’ve done in the US with the No Child Left Behind policy.

Again, think about teachers. Teachers join this profession not because they’re trying to maximize their financial wellbeing. If somebody chose that profession to maximize their financial wellbeing, you wouldn’t let them teach your kids, because they clearly can’t calculate anything. They have a sense of mission, and they have a sense of contribution, and all kinds of other things like that. All of the sudden you tell them, by the way, if the kids in your class do very well, we’ll give you $400 additional at the end of the year, and if they don’t do well, we’ll take some things away from the school. All of those things are basically small potatoes, right?

On the individual level, and what happens, all of the sudden teachers are saying, “Really? That’s what I’m worth? This is all that you’re interested in? That’s what we’re all about?” As a consequence, they lose much of their motivation. Another thing, by the way, that happened with the No Child Left Behind policy is the loss of autonomy. 

Imagine a teacher that wants to teach different kids differently. Wants to teach different classes differently, and realizes that maybe this is a better time for math, and maybe we’ll postpone English a little bit, or do something else. Now, rather than having autonomy of what to do, they are kind of in a dictatorial positioning when they tell them exactly what they need to teach every day. They’re becoming automatons who are just kind of executing. How motivating is this? It’s terrible. 

Actually, I’m sorry, this is going to be a really sad episode, but I recently looked a little bit at physicians. You know that every year in the US, we have about 400 physicians who commit suicide? Physicians are reporting that the quality of their life is dramatically decreasing all the time. Why?

Because we take people who are committed to healing, and on one hand we trust them with sharp knives, and cutting our bodies open, but on the other hand, we don’t trust them with not filling paper work correctly, or overcharging us, all kinds of things. We’re drowning them in paper work and bureaucracy. We’re telling them that they can only see patients for 12 minutes, or 15 minutes, and we’re basically making them work like in a factory of patients where they have no judgment. There’s lots of medications that they want to prescribe, but the insurance company is not letting them. Or there are treatments that they wanted to give, but the procedure of doing so and getting permission is too cumbersome.

We’re talking away basically their autonomy, and we’re making them little medical robots, and we say that this is the constraint of your work. The more we constrain teachers, and doctors, and so on, the less joy they can find in the work. Of course, people who have the ability either leave, and the people who don’t leave are just very unhappy.

[0:26:38.2] MB: In the context of replacing social norms of the market norms, I think it’s Predictably Irrational where you tell the story of the daycare facility?

[0:26:47.0] DA: Yes.

[0:26:47.8] MB: Could you share that anecdote briefly?

[0:26:50.7] DA: Yeah, this was a story- it’s an experiment. Generally, what happens if you have kids, you know that you pick up your kids late from time to time, and you get a bad look from the teacher or the daycare center, and you feel guilty, and you say sorry, and you try very hard not to feel this bad again.

In this particular daycare center, they decide to- with the help of some economists, they decided to add a fine. If you’re late, we’ll charge you $5 per hour. What happened? People started being really late. Why? Because imagine it’s 3:00 in the afternoon, and you have to pick up your kid at 3:30, and before the fine was introduced, guilt would kind of get you to go there on time. But after they just say it’s $5 an hour, people said, “It’s $5 an hour, they can keep my kids for two hours”, right? It’s just babysitting. What happened was that guilt went away, and money was just a fine payment. 

Now, if they charge $100, right? What would happen? People would be on time, but they would also take their kids out of the daycare, because from time to time they would miss it anyway, and the fine will be too much. People will get really pissed off. What happened here was that the fine did not add to the feeling of feeling bad, it replaced it. There was another thing with that study is that when they took the fine away, you would say would guilt come back?

The answer was not until the following year. Once you take a social relationship that is based on respect, and guilt, and fear of reciprocity, and so on, and you make it into a transactional relationship in which I pay you by the hour, it’s hard to change the relationship back. It’s hard to go back into a relationship of caring, and mutual benefits, and long term vision, and so on.

[0:28:48.3] MB: You talked earlier about the idea of joy, and I want to dig in a little bit more on that. Tell me about sort of why we have such a deep attachment to some of our own ideas, and how we sort of source joy?

[0:29:01.7] DA: Yup, this is something we called the IKEA effect, after the Swedish furniture manufacturer. One of the things we kind of first observed in our own behavior was that- this was in my case, I have a chest of drawers for my kids that took me a really long time to assemble. The instructions were not very clear, I got parts in the wrong way, but even though it was many years ago, I still carry it with me when I move around the country. Not only that, I look at that piece of furniture in a slightly more favorable way than my other pieces of furniture, like we spent an afternoon together creating it.

The thought that we started- Mike Norton, Daniel Kahneman, and I started looking at was- does the fact that you put more effort into something actually get you to love it more? And the answer is yes. We did experiments with Lego, and Bionicles, and we did it with origami. What we found is that the more effort you put into something, and the less clear the instructions are, and the more complex it is, you might not enjoy the processes much, but you end up liking the outcome more.

Think about something, like a home cooked meal compared to one in which somebody delivers it. Yes, it’s more painful, and more difficult, and you put more effort into it, but the joy of it is higher at the end. People don’t understand this. This is not something we have a good intuition about. It’s not as if you say, “I understand if I’ll assemble this myself, I’ll like it more at the end” Then the other interesting thing is people don’t understand that other people don’t look at their own creation from the same perspective.

It’s not as if I create something, and I love it because I put so much effort into it, like one of my books, and then I think that everybody else should see how wonderful they are in the same way that I do. We kind of blinded to other people’s motivation, or their perspective. We think that everybody will see things in the same way that we do, but of course, other people see things from their own perspective and not from ours. 

The IKEA effect exists. We fall in love with what we do, we don’t understand that other people don’t see things in the same way. It’s an interesting force, because it’s a good force, and it’s a not so good force. It’s a good force because by loving what we do, we can spend many hours doing what we do, right? I do research in social science, we have economics, and I love what I do. It causes me to spend many hours in the office, and I work hard, and I care about what I do. It’s the joy of loving what I do is by doing it, I love it more, and it creates a virtuous cycle.

The potential downside is that we get blinded to reality. I think that’s what happens to a lot of startups, where people- not just startups, but in startups it’s kind of a good example, is people have an idea, they fall in love with their idea, they think that everybody else would love their ideas, they start working on it, they get some evidence that this is not really that popular with other people, that other people don’t love it as much as they do. But they are so strong in their beliefs of how wonderful it is that they reject other people’s…

They reject the data, and then sometimes they manage to- sometimes they burn all their money in the process and not get to it. Falling in love with our ideas, and our labor, and what we do is a blessing and a curse. It’s a blessing because it gets us to people and being motivated, it’s a curse because it gets us to be blinded to sometimes reality.

[0:33:00.7] MB: I loved the origami story in the book. I thought that was one of my favorite examples.

[0:33:05.6] DA: Yeah, have you ever played with origami?

[0:33:07.5] MB: No, I’m horribly untalented at that.

[0:33:10.4] DA: Yeah, you know what? It turns out it doesn’t matter because people in our experiments created terrible origami and nevertheless, they loved them very much. I think there is something about creating something. Here’s another thing. Matt, how old are you?

[0:33:27.2] MB: 29.

[0:33:28.2] DA: 29. You grew up kind of in the digital world. Think about things in your life and think about what have you created from start to finish, right? This is not a test, and it’s not blaming, but you know, people used to do more things. Like when I was a kid, we went to study pottery. We did woodwork. I’m almost 50, and we did all kinds of things, and then when we learned how to program, we wrote stupid little programs that did very silly things, or right now they look trivial, but we wrote the whole program. I remember that my first program that did addition.

I wrote the whole thing. As we move forward in life, we don’t create many things ourselves. This podcast is your creation, right? Of course, you get help from software, and all kinds of other things, but it’s your creation, and it’s yours from end to end. When I write a book, it’s from cover to cover. Yes, lots of people helped, but it’s my book. In life in general, we’re having less and less of an opportunity to create something ourselves from scratch, and when we do, we also have every easy substitutions. Instead of making a meal, we can buy something readymade. Instead of creating furniture, we can get something from IKEA. 

I think something is missing. I think that there is kind of a connection to the fruit of our labor that we’re missing, and even in software, right? When was the last time somebody could write the whole piece of software by themselves? No, now people become- software is so amazing, and so complex, and has so many libraries, and everybody’s writing a library, or part of a library, or part of the process.

It’s wonderful; it also doesn’t give people the full feeling that there is something that is just theirs. I think that the only area in life that is still kind of about an individual creation is probably art. Almost everything in art is about one person doing everything from start. Start to finish. Whereas in most other things, we just do parts of things rather than the whole thing.

[0:36:02.1] MB: You know it’s funny, because I definitely am kind of a digital native, and grew up with a lot of that, but when I was a very young child, the internet really wasn’t around. Legos are one of my favorite things, and I still sort of think back about that, and to some degree, almost crave that desire to construct and build all kinds of unique creations. I know you talk about Legos in the book as well.

[0:36:25.2] DA: Yeah, Legos are great, I mean, it does- somebody gives you the basic building blocks and you do the exact thing you want. Not exactly but you know, you try to do something, I agree with you that there’s something about craving those experiences of feeling that you have done something. I do Legos with my kids from time to time. When you work with just Legos, it’s a very different feeling that when you build a set with instructions.

When you have the Star Wars set of something and you have these instructions, the instructions are very complex, and you have some joy, because the piece you’re creating is beautiful, and the instructions, you manage to overcome the challenges of understanding the instructions. It does have some other joy to it.

It doesn’t feel that you’ve created it in the same way. You’ve kind of followed the instruction that somebody else gave you. Yes, very successfully, but it doesn’t feel that it’s yours in the same way. Think about kind of the hesitation before you break something apart, or you desire to build a piece of Lego, and keep it untouched for a while. When you do something from a set, you finished it. It’s over, you don’t want to keep it. But when you do something without instruction that is more you, now taking it apart is a bit more painful. You’re taking something away from yourself while doing so. It’s not just breaking a piece of Lego.

[0:37:57.5] MB: Changing gears slightly, but really kind of also getting into the meat of this to some degree, we talked about money and pleasure were not great models to sort of understand the concept of motivation. What are some of the deeper, more intangible emotional forces that do underpin motivation?
 
[0:38:15.7] DA: It’s not that money is not part of it. It is part of it, and it’s not as if joy is not part of it, but it is part of it. It’s just not the whole picture. There’s lots of things about motivation, and you could just kind of think about your own experiences to try to figure out what are some of the elements. Here is another example. I was in San Francisco not too long ago, and I met with a very nice startup, and after talking about what they were doing - which was very interesting - I asked them, how late do they stay in the office? They told me that the night before they stayed until 1:00 AM, and we talked about that.

Here is what happened. One of the people in the team needed to do something for a deadline, and they were the only people on the team that needed to stay until late. Everybody else in the team stayed with them. I talked to them and I said, “Look, how was the phone call when you called and told your significant other that you’re going to stay late in the office?” They said it was no problem, they said they called their significant other and they said, “You know, Hannah is behind the project, needs to stay over until late, and I’m staying with her to help her finish that project.” 

Then I asked them, “What would happen if it was your project that was late, and you had to stay late in the office. How would your significant other react to that?” And they all said that the significant other would have said something like, “This is terrible, you should have started on this early, this is unacceptable and you can’t do this.”

Here was a case where for their own project, they couldn’t have stayed late but staying late for a friend was more justified, in their own eyes, and their significant other’s eyes.

This is one examples that says that our caring about work is often about caring about the people that we work with. When we care more about the people that we work with, through them, we care more about work as well. Actually, I’ll give you one more story about this in a different domain. I do lots of experiments on dishonesty, where I tempt people to steal money from me,and I see how much money they steal, and under what conditions.

In one type of experiment we gave people a die. It’s a six-sided die, and we get people to roll the die, and we say, “Look, roll the die, and we’ll pay you whatever it comes up on. If it comes up on six, we’ll give you $6, $5, and so on.” We tell them, “You can get paid based on the top side of the die or the bottom. Top or bottom. You decide, but don’t tell us.” You get the dye, and I say, “Please think top or bottom”, you think your top or bottom, you roll the die, and let’s say it came up with five on the bottom and two on the top.

Now I say, “Okay, what did you pick?” Now, if you picked bottom, you say bottom, and you get $5. If you pick top, you have a dilemma. You say the truth, top, and get $2, or you change your mind, you say bottom, and you get $5. People do this 20 times, and every time they think to themselves top or bottom, they roll the die, they write down what it came up with, and then they say what they had chosen and so on. 

What we find when people do this 20 times is that people are extra lucky. Of course, I don’t mean lucky, I mean that people are cheating. Not cheating a lot, but cheating a little bit. Now, in this one experiment, we got people to sit next to their significant other. Matt, you’re married right? 

[0:41:49.4] MB: I am.

[0:41:50.5] DA: Okay, imagine that you’re rolling the die, and you’re writing down what the die came up and then what you chose, and your significant other is sitting right next to you. Your significant other doesn’t know what’s going on in your brain, if you chose up or down, but they see if you’re extra lucky or not. What do you think would happen? Would you cheat more, the same, less if they sit next to you?

[0:42:12.9] MB: I would assume people definitely cheat less. 

[0:42:14.1] DA: That’s what most people assume, but what we found in the experiment is people cheat more. Why do they cheat more? Let me tell you about another experiment, then I’ll come back to this. In other experiment, we do the same thing, but people don’t make the money for themselves. In one condition the money goes to them, in a second condition, they pick a charity and all the money they make go to that charity. 

What happened when the money goes to charity? People cheat more. But in that experiment, we also connected people to a lie detector, and we measured how good is the lie detector detecting dishonesty. When people lie for themselves, the lie detector detect this honesty quite well. Not perfectly, but quite well. When people lie for a charity, the lie detector doesn’t work. People cheat more but the lie detector doesn’t work. Why?

Because the lie detector works on the tension. I feel I want more money, but I feel about it, I want more money, but I feel bad about it. If the money goes to charity, we don’t feel bad about it. All of a sudden we feel good. This is, by the way, why politicians feel so comfortable lying so much, because they can convince themselves that it’s for our good, the good of the country.

Now, let’s go back to this experiment, you sit there, your significant other is sitting next to you. All of the sudden you think to yourself, you don’t think it consciously, but you’re basically saying, “I’m not just cheating for myself, I’m cheating for the whole family”, and with that, people become more free to cheat, and this is not just about the significant other. It’s also about for the good of the company, for people who work with you, all kinds of things like this is just a science.

All of this is to say that one of the many forces that motivate us is the caring we have for the company. That force works for good because we care more, it also sometimes have negative effect because we might cheat some more, and the caring for the people that we work with. Of course you know, we can go on and on about all kinds of other forces, but these are just some examples for the things that end up mattering a lot for our motivation.

[0:44:28.1] MB: One other concept that I loved from Payoff was the idea of symbolic immortality. Could you talk briefly about that concept? 

[0:44:34.2] DA: Sure. At some point, you die, and some people believe in the afterlife and let’s forget about those people for now. Let’s think about just the people who don’t believe in the afterlife. The question is, do people- even if they’re going to die, and they don’t believe that there’s anything after death, do they still care about how people would remember them, and do they still care about their inheritance, and- not financial, but their contribution and their impact.

We find that the answer is absolutely yes. In fact, that people who believe in the afterlife and don’t believe in the afterlife don’t- it doesn’t matter to what kind of things people are willing to do to be remembered in a good way. We’ve looked at things like funerals, and how people spend on that. We’ve looked at things like wills, and how people setup their wills. 

For example, people are trying in their wills to settle scores and to make amends. You’re dead already, why is it important, and why don’t you do it when you’re still alive? The afterlife- the fact that even after people die, we still care about our reputation, and how people think about us, and so on. I think it’s kind of the extreme case showing how not everything is about material goods, because you know, no matter what theory you have about the afterlife, whatever material goods you have don’t really matter once you die.

The fact that we care about how people remember us, think about us, what scores we have, what we’ve left, what will happen with our possessions. All of those, it’s an indicator of the kind of things that get us to be motivated. Not just as we get closer to death or dead, but throughout our lives.

[0:46:32.3] MB: Well Dan, I absolutely loved the book Payoff, and I know that listeners are really going to enjoy it. There are so many things that we didn’t get to talk about today from the book that I really enjoyed. I’m curious, where can people find you and the book online?

[0:46:46.9] DA: I have a website, danariely.com, and the book should be on Amazon, and Barnes and Noble, and all the usual suspects, and then on my website I have other information and videos, and so on.

[0:47:05.6] MB: Awesome. Again, the book is called Payoff: The Hidden Logic that Shapes our Motivations. Dan, thanks again, we loved having you on the Science of Success.

[0:47:13.8] DA: Thanks to you and it was great and looking forward to continuing this another time.

[0:47:19.3] MB: Thank you so much for listening to the Science of Success. Listeners like you are why we do this podcast. The emails and stories we receive from listeners around the globe bring us joy and fuel our mission to unleash human potential. I love hearing from listeners. If you wanna reach out, share your story, or just say hi, shoot me an email. My email is matt@scienceofsuccess.co. I would love to hear from you, and I read and respond to every listener email.

Remember, the greatest compliment you can give us is a referral to a friend, either live or online. If you’ve enjoyed this episode, please, leave us an awesome review and subscribe on iTunes. That helps more and more people discover the Science of Success. Lastly, I get a ton of listeners asking me, “Matt, how do you organize and remember all this information? Because of that, we created an amazing free guide for all of our listeners. You can get it by texting the word “smarter” to the number 44222, or by going to scienceofsuccess.co and joining our email list. Thanks again, and we’ll see you on the next episode of the Science of Success. 
November 17, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity
43-How To Execute on Huge Goals, Take Action, and Create The Results You Want with Neil Patel-01.jpg

How To Execute on Huge Goals, Take Action, and Create The Results You Want with Neil Patel

October 13, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity, Career Development

In this episode we talk about execution, how to break down big goals into actionable steps, how and why Neil hired a “mama” for himself, the “ten minute rule” that could help you achieve big productivity gains and how to optimize your life to free up huge amounts of time with entrepreneur Neil Patel.

Neil is the co-founder of Crazy Egg, Hello Bar and KISSmetrics. The Wall Street Journal calls him a top influencer on the web, Forbes says he is one of the top 10 online marketers, and Entrepreneur Magazine says he created one of the 100 most brilliant companies in the world. He was recognized as a top 100 entrepreneur under the age of 30 by President Obama and one of the top 100 entrepreneurs under the age of 35 by the United Nations. Neil has also been awarded Congressional Recognition from the United States House of Representatives.

We discuss:

  • How to break huge goals into small bite sized tasks that you can quickly and easily execute

  • How Neil defines success and why money wont make you happy

  • The "10 minute rule" and how it can help you achieve big results

  • “Hacks” that Neil recommends for those who want to climb the corporate ladder

  • How to go from A to Z by skipping B, C, D etc and getting straight to the result

  • Why you don’t have to take the traditional path the everyone else does to get what you want in life

  • The strategy Neil uses to pitch huge deals to corporate executives

  • How to optimize your life to save time and free your time up

  • The rules that Neil uses to improve and use his time more efficiently

  • How Neil hired a “mom” to cook him breakfast and do his laundry (and why!)

  • How to manufacture and generate luck for yourself

  • Why shouldn’t “rent your dreams"

  • How to take action on the things that matter and actually create results, so you can stop spinning your wheels

  • And much more!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions on how to do that!). 

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • [Website] neilpatel.com

  • [Website] QuickSprout

  • [Guide] The Complete Guide to Understanding Consumer Psychology by Neil Patel and Ritika Puri

  • [Assesment] Intuit Personality Tests

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

 

[00:00:12.4] MB: Welcome to The Science of Success. I’m your host, Matt Bodnar. I’m an entrepreneur and investor in Nashville Tennessee and I’m obsessed with the mindset of success and the psychology of performance. I’ve read hundreds of books, conducted countless hours of research and study and I’m going to take you on a journey into the human mind and what makes peak performers tick, with a focus on always having our discussions rooted in psychological research and scientific fact. Not opinion.

In this episode, we talk about execution, how to break down big goals into actionable steps. How and why Neil Patel hired a mom up for himself, the 10 minute rule that could help you achieve huge productivity gains, and how to optimize your life to free up huge amounts of time with entrepreneur Neil Patel. Because the Science of Success has spread across the globe with more than 550,000 downloads, listeners in over a hundred countries, hitting number one in New and Noteworthy and more, I give away something awesome to my listeners every single month. 

This month I’m giving away $100 Amazon gift card to one lucky listener. All you have to do to be entered to win is to text the word “smarter” to the number 44222. Again, that’s “smarter” to 44222 and if you want 10, yes 10 extra entries into the giveaway, leave a positive review on iTunes and email me a screenshot of that review to matt@scienceofsuccess.co. 

In our previous episode, we explore the link between trauma, mental health, learning disabilities and genius. Looked at a number of historical figures and how they harnessed struggles like depression and ADHD to achieve world changing results and examine the practical steps to overcome your struggles today with Dr. Gale Saltz. If you think you have a challenge you can’t overcome, listen to that episode. 

[INTERIVEW]

[0:02:08.1] MB: Today, we have another awesome guest on the show, Neil Patel. Neil is the cofounder of Crazy Egg, Hello Bar and Kissmetrics. The Wall Street Journal called him “a top influencer on the web”. Forbes says he is one of the top 10 online marketers, entrepreneur magazine says he created one of the hundred most brilliant companies in the world. He was recognized as a top 100 entrepreneur under the age of 30 by president Obama and as one of the top 100 entrepreneurs under the age of 35 by the United Nations. Neil has also been awarded congressional recognition form the United States House of Representatives. 

Neil, welcome to the science of success.

[0:02:45.4] NP: Thanks for having me.

[0:02:47.1] MB: Well we’re very excited to have you on here. To kind of get started, obviously have an amazing background. For listeners who may not be familiar, tell us a little bit about you and your story?

[0:02:57.2] NP: Sure, just a serial entrepreneur, started off at the age of 16 looking for a job, couldn’t find one, decided to create my own job. Failed miserably for many reasons but one of the main reasons was I didn’t know how to get traffic to the site. So eventually I learned how to drive traffic to the site, still couldn’t figure out how to make money but I decided that, “You know what? It’s just better if I do consulting from marketing perspective for other people.” 

Got good at it, got value, they referred me to more clients. Eventually started a consulting agency, then from there I realized I hate it but through the whole process I learned that these companies don’t know how to optimize their site for conversions and sales and they don’t know how to look at metrics and that’s how I started my software journey and started focusing on optimizing for conversions and SAS sales, et cetera.

So that’s pretty much the gamut of my entrepreneurial journey. I also blog too, right? Which some people know, some people don’t, at Quick Sprout and neilpatel.com.

[0:03:54.4] MB: So in a recent interview, Tai Lopez asked you, "What are you the best in the world at?” What was your answer?

[0:04:00.7] NP: I don’t remember. That was, I did that interview a while ago.

[0:04:03.3] MB: All right, that’s fine.

[0:04:05.1] NP: I’m good at driving traffic to a website. I don’t know if that’s what I said but that’s probably what I’m really good at, driving traffic to a website. I’m good at converting those visitors into customers and I’m really good at learning from mistakes and executing really fast.

[0:04:17.9] MB: Yeah, so executing was the answer that you gave him. And I’m curious, how do you execute and for people who are struggling with execution, what do you think they could do to improve?

[0:04:29.8] NP: The biggest problem with execution is people look at these big giant tasks and they’re like, “Okay, we’re going to get this done.” It’s too big. But what I found is when people on small bite sized tasks, like I want to just purely focus on hypothetically let’s say you’re trying to build a bigger audience. Then you break that down to smaller tasks. Okay, SEO could be one of them, social media could be one of them, and blogging could be another one. And then you’re like, “Okay, let’s tackle blogging.”

Well what’s the first step of blogging? Write a blog post. What’s the first step of writing a blog post? Come up with some ideas, right?  And I’m not breaking down as granular as they could be, you could just be for your task, “All right, today I want to focus on coming up with ideas for a blogpost, picking one, creating the draft. And then another task could be to write it, another task could be after I write it, publish it. After I publish it, promote it,” right? I’m breaking this down to such small task that it’s much easier to complete them and when you do that, you're more productive and you typically get way more done.

[0:05:37.5] MB: People who struggle often have this big goals but they fail to connect that to specific actions they can start taking right now.

[0:05:47.0] NP: That’s correct, yes.

[0:05:49.2] MB: What are some of the things you might be able to do or listeners to this podcast could potentially do in terms of sort of chunking down those tasks into day to day actionable steps?

[0:06:02.2] NP: I use task lists or like to-do lists, I think that helps a lot. I don’t think there’s much more that you really need to do other than just break down the task into small things, do your to-do list and then each day go over, did it work? Did it not work? Did you accomplish what you wanted to? If so great, how so? If not, why? What would you change to fix that?

[0:06:24.5] MB: That makes a lot of sense. Let’s change directions a little bit, how do you define success or what makes somebody successful to you?

[0:06:33.3] NP: What makes someone successful to me is them loving what they’re doing in life and doing great at it. That’s really it, right? Because if you’re happy, then you’re good to go. In my eyes, you're successful. If you’re not happy then something’s off. It doesn’t matter how much money you make. If you don’t love what you're doing, you’re not enjoying it then something’s off.

[0:06:50.7] MB: Why do you think people fall into the trap of constantly sort of seeking out more money or more whatever it might be? 

[0:06:58.7] NP: That’s what they think will make them happy and eventually people learn as they make more money that money doesn’t really make you happy. 

[0:07:05.7] MB: Did you learn that lesson from personal experience?

[0:07:09.4] NP: I did in which I would just, I started my first business because I wanted to make money, and as I started to make it and as I started to make it and I started buying useless things that I didn’t even care for but not too many useless things. Eventually I figured out that hey, none of this really matters. But what I really do enjoy is just focusing on businesses that I love.

[0:07:28.4] MB: Let’s segue into discussing your recent book Hustle. Tell me a little bit about that book?

[0:07:34.7] NP: Sure, if you look at the world right now, the people who are really rich are extremely rich, the poor, poor and the middle class is depleting, right? It’s not just me that thinks have the stats show that as well. A lot of the people who aren’t successful, which is the majority, feel that, “Hey, I wasn’t born with wealth, I didn’t’ grow with silver spoon I don’t have that Harvard degree, you know, all hope is lost.” 

We know that’s not the case because a lot of this entrepreneurs are doing successful even people who are going to the works force and climbing up the ranks, a lot of them didn’t come from the best education, it didn’t come from a family that just give them tons of money and what we ended up our goal, what we wanted to do was to teach this people concepts and strategies that they can use to increase their odds of succeeding when the odds are stacked against you.

[0:08:27.5] MB: You, in the book, kind of break things into what you called a three part framework of hustle. What are each of those components?

[0:08:34.0] NP: Yeah, the components of hustle. So it depends on where you want to start, right? The biggest thing that we end up breaking down into the book, there’s four main ways that we teach you how to grow but we try to break down everything in the book under the main concepts of money, meaning and momentum, right? There’s subsections within each of them. We teach you a lot of different concepts, for example, one of the concepts we teach you is a 10 minute rule in which if you have goals in life, how can you focus just for 10 minutes out of your time?

The reason I say 10 minutes and this is really important is, most people when they’re trying to achieve something they’re like, “Okay I want to create XY and Z company or I want to work for myself and be financially independent,” that’s their goal. But how do you get there? So we teach you how to break down these goals, these tasks into small little 10 minute chunks, you try something out for 10 minutes, does it help you achieve what you’re trying to go through in life, right? If it does, great. If it doesn’t then you should redo something else for 10 minutes. 

Then we also teach you other concepts on how to grow. Some people you realize that hey, the corporate route is great for me and we teach you how to climb the corporate ranks. Or you may realize that you’re inside of a company and you don’t want to be inside, it’s best for you to do entrepreneurship. We break down concepts on how you can try entrepreneurship and go for it even when you’re within an organization, right?

Or we even break down that hey, you’re outside and you're trying to figure out how to get into the corporate world or get a job, right? We break down concepts like that. But we teach you many different concepts we call little “hacks” on how you can do the small bite sized things to succeed in life.

[0:10:22.2] MB: Let’s drill down into one of those categories, for example the corporate route. For somebody who’s listening to the podcast right now that is in a corporate job and wants to stay there and kind of succeed and thrive, what are some of the tops that you would give them or some of the hacks that you would give them?

[0:10:38.6] NP: Yeah, so if you’re in the corporate world and you’re trying to figure out the upside like how you can grow, there’s a few things. One, a lot of people who work in the corporate world, all they do is just try to focus on pleasing their boss. Don’t get me wrong, you can please your boss and you should, but you also have to think about yourself. Is what you're doing only helping your boss succeed? Are you focusing on helping them achieve their goals? Or are some of the things that you’re doing also helping you achieve your goals, right? 

One simple thing that you can do is if you're in the corporate world, once you figure out, “All right, am I focusing on helping myself improve?” In many cases you’ll find that most people are just focus on pleasing their boss. That’s great and all, but why not have a conversation with your boss and say, “Hey, here’s where we’re at, right? I love this company I want to be here for life, I love what you’re doing and I want to follow in your footsteps. What are some things that I can do to make your life easier or to show the company or to help out the company,” right? 

In essence you want to put the company first, not just your boss but the company first. Not necessarily focusing on pleasing your boss but the companies calls an objective, right? Because even if some people hate you but you 3X the company’s revenue, someone’s going to notice. And if you can find out what those specific items are and you can help them achieve it and go above and beyond, people will start noticing and you’ll start realizing that you can start getting promotions within the organization or climbing up the corporate ladder.

[0:12:13.5] MB: So a moment ago you kind of threw out the term and I actually used it too without really thinking about it, the term “hacks”. You and I are probably familiar with what that means but for somebody who is listening that may not know what that is, can you explain kind of what a hack is or what it means to hack something?

[0:12:28.7] NP: Yeah, a hack is, think of it as a shortcut to get to the result. If you want to go from A to Z, most people think you have to go A, B, C, D, E, X, right? Why can’t you jump around? Who says you can’t go backwards and just go form A and then in the alphabet and go backwards all the way to Z, right? Let’s just say example of a hack, it changes in the corporate world or in life on what each hack is, but in general, the whole concept is you don’t have to take the traditional path that everyone that everyone else does to get to where you want in life. 

For example, in my dad’s age, you would go to high school then you go to college, you get your degree, you work at a job, you stay there forever, you may go back to school to do more further learning then you may get raises, you’re pretty much there for life. That’s how my parents were brought up, that’s how they were taught. The world doesn’t necessarily work that way. Just because you go to college, you got a good degree even from Harvard and then you go back and then you get your Harvard MBA, it doesn’t mean that you’re going to get promotions or raises or do better, right?

There’s no guarantee, and that may not even be the most optimal route. Sometimes a person who does the best as a guy who is closing the most amount of deals or most well network or the guy who is going above and beyond and then being really creative with the strategies, whatever it may be. But we teach you that, “Hey, think outside the box. There’s a lot of quicker solutions to get to where you want and just taking their traditional route.”

[0:13:51.2] MB: I love that and it’s something that I’m a huge fan of as well, is the idea of kind of thinking nontraditionally, thinking outside the box and shunning conventional wisdom and figuring out, “All right, is there a shorter path from where I am today to where I need to get that defies the conventional wisdom of you need to do XY and Z?”

[0:14:09.9] NP: Exactly.

[0:14:11.4] MB: So you have some really fascinating stories from your background of how you’ve applied that concept. Everything from sort of hacking the idea of a personal driver to hacking some of your college course work. Could you tell a few of those stories or share some of those examples?

[0:14:26.4] NP: Sure. I’ve done everything, the driving one I’ve done quite a few. I’ve done driving ones where I leased a car and then I took the leased car, gave it to people for free but they would have to drive me around and then I didn’t have to pay for gas and maintenance. I’ve even done stuff for different things like where I don’t have a car and people drive me around and I give them advice, right? They can pick my brain, drive me to the airport and wherever I need to go.

I’ve done a ton of hacks, just questions is, what category or industry? Yeah, I always look for creative solutions. Nowadays, I mainly just use Uber, it’s so convenient, right? It’s a big time saver, I actually optimized most things for saving time in life. I’ve done a lot of other hacks too in business that are really creative like if you want to get to someone in a high position and get a deal done, instead of emailing I’d be like, “I want to apply for this job or this contracting position,” I’ll just email them saying everything that they’re doing and how to fix it and I would give it away to them for free. As crazy as it may sound, what happens is some of these people are like, “Okay, we’ll hire you.” Like that’s the best resume ever, right? You’re telling them what they’re doing wrong and what you would fix.

[0:15:37.8] MB: That’s a great example. So what are some of the ways that either somebody listening or even I personally could optimize my life to save time or how have you applied that lesson because I think everybody could use some more free time or use more time in general.

[0:15:51.8] NP: I use a program called Rescue Time, it’s the most optimal thing that I’ve ever done in my life, what Rescue Time does is, it just tells you where you're spending time and where you’re wasting it. From there you can just optimize. Like it will tell me, “You’re spending too much time on Facebook,” for example.

[0:16:07.5] MB: What about outside of kind of the digital context, are there any tools or hacks that you use to free up your time?

[0:16:13.9] NP: Outside, I mainly use an assistant, you can try virtual assistant or personal assistant. I also go by certain rules, like if I tell someone I’m going to do something, I do it right then and there. Or I send myself a note or reminder, because it makes you more efficient . If I open up an email I make sure I answer it right then and there or else I won’t open it because if you don’t then you have to reread it.

When I’m also doing task or driving around or whatever it may be or in meetings, I always analyze it after just for like a quick 30 seconds. Like, “How did it go? Could I have got to the point quicker? Where am I wasting time? Where was the pitch weak?” Whatever it may be, “Where were we inefficient as a group? Where was it a miscommunication? How can we set it up to be more efficient?” 

And it usually revolves around communication because if everyone was on the same page beforehand, everyone would save much more time right? So we just look a lot of little things like that and then you optimize from there. It’s just creating that right mindset mentality.

[0:17:07.3] MB: So it sounds like mindset is a huge piece of it. The next piece with a tool similar to Rescue Time is perhaps kind of measuring where you are in the status quo and then from there, taking that information and optimizing sort of your life and your workflow around time efficiency.

[0:17:23.1] NP: That’s correct, yes.

[0:17:25.7] MB: Do you use some of the things you just mentioned about kind of your productivity framework, only touching things once, et cetera, is that derived from something like GTD or what is sort of your productivity framework that you use?

[0:17:38.5] NP: I don’t really use any framework. I just naturally — so my personality trait, when we took like a personality quiz, I don’t feel happy unless I feel like I’m getting stuff done, which is weird but that’s just how I am. Most people aren’t like that. In general, what I would tell people is, I like doing task list and breaking down into small task and just focus on accomplishing them each and every single day.

[0:18:03.7] MB: That makes a ton of sense. One of the other ways that I remember a story about you kind of outsourcing something in a nontraditional way was hiring a mom. Can you tell that story?

[0:18:13.8] NP: Yeah. I have a mama, I still have her, her name is Jackie, I love her to death, I call her mama though. Mama gets all my stuff done. I put out a Craigslist ad looking for a mama. She does everything from packing for me to cooking to cleaning like whatever it may be and it just helps make my life so much more efficient so I can focus on work.

[0:18:33.6] MB: Some people listening might think that it’s ridiculous to hire somebody to cook your breakfast or do your laundry or whatever. Why do you think that that is a prudent investment?

[0:18:43.6] NP: It helps you focus on what’s most valuable for you, right? I believe in optimizing for time so why not just focus on what you're good at and I found out I can do my own laundry but it takes me forever to do it compared to other people and I lose way more money compared to just focusing on just getting one thing done which is my work, growing the business.

[0:19:03.7] MB: You touched on something there that I think that a lot of really highly productive people think differently about this particular concept, which is the idea that whatever your “hourly rate” is or whatever you value your time at, if their activities, you’re performing hat are sort of under that hourly rate, regardless of how silly it may seem on the surface to hire somebody to do that, it’s actually really efficient to pay somebody say 10 or $15 an hour if you view your time as being worth a couple of hundred dollars an hour to do all of these tasks for you.

[0:19:37.9] NP: Exactly, you got it right.

[0:19:40.6] MB: Yeah, I’m a huge fan of that whole concept as well and I have things like a virtual assistant and focus on trying to optimize my time in a similar fashion. Changing gears or actually touching on something you talked about a second ago, you mentioned a personality test around sort of what are your biggest strengths or what are you kind of focusing on or what do you like to do that makes you feel productive. What is that test, and is that something that you think is really important in terms of optimizing around people’s strengths as supposed to focusing on fixing weaknesses?

[0:20:09.1] NP: It is. I don’t know the exact name of the test, it’s the one Intuit uses as an organization and we hired some consulting years ago, I forgot his name. Good guy. And we just copied the same person who test that Intuit use and the reason being is you can tell who people are in an organization and how they are and how they prefer to get work done and then you can just align up and try to do similar things, right? Like if you know how certain people, what motivates them and what makes them happy, then you know what you should be focusing on to try and help them accomplish goals or help the company become more productive.

[0:20:44.6] MB: I think in many ways, that same principle of kind of, leveraging or focusing on strength as opposed to trying to repair weakness, kind of dovetails back into the same concept of focus on the skill sets and the things that you’re really good at in terms of making money or doing what you love and then outsource or find somebody to do the other stuff, whether it’s driving you around, whether it’s cooking your breakfast or whatever it might be, right? It’s kind of the same two sides of the same coin in many ways.

[0:21:12.5] NP: Exactly, you got it right.

[0:21:15.0] MB: Another concept that I know you’re a big fan of and you’ve studied deeply is psychology and how to kind of leverage that. Obviously this podcast is focused deeply in psychology. Tell me some of the ways that you’ve leveraged psychology to help you be more productive, to influence people, and to kind of drive some of the results that you’ve achieved in your life?

[0:21:34.9] NP: Yeah, for me, we’re all humans, right? You have to figure out what makes people tick. Now you don’t want to use it like abuse them and manipulate. But in essence, by studying psychology and understanding it, you can get a much better understanding of what you should be doing or the messaging you can put on a website or what to use within meanings, et cetera. Just try to close more deals. What we end up doing our base of psychology is just how can you use the right words and phrases that correlates with people to make them understand what you’re trying to convey? So then that way you’re wasting less time and you’re going to the point and hopefully you’re causing more sales and creating a better experience for both people.

[0:22:18.8] MB: For someone listening that’s interested in whether it’s driving more business, sales, leads, whatever it might be, obviously you’re a deep marketing expert. How could they embark on that journey in terms of starting to understand some of the psychology pieces of that?

[0:22:33.4] NP: You’re asking, how can someone go about understanding psychology and learning it when they’re starting off?

[0:22:40.1] MB: Generally yes, but specifically within the context of kind of applying that to a marketing.

[0:22:45.3] NP: Sure, she have a Definitive Guide to Psychology on my blog, quickspot.com. It pretty much breaks down all the necessities, it’s like around 30,000 words all for free.

[0:22:55.2] MB: That’s awesome, well we’ll definitely include that in the show notes so that people can access that. What are one or two of those take away for listeners that might be driving or can’t access it right now.

[0:23:07.0] NP: Sure. So a few tips is, psychology is all about understanding people, right? The mind of the person, how you can get them to what makes them tick in essence. So one little simple tip is, don’t just assume that making some changes with your website copy or colors will affect sales. Why not survey people to really truly understand who your buyers are, who your customers are, what makes a certain people happy, love your product or service and what makes the people who are disappointed hate it.

Because if you can find out that hey, the people who love my product love it because XY and Z reason, you now know you can focus your messaging, your copy, et cetera just around those people. 

[0:23:50.2] MB: That’s a great tip. Circling back a little bit to some of the lessons from Hustle, there were a few terms or kind of ideas from the book that really resonated with me that I’d love to touch on. Tell me about the idea of “don’t rent your dreams”?

[0:24:05.6] NP: Yeah, the biggest problem right now is people and we discuss this a bit earlier, they’re not doing what they want in life, right? They’re working for someone else and not just working at a corporate job, but think about it, that barista at Starbucks, do you think they’re really doing what’s making them happy? No, they’re helping their manager, the company, achieve their dreams and their goals but not theirs. 

That’s what it comes down to is in an organization, whether you're doing your own business or whatever it may be, you need to make sure that you’re accomplishing what you want as well. It’s not just about helping the other person like your boss fulfill their destiny, their dreams, their goals. What about you, right? As an individual. You need to make sure that whatever you’re doing also benefits you as well.

[0:24:52.4] MB: What about the idea of manufacturing luck? I love that concept.

[0:24:57.7] NP: Yes, so the problem with most people is or the problem out there, most people feel that the people who are lucky or do well is like, “Oh they have good luck.” I myself don’t have a lot of luck. Well, that’s not always the case, a lot of times, you’re not feeling lucky because you’re not doing something that can help you generate luck, what I mean by that is if you don’t take action, you’ll never be luckier, the right things won’t happen. So Patrick, one of my coauthors, his son wanted to go find fish in Little Pond Creek, whatever you want to you want to call it.

So his son’s like, “Daddy, let’s go find some fish.” Dad looks down at the water and be like, “Shane, let’s go, there’s nothing there.” Shane looks back up at his dad, doesn’t say anything, jumps into the water like it’s shallow, right? Shuffles his feet, next thing you know, fish pop up. In essence, he manufactured his own luck, right? If you take action, you’re much more likely to get lucky. If you don’t take any action, how are you ever going to get lucky?

[0:25:58.2] MB: There’s a great quote that I think dovetails with that, which is, “Luck, this is where preparation meets opportunity.”

[0:26:03.7] NP: That’s an amazing quote, yup.

[0:26:06.0] MB: I think many people can often get stuck kind of feeling like things aren’t going their way or they’re never getting a lucky break. But the reality is, you can always find a way to take action and create results out of the world.

[0:26:19.0] NP: Yeah, no, totally. The biggest thing that we’ve learned with the whole process, especially writing the book, most people have it in them to do well. They just need the principles, the concepts that can help them take action in the right place and focus their energy on what matters versus just spinning their wheels and feeling like they’re stuck.

[0:26:40.3] MB: How does somebody differentiate between taking action on the things that really sort of drive results versus things that don’t matter?

[0:26:49.6] NP: It comes down to if you spend 10 minute just focusing on something that you think will help you accomplish your goals, your dreams, and if you end up feeling, after about 10 minutes if you feel like it’s helping you accomplish your goals and dreams, great. But if it doesn’t then you need to go back to the drawing board and try something else. It’s that simple, just do something for 10 minutes and you’ll know if it has a chance of helping you accomplish your goal.

[0:27:16.3] MB: So I know we’re ended on time and you’ve got to go. Tell me, where can people find you online?

[0:27:21.1] NP: Neilpatel.com.

[0:27:22.7] MB: Awesome. Well Neil, thank you very much for being a guest on the show and we really enjoyed hearing from you.
 
[0:27:27.0] NP: Thanks for having me.

October 13, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity, Career Development
29-HowtoGetRocketFuelforYourSuccess,BendReality,andAchieveHappiness,WithVishenLakhiani,FounderofMindvalley-IG2-01.jpg

How to Get Rocket Fuel for Your Success, Bend Reality, and Achieve Happiness, With Vishen Lakhiani, Founder of Mindvalley

June 29, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Emotional Intelligence, Focus & Productivity

Learn to think like some of the greatest creative minds of our time - to question, challenge, and create new rules for your ideas of success, happiness, and much more with Vishen Lakhiani. Vishen shares incredible strategies to redefine your life and success on your own terms in this episode of The Science of Success.

Vishen is an entrepreneur, best-selling author and speaker. He is the founder and CEO of Mindvalley, a learning experience company serving three million students, subscribers and followers worldwide.

His book, The Code of The Extraordinary Mind, a New York and LA Times best seller, blends evolutionary biology and computational thinking, providing a new framework for identifying, questioning and redefining beliefs to understand and enhance the human self. The book also draws knowledge from the world's leading thinkers such as Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Peter Diamandis, Ken Wilber, Arianna Huffington and more.

If you’re looking for something to take yourself to the next level, break through barriers, and achieve your dreams, listen to this episode immediately.

Vishen and I discuss:
-How language shapes reality and controls your understanding of the world
-How to uncover the “bullshit rules” making you unhappy in life
-How to set “ends goals” instead of “means goals"
-How to cultivate “rocket fuel” for your success
-How to live a life of “Blissipline” (and why that’s important)
-How to set and accomplish huge goals without having you happiness anchored to them
-How to combat the fear that “I Am Not Enough"
-How to live life as though everything is rigged in your favor
-And Much More!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

SHOW NOTES, LINKS, & RESEARCH

  • The Code of the Extraordinary Mind: 10 Unconventional Laws to Redefine Your Life and Succeed On Your Own Terms by Vishen Lakhiani (Amazon Link here).

  • Free Lessons From The Code of the Extraordinary Mind (see here).

  • If you want to learn more about discovering and breaking down Limiting Beliefs, listen to that episode below or click here.

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Today, we have another amazing guest on this show: Vishen Lakhiani. Vishen is an entrepreneur, bestselling author, and speaker. He's the founder and CEO of Mindvalley, a learning experience company that publishes ideas and teachings by the best authors in personal growth, health and fitness, spirituality, productivity, mindfulness, and more, serving three million students, subscribers, and followers worldwide. His book, The Code of the Extraordinary Mind, which is a New York Times and L.A. Times bestseller, blends evolutionary biology, computational thinking, and provides a new framework for identifying questioning and redefining beliefs to understand and enhance the human self. The book also draws on knowledge from the world's leading thinkers, such as Elon Musk, Richard Branson, Peter Diamandis, Ken Wilber, Arianna Huffington, and more. It's an incredible book. I recently read it. Huge fan. And I just wanted to say, Vishen, welcome to The Science of Success.

Vishen:	Thank you, Matt. I'm honored to be here.

Matt:	Well, we're super excited to have you on. I'm a huge fan of you, Mindvalley, the six-phase meditation, and love the new book, which I have sitting right here. So, you know, to kind of start out, I think most people are probably familiar with your background and who you are, so I wanted to dive right into the meat of some of the cool topics from the book that I really found fascinating.

Vishen:	Thanks good. I think that's a great idea. Let's dive straight into the meat.

Matt:	Let's do it. All right. So, tell me the story of the tribe that could not see the color blue, the sort of thing with the blue squares and the green squares. I found that totally fascinating.

Vishen:	So, in this book, I like to bring in information from a wide range of different media out there, right, and so one of the things I absolutely love listening to are podcasts. And there was a particular podcast. It was called Radiolab. It's a wonderful podcast. I recommend it highly. And Radiolab had an episode that spoke about the Himba tribe. The Himba tribe are a tribe in Namibia, and one thing that's unique about them is that they have 19 words for the color green but no word for the color blue. So, this Radiolab episode was exploring the idea that what language delineates, we can see. In other words, when you don't have a word for something, we cannot see it. It doesn't exist in our frame of reference. So, the speakers in that episode were citing a book that spoke about how when historians go back to ancient cultures, the ancient Chinese, the ancient Greeks, they find that there is no mention of the word blue. There's no mention of the color blue. Even in Homer's Iliad, he refers to the Aegean Sea as the wine dark sea. To us, it's not wine dark; it's blue. It's clearly blue. But they refer to it as the wine dark sea. Go back to ancient Chinese texts. No mention of the color blue. Red, green, yes, but no blue. And so, this Radiolab episode wanted to investigate, could it be that the word blue did not exist until just several thousand years ago and, prior to that, people couldn't see blue? So, again, to explore this theme, what language delineates, we can see, they went to Namibia and an anthropologist there studied the Himba tribe, and she showed them a series of squares, green squares, and one of these squares was clearly blue. The rest were all green. And she asked them, "Pick out the square that's different," and they could not. They really could not see the blue square. To any of us it's obvious. Then she tried a different experiment. She showed them a circle of squares. All of them were green, but one was a slightly different shade of green. Most of us cannot pick that out, but the Himba people, it was obvious. So, the question here is, what is it about language that gives us the ability to perceive certain things? Now, I used this in the book. I coined different words to allow people to see different structures in the world around them, in terms of how they're functioning in the world so that we can remove ourselves from structures that are no longer serving us. So, I used this analogy to coin the term the "culturescape". The culturescape is that tangled web of human rituals, beliefs, habits, that come together and define how we see the world. You see, we simultaneously exist in two worlds. There's a world, the physical world of absolute truth. This is a cup. It's white, and in it I have tea, which is hot. But then there's the world of relative truth. When you think of words such as happiness, success, meditation, religion, God, none of these things are absolute truth. Different cultures define them in different ways. And so, what I'm trying to teach people is to not place too much legitimacy on singular words, because so much of our communication in so many ways, we misunderstand ourselves. We get into dumb political arguments or fights because words mean different things to many people. And, at the same time, words and these constructs can shackle us, can hold us, confined to who we are. Think about the word "marriage", right? What exactly is it? From culture to culture, it's completely different, yet we have these ridiculous, pointless political fights over concepts such as gay marriage. So, I coined another word called "brule" to help us see the ridiculousness of all of this, and a brule is simply a bullshit rule. So, we live in a culturescape filled with brules, and when you can learn to identify which rules are lifting you up versus which rules are restricting you, you gain ability to free yourself from that tangled mess of useless constructs in the culturescape that keep so many people trapped in an ordinary life.

Matt:	I love the concept that language shapes reality, and I think that's something that you hear about sometimes in philosophy textbooks or whatever it might be, but the fact that there's this incredible research study that literally... You know, people can't see a color that, to us, is so obvious. It's amazing how we often really don't understand how language truly does underpin the way we perceive the world. And limiting beliefs is something I know you talk a lot about and we've talked about in previous episodes of the podcast, but I'd love to dig in specifically to one word that you created that I love and has actually helped me reshape my daily architecture in many ways, and that's the concept of blissipline. Can you talk a little bit about that?

Vishen:	Sure. Sure. So, blissipline is a word that has been used by many different people, including Reverend Michael Beckwith, Brian Johnson of PhilosophersNotes, so I wouldn't say I coined a word, but it's not in the English language yet and I thought it was a cool word. Blissipline's the discipline of daily bliss. It is the idea that the number one discipline you can have on a day-to-day basis is to put yourself in a state of bliss. Happiness, you see, science is now showing, happiness is rocket fuel towards your success. We grow up in a world where we're told to chase certain goals, that it's about the career ladder. And, again, all of these are just words. Really, what you want to seek are feelings. We chase words to get to feelings. We chase the nine to five. We chase the safe corporate job. We chase money. We chase being an entrepreneur, whatever the hell that means, because we're actually pursuing a feeling. Feelings of freedom, feelings of being happy with yourself, feelings of being able to contribute. Now, blissipline is simply the idea that, look, stop the chase. Get to the feeling first. And those feelings are typically feelings of bliss, of joy, of happiness, hence the word blissipline. Now, we can hack those feelings. You do not need, for example, to grow your salary 25% or to have 25% more sex to be 25% happier. Studies have shown that the simple practice of morning gratitude 30 days in a row, science says, will make you 25% happier. So, blissipline is looking at the simple mental hacks to get to the feelings that you want to get to for which more people are taking a really long, painful, brule-based thought. And that's what it's about. It's about understanding how to hack joy, bliss, happiness to get you there now.

Matt:	I think that's so important, and I'm curious. Obviously a daily gratitude practice is one tactic that listeners might be able to employ to integrate blissipline into their lives. What are some other examples or strategies that you implement?

Vishen:	Well, there's a whole ton, right. So, I invented something called the six-phase meditation. Okay, so when I was a kid, I loved computer games, probably like any one of our generation. And I used to play this game called Rings of Zilfin, where the hero, Reese, would travel to this horrible land filled with ogres and weird dinosaur-like creatures, and he had to gain certain skills to battle these creatures so that he could kill the evil lord and save the princess and free up the land. So, I was 14, so those kinds of things appealed to me. So, Reese had to up-level and, like many video games, he had to up-level his amount of gold, his amount of endurance, his amount of charisma, his amount of skill in archery. And life is often like that in a certain way. There are certain core areas in which we need to up-level. And I identified six, and I believe that if you can up-level yourself in these six areas, everything else you want in life starts coming to you really easily. So, I looked at these six areas and I found that there was a lot of research behind it. The first is connectedness. It's a feeling of connectedness or compassion with your family, but also beyond your family, beyond your tribe, with the world around you. It's an ability to have empathy for other people. When you build this connectedness, you move from nationalism to the idea of seeing the world as a unified whole. You see beyond race, beyond religion, beyond culture, and you realize that we are all human beings having human experiences in our own way. So, that first skill is connectedness. It creates a feeling of love and appreciation for the world around you. It's a really powerful feeling. So, I created a meditation called the six phase, where the first phase is about applying certain practices from Zen Buddhism to create feelings of compassion. Now, the second phase is happiness. It's bringing happiness into your life immediately. That is obviously. Gratitude, one of the biggest hacks for happiness. That third feeling, that third thing that we have to up-level, is actually forgiveness. A lot of people don't get this, but forgiveness improves your physical body. Studies now show that forgiveness can reduce back pain. Forgiveness can increase your vertical jump. Forgiveness can increase your insurance. It's insane that forgiveness does so many different things to your body. I've done experiments where I've seen that forgiveness can improve dramatically my alpha brainwave amplitude and brain coherence, which is a powerful skill that people get to with years and years and years and years of meditation, but you can do it with forgiveness much, much, much faster. So, forgiveness is that third thing, but it's not just forgiving other people. It's forgiving yourself from past shame, from past guilt, from past mistakes. It's a process of self-healing. Now, those three initial phases are all on the idea of bliss, on the idea of blissipline. I do this every morning. So, I woke up this morning. That was the first three things I did. 

But then, while still in my meditation, I do an additional three things. You see, I believe we need a certain balance in life. You need to be happy now. We need to be fully immersed in the present. But that's not the entire thing. We do live in a world where we are encouraged to go out there, to build things, to be a success, and that's important, too. It's a game that we enjoy playing, and it's a game that pushes the human race forward. So, the next three things are about getting out of this passive state of meditation and actually using your mind to do things. And so, phase number four is about visualizing your life three years into the future. You could call this future vision, and I recommend exercises people can do. Phase number five is crafting your perfect day internally in your head before you start the day, and phase six is basically creating a sense of internal support. It's creating this sense of inner drive and stability where you know that whatever higher power you believe in or whatever inner mechanism you have is there to support you in your quest for the day. When you put all of these together, you have a really powerful meditation practice. A lot of entrepreneurs who say they cannot do meditation, a lot of people who say, "Oh, I'm too ADD to do meditation; I can't clear my mind," well, that's the wrong kind of meditation for you. This is designed, the six-phase is designed specifically for these kinds of people, and this is how I spend my time every single day.

Matt:	And longtime listeners of the podcast will know that I'm personally a huge fan of the six-phase, and I do it every day as well. I did it this morning.

Vishen:	Matt, sorry, I just want to say, the meditation is completely free. You can download the app Ombana--o-m-b-a-n-a--and the app, you can get it on Google Play or the Android store, the IOS app store, and on the app it comes with the meditation pre-loaded.

Matt:	Awesome. That's perfect. So anyway, what I was going to say is you touched on the idea of the balance between happiness in the now and setting goals or striving to achieve things in the future, and could you talk a little bit about something you mentioned in the book, the notion of the intention paradox? It's sort of, you know, how can we have goals in the future but also still be focused on just happiness in the present.

Vishen:	Well, it's because we accidentally mesh the two, don't we? We say we'll be happy when... I call it the "if-then" model of happiness. If I get this, I will be happy. If I get that, I will be happy. Problem is, if you are placing that condition for happiness on a future, as soon as you hit that future, what happens? You're not really happy. You're just thinking about the next future and the next future and the next future. Happiness always stays on the horizon. As you keep running towards the horizon, it just gets further and further and further away. That's what happens you have an if-then model of happiness: you never catch the horizon. And so, people waste all their time chasing things, thinking it's going to make them happy. That's why so many people wake up at the age of 40 one day going, "Holy shit, I can't imagine. How did I get my life to this level? I'm miserable." And that really is what you want to avoid.

Matt:	And that ties into the concept that you talk a lot about in the book, sort of the distinction between a means goal and an end goal.

Vishen:	Yeah. The way to really understand if you're chasing the right goal is to know the difference between a means goal and an end goal. Now, means goals are what the culturescape tell you that you have to chase. Means goals are often brules, okay. So, a means goal might be six pack abs. A means goal might be a job where I get to go to work every day and earn a living paycheck. A means goal might be marriage. A means goal might be "I need to lose five kg". A means goal might be "I need to get to a certain salary level". Problem is, many of these means goals we chase because society makes us believe it is important, and then when we get to the goal we realize we don't really have that feeling that we initially wanted. You see, you want to go from goals to feelings. The thing is to ask yourself, "If I got this goal, then what? If I got that goal, then what? If I got that goal, then what?" And you keep asking yourself this question, you start to arrive at what I call end goals. End goals are those things that your soul really, really, really craves. End goals are things that truly bring you happiness. You see, you want that six-pack abs? No. You want that six-pack abs so you can feel healthy. But there are better ways to do it. You don't want that nine to five job with a steady salary. No, you want security, and there are better ways to do it. You don't want to be an entrepreneur, because most entrepreneurs are facing anxiety, stressed out, and simply bought themselves a new nine to five job. What you want is freedom. So, when you aim for those feelings, when you identify what are those feelings that you crave, you start to understand that you can hack life to get you those feelings much, much faster. And when you do that, you don't fall into the means goals trap. Here's a classic example of the means goal trap. So many Americans decide that they want to become lawyers because it's one of the highest-paying professions when the average American kid graduates from college, yet... And so people spend all of this time getting student loans, studying hard, taking their LSAT, joining a firm, becoming a lawyer, but I used to work in the legal industry and studies show that 50% of lawyers are clinically depressed, especially female lawyers. 50% clinically depressed. And it's crazy people make this their goal, but a big reason is they were following the rules of the culturescape. They were chasing a means goal. Why did they become a lawyer? And I asked this to a couple of my friends who are lawyers and who had quit, and they became a lawyer because, really, what they were seeking was "I wanted a good income so I could have a good home, so I could raise a family, so I could be happy. I wanted to do something to contribute to the world." And the point is, don't follow what the herd tells you to do. Understand what is it that your soul craves and chase that. That is the end goal. It gets you off the hamster wheel. So, here's the thing. End goals fall into three buckets. The first bucket is experiences; the second bucket is growth; the third bucket is contribution. All end goals fall into these three buckets, so you start by identifying what are the experiences you want to have in the world. These are things such as waking up next to the man or woman I love, being able to backpack across Southeast Asia. Then you ask yourself, to have these experiences, who is the man or woman I need to be? And this might be, well, I need to be really fit. I want to speak this extra language. I want to be able to be confident in the way I carry myself. And this is good. Growth is a goal in itself. Now, the third bucket is, if I had those experiences, if I evolved to be this incredible man or woman, how can I give back to the world? And here you come up with your list of how you can contribute to your fellow man. Now, when you chase these three things--experiences, growth, and contribution--it is a much surer path to happiness. Experiences bring us happiness because they let us experience all the wonders of the world. Growth is one of the surest parts to happiness. As Tony Robbins said, as souls, we crave two things: growth and contribution. And that brings us to contribution. Contribution is, according to the Dalai Lama, you want to be happy? Make other people happy. Contribution is one of the quickest ways to hack your levels of happiness. So, when I teach people goal setting, I ask them to toss away the goal setting models of past generations and instead aim for experiences, growth, and contribution. This, I believe, is a much, much, much better path to a life that's wonderful, that's full of meaning, that actually gives you what your soul craves.

Matt:	And this kind of duality between present happiness and end goals and kind of blissipline, how does that tie into another concept you talk about, which is the idea of bending reality?

Vishen:	Ha. So, firstly, in the book I lay out ten different laws, right. Ten different laws that I think really help us advance in terms of our scale of human evolution, and bending reality is one of those laws. It's an understanding that our consciousness, to some degree, shapes what we experience. And that's what I mean by bending reality. There are certain people out there--I'm sure you've met people--who feel really lucky, who talk about coincidences and synchronicities entering their lives. I can't explain it, don't know how it works, but I believe it's real. And what I suggest in this book are a couple of models that help you get there, a couple of mental constructs that help you get there. And again. I'm not talking about that mumbo-jumbo stuff from The Secret, which I don't buy into. I'm talking about something quite different and a process that is quite different.

Matt:	You know, it's really funny. In our previous episode, actually, we had a neuroscientist on here and we were talking about how to create an upward spiral to escape from anxiety and depression, and he talked about the fact that beliefs shape reality and that truly, you know, your conscious experience can remap your brain, can change your neurochemistry and literally shape what happens in the world around you. And so, it's not mumbo-jumbo. It's not hokey. And for listeners that are skeptical, if you check out that episode, you'll hear a neuroscientist explain the process behind how and why this takes place.

Vishen:	Right. And what I say is, "Look. Is it the mystical law of attraction? Maybe. Is it our brains reticular activating system where our thoughts help our brain recognize objects in the world that help facilitate those thoughts? Maybe. But the fact is we don't have to know how it works to let it work for ourselves."

Matt:	That's totally true, and I think that dovetails a little bit with another concept, even maybe just a phrase that you kind of mention in the book which I love, which is the idea that live life as though everything is rigged in your favor.

Vishen:	Right. I love that model of functioning in the world.

Matt:	I think it fundamentally kind of shifts your perception and the way you experience events, and I think it's something Tony Robbins talks about, too, sort of the notion that shift your perception to think that everything in life is happening for you, the notion that I think you also use the phrase, or I maybe quote somebody, that the world sent you nothing but angels, right.

Vishen:	Right, right. That's Neale Donald Walsch who said that. 

Matt:	Well, I'd love to talk a little bit about the concept of digging into a sort of... going back to brules and limiting beliefs, one of the most kind of damaging and insidious limiting beliefs that almost everyone suffers from is the belief that I am not enough, right. Can you talk a little bit about that?

Vishen:	Right. So, one of the interesting things... We were just talking about how our thoughts create our reality. That's not true. Your thoughts do not create your reality. Your thoughts are constantly changing and shifting. It is your beliefs that create your reality. People get this mixed up, and that's why...

Matt:	Very good point.

Vishen:	Yep, because your beliefs run your thoughts. If you believe you are not enough, you will have thoughts related to that thing. If you believe that you are smart, that you are intelligent, that you are powerful, you have thoughts that relate to that. Your beliefs shape your thoughts, which create and craft your reality. So, the idea here is how can we adjust our beliefs? How can we make sure that we have the right beliefs? And it's really a process called belief hacking. It's maybe a little bit too complex to explain in the short timeframe we have, but it's understanding that your beliefs, like hardware in a computer, are swappable. If you want your computer to function better, well, you can swap out an outdated hard drive and swap in a better hard drive. You can upgrade your monitor. You can change certain things about your computer. You can go from an old mouse to a more modern, sleek Apple magic mouse, too. Just like that, your beliefs are also swappable, and people don't get that. People cling to their beliefs and believe that their beliefs are them. They are not you. You feel that your religion is holding you back? You can swap that out. You feel that have a negative belief about a certain way of functioning in the world? You can swap that out. Now, I learned about this through a phenomenal teacher called Marissa Peer, who I mention in my book, and she's the hypnotherapist for many successful famous people, including the U.K. royal family, the who's who in Hollywood, and so on. I did this hypnotherapy session with Marissa once. She's also a Mindvalley author, so you can check her out on mindvalleyacademy.com. And I was trying to wonder, why is it that I had this big ed tech company, but I never seemed to have as much money as I wanted. And she regressed me into my past, and I had this memory of this school teacher whom I really, really, really adored. He was my favorite teacher. And I adored him, I loved his classes, at the age of 13 I wanted to be like him, but the thing is he was always broke. His wife had left him. He just led a really sad life. He was a great teacher but a sad life. And in that moment, while under hypnotic regression, the belief popped up. I was carrying the belief internally within me that said, "To be a great teacher, you have to suffer". And I realized that the belief had been holding me back, and so when I cleared that belief, so many things instantly shifted in my life. It was unbelievable how fast these shifts happen, but that's the thing about how our heads work. We carry with us beliefs that we do not know we're carrying with us. Think of this little circle. This is the amount of beliefs that you know you have. But this is the amount of beliefs, this giant circle over here, that you're carrying with you that you do not know you have, and life is that process of discovery where you discover these beliefs and you uninstall them as you go on. The six-phase is a great way to do it. As you meditate more, as you practice mindfulness, realizations come to you, and many of the realizations come in the form of new beliefs that push out outdated ones.

Matt:	And the thing is, everybody has these limiting beliefs, right. Even if you're not aware of them, even if you're listening and you think, oh, I don't have any beliefs holding me back, the reality is, just like that regression, that something that happened 15 years ago is still shaping and having a very material impact on your life. And for listeners who are curious or want to kind of dig into how to root out and uncover limiting beliefs, we have an earlier episode on The Science of Success where we kind of dig into the whole process of how to kind of uncover and break those down. But, you know, as we're wrapping up I'm curious: What is one piece of homework that you would give to somebody listening to this episode?

Vishen:	Sure. Well, what I'd say is go to mindvalley.com/extraordinary, and there you can sign up for a free course that takes you through many of these ideas. Now, if you buy the book, that's phenomenal, because the book helps you understand the free course and vice-versa, but if you don't buy the book because you can't afford the 13 bucks, just go and sign up for that anyway. Because in that course, I take you through a whole process of identifying your goals in different dimensions of your life, and to move past the rules into true end goals. And the process is really interesting.

Matt:	And for anybody out there listening, you know, personally I've read The Code of the Extraordinary Mind. I think it's an amazing book. I highly recommend everybody checking it out. I read it and literally--I'm not even joking--I changed my entire daily architecture. I was already doing the six-phase, but I added on some other kind of exercises and strategies that have already, in the few weeks that I've been implementing them, I've seen dramatic changes in my happiness, in my excitement, and it sounds kind of woo-woo but, you know, even in the way that the universe suddenly sort of... you know, things start to go your way. You start kind of experiencing luck and bending reality and shaping the outcomes around you. It's pretty amazing.

Vishen:	Thank you. That's really good. I'm glad that's working out for you.

Matt:	Absolutely. Well, Vishen, thank you so much for being on the Science of Success. We're so glad to have had you on.

Vishen:	Thanks. Likewise. I'm honored to be on your show. So, good luck there, Matt. Thank you so much.

June 29, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Emotional Intelligence, Focus & Productivity

Why Everything You Know About Time Management is Wrong with Best Selling Author Rory Vaden

May 24, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Focus & Productivity

In this episode - we dig into the truth about time management, uncover the reason that most time management thinking is wrong, and learn how we can give ourselves permission to multiply our time with our guest Rory Vaden. 

If you feel like you never have enough time and your todo-list just keeps growing, listen to this episode!

Rory is the best-selling author of Take The Stairs and Procrastinate On Purpose, an award winning entrepreneur and business leader, a self discipline strategist, and co-founder of Southwestern Consulting. 

We discuss the following topics:
-Why everything you’ve heard about time management is wrong
-The one calculation that changes everything in your time managemnet
-How to do things today to create more time tomorrow
-How to tell people “no” in a kind way
-How to create "compound interest" for your time
-How to overcome the fear of delegation
-How to overcome the emotional barriers preventing you from multiplying your time
-Why time is NOT money
-And more! 

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

This episode, we have another incredible guest on the show, Rory Vaden. Rory is the bestselling author of Take the Stairs and Procrastinate on Purpose, an award-winning entrepreneur and business leader, a self-disciplined strategist, co-founder of Southwestern Consulting and—bonus points—a Nashvillian.

Rory:	Boom!

Matt:	Rory, welcome to The Science of Success.

Rory:	Hey, thanks, Matt. It's good to be here. 

Matt:	We're very excited to have you on. So, Rory, tell us a little bit about your background and how you became fascinated with self-discipline and self-improvement.

Rory:	Yeah. Well, I grew up around... A lot of my story I talk about I was raised by a single mom who sold Mary Kay cosmetics. So, I grew up around success and sales and leadership principles, and it means I know more about makeup than I do about cars. So, I kind of had that exposure when I was little, and then when I was in college, I worked for a company called Southwestern Advantage and ran my own business selling educational children's reference books, 14 hours a day, six days a week on straight commission, paying all my expenses all the way through college door-to-door. Did that for five summers and made about a quarter million dollars in the five summers in college and graduate school doing that, and then entered into the world of business and entrepreneurship, and then started Southwest Consulting. Actually, I did a thing called the World Championship of Public Speaking for Toastmasters, and that launched my speaking career, and then started Southwestern Consulting with some business partners. Just had our ten year anniversary, and we started with four of us and we now have 115 team members that make everything happen. Moved to Nashville six years ago and dreamed one day of being on The Science of Success podcast with Matt Bodnar, and here we are!

Matt:	Nice. Well, that's awesome. That's an amazing story. That's quite a few reference books to sell door-to-door.

Rory:	Yeah. Yeah, well, it was, and it was amazing training, and that's really where I got exposed to a lot of the principles of success and self-discipline and just really what it takes to make a business successful, and I'm very grateful for that opportunity, and I'm actually speaking tonight at an event where there will be several hundred students who are about to go sell. It's the new class of this summer's students and I'm going to go talk to them a little bit, so it'll be fun.

Matt:	That's awesome. Well, one of the things that I'm a huge fan of, and I know you've talked a lot about, is sort of the distinction between effectiveness and efficiency. Can you tell us a little bit about... A lot of people might think those are kind of the same thing. What's the difference and why is that difference important?

Rory:	Well, actually, yeah. So, efficiency, as I think Dr. Stephen Covey said, is doing things right. Effectiveness is doing the right things. And Procrastinating on Purpose, the first sentence of the book says "Everything you know about time management is wrong." And one of the things that we challenge... Effectiveness is kind of around the idea of prioritizing and focusing first on what matters most, but what we have found in recent years is there's this emergence of a new type of thinker that we call a multiplier, and multipliers don't care so much about efficiency or effectiveness as they do about efficacy, and efficacy is different. Because if efficiency is doing things right, effectiveness is doing the right things, efficacy is simply about producing results. And multipliers don't even care so much... It's not so much about the right way or the wrong way. It's about what is the way that produces results, and that is what they really care about. So, it's not about quantity of time or even quality of activity. It's simply about what produces the maximum result, and that word is efficacy.

Matt:	Fascinating. So, when you say that everything we know about time management is wrong, could you extrapolate on that a little bit more?

Rory:	Yeah. So, there's two major differences that we have discovered, and Southwestern Consulting, so what we do is one-on-one coaching, and we have about 1,600 active clients right now that we work with one-on-one, you know, talk through the daily challenges of their lives, and helping them get to the next level, particularly in sales, sales leadership, and time management. There's two major differences in the way that multipliers think, compared to everybody else. The first one is that... I was actually with my business partner on a Saturday morning, and he has this... at the time, this little two and a half-year-old girl, baby girl named Haven, and we were having an International Leaders Planning Retreat, and it was like a big meeting day, and so we're leaving Dustin's house early in the morning or whatever, and Haven comes running down the hallway and she runs and she grabs ahold of Dustin's leg, and she looks at him and she says, "Daddy, where are we going?" And he looks at her and says, "Oh, you know, I'm sorry, baby Haven. Daddy actually has to go to work today." And her eyes well up with tears and she says, "No work today, Daddy. Please no work." And, in that moment, Matt, I realized two things. The first is that I'm not ready for children quite just yet. [Laughs] But the second one is that everything I had ever been taught about time management was all tips and tricks, tools and technology, calendars and checklists. It was all logical. But looking at Haven in that moment, I realized that today, time management is no longer just logical. Today, time management is emotional, and our feelings of guilt and fear and worry and anxiety and our desire to feel successful and valued, important, those things actually dictate what we actually spend our time doing, as much as anything in our email list or in our to-do list or on our calendar, and yet most of us have never had any formal training on managing those emotions, and most of us aren't even cognitive or consciously aware that emotions are driving our decision making. And so, that's the first major difference, is that today, time management isn't just logical. It's emotional, and Procrastinating on Purpose is really the first book that focuses on that emotional aspect of managing your time.

Matt:	I think that's critically important, and we've talked a lot on the podcast about looking at limiting beliefs and fears and that kind of stuff. What are some of the big fears that hold people back from being able to multiply their time?

Rory:	Yeah. Well, the subtitle of the book is actually The Five Permissions to Multiply Your Time. It very easily could have been called The Five Fears that Prevent People from Multiplying Their Time. And there's more than five, but one example is guilt. The first of the five strategies is in the focus funnel, which is the framework for the book, is eliminate. And we call it the permission to ignore. It's giving yourself the permission to develop the confidence to say no to things, because most of us try to go through life never saying no, and I was one of those people. I like to say yes. I'm a people pleaser. I want to make everybody happy. Until one of the multipliers said, "Rory, that is the stupidest thing I have ever heard," and I was like, "Okay, jerkface." But they explained and they said, "You have to realize that you're always saying no to something. Any time you say yes to one thing, you are simultaneously saying no to an infinite number of others," and that was a huge breakthrough for me. That's something that we call the significance calculation, which is the second major difference, and we can talk about that in a minute. But the fear is the fear of missing out or feeling guilty, and so we get asked to do things and we pressure ourselves, or we allow other people to pressure us into doing them when we don't really want to do them but we feel like we have to or we should, or we're afraid of missing out. And so, that fear causes us to take on things and accept things and overcommit in a way that has a negative long-term impact, both on our emotional stability and our psychology, as well as our productivity and our ability to get results.

Matt:	And I think that's something that, personally, I definitely struggle with, is, you know, when to say no and how to say no. What are some ways that you can say no to people in a way that you're not being rude to them or disrespectful or disruptive? Or is that just a fear that you just have to get over and be confident in your ability to say no to things?

Rory:	Yeah. Well, mostly it's a fear. Mostly we associate telling people no with being mean and we don't want to be mean, so half of the battle there is the realization that you can say no but still be nice. And so, you make a game out of it. We do it. We try to make a game out of being the nicest no that anybody ever got. A big part of what I do these days is I speak, and over the years, my speaking fee has gone up pretty dramatically, and so now we get people who are... you know, it's just awesome, because they'll come to us. They invite us to come speak but maybe they don't have the budget to afford it, so we only have a certain number of dates that we can take to be out-speaking, and so we can't take all of them, and if we have to tell somebody no, we put together a little care package. You know, it's like, thank you so much for the compliment of requesting us. Sorry it's not able to work. Here's some things... We put quote books in there and some magnets and some different things, and then we always try to point them in the direction of, "If you were looking for a message like me, here's maybe some other speakers that you should check out that you might like, and they might still help you accomplish that objective." So, you know, it can be that, or it can just simply be with language. One of the phrases that I love, and I don't know when I started using it, is just, "Thank you so much for the compliment of asking me." It's flattering to be asked. I want to able to say yes to you. Unfortunately I have a stack of previous commitments that are not going to allow me to do this with the appropriate level of focus and dedication it really deserves, so for that reason I'm going to have to decline, but I really wish you the best and here's a couple ideas. Or, you know, we try to always give people some resource or direction to the extent that we can for whatever their next step might be. But it's not so much about the tactical part of it as it is the mental realization that you can say no and still be nice.

Matt:	That was great. I think that's a very, very good way to phrase it, and that's something I think I'll definitely be using. I think that there's a lot of advice out there, too, that you should say yes to everything and take every meeting and blah blah blah, and I think that on the road to success, there's a flipping point where you switch from needing to say yes to everything needing to say no to more and more and more things so that you can really focus in on the highest value, biggest impact things.

Rory:	Yeah. It absolutely is. It's very often a case of what got you here won't get you there. It's an example, though, of how everything about time management is wrong, because we hear that very thing, right, that you have to be saying yes, you have to be out there always taking on everything, and, according to multipliers, what's more important than having a to-do list in the next generation is having a not-to-do list. So, it's having clear clarity about the things that you do not do, and that becomes more important, because as you become more and more successful, as your star rises, whether that's inside of an organization or inside of an industry or just kind of in general with public popularity and influence, more and more opportunities come your way and you have to be really clear about the things that make sense and the things that don't, which ties in to multiplying time. For us, we actually have created a scoring system, basically, or a new way of thinking that helps people evaluate what tasks they should do and they shouldn't do, based on a calculation we called the significance calculation.

Matt:	So, tell me a little bit more. What is the significance calculation? 

Rory:	Yeah. So, it's based upon the history of time management theory, and early time management thought, which we call era one thinking, was very one-dimensional. It was all about efficiency. It was managing your time by doing things faster. Well, then a book came out called Seven Habits of Highly Effective People. Amazing book written by the brilliant late Dr. Stephen Covey, and he changed the world. The book sold 25 million copies and it was just a game-changer, and Dr. Covey introduced era two time management thinking, which is prioritizing your time. And he taught us, rather than just trying to do things quickly, is that you should focus first on what matters most, and you should prioritize certain activities, and he created this two-dimensional scoring system that he called the Time Management Matrix. Well, in the Time Management Matrix, the Y axis was importance and the X axis was urgency, and importance... you used those two criteria to help you score and you realized not all tasks are created equal. And it was so powerful. It was huge for all of us, because it helped you realize that, hey, item number seven on your to-do list should actually be bumped up to number one, and that concept is really powerful. The limitation of that, as the world has evolved, and a lot of people don't realize this. That book was written in 1989.

Matt:	Wow.

Rory:	Think about how different the world was in 1989.

Matt:	Seriously.

Rory:	Right. I mean, there's no cell phones, no internet, no Google, no Facebook, no social media, none of that. None of the stuff that we have today. Well, you can't solve today's time management problems using yesterday's time management thinking. The next level of results always requires the next level of thinking, and so, what we noticed is that these multipliers, these top one-percenters, these ultra-performers, that we call them in Take the Stairs, which was our first book. Their thinking has evolved to something where they include the significance calculation. And while importance is how much does something matter, and urgency is how soon does something matter, significance is how long is this going to matter. In other words, how is this going to play out over time? And the significance calculation changes everything. Absent the significance calculation, we tend to live in a world of urgency. Significance is the natural counterbalancing force to urgency, and what I mean by urgency as a practical example is most of us live with a 24-hour paradigm. Most of us wake up and we say, what's the most important thing I have to do today? But that is not the question that multipliers ask. Multipliers, when you make the significance calculation, you break free of that one day, 24-hour paradigm, and they instead are thinking about tomorrow and the next day and the next day. So, while most people ask the question, 
"What's the most important thing I can do today?" multipliers are asking the question, "How can I use my time in a way today that creates more time tomorrow? What are the things I can do right now to create more time or more results in the future?" And, based on that question, they choose a different set of tasks than most people would. Again, let me give you a practical example of this, Matt. So, if I ask the average person off the street, I say, "Hey, do you have two hours open in your calendar today where you could set up online bill pay?" People would be like, "No. Are you kidding? I don't have two hours open in my calendar. I don't remember the last time in my life when I had two hours open in my calendar." So, they would say, "No, I don't have time to do that. I have more important..." They would say, right, "I have more important things to do." Well, a multiplier would look at that and go, well, wait a minute. If I spend two hours today setting up online bill pay, and I don't really have the two hours. Of course, there's other things I could be doing with that two hours. But, if I take two hours and I set up online bill pay and that saves me 30 minutes every month from paying my bills, then that means in just four months' time, I will have broken even on that investment and every month thereafter I will be getting something that we introduce, a concept in the book, called ROTI, which is return on time invested. So, every month for the rest of your life, you're getting this ROTI. It's creating time in the future that you wouldn't otherwise have. I mentioned there's five permissions in the book. The first is eliminate. The second one is kind of related to what we're talking about here, which is automate the permission to invest. And what we realize is that automation is to your time exactly what compounding interest is to your money. So, just like compounding interest takes money and turns it into more money, automation takes time and it turns it into more time. None of us have time to set up a better system today. None of us have time to create a better technology. None of us have time to migrate over to completely different software than we've been using. It's never convenient to do that. But the people who have explosive growth are the ones who are constantly doing that. Not constantly, but they're regularly evolving in that fashion because they know that those things create more time in the future. So, the way that rich people think about money is almost exactly the same way that multipliers think about time.

Matt:	I love that analogy and the comparison to compound interest. Compound interest is such a powerful phenomenon and it really translates into a way of thinking about, you know, if you apply the same principle to your time, you'll be able to multiply it. 

Rory:	Yeah. Absolutely. And it's a new way of thinking, and you have to give yourself permission, because if you don't give yourself the permission to invest the time and the money to set up that system, you will always fall victim to whatever's latest and loudest. You will always be victim to the urgent, and there's a term that we coined in the Take the Stairs book that really captures this, and it's part of what really popularized our work in the media, was this phrase that we call priority dilution. And so, priority dilution is the new procrastination, because priority dilution, even though it has nothing to do with being lazy or apathetic or disengaged like classic or traditional procrastination, it's the same net result as a procrastinator, which is that we leave the office at the end of the day with our most significant priorities left unchecked, not because we're lazy but because we allow our attention to shift to less important but perhaps more urgent tasks. We're constantly fighting fires, and the result is we only have linear growth for the company versus exponential growth. Multipliers are the people who make that significance calculation. They're willing to take the hit in the short term, the same way that wealthy person is going, "You know what? I'm not going to buy a new car this year. I'm instead going to invest that money, and ten years from now I'll buy a car that's ten times as nice." It's the exact same mode of thinking. It's just that instead of about money, it's about time. And what Procrastinating on Purpose does, you know, I think the idea isn't really novel. It's just the power is bringing it into your consciousness and having a nomenclature and semantics and a visual, which we use this thing called the focus funnel, to codify the way that this thinking happens, because even multipliers themselves do most of this on an unconscious level. They don't know they're doing it. What we do, because we're around them all the time, and I interview them on my podcast—I do a weekly podcast also and I share the stage with a lot of these authors and thinkers and amazing people or whatever—is I started to realize there's these certain patterns that were shared. So, we put that together in a book and that's making a big impact.

Matt:	So, you've mentioned the five permissions, and we've talked about a couple of them already. What are the others?

Rory:	Well, yeah. That's a lot to get into in a short period of time.

Matt:	Fair enough.

Rory:	And, in fact, if you go to procrastinateonpurpose.com, you can watch a free webinar. It's a one-hour webinar and it's completely free, and it walks you through the entire framework. It shows you the visual of the focus funnel, explains how these multipliers think. But basically, at the top of the funnel, if you have all your tasks coming in, the first question is, "Can this be eliminated?", which is the permission to ignore. If it can't be eliminated, then it drops down into the middle of the focus funnel, which is automate, the permission to invest. So, can this be automated? If it can't be automated, then it drops down to the bottom of the funnel, which is, "Can this be delegated?" And delegation is a really core focus because, at that point, you know a task must be done. The question is, must it be done by you? And if it can be done by somebody else, then you should have them do it. The problem is that most of us... Like, if you asked the average small business owner, you say, "Hey, are there tasks that you're doing every day that you could train someone else to do?" Most people would say, "Well, yeah, of course there are." And you say, "Well, why haven't you trained them to do it?" And they'd say... well, one or two things. They would say, "I either don't have the time to do it, like, it's just faster for me to do it myself," or, "They won't be able to do it as well as I can." Again, those are actual emotional rationalizations that we make in a split decision, like an instant. And if you actually break those down and you look, so let's look at the one about... You know, it's faster for me to do it myself. And one of the things, Matt, that we encourage and we try to teach our coaching clients is what we call the 30x role. So, the 30x role suggests that you should spend 30 times the amount of time it takes you to do a task once on training someone else to do that task for you. So, let's just say you have a task that takes five minutes, as an example. The 30x rule suggests, then, that you should spend 150 minutes... So, 30 times five. 150 minutes training someone how to do the task. And this is where I lose people sometimes, because they go, "Rory, that is so stupid. Why would I spend 150 minutes—that's two and a half hours—training somebody to do a task that I could just do myself in five minutes?" Well, the answer is, it never makes sense to do that unless you make the significance calculation. In a world of urgency, in a 24-hour paradigm, it never makes sense to trade two and a half hours for five minutes. It just doesn't. However, if you make a significance calculation and you look at this over just one year worth of time, you'll realize that if you spend five minutes a day on the task, well, if there's 250 working days in just one year, then over the course of one year, you're going to spend 1,250 minutes on that task. So, now the question is a little bit different. The question isn't, "Should I spend 150 minutes to save five?" It's, "Should I spend 150 minutes to save 1,250?" Well, the answer is just as obvious, but it's the complete opposite of what you originally thought. The only thing that has changed is your perspective, what we call the significance calculation. And if you were to evaluate that investment of time the way that you would evaluate a financial investment, so now I'm investing 150 minutes, I'm saving 1,250, so really, that's a net gain of 1,100 because I have to spend the 150 training, so the net gain is 1,100. So, I invested 150 minutes. The net gain was 1,100. If you divide 150 into 1,100, that's a 733% ROTI, return on time invested. And we think the next generation of cost savings for companies is not going to be about saving money. It's going to be about saving time, because people say time is money. Time is not money. Time is worth way more than money is. So, when you look at delegating, most of us don't have time to train someone to do it for us, right? Because we're living in a world of urgency. Well, multipliers go, "Well, I don't care how urgent it is. I'm going to take the time to train this person to do this right, and then I'll never have to worry about it again," and that longer calculation changes everything. So, what it really comes down to with delegate is not that you don't have time to do it. What it comes down to is the more emotional thing, you don't think they'll be able to do it as well as you can. Again, though, if you make the significance calculation, you realize that might be true once. Like, the first time they do it, yeah, it's not going to be as well you could do it. Maybe the second time, maybe the third time, maybe the fifth time, maybe the hundredth time, but at some point in the future, they're going to be able to master that task just like you were, and they'll probably be able to do it even better because they're going to have a higher level of specialization and focus, because they're not pulled in as many directions as you are. So, delegation. The third permission is the permission of imperfect. You have to give yourself permission to say, "Yeah, this is going to be a little bit messed up for a while, for a short term, but the value in the long term is worth it," and it's the significance calculation that provides the foundation and the basis for being willing to accept that short-term permission of imperfect.

Matt:	That's so critical. I see so many people struggle with an inability to delegate, primarily because of a fear tied to they're not going to be able to do it as well as I can.

Rory:	Yeah, and that's an emotional thing. Like, it's a perfectionism fear. Like, it won't be good enough. That is emotion at the subconscious level dictating you that you're going to do it. And not only dictating you, but trapping you. It's trapping you into doing that all the time, which means that you're restricting your ability to grow individually, and certainly to grow your organization or whatever your cause is, because you're imprisoned, you're handicapped by this idea that you have to do everything. And if you're talking about entrepreneurs, until an entrepreneur gets past that thought that I have to do everything, they're going to inhibit the growth and the possibility and the potential for everyone around them.

Matt:	So, what is one piece of homework that you would give our listeners to kind of implement some of these ideas into their lives?

Rory:	Well, so, there's two things. So, first of all, I would say don't be silly. Like, give yourself permission to spend an hour and watch. Go to procrastinateonpurpose.com and watch this and get the education. We're making it available for free for people, so go and do that. That one hour will have a return, I am sure, of thousands, if not tens of thousands of your time. But the other practical thing to do is, okay... The whole premise here—make sure that we're clear—is very simple. You multiply time by giving yourself the emotional permission to spend time on things today that give you more time tomorrow. That's the whole premise. So, what I would say is, make a list, because you probably have had these ideas kicking around in your head. You're like, yeah, you know what, I probably should reorganize that thing, or we probably need to update this software, or we really need a tool that does this, or this process needs to be improved. You know, we should really create a series of talking points for that customer service issue. I really should hire a person to do this. I find that I'm doing this one thing over and over and over again. And that's a great place to look, by the way, is things that you keep doing over and over and over again. Make a list of those things and ask yourself, okay, what are the things that I could do today that would create more time tomorrow? How can I eliminate, automate, delegate, and then there's two other permissions, which you can get into in the webinar. And just develop clarity around those things, and that's half the battle is just bringing it into your consciousness, the power of this idea. 

Matt:	Well, Rory, this has been fascinating, and I'm sure the listeners are going to have some very actionable insights here, especially if they check out that webinar. That will let them multiply their time. So, I wanted to say thank you very much for being on The Science of Success and sharing all of these insights.

Rory:	Oh, yeah. It's my pleasure, Matt. Thank you so much for having me and remember, success is never owned. Success is only rented, and the rent is due every day.

May 24, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Focus & Productivity

How You Are Sabotaging Yourself By Setting The Wrong Goals - And What To Do About It - With Emmy Winner & Bestselling Author Scott Halford

May 17, 2016 by Lace Gilger in Emotional Intelligence, Focus & Productivity

In this episode we dive into how to activate your brain, create and sustain momentum to make your goals a reality, how goals can often be self-sabotaging, and the neurochemistry behind how and why all of this happens with our guest Scott Halford.

If you are feeling stuck or want to make progress on a goal but can’t figure out why you’re not – listen to this episode!

Scott is an Emmy Award winning writer and producer, acclaimed public speaker, and the author of Activate Your Brain. Scott is also a long-time educator of Fortune 500 executive teams on topics including achievement psychology, brain-based behavioral science, and more.

We cover some incredible topics including:

  • How long term goals can self sabotage by triggering a “disgust” response in your brain (and what to do about it)

  • The ways to “erase” cortisol and other stress inducing neurochemicals

  • How to create momentum towards your goals and put yourself in an achievement state

  • Simple strategies to “activate” your brain

  • The “three brains” inside your head and what each of them is responsible for

  • The truth about multi-tasking and why its impossible

  • And Much More!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Welcome back to The Science of Success. Today, we have an exciting new guest on the show, Scott Halford. Scott is an Emmy Award-winning writer and producer, acclaimed public speaker, and author of Activate Your Brain: How Understanding Your Brain Can Improve your Work and your Life. Scott is also a long time educator of Fortune 500 executive teams on topics including achievement psychology, brain-based behavioral science, emotional intelligence, and the principles of influence. Scott, welcome to The Science of Success. 

Scott:	Thanks, Matt. Great to be here.

Matt:	Well, we're excited to have you on. 

Scott:	I'm thrilled. You guys do all this psychology stuff. It's pretty interesting, huh?

Matt:	Absolutely. So, to start out, Scott, tell me a little bit about how did you kind of get into this field and start doing some research and kind of talking and writing about neuroscience and psychology?

Scott:	Yeah, I think I've been interested in what makes people tick for a long, long time. Never from a disease state, but mostly from an achievement state, which is a very different kind of path, and when I was in television... I had a TV career, as you intimated in my introduction. When I was in television, I had the opportunity to do a number of different documentaries on a number of different topics, and met some people in really very, very difficult and trying situations, all the way from people on death row for capital punishment to people who were burned on 90% of their bodies and lived and just the kind of trauma and drama that ensued after that and the kind of life that they had to deal with. And, you know, just meeting them, following them, understanding their plights, really just kind of always resonated with me, and as I got into the corporate world, I really wanted to kind of apply some of the lessons that I learned and to really help them to understand, you know, what is it... We know a lot about what makes people not work well. We even have a huge diagnostic manual on it called the DSM, that tells us all about the mental normalities, but we don't have that much out there that is actually published and rigorous and specific about achievement states. And so, I just got really interested in it and worked in corporations with executives and began just speaking a lot about it, writing a lot about it, and that brings me to kind of where I am.

Matt:	So, when you say achievement state, what does that mean?

Scott:	Well, so, when you look at... For instance, let's go back to disease states. When you look at paranoid schizophrenia or any kind of neuroticism or any other kind of psychopathology, you're typically trying to bring people to homeostasis, or normal. You're trying to fix something that they have that doesn't fit into the typical nomenclature of an average, normal human being, because of either brain chemistry or brain architecture that's gone wrong or, sometimes, substance abuse and physical and emotional abuse that creates that. So, there's all that work around that, and the achievement state is, if you're taking someone who's basically got kind of a normal profile, what is it that they can do to be exceptional, to push themselves, to drive harder than the typical person would, to stick with things longer than the typical person would, and to achieve kind of extraordinary results by the habits that they create and the kind of thinking that they have and the way that they go about paying attention to the world.

Matt:	Fascinating. So, is that sort of the same thing as positive psychology, or is there a difference there?

Scott:	Yeah. So, positive psychology, for sure, is a big piece of it. I actually did a semester of the Authentic Happiness with Martin Seligman, who is considered the father of positive psychology, now offers the master's in applied positive psychology at the University of Pennsylvania. And yet, you know, what they're really looking at are things like happiness and things like flourishing and really taking a look at the things that allow us to have a higher sense of wellbeing and applying it to counseling, applying it to coaching, applying it to just everyday kind of work. It's the same. I'm really interested in achievement states through the lens of the brain. So, I love being able to see it proven through science, and to see that gives it teeth. A lot of the executives I worked with, as well as I do a lot of physician leadership programs, and these doctors and highly analytical and cynical executives, quite frankly, they'll listen to it and they'll understand the emotional intelligence. They'll understand that's an important thing. I get that. I read that. It makes sense that it's important. But they're kind of like, well, it's really secondary to my business acumen or my understanding of financial spreadsheets, and so on and so forth. So, it doesn't always feel like they have teeth because there's no data. Well, neuroscience gives it data, and all of a sudden they can see it in the brain. They can see that their ability to make decisions is impaired by their stressors. They can see that their ability to interact with people in a positive light that actually brings out positive outcomes is predicated on how they manage themselves on a moment-by-moment basis throughout the day, and that you can actually see that in the brain. So, there are a variety of other examples. So, that's where I just get very switched on about the whole thing, is to be able to say, you know, take that cynical person and kind of show them a picture of what's happening in the neuroarchitecture and, with the endocrinology in the brain, the hormones, and say to them, "There's your data. There's the teeth. This is not soft skills. These are the hardest skills you will ever learn." The softer skills are business acumen and financial acumen. You can learn that in a book. You can go through a course, semester, go through an MBA in two years and get all that done and then go out there and experience it, but understanding humans is a lifelong process that has so many variables that we'll never, ever achieve that state. We'll just always be on the journey of it.

Matt:	That's such a great point. One of the things that set me on that journey many years ago was a speech by Charlie Munger. I don't know if you're familiar with him or not.

Scott:	Mm-mm.

Matt:	But he has this amazing speech. He's Warren Buffet's business partner.

Scott:	Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah. Okay, yep.

Matt:	And he's a fascinating guy. He has this incredible speech called... I forget how many exactly, but it's like the 21 standard causes of human misjudgment, and he basically goes through all these things that cause people's decision making to go haywire. And that kind of got me on this rabbit hole of digging into all these different pieces of the puzzle.

Scott:	Fantastic. So, why did you... Why are you so interested in it?

Matt:	Like I said, I mean, I think it started with that speech and I really just wanted to figure out, you know, what drives people to make decisions, and I think in many ways, and I get a lot of listeners, actually, who send me questions sometimes that kind of fall into this category. I think a lot of people's interest in psychology, understanding humans, understanding decision making, all of that sort of stems from initially almost like a very naive place of, you know, I want to figure out how I can influence someone to do what I want, right. It's like, I want A plus B equals them doing what I want them to do, basically.

Scott:	Right, right.

Matt:	And once you kind of get into it, you know... I mean, I started in that place. There's nothing wrong with being in that framework or that kind of thinking about things that way, but once you actually dig into it, there's so many more layers deeper than that, and you really have to kind of start understanding the building blocks and the fundamentals and how those fit together, and then once you understand a lot of that and you really start to build that deeper framework, then these sort of surface level tactical applications of everything from "Why am I making a bad decision?" to "What is this other person making this particular decision and what are the factors going into that and how can I potentially influence them in a more positive way?" Those sort of flow naturally from a deeper understanding of it.

Scott:	Mhm. Yeah. And the variables become really difficult, not to understand but to maneuver around, and so when people have relatively good principles that work, they can work most of the time. Where the A plus B equals C falls apart is that A has a variable, B has a variable, and then the environment affects C as well, and so mood affects it, the timing of the day, positive or negative effect, what you ate, you know, prior decisions, the environment, so many different things. And so, I get that a lot from executives. Just tell me, what's the one line that will get everybody to do what I want them to do?" Like, wow. If it was that easy, I'd be out of business, but it's not that easy. And so, I think that it's so incredibly cool to be able to think about it from a not only personal perspective, but in helping other people. And for me, a lot of people will think because I teach it that I have all my stuff together, and nothing could be further from the truth. I just teach it. And again, we're all on that journey as unfinished human beings trying to figure out how do we go about in the world with high well-being, being effective, feeling successful, feeling meaningful, all of those things that allow us to be who we are. And I think the other thing, too, is that at our very basest, I think a lot of people are interested in psychology because they want to understand their own, number one, and I think when we look at our species, again, through brain architecture, we have brain architecture that allows us to contemplate about ourselves and reflect on how we fit in with the person sitting across from us. So, if you'd go to an airport and you sit around and you're not buried in your iPhone or other device and you just watch people, you watch people watching people. Not very many other species are as interested in each other as we are, because we have so many variables. And so, that's why people watching is so incredibly fascinating, because we can be stunned by each other every single day throughout the day, and I think that that's kind of at the crux of it all, in terms of why people are interested. We inherently should be interested in our own species.

Matt:	You know, one of the things that it took me a little while to realize was that understanding your own decision making and why that can go haywire, why that can go wrong, and understanding other people's decision making, are essentially two sides of the same coin. And so, once you kind of dig into either one of those, you really start to get to those core principles.

Scott:	Yeah. Yeah. I agree. And I think that, you know, we become better when we watch other people, and it's typically not in a book. You know, none of this is... It's all written about. We all ponder it, but no one's ever pronounced the truth just yet. I think that we do our best when we are aware, and not just of ourselves but of other people, and I meet countless executive after executive. And I mostly work in corporations, and I meet countless person after person who can't figure out why all the bad stuff in their life keeps happening, but when I ask them deeper questions and they come to a realization that they're just not looking up. They're not paying attention to the people sitting across from them. They're not interacting, and then understanding their own impact in that relationship. They don't question it. They don't take responsibility for their piece in it. They just kind of have a sense that something went wrong. Huh, what did they do wrong out there, you know? So, the successful ones are looking up and they're watching and they're interacting.

Matt:	That makes a lot of sense. So, kind of changing gears slightly, one of the core concepts that you talk about in Activate Your Brain is the idea of activation. What does it mean to activate, and how does that tie into kind of what we were just discussing?

Scott:	Well, so, from a neurophysiological standpoint, you can actually see activation in the brain. It's what we look at when we're looking at PET scans and we're looking at fMRIs, which is a functional magnetic resonance image. Allows us to look in your brain as things activate while you're doing something. And when we activate, in the book when we're looking at activation, we're talking, really literally, about activating momentum around doing what it is that you want to do that pushes you toward more what you believe to be your own successful state and your own state of wellbeing. And activation is a place in the brain. It's in the medial orbital frontal cortex, so in the middle. So, if you put your finger in the middle of your forehead and just to the left of that middle, you're on that left side of the medial orbital frontal cortex, orbital meaning around your eye, and right under there is a place that, when it activates by you doing something, and typically it has to do with something that you've accomplished... You know, like you just got something done on your to-do list and you cross it off. When you do the crossing off, that literally activates that left medial orbital frontal cortex. We'll just call it LMOFC for short. It activates it, and what it does is it energizes the reward systems in the brain, and the reward systems include a neurotransmitter called dopamine, and dopamine makes you feel like you want to do something again and makes you feel excited and gives you pleasure, and it says, "Do it again, do it again, do it again." So, when you activate, activation preceeds motivation. Motivation is a psychological construct that really looks into and determines on why are... Really, the why. Why do you want to do something? And looks at desire. We all have those things that we don't desire to do but we have to do, and we have to be the one to do them. And we don't ever get motivation around them, and so what we have to do is activate around them. You just do it. You just begin. Start small but start now is a mantra throughout the book. And once you start and you get that one little cross off, you go again. I mean, we've all had that, where we're like, oh, you know. You're looking at your emails and you've got in your inbox, even though you've looked at them, you just haven't cleaned it out. I have this going on right now. I've got 3,000 emails that they're all dealt with, but it really needs to be cleaned out. And you go, okay, I'm going to spend some time. I'll just do a few. Well, once you start doing it and you start kind of checking off, either mentally or physically, around it, and you activate around it, pretty soon you've cleaned out the whole thing. You've done it with your office. You've cleaned your house, right. We've all done that.

Matt:	That's totally true.

Scott:	Yeah. That's the activation. You know, and to be certain, the activation portion of the brain is also implicated in addiction at all, because it's within the same neurotransmitter and receptors as addiction does. But it's a great message to understand. That's the achievement side, is that you can become addicted to positive things. So, that's what that's all about, and really, it's the dance between that right side, which is on the orbital frontal cortex on the right side, is your no button. The left side's your go button. The no and the go. And the right side says, you know, when you wake up in the morning and you're supposed to go work out and you lay there and you think, oh, no, I just want to sleep, and the sleep wins, the no button won. And so, that's the part that keeps you on the couch. But, as with the left side being both positive and negative, having the positive attributes, the right side does, too. So, the right side, says, "No, stay on the couch," but it also says, "Don't eat that food. Don't go and gamble again." So, it's the dance between that left and right side that actually help us to navigate and negotiate our conscience, our guilt, our morals, our values, our ethics and beliefs. And that drives our behavior and really allows us to achieve what we want to achieve in the world, and that dance back and forth is what we're really looking at.

Matt:	That's fascinating. It reminds me of, I think, Josh Waitzkin. I don't know if you're familiar with him, but he's a world champion martial artist, a national chess champion who's now kind of a performance coach, but he talks about the idea of unkinking your energy flow, and it's kind of like a hose that has a bunch of kinks in it, and you know every time you move one kink, the flow through the hose gets stronger and stronger and stronger. And it's the same thing. You know, when you activate one thing, then that sort of cascades into multiple different activations of doing and executing all kinds of different things. You know, you start with your one email and then you've cleaned your inbox, cleaned your office, et cetera.

Scott:	Yeah. I 100% agree with that, and that would be exactly what our goal is. Because when you look at drivers, you know, Hertzberg studied drivers in the 1960s when he created hygiene therapy. I don't know if you know about that, but... Hygiene theory, rather, not therapy. Hygiene theory basically says that the things that demotivate us are not the same things that motivate us, so the things that demotivate us are pay, the environment, fairness, that kind of thing. Well, when all those are taken care of, if you feel like you are being paid well enough, it's not consider a motivator. So, it will demotivate you if you're not paid well enough but, once you're paid well enough, it's not the motivator. The things that drive you to motivate are things like achievement, personal growth, the job itself, earn recognition, so on, so forth. And really kind of unkinking, to your point, unkinking to get to those places and making sure that those demotivator things are taken care of, are really kind of what it's all about and really important, and I think that when people pick up my book, or any other kind of book like that, what they're really looking for are the tactics and the ways to get out of the way of themselves and to unkink and to... You know, most people are looking for an easy kind of way to go. I think success is never easy. It's always rewarding, but you have to make sacrifices. You've got to get up early. You have to work harder than you typically might want to. But, you know, when you look at a pathway that says, "All right, so what do I do to kind of feel excited about doing this hard stuff?" part of it is just the awareness of, number one, what it is that you're going after, number two, what's in your way. Those are the kinks. And number three, having the gumption to get rid of them, and actually, not only get rid of them but to create things that keep you activated, keep you excited, keep that energy going and making sure that you stay on that achievement side, as opposed to falling back into what Hertzberg would call the maintenance side, which is the demotivators. So, you know, again, it's not a destination. It's just always the journey. That's what you will do for the rest of your life if you want to be successful.

Matt:	So, I'm sure it's a lengthy and complex answer, but how would you say people should go about keeping themselves activated, or even starting, kind of jump-starting, activation?

Scott:	Well, you know, it really kind of boils down to a couple of things. First off, really kind of beginning to live under the adage, getting away from the old, you know, do more with less. What a crappy adage that was. I mean, what a bad theory. And we're discovering now how bad it was. In the '80s, '90s, even... you know, some organizations still live with it. Do more with less, right. Why should I multitask? We know that actually is such a bad idea. It's not only a bad idea, we physiologically cannot do it, number one. Number two, we also know that it degrades the gray matter of your brain over time, so it's hard on your head. But we know that people do better when they do fewer things. They just pick fewer things. They do them better. And so, first off, it's figuring out what you want and not having... You know, you can have anything you want. You just can't have it all right now. And the thing that people get really overwhelmed with is when they put too much on their plate. I know I do. I've done that several times where I just get too much on my plate, got to accomplish things around them, and now what I'm just doing is just maintaining them, just getting them done, not having enjoyment going toward them. So, if I have something I really want to go toward and I figure out what those are, two or three things, and I'm going toward them, I don't become overwhelmed. I can activate around them and I can start small but start now. Just start, you know, doing a little bit around each one and allowing the activation momentum to kind of take over and just rely on myself to push myself. I also think we all need people who help us be accountable, whether it's a coach or a mentor or a good friend, significant order, who, when you say, "All right, so I want to accomplish this and I need you to help make sure that I'm sticking to my goal here, and so I want you to hold up the mirror every once in a while and say, 'Hey, you know, you said you wanted to...' da-da-da-da, 'but you just didn't do this this time. You said you wanted to lose weight, but look at that big old triple-decker cheeseburger in your mouth.'" Whatever it is, right, that we have somebody who we're willing to listen to, to kind of hold us on the path. You know, my philosophy... And I don't have any data around this, but I do have a lot of experience. I've been in my... I've had my company, Complete Intelligence, for 26 years. I've watched people for a long time, and I think about 75% of the people I meet are not self-starters. Only about 25% are self-starters. About 75% are kickstarters. They need a little kick in the butt. I'm one of them. I mean, I self-start on some things and I kickstart on others. I need somebody to go, "Okay, come on. Come with me." Like, all right. I'll go. We need that, and really getting an awareness around that allows us to get into the activation. It's a habit, you know, and I think people get really hung up on the whole idea of, you know, am I accomplishing everything I want to accomplish and am I doing it fast enough? And look at what... You know, we have these yardsticks that are crazy, quite frankly. You know, we look at... I'm looking at a picture of you and you look really young.

Matt:	I have a very young face.

Scott:	You do? You look pretty young. And people... In my business, you know, the speaking world, we have an award that is the National Speaker's Hall of Fame. Well, people get it at different times in their lives, but you know what people brag about? Is how young they got it. And I think that's a ridiculous yardstick. Okay, so you got it when you were 30 as opposed to when you were 50. Is that the goal? Is the goal to get it done fast? And then what? And what does it get you? What does it bring you? So, I think we fall into this trap of saying, I need it all, I need it fast, and if I do it fast then that's... wow, yay. And I ask people... I have a really good friend. When he was inducted into the National Speaker's Hall of Fame—and he really, really, really wanted it bad for a long time, many years—and he started kind of getting bitter about it. And he's a great performer and an awesome speaker. Well, once he got it, we were having a beer, and we were just chatting about it. It was a couple of years afterwards. I'm like, "So..." I'll just call him John. That's not his name. "So, John, so has your life changed since you got inducted?" He goes, "No, not really." So, "Did it change how you feel about you?" He said, "For a small amount of time it did, but I needed to get it checked off and I needed it now," kind of thing. So, I think, you know, when people look at what they want to accomplish in their lives, I think being measured about it, understanding that, you know, obviously we're not living forever, so there is that time element to it, but this whole idea of "I want to make $30 million by the time I'm 40 years old." I know people like that. It's like, why? But, you know, it's different whys for different people, for sure. I just think that when we put ourselves on the journey that says we have to have it all right now, we create an anxiety that actually causes us to not perform as well, increases our anxiety, increases our stress state, our wellbeing is reduced, and then they accomplish it and it's kind of like, wow. You aged yourself. Your brain is worse off. You got what you wanted. It didn't change anything. You're not healthier because of it, right? So, my own little soapbox. Pardon me.

Matt:	Oh, no. It's all good. That was very interesting. So, kind of circling back a little bit, what are some things that someone listening to this podcast could do...? Let's say they have kind of a challenge or a goal. I think, one, the idea of addition by subtraction, i.e. cut down, focus on fewer, more high-impact things, I think that's a great piece of advice. What are some other things they could do to maybe create that momentum or to take that small step right now to get started, if they're struggling or they can't quite get the momentum they want and they feel like they're not motivated?

Scott:	Yeah. Well, you know what? I always like to use the weight metaphor. Weight. A lot of people relate to the idea of losing or gaining weight, or getting fit. And, you know, you're not going to lose 50 pounds between now and tomorrow, and when you put that as your goal and you lay that out, it's a great goal. You know, if you have 50 pounds to lose, it's a fantastic goal to have. But your brain doesn't see you as losing 50 pounds between now and tomorrow, and so what we typically do is we put it off. And there's some research that shows, actually, in an fMRI, that shows that the part of our brain that lights up that registers disgust is the same place in our brain that registers when we have a goal that is longer than 90 days out.

Matt:	Wow.

Scott:	Yeah. So, it's kind of fascinating to see that when we have this long-term goal, what we see is that... You don't see yourself as accomplishing it. You see it as somebody else's thing. It's an out there kind of thing. Because if you think about a goal that you have, like if I say to your listeners now, think about something that you have to accomplish between now and next week. So, just think about that right now, and whether it's your email or getting your proposal done—whatever it is, right—you think about that. The part of your brain that lights up is called the ventral medial prefrontal cortex, almost near that orbital frontal cortex on the left side. It's right in the middle of your forehead and right behind it, and it's the place where you see yourself. It's the place where you self-reflect. And that lights up when you think of short-term goals. And, again, it is a reward radiator and it allows you to kind of create momentum. So, all of that architecture's interconnected. But, when I say, all right. So, Matt, think of... It's right now May. What do you want to accomplish by December? What's one goal that you don't have going right now but you know you want to accomplish by December? You think about it and then you might write it down. If I looked in your brain and had you think about it, the part of your brain that would light up would not be the ventral medial prefrontal cortex. It would likely a part called the medial parietal lobe, and what happens there is it does radiate to discuss and it does begin to become something where we push it off. So, that's the science behind it, which says it's real. So, what we need to do is take a larger goal, that 50 pounds, and bring it down to, I'm not losing 50 pounds between now and tomorrow. Not even now and the end of the month. Not even now and the end of two or three or four months. However, what I can do is I can lose about eight ounces a day and keep it off. Or, if you want to look at it in terms of a week, a pound a week or something like that, or maybe two, but it needs to be sustainable and reasonable. And then what would I do every single day...? So, you would have the piece that would be... Okay, what's the big goal. Then what would I do to bring it down to a manageable goal? What would be the amount I could actually lose? And then ask yourself, there's the goal. Now I have to have two other things. I have to have a how and why. And they're two separate operations in the brain. So, the how is, what would I do? I would exercise more. I would take the stairs. I wouldn't eat carbohydrates after seven o'clock, cut out bread, don't drink wine and beer as much, and so on and so forth. Those are all the hows. The why needs to be all the benefits. Well, I'll feel better about myself. I'll look. I'll have better self-image, my self-confidence, so on and so forth. Those two networks in the brain are two different networks, but you need them both in order to accomplish motivation, if you will. So, it really is... Kind of reducing it down is this, is: go ahead and have a big goal. Understand that it could take you a year or longer to accomplish. And, if you really want to accomplish it, you really want to be able to break it down into bite-sized pieces that you can check off to get that dopamine bump, if you will, check off at least a few times a week, if not every day, and then have a why. Why are you doing it? And that's the big thing that a lot of people are missing. I have a good friend who was a client. He was joking that it was the $40 million by the time he was 40. And he did it, but I kept asking him, why? I mean, it sounds ridiculous. We'd all love to have $40 million by the time we're 40. But it doesn't take disease away. It doesn't make people happier. We've seen the research around that. You know, how many cars can you have? How many houses can you have? And, as a matter of fact, achieving those in a state where you don't have to really work hard to earn it, there's not as much happiness. When you go buy your first house, that's huge. It's so exciting, because you work at it, and it's a lot of bump. But when you can just do it any time, it's not as exciting. So, you know, the why. Why is so huge, and really figuring out what's the benefit to yourself. And earning $40 million, you could have a fantastic why, but if you don't articulate it, kind of the wellbeing part of it kind of gets compromised.

Matt:	That was great. That's super helpful. I love the idea of really breaking things down into bite sized kind of weekly or even daily activities towards that longer-term vision. I think that's super important. 

Scott:	Yeah. And you want to make sure, for sure, that it's got some frequency to it. When I was writing my book, when I was writing Activate Your Brain, it's an evidence-based book, so it's a harder book to write than... Like, my first book, Be a Shortcut, which is more... You know, there's evidence in it, but it was more me expounding on my philosophy about things, right, or my influence in emotional intelligence. So, when I had to write that book, I would stare at it and go, oh, God, I just don't want to. I was on a deadline and I didn't want to write it, and so I would just take my own advice and literally take out an old chapter that I'd already written and just kind of read through it. That was my activation, was just to get out a chapter I'd already written and read it, and you know, what do you think would happen from that? Well, I would start editing it, and I'd add to it, and pretty soon I had written 15 or 20 pages. And that's what it looks like. It literally is... I'm not writing the whole chapter. I'm not writing the whole book. I'm actually not going to even write. That wasn't even my activation. My activation was to get out an old chapter and read it and, knowing exactly what would happen, is that I would begin to edit it, add on, think of new things, and then just bam, just go.

Matt:	That's awesome. So, you've touched on, in some of that extrapolation, kind of the ideas of brain structure, neural networks and everything. One of the things we've talked about in the past on the podcast are kind of the biological limits of the mind and how biology constrains and sort of structures our thinking. One of the topics I know you've talked about in past is the idea of the three different brains and how that ties into neuroscience and sort of our brains themselves. Would you talk a little bit about that?

Scott:	Yeah. So, it's kind of a simplistic way to look at the brain, but when you look at kind of architecture in a larger, macro format, and you look at what developed when in the brain, the first thing that came online was the reptilian brain. It's ancient. And it's kind of at the base of the brain. It's what we call the pons or the brain stem. [INAUDIBLE 00:35:28] is also in there, and it's really the ancient part. It's implicated... You know, the whole brain interacts with each other, but this one is on 24 hours a day, seven days a week, reptilian, pays attention to things that are automatic and autonomic, that they just have to happen and they need... Like, body temperature, perspiration, respiration, aspiration, salivation, any of the -ations it's doing for you. And basically, it turns those on and off. You don't really have a choice about it. And it also helps to activate around certain motivations, as well. The medulla, that is at the very base of the brain that kind of looks like a second brain, that's where we lock all of our consolidated behaviors like riding a bike, brushing your teeth, buttoning a shirt, tying your shoes, things that were really hard when you were a two-year-old and spent a lot of sugar to be able to do, a lot of glucose, because that's what the brain uses to energize itself, and it used to take you lots and lots of energy, and that's why kids have meltdowns if you push them too hard. But over time, what happens through repetition, those behaviors consolidate, and now the glucose expenditure reduces, and that's all in the medulla. And so, it allows you to operate in the world without having to spend a lot of sugar. We want to use that for other things. Then the second brain is what we call the mammal brain, and that's kind of locked right in the middle of the brain. It's the mid-brain. We call it the limbic system and it harbors lots of architecture. We store behaviors, we consolidate and store behaviors, in that part. It's also where we harbor our memory, most of it, in a place called the hippocampus, and the emotional danger-detecting architecture is there, as well, and we have several times, about seven times more danger detecting architecture in our brain than we do for a reward. It allowed us to survive the world. And that's the emotional part of the brain. It's what puts you on high alert. It's what makes you kind of pay attention to things in the environment. And we put rewarding things on the bottom and we put dangerous things on top, and it gives you a lot of clue about behavior. You know, people who are constantly seeing the negative are in their danger-threat response quite a lot. And that mammal part of the brain si 24 hours a day, seven days a week, scanning the environment for danger and threat in the environment about three to five times per second, even while you're asleep. So, it's a busy, busy, busy brain. The problem with it is it has no logic. It's messy and it's the part that says, you know, if you hit me, I'm going to hit you back. It's that part that says, you know... If all we had was our mammal brain and we were executives sitting across from each other and I vehemently disagreed with you and I wanted to choke you, I actually would. And so, we have to bring online the human part of the brain, which is the prefrontal cortex, and that's the last part to have been added to the brain, about 30,000 years ago. That's the part that is the executive reasoning, thinking, innovating part of the brain, and so it gives intelligence to our emotions, thus emotional intelligence. It's the dance between the prefrontal cortex and the limbic system. That's emotional intelligence. Because, again, if we acted on all of our impulses, all of our emotional impulses, especially the stronger ones—to hit, to bite, to scratch, to yell, to scream—we wouldn't be very effective as a species. We'd be effective as other animals is what we'd be. And the intelligence, that prefrontal cortex, says, no, no, no. Let's modulate that. You might be really angry right now, but is that anger going to help you get what you want, or do you need to just slow it down, take a deep breath, and restate and reframe your needs in a way that's not going to cause somebody else to become defensive and not get what you want? So, that's the emotional intelligence piece, and those are the three parts and pieces that kind of interact. So, that's what they look like right there.

Matt:	And I think that... We've talked about this in a previous episode. It's fascinating that the brain is sort of geared towards it via the process of evolution, focusing more on threats and danger and, in many ways, that's kind of maladapted to modern day society where, oftentimes, the threats that you're facing are not an animal jumping out of the bushes that's going to eat you, but it's somebody across the table or in a board room or whatever it might be that is not actually a physical threat to your life, necessarily, and so our response is often inappropriate or wrong, kind of rooted in these biological nature and structure of the brain itself.

Scott:	Yeah. And, you know, exactly. The architecture is the same. The dangers have evolved. And you're right. It's no longer the saber-toothed tiger or the poisonous plant. It's the missed deadline. It's you disagreeing with me. It's you telling me that my baby's ugly, right. It's that back and forth. That's the danger in the environment. And the architecture is still useful. We just have to manage it, and when our prefrontal cortex... You know, before that prefrontal cortex became fully developed, we were still a pretty nasty species. All you have to do is look back at the history of our species, especially in the last 5,000 years. We've been pretty mean to each other in a lot of different ways. When you add language and some of the sophistication that comes with a prefrontal cortex, wow, that's another layer that you have to deal with, right? I mean, confusion really became part of who we are and how we interact. When you add language in... Because we've all had that, you know, when you say to someone, "Hey, you want to go have Mexican food?" and they look at you like, oh, sure. You know, you can't see my face right now, but if you saw it you'd be like... you'd look at it and go, he really doesn't want to go. Well, because we play games with each other, we might be passive-aggressive, if you will. I might look at you and see your face saying no but decide not to pay attention and say, "Well, you said yes, so okay. Great. Let's go have Mexican food." And now you have conflict, right, and so we're constantly dealing with these little teeny papercuts of dangers. Cortisol is your stressor hormone that is activated when you're paying attention to all those dangers. So, as we look at the health of the aging brain, we look at cortisol and the implications of it, in terms of the integrity of that brain, because we're all shrinking after we're 25, 25 to 30 years old. You're either shrinking or you're growing. You're not going to stand in place, your brain. And, in order for it to grow, you have to proactive. It's going to just shrink on its own, and if you are paying attention to all of the dangerous threats that you interpret as a danger in the environment, something tardy, an email that you get that is upsetting, and myriad of things, if your lens is always about danger and you can't reframe it, which is what the prefrontal cortex allows you to do, then your brain health is... you're going down a nasty path. And you feel bad, and other disease happens because now your immune system, your immune function is battered from all that cortisol in your system. So, it's a circular kind of thing that happens. Our danger detection system is there for a very good reason. It's just that because we have evolved into a modern world, we need to kind of say to our danger response, really, that email, it didn't make me rageful. It made me frustrated. That's a different set of neurohormones, but we keep telling ourselves that, oh gosh, we get really mad when it really requires not such an outsized emotion that is filled with all kinds of... not only negativity from a feeling sense, but also from a neurochemical sense to the brain.

Matt:	So, along with cortisol and dopamine, which we've touched on, what are some of the other key neurochemicals, and how do we control or manage their impact on our behavior?

Scott:	So, fun with neurochemistry is what we're talking about. Yes. [Laughs] So, there's a set of catecholamines that include dopamine and epinephrine, and then you add oxytocin into it, and those are the three I like to focus on, along with cortisol. And again, cortisol's not all bad. You don't want to get rid of it. It's actually a very positive thing as you're learning something. It focuses you. That along with norepinephrine. Norepinephrine's your focuser. That's the thing that actually causes you to pay high alert and attention. In a positive state, it's exciting, and when you're learning something... Say you're going to go out and learn to play golf or any other thing, and you go out and you start playing and you start getting positive feedback. Well, norepinephrine plus the cortisol, which is, again, focusing you, those two things cause you to learn rapidly. It's just that when you're pushed too hard and somebody starts to criticize and then the danger becomes danger, you know, the threat response becomes dangerous as opposed to positive, then we crumble, because we're spending way too much glucose. Cortisol doesn't travel alone. It travels with glucose, because glucose and cortisol, along with adrenaline, come together to make you fight, flight, or freeze. Well, you know, you just don't want to be in that space all day. It's exhausting. And that's what happens when you're in a state of learning where you've been pushed too far. So, on the positive side, norepinephrine focuses you, makes you interested, makes you engaged, makes you excited, and we know that things that actually activate it are things like novelty, learning something new like I just explained. You know, a new language, a musical instrument, going and learning something you've never done before. Paint a painting. Do mosaics. Do something you've never done, and it's not about achieving mastery but just about... and not only about exciting your brain, but when you are in novelty, you're actually in neurogenesis as well as neuroplasticity. You're causing your brain to grow. You're binding neural pathways that are there that have never talked before and now they are, and you're creating new growth in your brain, and then neurogenesis, which is brand new neurons in the memory center of your brain as well as the motor center of your brain, the medulla and the hippocampus. So, those... norepinephrine is really positive that way, so learning something new, getting hobbies, and that kind of thing. Dopamine comes from winning. It comes from accomplishing things, that check mark. It comes from achieving mastery and feeling like, somewhere in your world, you have some chiefdom, some little corner of the world that you know you do really well, and that sense of wellbeing is part of what happens with dopamine. And then there's oxytocin, which is your bonding hormone, and that is that state of feeling like you're part of a social group. It's pro-social. It makes you feel included. It makes you feel loved and it makes you feel liked, as well. And things like collaboration, laughter. So, if you're laughing a lot. We love people who we laugh with, and that's an oxytocin bump. If you like somebody, you're just hanging out with them, going and having a coffee with them or a beer, whatever, and you just feel simpatico. That's an oxytocin. That's that feeling. When you fall in love with someone, you're going to get a bunch of oxytocin. And then being generous. You know, being benevolent and going out in society and doing something for people that you don't have to do something for. That creates oxytocin. We know that, actually, to that end that volunteering and helping people, where you don't have to do it, right, but doing something for other people has about the same palliative effect on your depression, mild to moderate depression, as an anti-depressant does. So, volunteering's a really great kind of therapy for yourself, if you will. And so those three, dopamine, norepinephrine, and oxytocin, kind of combine to give you that overall sense of peace, wellbeing, excitement, mastery, control. All the positive things in your world. We kind of dive deeply in the book into, you know, what are the things you want to put in your place that create those, and I just mentioned some of them.

Matt:	Yeah. No, those were some great examples. So, for example, if somebody has too much cortisol or they're constantly in that fight or flight danger response place, what are some of the things that they might be able to do to calm themselves down or to reduce their cortisol levels or to kind rebalance some of their neurochemicals?

Scott:	Yeah. I call them erasers. I call these things erasers. They erase the cortisol. They rebalance it, set it to homeostasis. And they're everything we all know about, and yet you've got to do them. And here's the thing: got to do them every day. And not all of them, but some of them you have to do every day. Some of them, you just do it when you're starting to feel stressed out. The everyday things are, number one, and by a long shot, is sleep. We are so under-slept, and we're seeing inflammation in the brain, which is a bad thing. It's making the brain stickier. We're seeing that being implicated in Alzheimer's, where the beta amyloids can't be flushed because of the inflamed brain, and the lack of sleep will inflame your brain. It's why you can't think. You gotta get your seven to nine hours, and on average, that's where we are as an adult human being. So, sleep. If you're having frenetic sleep because you're so anxious, you've got to go figure that out. Go work with a sleep doctor. Work with somebody, but read the chapter in the book on sleep. You've really just got to pay attention to this. So many people: "Oh, I don't like to sleep. It's a waste of time." It is the most important time you have all day. If you're not sleeping, you're not consolidating, and that's where we consolidate our memories. It's not happening while you're awake. While you're awake, you gather. While you sleep, you learn. And so, you might think it's a waste of time. It's the most productive time your brain has, and if you're not doing it, you're headed for an early grave. Just really pay attention to that. That's number one every day. Number two is exercise every day. Gotta walk, faster than a typical walk. 30 minutes a day is what's being recommended. About 150 minutes a week. Cardiovascular's where we see both neurogenesis and neuroplasticity be affected in a positive light. Plus, BDNF, the brain-derived neurotropic factor, which is like Miracle-Gro to the brain, causes the brain to have the neural pathways to connect, as well as neurogenesis. So, it's a brain grower. Sense of wellbeing happens, brings down the cortisol levels, brings up endorphin, which is your natural painkiller. So, exercise, you know, and cardiovascular's the big thing. For those of you out there just lifting weights and not doing any cardiovascular, we're not seeing the same kind of positive implication in the brain. It's great for your bones. Gotta have that, right. So, it's great for the pressure on the bones, but I really want you to get out there and do some cardiovascular stuff. It doesn't have to be crazy. Just get a Fitbit and get 10,000 steps in a day. You know, Fitbit or something else that's a step counter, and make 30 minutes of those a day something that are faster than walk and make you breathe a little heavier and maybe get you a little sweaty above the lip. So, that's exercise. The third thing every day: your brain needs downtime that is not asleep. We call it a wake rest in neuroscience, and that means mindfulness. It means meditation. It means just wandering, mentally wandering. Sit in your office, sit in your home. Just look out the window and untether yourself from electronics. Literally untether from electronics. And give yourself ten minutes of that three times a day. The recent research shows that your brain is best from a work, productive, and quality standpoint, best at sprinting for a maximum of about 57 minutes with a 17 minute break, and in that break you're doing downtime things. You're laughing. Maybe you go and do a deliberate distraction. Maybe you just mentally wander. Maybe you do some mindfulness where you just think about a thing. There's lots of stuff out there, Headspace and other kinds of apps out there that you can really just take that cortisol level down. So, sprint 57. In my book I call it 50-10, because I like even numbers. So, sprint for 50, take ten off. Also during that ten minutes, by the way, is to hydrate. An under-hydrated brain doesn't think as well. Your brain needs about ten times more water than the rest of the cells in your body. So, during your ten minutes, go... You know, every time you hit that ten minute mark, go get a glass of water and drink it. So, 50-10, 50-10, throughout the day, to the degree you can. Obviously, nobody's on that exact schedule, but you want to introduce it at least three times a day, and during that ten minutes, during at least three of those, really have that downtime awake rest. Not where you're sleeping, but awake rest. If you want to take a nap in your office for ten or 15 minutes, awesome. Awesome, awesome. Really, those reset everything in your head, and if you can do it and close your door and figure out how to accomplish that, it's highly encouraged. Lots of research around the benefits of napping. Laughter is... We talked about that, but laughing, finding lightness, going to websites that make you laugh and make you giggle, and don't discard all those things that your friends are sending to you. Put them in a file, and when you're feeling a little in energy, get them out and giggle. Watch what happens. You feel awake. It's not an accident. Gives you stamina. And then the final thing is being moved. Tears of joy or just being moved, feeling emotionally positive. You know, the underdog videos or movies. One of the websites I love is values.com, and it's a non-religious, non-political website, and you can't give it money. It's a great of entrepreneurs and philanthropists who came together and created a thing called the foundation for a better life, and it's literally public service announcements that are 30, 60, and 90 second long videos about doing the right thing. It's anti-bullying and it's just about doing the right things, and if you watch those and don't feel something, you've got ice in your veins. You need to go do something about that. And that sense of... That's where we feel that oxytocin and that towardness toward our own species, where we feel like, oh, look at that. See, how cool is that? So, we've all seen all those videos, and you want to see those a few times a week. I just encourage you to sit down and find those things in your world that make you laugh, make you feel, make you feel energized, and the five things I just outlined for you are the great erasers for that.

Matt:	Those are some excellent things, and we've talked a bunch about the importance of sleep, meditation, and several other of these topics on previous episodes, so I think you're echoing what our listeners have heard before, but it bears repeating, definitely, that these are absolutely critical things to be doing every single day.

Scott:	100% every day. And you know, the thing is people get all into a regimen. For me, mine is like, okay, when am I going to get this in? It's like I'm going to go work out right after we're done. And I have a personal trainer, by the way, and I put that person in my life because I know I won't go push myself like he will, right? So, it's that accountability. It's that person and, you know, I look at that and I'm like, okay, a few times a week I'm going to go work with him when I'm in town. Not in town a lot, but and then in the off time, I'm going to go get on a treadmill. Don't love it, but I'm going to do it, not necessarily for my body but definitely for my brain.

Matt:	So, what is one piece of homework that you would give to our listeners?

Scott:	Well, I would have your listeners take stock of their open order list, what I call an open order list. What are all the things that you've told yourself that you will do that, you know... kind of think a month out. What are all the open orders that you have? Gotta get this anniversary gift. Have to finish this email. Got to get this proposal out. Have to go look for venture capital money. Got to finish the basement. Got to do yard work. All those go on there, because it's what you're asking your brain to pay attention to. I would detail them out, write them down, and think as many as you possibly can. It's kind of like a to-do list, but it's even bigger, because you wouldn't put "Call Mom" on your to-do list, usually. Maybe not. But I want you to look at everything that you're telling your brain to pay attention to, and then what I would like for you to do is start to discard stuff. Get rid of the things that you know you're not going to do. Stop telling yourself you are. When you're ready, you will. And start focusing on a few things, big chunky things. I would really look at what is putting you in a towards state. What are you moving toward? And that typically has to do with a goal. We know that people who are moving toward a larger goal and, breaking it down into the smaller, bite-sized pieces, start small but start now, they have better wellbeing overall. And they accomplished their goals. They just have more effectiveness in their lives. So, it's really about cleaning out the attic of your life, and get rid of the mental boxes that you're not going to do anything with and just discard them. Start to discard. Really look at that list. That would be from a piece of homework I would have people start with.

Matt:	That's great advice. So, what are some other books and resources, obviously other than Activate Your Brain, that you would recommend people check out if they want to learn more or dig into some of these concepts?

Scott:	Yeah. I really like Flourish, as well as Authentic Happiness by Martin Seligman. Positivity by Barbara Fredrickson. I like Charles Duhigg's book on habit. I like Shawn Achor, A-C-H-O-R, on happiness, the Happiness Factor. I think he's great. Written some really cool things on that. You know, there are so many tomes and books out there that really... Oh, here's one that I really love, is a book that kind of got me really deeply interested in some of the intricacies. It's called Rewire Your Brain. I don't have it in front of my right now and I would misquote the author's last name, but Rewire Your Brain is the name of the book, and a really great... Written by a PTSD neuropsychologist who really understands the intricacies of bringing the science down to a place where people can eat it, consume it, and do something with it. Really great book.

Matt:	And where can people find you online?

Scott:	They just go to www.completeintelligence.com, and that's my website. You can find my book there. Both my books are on Amazon.com, Activate Your Brain and Be a Shortcut. Activate Your Brain was the one that came out about ten months ago, and it hit the Wall Street Journal Bestseller list in September, so I'm proud of that. 

Matt:	Congrats.

Scott:	Thank you.

Matt:	Well, Scott, this has been great, and I'm sure the listeners are going to love a number of the insights and tactics that you've shared here. So, I wanted to say thank you very much for being on The Science of Success.

Scott:	Great to be here.

 

 

May 17, 2016 /Lace Gilger
Emotional Intelligence, Focus & Productivity
PShallard-01.png

The Surprising Data-Backed Truth About Achievement with Business Psychology Expert Peter Shallard

April 06, 2016 by Matt Bodnar in Focus & Productivity

In this episode you’re going to learn the surprising data-backed truth about achievement, the one personality test that can predict success in the real world, the incredible importance of willpower, the ultimate indicators for personal growth, and much more with our incredible guest Peter Shallard.

Known as “The Shrink for Entrepreneurs” - Peter is a renowned business psychology expert and therapist gone renegade, he works with entrepreneurs from around the globe to help them master the psychology of reaching their goals of success faster, better, and with a bigger impact.

We talk about:
-What Peter Learned from More Than 10,000 1on1 Phone Calls with High Achievers
-Why A Select Few Have Advantages In Achieving Their Goals
-The Amazing Finding of the “Marshmallow Experiment"
-How to Refuel Your Willpower
-And more!

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT  

Today, we're excited to have an incredible guest on our show, Peter Shallard. Known as the shrink for entrepreneurs, Peter is a renowned business psychology expert and therapist gone renegade. He works with entrepreneurs from around the globe to help them master the psychology of reaching their goals of success faster, better, and with a bigger impact. Peter, welcome to The Science of Success.

Peter:	Thanks for having me.

Matt:	So, Peter, tell us a little bit about your background.

Peter:	Yeah. So, as you just said, I've got a background in psychotherapy and psychology. I started out actually running a private therapy practice working with civilians back in the day, and since then I've kind of specialized and I found myself as a specialist working with entrepreneurs, which has been a really fascinating experience for the last... almost ten years now, I think. And the practice that I've built, it has me really get this incredible insight through one-on-one consultation some of the brightest and best people doing some of the most crazy, high risk venture pursuit in the world. Along the way I started another company called Commit Action, which is really about helping people who are starting out in business overcome a lot of the psychological obstacles that really prevent them from getting started, and that's been kicking around for the last two years and has gotten me obsessed with, you know, pretty much the title of your podcast: the science of success. We're trying to really look into empirically what is it that moves the dial for helping people turn their intentions, their hopes, that desires, their dreams and all of that into actual concrete results and what really you know makes a difference in a tangible, measurable way. So, yeah. That's the world that I play in.

Matt:	So, you work with some of the smartest minds in neuroscience as part of what you're doing at Commit Action. What have you picked up from kind of running in those circles?

Peter:	Yeah, that's right. So, along the way, we figured out that we wanted to put together a solution for these entrepreneurs who are starting out. You know, the hundreds of thousands of people who are joining the self-employment kind of movement every year. We know that number is growing and growing and we realized to really get into the science of it we needed to approach some of the folks who are working at the absolute cutting edge in the academic world and who are doing some of this research. So, we worked closely with the professor of positive psychology at NYU. We've worked with some Harvard neuroscience folks to try to really get an insight into the vast wealth of knowledge that these guys have with the research that they're doing, and so, you know, I have all sorts of exciting little nuggets to talk about that we've picked up from some of these people are on our company's Advisory Board. And also, you know, that we we've used to inform the work that we do it Commit Action with our members, and we've actually become a bit of a statistical force to be reckoned with, because in the last, I think, three years, we've conducted of over 10,000 one-to-one phone calls with entrepreneurs all around the world, and when we're doing that, we're collecting all sorts of data about how these people are accomplishing their goals, you know, what sort of intentions they're setting, what the follow-through looks like. We're basically empiricizing the science of achievement and tracking all of this stuff, and so, our long-term intention is actually to be working with some of these incredible academics who are figuring out amazing, amazing stuff through these studies, that to be honest, primarily revolve around undergrad students coming into a lab and playing various games and doing kinds of examinations to figure out these different hypotheses. We're really hoping to be able to take some of the stuff and apply it to the business world, where there's this bottom line metric, which is, can you help somebody who's made it their mission to build a business, who's maybe quit their job with the intention of starting a web design company or finally creating that widget that they've always had as a hobby and they want to see if they can bring it to market and make that their source of income and whatnot, and can these insights into the psychological science that really show that, you know, at least in the lab, this is how you can predict someone's performance, this is how you can improve someone's performance, this is how you can make a goal more achievable. Will this stuff actually move the dial in the real world? We're starting to see some really exciting signs of that happening, and then as we grow our business and get to even more of a significant statistical sample, we'll be working closely with these guys to hopefully be running efficacy studies of our own.

Matt:	That's fascinating. So, over 10,000 one-on-one phone calls collecting all kinds of information.

Peter:	Yeah. I mean, at this point, we're also... you know, we have a proprietary web app, which is an amazingly powerful tool that our members use to plan out their goals. I mean, I don't want to talk too much about what the actual business does because I don't want to just pimp it out here. It's not my intention. But the thing that we do is we meet with our members every week over the phone and help them essentially plan their goals to the next week, so at a primary level, the service we provide is kind of like personal training for productivity. Just like you'd go to the gym and have someone yell at you and spit in your face to make you do push-ups, we're actually providing a service where these entrepreneurs, many of whom incredibly isolated, they feel, in the real world at least, that there's not too many people and their friends and family groups who sort of understand or get what they're going through. They'll meet with one of our coaches over the phone and also through this virtual experience that our app facilitates, and they'll plan out the week ahead, you know, create incredible clarity around what they should be focusing on, and then leverage the accountability of having a pro help them with all of this to actually make sure that they get it done. So, we've created this kind of revolving seven-day ritual. Now, the exciting thing about that from a scientific point of view is it gives us this amazing snapshot of people's lives and really gets solid data on how many things are people actually accomplishing that they articulate as clearly defined actions, and what is the effect of applying more specificity to go setting, and things like that. You know, any particular question you might have about how an entrepreneur goes about accomplishing a goal, we can basically run a survey out to hundreds and hundreds of people within seven days and get, like, a 99% response rate and have some really interesting data to play with. So, we're really trying to figure out what is it that really matters, what is it it really helps people succeed in an area and an industry, honestly, that I believe there's just so much noise, there's so much BS, to be honest. There's so many people peddling all kinds of, like, we can help you be successful type products and services, and yeah, it's our mission to be the one that actually works.

Matt:	So, what are some of the take-aways that you've seen from kind of diving into those snapshots of people's lives?

Peter:	Yeah. So, this is the whole reason I was excited to talk to you, and I think that the place that I'd like to start the conversation is to say that what the science tells us is--and this is going to be a big let down for everybody here--is that the truth about achievement, about I guess the science of success, is that it's deeply un-sexy. There's a lot of really cool ideas that are out there kicking around the personal development industry. 
You can go out on a retreat. You can pay thousands of dollars to go to some retreat where you do a sweat lodge or some incredible heart cracking wide open ceremony where you're going to have an epiphany and maybe cry like a little baby and have this amazing, almost psychedelic insight into what's been holding you back, uncover limiting beliefs, and really examine the very essence of your soul. What we've discovered is that that stuff very rarely actually makes a difference. The things that really help people actually simply get more done or accelerate progress towards a clearly defined outcome, you know, literally things like increasing profitability of a small business, that sort of stuff, that is actually really deeply un-sexy, that it has to do with a lot of basic psychological concepts, which I'm happy to talk about in a lot more depth, that at first look seem really kind of intuitive and boring and kind of like, "Oh, yeah, I know I should be doing that," but when you look a little deeper I think that where it gets exciting is that a lot of these concepts and ideas are, I guess, things that we might think we know about but that so few people are applying, and that's what we've really discovered. I mean, one of the most shocking things that has kind of come up as sort of a hypothesis that we're brewing and that we're seeing a lot of evidence for is that, initially, when I started this business, when we started working with these beginning entrepreneurs and new folks to entrepreneurship, I sort of believed that success was a spectrum, right. I thought that, you know, just intuitively there was probably people who are really struggling and there's people who are, you know, really, really crushing it, hitting home run after home run, serially successful entrepreneurs, and then everyone in between all the colors of the rainbow. Once we started looking at these psychological dynamics, these kind of core ingredients that seem to really make up, you know, the ability for someone to be able to set a goal and achieve it, I guess as easily as possible. We found that there was an almost binary difference, or at the very least there was a big chasm, a huge gulf between the kind of haves and the have-nots, that there's a huge number of people, the vast majority of people who are aspiring entrepreneurs, which is the only the sample population we deal with. They actually are totally lacking a lot of this stuff that seems very intuitive, and then there's a very tiny fraction of a percent of really high performers who have what I kind of think of as the psychological equivalent of a silver spoon in their mouth, right. Like, they've got this incredible advantage, whether they've picked it up from, I don't know, their parents, their education, something in their life has conditioned them to think about goals in a certain way, to manage their own performance in a certain way, to sort of measure their expectations in a certain way, and they have this ability that helps them from the outside look like absolute wizards, look like people who are capable of just taking a dream or an idea and blowing it up into something extraordinary. But yeah, that was one of the most kind of shocking things, but when we really look at the individual pieces of the puzzle what we actually find is that, yeah, it's pretty un-sexy stuff. There isn't any magic bullet in here that's going to feel like an epiphany to your listeners, so I want everybody who's listening now, as you got through this podcast you're going to probably learn a whole bunch and it's going to be very real and tangible, but there won't be any moment where your mind is blown by some completely foreign and alien concept, because what actually works is the most un-sexy and real sounding stuff, advice, tactics, strategies of all.

Matt:	So, I'm very intrigued. Tell me more about these, as you call them, deeply un-sexy concepts that underpin some of the highest achievers' results.

Peter:	Okay, cool. So, yeah, the first thing is, you know, one of the things I've always been obsessed with, anybody who's kind of interested psychology loves personality profiles, personality tests, that kind of stuff. Myers Briggs, there's all kinds of... There's a whole spectrum of these, ranging from the ultra-spiritual woo-woo, totally unscientifically validated, but, in my opinion, still sometimes genuinely very interesting systems for splitting up personality and figuring out who you are, right through to the ones that we think of as more scientific. In... I believe it was in the '80s but I'm not totally sure, though, actually, off the top of my head. There was a group of psychologists and social scientists all around the world who got together to try to kind of figure out... They ran a global symposium to figure out, well, what is it about... You know, what is the real personality type? Like, let's get rid of all the noise, let's try to scientifically really dig down and find out what are the traits, what are the fundamental building blocks of personality, and this is the key that we can use to actually predict success, because if you can't use a personality trait or personality type, a label of some kind, to predict anything, then what's the point? Is it actually real? So, these guys got together and they eliminated a huge amount of different systems and basically boiled it down to what are now known as The Big Five personality traits. You're familiar with The Big Five, right?

Matt:	A little bit, but tell me more and kind of explain it so that the listeners can really understand the Big Five or, as I think it's also known, the Five Factor model.

Peter:	Right, yeah, the Five Factor model. So, the five factors that we're talking about here, and what's really important to preface this with, these are not "types" in the Myers-Briggs sense where you can sort of be one or the other, extrovert or introvert, and it's about what kind of unique beautiful snowflake are you. These are almost like... I think of them as levels, like in a video game when you have a character who levels up. So, we're looking at a high score being, you know, implied as superior and higher-functioning and a low score being implied as lower-functioning. The five factors are openness, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, and then the last one is neuroticism, what is kind of a reverse score. I'll explain that. We'll go through them a little bit. Openness, number one, is basically openness to experience. It's really fundamental curiosity. It's the idea that, you know, some people are more just genuinely open to variety, to the experience of the new in their life, and what these guys figured out is that this trait is really, really important for things like self-actualization, at the top of Maslow's hierarchy of needs. It's really a big part of that we believe people's ability to ultimately be happy, because seeking out new experiences and being open to new experiences is what really gives us a lot of emotional fulfillment. The second trait, conscientiousness, is the one that I really want to talk about today. Conscientiousness is the big success predictor. You know, at the base level, it can really be looked at as just a tendency to be kind of organized and sort of very deliberate. You know, self disciplined in a lot of ways. But when we look a little bit deeper into it, we start to associate conscientiousness with somebody who's incredibly good at an understanding of and an appreciation for delayed gratification. So, conscientiousness is the hard-working personality trait. People who have high levels of this are incredibly good at present moment sacrifice in pursuit of a long-term outcome. And, of course, as you're listening to this, this sounds like an entrepreneur. This is somebody who is willing to work 16 hours a day so that they can really create something for themselves or make some kind of a big impact down the road. Extraversion. This is an important one to kind of clarify because a lot of people are obsessed with this idea of extrovert/introvert that comes from Myers-Briggs. Extraversion in the Big Five is a little bit of a different concept. It's less about how you sort of recharge your batteries, which is the phrase thrown around in the Myers-Briggs world a lot, and it's more about how outgoing and energetic you have the ability to be, how well you cope with the stimulation of others, of groups of people. The thing about Myers-Briggs is that there's a lot of introverts who have the ability to be quite highly extroverted.  They just get really exhausted by it. For the purposes of the Big Five, how your energy responds to being extroverted doesn't really matter. It's about whether or not you have the ability to do it. And so, extraversion is really powerful in predicting things like people's ability of salespeople, all that kind of stuff, and also just predicting help people socialize and play well with others. Agreeableness. These last ones, I'm not... I'm more interested in conscientiousness, but just since we're giving a little bit of a dictionary definition here, we'll power through them. Agreeableness is basically a tendency to basically get on well with others, to be cooperative. It tends to really kind of resonate with people who find themselves matching conversationally with people. So, when they chat with others in a social context, they're more likely to search for shared experiences. They're more likely to say a lot of yeses and make a lot of, literally, agreements in a conversation, rather than seeking to criticize where the other person may be incorrect or sort of analytically pick apart someone's arguments as though conversation is some kind of Socratic dialogue. So, people with a low score in this area are often perceived as very highly competitive, very argumentative people. And then neuroticism is kind of a reverse trait. We actually want to have a really low score with neuroticism. Neuroticism is basically just kind of how solid our grip on reality really is. You know, how well, how good we are at emotional self-soothing, we good we are at kind of controlling our negative emotions and being resilient in that sense. It has a lot to do with emotional stability and impulse control. I often think it's a bit of a shame that they've called it neuroticism. It's because there's a beautiful acronym, OCEAN. Openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism. Really, it should be emotional stability with a positive score, right, so you want to be really good at that. So basically, these five factors... You know, what these these social scientists and psychological scientists figured out, this is the stuff that really, really matters. This was a while ago. These are the traits that we can say pretty empirically that when people have high scores on all of these and a low score on neuroticism, they're going to be a successful person, they're going to be more likely to maybe make a lot of money, maybe stay in a long-term relationship, maybe raise healthy, well-adjusted children, or whatever it is that you really care about. Now, to finish this massive soliloquy that I'm giving here, where we get really excited is in some of the developments that have happened the last ten, fifteen years, particularly in the positive psychology field, breaking down this idea of conscientiousness and really proving that to be one of the most powerful predictors for success in any particular area of life that really matters. And yeah, that's kind of what we're seeing right now, is that conscientiousness and a bunch of associated traits and synonyms for essentially that thing, that ability to appreciate delayed gratification, that ability to work hard, is something that just straight-up predicts phenomenal success, and probably where this began and was with the famous marshmallow experiment, which I wouldn't be surprised if you've had other guests on this podcast talk about. This is a guy called Walter Mischel, who basically had a bunch of kids come in and do this experiment where, really, the challenge was for them to succeed at resisting immediate gratification. So, what they did is they put a marshmallow out in front of these kids and they told them that if they could wait--I think it was something like 15 minutes--in a room alone with a marshmallow sitting on the table in front of them, they would have two marshmallows. They could wait 15 minutes and not eat the first marshmallow. Now, what they found is that the kids who were able to hold out the full 15 minutes... These are very young children. I forget the exact age, but I'm thinking five, six, something like that. These kids who held out for the full 15 minutes did 210 points higher on their SATs down the road than those who caved within the first 30 seconds. Not only did they perform better academically as they grew up, they were also more popular, and in these studies that tracked kids going through into adult life, they earned higher salaries. They also had lower BMIs. They were physically healthier people. And this all comes from an experiment that just basically measures how conscientious are these kids, how good are they at delayed gratification. So, it's through the Big Five and then narrowing down into conscientiousness that we're starting to see in the last few years the science of psychology and performance psychology be able to actually tell us what are the things that really matters, and this is an exciting time because up until very recently, almost all psychology was theoretical, was based on really, really smart guys, admittedly, having a lot of bright ideas and basically writing down incredible theories and just thinking stuff in an armchair. It was almost, you know, the philosophy of psychology, so it's exciting to be able to see this stuff actually create results in a lab.

Matt:	Well, that whole thing is fascinating, and I think that this is definitely the conclusion that people may not agree with or like this message, but the outcome of the marshmallow experiment alone, which I don't think we have talked about before on the podcast, is staggering. How can people really understand or measure their own scores on this test? Is it something you can go out and take, or how can you take a look at yourself as you are today?

Peter:	Yeah. It's a good question. It's funny because, you know, the Big Five... This is the thing that's so un-sexy about it, is that when these guys figured out the big five and conscientiousness and all this stuff, they really realized that they had distilled down personality traits to the point where it was no fun anymore, and there really isn't a test anymore. They actually say, I think... I'm not sure. I'm sure if you look up the Wikipedia for the Big Five or whatever, you'll find that it's kind of widely agreed that if you want to get a measure of the Big Five in adults, you literally just ask people to self-score. You know, there are tests out there, but they're not like these really fun personality tests that people really enjoy where they ask you these sort of [00:25:13] questions, right. Like, it's like, do you prefer pineapples or mangoes? Oh, you're an extravert. These are really questions more along the lines of how do you feel about working really hard for a goal that's down the road, that's in the future? So, because they've distilled it down to these fundamental basics, it's gotten to this place where there isn't any mysticism anymore. So, I think just knowing about these things is the real take-away here. Certainly, you can look online and take a test to figure out what your Big Five score is, but I think it's more useful to really think of these as the ultimate indicators for personal growth, and if our mission is to be happy and successful in life, one of the things that we can look at doing is increasing our openness to experience, increasing our conscientiousness, our ability to do this delayed gratification, working to increase our extraversion, our agreeableness, and just generally lowering our neuroticism and increasing our emotional stability. And so, I think that using them as a guide for growth rather than a place to pigeonhole yourself is really important, because that's what the Big Five have really evolved into. It's not like Myers-Briggs or some of these other personality profiling systems, a method for figuring out your identity. That's really the big difference that folks have to understand, is that when you find out you're an ENTP or whatever in Myers-Briggs, it's really telling you, this is your particular unique, beautiful snowflake. Enjoy this. These are your strengths. Maybe you might behaviorally try to, once you find out you're really extraverted, maybe you'll do a little bit more of that, or whatever. But the Big Five is different in that it's more of a recipe, a guide for us to tell us what to improve. So, I think it's less about asking yourself what you are, because I think that at a fundamental level, in our bones, we know if we have a problem with conscientiousness. We know if we have a problem with extraversion, you know. It's more about using these tools to figure out how you can improve.

Matt:	So, I really like the kind of description, that these are indicators for personal growth. It's kind of the road map in pointing you in the direction of where you need to be thinking about, in terms of how you can kind of level yourself up.

Peter:	Right.

Matt:	And so, do you think that... And I guess, what does the research say about how fixed are these traits? You know, I can hear somebody now saying, well, how can I change my neuroticism, or how can I shift to being more conscientious? Is it something that can actually be kind of improved and leveled up, or is it something that's unchangeable?

Peter:	Yeah. So, the science of conscientiousness is something that we're obsessed with at Commit Action. You know, myself and everybody at the organization, this is the number one thing that we're focusing on, because, as I said, where conscientiousness has been proven several times over to be one of the only accurate predictors for success, and particularly for financial success, and obviously we're working with entrepreneurs that care about this stuff. So, we're obsessed with it, and what we're actually doing, you know, we provide a service that's designed to level up conscientiousness, and there are a lot of ways that you can go about doing it. The best and brightest minds who are studying conscientiousness and associated traits, there's a lot of synonyms for it that are kicked around the psychology world like willpower, like grit, determination, that kind of stuff. These guys all kind of agree that this thing... The best metaphor for it, I guess, is a muscle, and a lot of the best researchers are really happy with that as a metaphor, and what that means is that it's a part of our personality. It's a mental faculty that we have that becomes stronger the more we work it out. And to be clear, that also working it out makes it really exhausted, right, as anybody who is a big kind of gym junkie knows. If you go to the gym and you do some crazy leg day workout, tons of squats, that sort of thing, the next day your legs are going to feel incredibly shaky, right? Like, you're going to have trouble getting out of chairs. But if you do this over a period of months, you're eventually going to be able to be objectively stronger. You're going to be able to squat a far bigger weight or deadlift a much bigger weight. That's pretty much exactly how conscientiousness in particular really works. It's something that we can work out, and the way we work it out is by hitting it like we would a muscle, by hammering it, by demanding of ourselves that we use this ability. And so, it doesn't really matter where you are with conscientiousness. What matters, I fundamentally believe, that we approach this, that all of us approach this with a fundamental optimism. You know, that we can, in fact, go and build this skill. 

Matt:	So, what are some of the practical ways that either you guys use at Commit Action or maybe some of the listeners could employ in terms of actually kind of building that muscle and really working it out?

Peter:	Yeah. So, that's a great question. It depends a little bit on where you're kind of at with it. Like, where you feel your ability lies with conscientiousness. I think that it's always best to start small, particularly if you feel like you're a very undisciplined person, that you struggle with delayed gratification. It's something that you can begin to actually exercise with something as simple as actual exercise. Like, working out, at a fundamental level, is an exercise in delayed gratification. You know, going for a run, going to the gym, it doesn't feel good in the moment. It does feel good afterwards, but what you're pursuing is a long-term result, like in a year you get to have a six pack or you get to lose a bunch of weight or whatever it is that you're looking for. You get all of the benefit much further down the road. So, if you've never really done anything like that before, that can often be a really good place to start. Now, for the entrepreneurs we're working with, we're trying to directly apply this to business pursuits. So, we'll do a lot of different things. I mean, we have a one-to-one service. We put one of our incredible productivity and accountability coaches one-to-one on these phone calls with our members. But we'll have them do things like dedicate a certain portion of the day, you know, five days a week, they'll do something that is incredibly scary to them. Like, a really common one, because we have so many folks who are starting businesses, they're in the first few years of getting going, they need to be doing something called cold calling, which is literally jumping on the phone and prospecting for business. Particularly common for people who have business to business businesses that they run, where they're selling things to other companies. And so, this is a terrifying exercise for a lot of newcomers to entrepreneurship, a lot of people who don't have sales experience. I mean, to be honest, it's terrifying even for people who do have that experience sometimes. And so, it meets the criteria of that delayed gratification exercise, right? Because it's painful up front. It's very difficult to pick up the phone and call a stranger and run the risk that you may be horribly rejected in pursuit of maybe opening up an opportunity when one in ten calls is maybe going to go your way, and even if it does, you're not actually going to sell something to that company that you just called, you know, for another month or two or three or six. Right? So, it's this incredible slow process, yet we know beyond a shadow of a doubt that it actually works. You know, billions of dollars of business are done this way all around the world every year. So, we'll play little games with our clients. We'll have them do things like take an hour out of every morning where they do nothing but cold call. We'll build an entire ritual around that. We'll have them understand that if they narrow the scope of the challenge down to 60 minutes, or even 30 minutes to get started, or even just kind of making one call, if they're really resistant, that they can build up a habit of sort of doing this thing that hurts, of doing the delayed gratification thing, of conscientiously applying themselves outside of their comfort zone. And what actually starts to happen is this extraordinary thing where the person does it and then creates a psychological feedback loop that gives them this incredible sense of confidence and well-being because ultimately, they feel great because they've started doing the thing. Now, this is the same thing that you'll see when somebody without an exercise habit spontaneously develops one. They start running. You know, a couple of weeks in, they're not getting the results yet, but they really start to feel incredible. I think, because of the internal narrative that we have of, like, "Hey, I'm doing this. I'm finally taking action on this." So, I'm trying to cook this down into a sort of a practical take-away for your listeners, but I think that if you've got something that you're horrifically procrastinating... And that's fundamentally why everybody who works with us comes to us in the first place. They know that there's something they should be doing, and they know they should be doing it. They need to do it. If you've got something like that, you can begin to build your conscientiousness muscle by creating a highly specific challenge as sort of a daily ritual or a very, very short-term implementation goal, but I'm tapping into all sorts of other psychological science, you know, using these sort of buzzwords here, and when you really just focus on that one thing, it demystifies the enormity of the project, right? I mean, just thinking about making ten cold calls a day for the rest of your life is horrifically... You know, it's terrifying, right? But when it's sort of like I just have to pick up the phone today, you look at this from a different perspective and you'll do it, and it will engage that willpower muscle, that conscientiousness muscle, and you'll be depleted at the end of that hour or that half hour. You'll be really worn out. But if you do this enough, you'll come back and get stronger and stronger and stronger before you become, in the case of our members, the kind of entrepreneur who eats cold calls for breakfast. And that's really what it's all about.

Matt:	I love the phrasing, kind of thinking about it in terms of the idea of embracing discomfort. That's something that we've talked about on the past on Science of Success. We actually have a whole episode about the concept of how to embrace discomfort, and we actually kind of tie in another thing that we call the sphere of discomfort, which is a very similar sort of concept, that the more you kind of play at the edges of your comfort zone, the more that that expands and broadens, and then you can really kind of create... You know, open up new frontiers and new opportunities that would have been essentially invisible to you before you kind of built that muscle.

Peter:	Absolutely. Yeah. I mean, I think that this is fundamentally... This is the un-sexy truth about real personal growth, about real... You know, I almost sort of wince to say this, but real personal development. Not in the epiphany sort of seminar, raise your hands in the air and scream about it sense, but in a tangible, can you measure this in your business's bottom line, can you measure this on your scales, can you measure this in some way that actually matters. And it does have to do with leaning into these ultimately painful experiences. One of the things that I think is very counter-intuitive that a lot of people sort of don't understand about this is that there is a real drain. There's a real psychological drain that some researchers have kind of pinpointed and described as ego depletion, and this is the draining of the fuel tank. This is the wearing out of the muscles, and one of the ways that we see these entrepreneurs over at Commit Action really kind of shooting themselves in the foot, tying themselves in a knot, creating self-sabotage of all kinds, is that they have these phenomenally high expectations of themselves, and this is true of, I think, anyone who sets out to be an entrepreneur. Almost universally, they have these enormous expectations. A lot of folks in the world have these very high expectations for themselves, and it becomes a problem because the high expectations are 24/7. They sort of think to themselves, if I can do this once, I can do it whenever. I should be performing at this high level. I should be working, you know, maybe 16 hours a day while I'm really building this business, or whatever it may be. What this doesn't account for is this phenomenon, well studied and measured and quantified at this point, phenomenon of ego depletion, and what ego depletion is is when we engage that psychological muscle, we're actually really draining... I sort of hesitate to use the word energy, but that's kind of what it is. We're really draining this mental energy. Now, this has actually been backed up and validated by all sorts of brain science. It's been understood... There was a study out at the University of Toronto, I think, that showed that ego depletion causes a slow down in the anterior cingulate cortex. So, the brain area that's basically cruicial for regulating self-control. And what is actually going on is that when we engage it, when we wake up in the morning and make ourselves go for a run and it takes a lot of willpower, it takes a lot of effort, we have to sort of grit our teeth and go do it, we now have less of that. We are now depleted, in a sort of metaphorical, energetic capacity, and in a real, neurological capacity, and we have less of that fuel to pour into other activities throughout the day. And so, it's this science that is at the heart of every entrepreneur's favorite story about entrepreneurial Jesus, a.k.a. Steve Jobs, and his decision to wear the same black turtleneck and mom jeans every single day, because one of the things that we've discovered is that ego depletion happens at a massive rate whenever we engage our mind in decision making. So, if you find yourself staring into your closet perplexed at what to wear today and thinking about, Well, I'm going to go out, I have this meeting, what should I put on, what temperature is it, blah blah blah, you're actually using this valuable mental fuel to make that decision. If you've ever found yourself low blood sugar, really hungry, trying to figure out a late lunch, and you're gazing into the fridge and you just can't possibly figure out what you should eat, what's going on is that you've had so much ego depletion throughout the day, you've been engaging this mental muscle so much that you now have none of it left. You're kind of running out of that juice, and that's that brain fuzz that people experience in the late afternoon and the evening where even the smallest decisions just feel completely overwhelming, and it's in that state that you're not going to be able to engage your mind to do that cold calling exercise or go on that workout. You know, the thing we know beyond a shadow of a doubt is that people who build a habit of working out early in the morning, at least when they're high-performing executive types, they tend to have a lot more success than folks who try to make it happen at the end of the day, and it's for a fundamental reason. Ego depletion happens all day, every day, because of all the different stuff we have to make ourselves do with conscientiousness, with willpower, and the only thing that really resets it... Well, two things. The biggest one is sleep. We get a new tank when we wake up every morning. And the other one is food, but it's vastly less effective. So, there's all sorts of studies that have happened that show that when people consume a bunch of calories, it does give them a boost in terms of decision making willpower. It gives them that mental kind of function back. But the problem is it's temporary and it follows what we are figuring out about nutrition science, which is that if you have a bunch of sugar, you get a short-term lift but then ultimately you pay the price later on. So, really, it's sleep, which means that we have a day's tank every single day and we have to wake up and choose to spend it the best that we can, and this is why you'll see these high-level entrepreneurs who work very systematically to eliminate decision making, superfluous and unnecessary decision making for their lives, for the reason that they're trying to save up, whether because they know the science and they've talked to me or they just intuitively do this, they're trying to save up all the mental juice they can for the ego depletion that really matters. They want to spend that willpower, they want to engage that conscientiousness muscle on making those cold calls or really performing in that negotiation meeting, or whatever it may be.

Matt:	And I think another name for ego depletion is also the concept of decision fatigue, which we've, I think, talked about in one or two episodes in the past, and I think it's a critical point and something that's super important.

Peter:	Yeah. Decision fatigue is absolutely a part of it. Ego depletion encompasses also what happens when we simply engage conscientiousness, right? Like, when we engage our conscientiousness skill. So, if you need to... You know, decision fatigue happens to... Everybody who goes shopping for their wedding registry, right, like go and talk to any salesperson at Macy's or Sachs or somewhere like that, and they'll tell you that the couples really struggle. It burns them out. They have little fights. They get glazed eyes and they're just zombies by the end of a shopping experience, and the reason is you're basically putting yourself in an environment where you have to go and pick hundreds of things. You have to make hundreds of individual decisions. That's decision fatigue. Ego depletion includes decision fatigue, but it also includes the drain to our willpower that we experience when we try to do anything that involves delayed gratification. So, when the kid at the marshmallow experiment table is trying to resist eating that marshmallow for a full 15 minutes, there's some phenomenal ego depletion taking place because it requires willpower for that kid to literally be good, to be the best version of themselves, right, to follow through and do this good thing, and so it's constantly draining muscle while he's doing that, and a lot of these really fun experiments they do with these undergrad students and whatnot have shown that if you have... There's a great one. I'm going to butcher the paraphrasing of this here, but there's a great one where they had people resist eating... Like, they had people starve themselves so they'd be hungry. They'd come to the lab. The lab would be filled with the aroma of freshly baked cookies, and they'd have these folks resist eating the cookies. Like, you're not allowed to eat the cookies, but they'd just be sitting there looking good, smelling good, and then they'd say, "Now you go watch this movie in this comfortable lounge and there's all these snacks there and you can eat whatever you want. This is your reward. Just chill out." Now, of course, what they're actually measuring is how many of those snacks do people really eat, and what they've found is that the control group, the people who didn't have to sit and watch the cookies and smell the cookies but resist eating them, they would snack. They would have a few chips and M&Ms and that kind of stuff while they watch the movie. But the people who had been forced to engage their willpower and resist the cookies for half an hour, whatever it was, they would just go to town on these snacks while watching the movies, because their willpower had been depleted. This ego depletion thing had happened and they didn't have any of that juice left.

Matt:	Fascinating. So, what are some ways that people might be able to kind of eliminate random or superfluous decisions throughout their day?

Peter:	Well, to answer that question, I think we should talk a little bit about what we really do at Commit Action and the sort of philosophy behind it. Our hypothesis and the point of our service is to create a weekly ritual for our clients that becomes the place that they make decisions about their implementation intentions throughout the week. So, that's a fancy way of saying we help people set goals for the next seven days on one recurring point, one time, one date throughout the week. Now, the reason that this is important is that it drains us, it engages decision fatigue and ego depletion, to sit down and try to do some work, whether you're an entrepreneur, an employee, or an artist or anything. If you're sitting down at your desk and thinking, Now what should I do?, everything that we know about the science is telling us that that's a really wasteful use of your mental faculties. So, probably the best place to get started for people who are interested in the science of success is by doing exactly what we do, by building a really solid ritual of planning out what it is that you're going to be doing, what objectives you're going to be chasing, with a solid level of specificity every single week. And so, that's the ritual that we do to try and eliminate some of that wondering what to do next, and we've found that this is incredibly helpful at helping people move forward, pick up the ball and move it forward on their most important projects.

Matt:	So, what books or resources do you recommend for the listeners who want to dig deeper into the Five Factor model or ego depletion or some of the other topics we've covered today?

Peter:	That is a good, good question. I mean, the first... Trying to think of a book before I give a shameless plug here. I'm looking at my bookshelf. There's a lot of different stuff. Look, honestly, the thing that... If you want to learn more about this, if you're interested in particularly the science of success in the sense of helping yourself really move forward, eliminate any procrastination or self-sabotage or overwhelm or anything like that, and basically turn all of your goals and ideas into actual concrete progress, that's exactly what we do at Commit Action. Our marketing philosophy is a pretty simple one. We believe in generosity, so I've given away basically the best nuggets of all of our research and the stuff that we've figured out. We have a series of videos that are a tutorial training program, and it's absolutely free for everybody to come and check that out, and these videos will detail exactly how you can built these kind of concepts--we call them the pillars of this stuff--into your life to become an extraordinarily productive and effective person. Particularly if you're a business owner or you aspire to be a business owner, this stuff is going to be really useful. But arguably for anyone who is interested in success and high levels of achievement, you guys should come and check this out. So, I was excited to come on the podcast today and what I've actually done is set something up special just for the people who are listening to this podcast, because I know that this audience is probably a little more obsessed with the science of all of this than everybody else. So, we have a video training series that's available to the public. You can go to commitaction.com and sign up, but if you go to commitaction.com/science, which is a page that only exists for listeners of this podcast, you can pop your email address in there to get access to the video training platform and unlock all of these videos that we have that are free, that tell you how to do this stuff in your own life. We're also going to send the people who opt in there, the listeners of this podcast, an extra training that will focus on just the best nuggets, the best kind of psychological pieces of the puzzle that have come to us from our advisory board, and yeah. So, you'll get a bit of an insight into the actual research itself and go into a little bit more detail, and also the practical implementation steps, what you can take away from this science and really build into your life. So, I'm really excited to go into even more detail with the folks who are interested in that stuff. So, go to commitaction.com/science, and you'll also hear in that video series from Dan Lerner, who's the professor of positive psychology at NYU. He's going to chime in and talk a little bit about some of the science stuff as well. All and all, it's a really kick-ass program and the intention of it is that you can use that to walk away and build this stuff in your life and be more effective absolutely on your own, and, of course, we do it because we want people to know about our science and our technology and how we might help them, but it's a great resource for everybody anyway.

Matt:	Well, that's awesome, and I think the listeners are going to be really excited to check some of that stuff out, so thank you very much for putting that together for everybody.

Peter:	Absolutely.

Matt:	Yeah. Well, I mean, I think that pretty much wraps up the episode, so thank you so much, Peter, for being on The Science of Success. I think this has been a fascinating discussion and I think everybody's really going to want to dig into some of the science and the research behind this, and in some ways, you might call it an un-sexy conclusion, but at the same time, kind of a surprising twist about what really predicts success and what really people should be focusing on in terms of trying to achieve results in their lives.

Peter:	Yeah. And that's ultimately the message that I want to share and what our mission is all about, is understanding that an incredible amount of personal development, personal growth stuff that most people are chasing is a bit of a misnomer. There is a lot wrong with it. But when we look at the science of what actually works, what it presents is this optimistic view that the things that really make humans superhuman achievers are simple skills that we can work to level up and strengthen, just as you would a muscle in the gym. And to me, that's exciting. That's the most optimistic kind of view one could take, because it means that we all have a shot at doing better.

Matt:	Awesome. Well, thanks for being on The Science of Success.

Peter:	Thanks for having me.

 

 

April 06, 2016 /Matt Bodnar
Focus & Productivity

How to Turn Your Life Into a Video Game & Level Up, With Author Steve Kamb

January 12, 2016 by Austin Fabel in Focus & Productivity

Improve your decisions, hack your mind, and master the psychology of persuasion with "The Science of Success".  This podcast will teach you the tactics and strategies to understand how psychology rules the world around us and what you can do to use that information to make yourself smarter and achieve your goals.

We're very excited about the guest we have this week on "The Science of Success": Steve Kamb, the "Rebel Leader" and founder of NerdFitness.com. He's also the author of the new book Level Up Your Life. 

In this episode, you'll learn:

  • How Steve's Epic Quest of Awesome changed his life

  • How to achieve your New Year's resolutions

  • Using game mechanics to create accountability

  • Overcoming the fear of changeHow to preserve willpower to make the best decisions

  • How to turn your life into a video game (using science and research!)

  • Why it's a good idea to floss a single tooth

  • How to create your own batcave (like Bruce Wayne)

  • The importance of the "progress principle" in forming habits

And much more! 

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Alright, well we've got a special guest on the podcast today, Steve Kamb. Many people believe that Steve Kamb was created in a laboratory in the 1940s as part of a secret government project. Those people are wrong. That was Steve Rogers, who became Captain America. But Steve Kamb is in many ways a real life superhero. Steve is the rebel leader and founder of NerdFitness.com, and the author of "Level Up Your Life: How to Unlock Adventure and Happiness by Becoming the Hero of Your Own Story." Steve, welcome to the podcast.

Steve:
Great intro, I'm just gonna, I'm golf-clapping over here. That was fantastic, I love it. Thanks for having me, man.

Matt:
Yeah, well we're super pumped to have you on "The Science of Success". I think your book is going to be super relevant for a lot of our listeners, and I think they're really going to love digging into some of this content.

Steve:
Thank you, I mean, I like to think it's like a self-help book for skeptical nerds that would never read self-help. You know what I mean? Like, I tried to ground this in as much behavioral psychology and the studies of human behavior. Like, grounding this in that stuff, so it's like yes it's super nerdy, yes you're creating or turning your life into a video game, but it's all backed by PubMed research and behavioral psychology stuff, because I just love that stuff and it's been so much fun for me to work through. And now to turn it into a book.

Matt:
And that's so relevant for our audience because our big focus on "Science of Success" is kind of how we can ground this stuff in science, and how we can have sort of research-backed strategies for improving yourself, improving your decision making, understanding and influencing other people, and all that kind of stuff.

Steve:
Sure, I love it. I'm in the right spot then.



Matt:
Absolutely. So I am a huge -- and you know this obviously -- but I am a huge video gamer. And in many ways to me, that's part of the reason that this book spoke to me so much. But one of the things you talk about, and kind of one of the core cruxes of "Level Up Your Life" is the idea of turning your life into an RPG. And, you know, you talk about in the book playing EverQuest, and I was a former Ultima Online player, so there may be some...

Steve:
Oh man, yeah I know.

Matt:
It might come to blows later. But tell me a little bit about that concept and how important that is.

Steve:
Yeah, well, as somebody that was raised on a Nintendo and by the time I was third, fourth, fifth grade-ish, the Super Nintendo came out, and all of these amazing old school (I mean at the time they weren’t old school but now they are), old school Japanese RPG games came out, like Chrono Trigger and Final Fantasy VI (which is, you know, actually Final Fantasy III), and Secret of Mana. All these amazing games that really shaped, I think, my childhood. In every one of these games is a concept of a small, weak character that is tasked with saving the world ultimately. And I love the idea, especially as somebody that lived in suburbia and was a small, scrawny, skinny, weak kid. I loved the idea of consistent, constant improvement, and leveling up of a character, and being able to explore these far off lands and do these amazing things. And as I got older and older, these games became more complex. The graphics got better, the storylines became more intricate. And there became less and less need for me to use my imagination, because everything was done for me in the game. And, unfortunately, what began as a fun, kind of fun entertainment, started to become an escape for me, and I spent far too much time playing EverQuest, and then EverQuest 2, which are kind of the precursors to World of Warcraft, but it's a persistent online universe in which you create a character that you can spend hundreds upon hundreds of hours playing as and still never see the end of the game. 

So, as I, after high school, through college, got a regular job but also kind of fell in love with this idea of getting fit and wanting to help others get fit, I wanted to do so in a way that spoke to me and my love of video games, my love of creation of the character, of stories and worlds and things of that nature. So I purchased the domain NerdFitness.com, because I'm a huge nerd and I've built computers and I love Harry Potter and I love digging into the back lore and stories. Just for example, I, yesterday, finished playing through BioShock Infinite.

Matt:
Dude, I love the BioShock games.



Steve:
Oh, they're so great. And finished going through them, and then the first thing I did as I sat down and read like four hours of message boards on the history of multiverse theory and all these crazy, crazy things that had no relevance to... but I was like "This is so fascinating to me!"

Matt:
The ending of that game is amazing.

Steve:
It's so well done. And you know there's some sort of twist coming, but even when you know it's coming, I still had no idea. I was like "Holy crap, this is, I need to go and talk to some instant message boards about this immediately." Anyway, I apologize, I'm getting sidetracked here. So I bought the domain NerdFitness.com, it's simple, I'm a nerd and I like helping people get fit. But the tagline was "Level up your life", and again, as somebody that was small and scrawny and started to get stronger and looked at my training in the gym as me going on a mission, or me completing a quest to gain strength, gain a strength point in my attributes or whatever. It just jumped out at me. I thought to myself, as I was kind of engineering the site, engineering the business, and truly engineering my life, what were the reasons why I was so addicted to the video games that I loved? And if I was addicted to those games for those reasons, could I apply those same game mechanics, the same psychology, the same psychological reasons why, to my actual life? And I broke it down into a few key components, one of which being the progress principle. It's this concept that we are, as a species, more entertained and happier when we are progressing than we are when we get the thing we're progressing towards. 

So, for example, there was a study done, I think it's the concept that instead of getting all your satisfaction from the reward at the end of the journey, it's really breaking down the idea that you are on a journey, and every time you can show progress on that journey, you're brain gets a little hit of dopamine, and you get addicted to this idea of making progress. That's why it works in the video game; you love going from level one to level two. Oh, you just got a new sword? Oh, that new sword lets you go kill this new bad guy faster, and when you kill that bad guy, it's like "Oh, that got me a new suit of armor, which allows me to go into this new cave. Which then has this new thing at the bottom of it." And next thing you know, it's like two years later, you have a full beard, and you don't know where your time went. So I thought about how I could apply the progress principle to my own life. So I actually built a questing system that add experience point values to each quest, depending on how difficult they were. 

As I crossed those things off of my list, my character -- AKA Steve -- would level up. Although, actually, my character's name is Rebel One. I thought that was a cooler, nerdier name than just Steve. So, Rebel One is kind of like my alter ego. So, by day I'm writing articles and sitting at a desk, and whatever. But in the afternoons, evenings, I might be planning my next trip, working on the violin, getting closer to deadlifting 405 pounds or completing a certain gymnastic movement. But it's all done with this idea of progress and this whole progress principle, because it's not as instant as it happens in a video game. If you're trying to lose weight, maybe you're trying to write a book. If you are studying, doing a research paper or something like... If you can find a way to break that down into bite sized missions or quests that you can complete and show yourself that there's a progress bar to be filled up or an experience bar to fill up. Maybe even creating some sort of reward system that every time you cross a threshold or you cross a milestone, that character can, your character can level up. You can earn a new item that helps you further along in your quest. 

I just fell in love with the idea of life as a Role Playing Game, and as somebody that spent, at this point, thousands of hours buried in games, and imagining myself as that character, I wanted to start living vicariously through myself, and get hooked on leveling up myself as a character. So, I broke my quest system into travel goals, financial goals, volunteering goals, business, social goals, whatever they may be. And broke them down into small enough goals and habits and missions and quests so that they were things that I could consistently make progress on and show it to myself. Prove to myself that I was, in fact, progressing and get addicted to that idea of moving forward.

Matt:
So, tell me about... You talk about the term that you sort of created your own "epic quest of awesome". Tell me what some of the pieces of that quest and how you created that.

Steve:
Sure, everybody's got a bucket list, and everybody wakes up on New Year's Eve, I'm sorry on New Year's Day, hungover and says "This year, things are going to be different, and I'm going to run, I'm going to exercise more, and I'm going to eat better, and I'm going to finally write my book, and I'm going to do this and that." Whatever the studies say, it's like three weeks later, ninety percent of people have abandoned their goals. They haven't gotten anything done. Or people get more excited about adding more and more things to their bucket list, that they never actually cross anything off of it. So I wanted to reframe things and I decided to rename my bucket quest my "Epic Quest of Awesome". Why? I don't know. It was like the two most ridiculously superlative words I could pick out was awesome and epic, and throw them together. It's funny, my friend Benny, who is from Ireland, let me know at one point that his two least favorite words that Americans use was "epic" and "awesome". He's like "Everything's epic! Everything's awesome!" I was like "You are not going to like the quest that I just put together then." He was like "What are you talking about?" I was like "Welllll, don't worry about it. It's fine." 

So I called it my epic quest of awesome, and as I said a little bit earlier, I divided my life into goals and missions that challenge me, things that pushed me outside of my comfort zone, things that improved my health, my physical strength, my endurance. Fun missions. For example, while writing this book, I learned to play the violin because I thought that was a challenging mission that self-doubt had already set in before I even picked up the violin, so I was like "This is a perfect case study for this book. Why don't I use game mechanics and the structuring of my environment to make learning the violin almost like a foregone conclusion?" So I have music quests, I have -- and I can talk a little bit more about the music stuff later, that's a big ass, big part of my life too. You know, I turned life into the game, I segmented it into quests, lines, and story missions, and tried to take a lot of the same, take a lot of the things that you used to, I used to escape into, and instead apply to see if I could have a fun way of reenacting those experiences in real life. 

So, for example, I love James Bond. I think what Daniel Craig has done with the character is phenomenal. The original book, Ian Fleming's series, I think is really great. So I thought to myself, instead of just watching another James Bond movie, why don't you live out a weekend like James Bond? So I thought what that would look like, and planned it out and structured it out. So I went and stayed in a really cheap hostel in Nice, France. I found somebody there that spoke French, and brought her with me to a costume shop that also happened to rent tuxedos. I then used hotel points to stay at the Fairmont Monte Carlo and had set up an automatic savings account to set aside a little bit of money each week, so I had enough money to gamble with at the famous Monte Carlo casino. So here I am, sitting in a tux, drinking cocktails, gambling at the Monte Carlo, laughing my ass off, and cracking corny jokes like James Bond would, when in reality I was a kid that was traveling around the world with a backpack. There was more money in the table than I had probably spent in the previous week, and it was fun, it was kind of fun for me to see how I could create these amazing, epic experiences without breaking the bank to show other people like "Hey, I'm a regular person like you. Here's exactly how I learned to do this." Or "Hey, if I'm learning to play the violin, or a language, here's a system you can put in place using your favorite games and movies to set yourself up to succeed in those instances as well."

Matt:
Yeah, I mean I love that example in the book. I think that's a perfect illustration, especially of an epically awesome thing to do.

Steve:
It was so much fun. I made money in the weekend. I think I won like two hundred bucks or something playing Blackjack. The tux rental was like fifty bucks, and I used hotel points for the hotel. So overall, this amazing weekend that I got plenty of emails from people saying like "Oh, must be nice to be rich." And I'm like "I didn't really, I had a specific mission in mind, I had a goal structure, a goal system in place. I had a progress structure in place. A leveling system, etcetera." I considered like James Bond was like a boss battle. I was building up to that moment, and whether I won or lost, it wasn't going to financially cripple me with the money that I gambled, because it had been slowly, automatically set aside, so that it was all a part of the experience and the stories that I was building. In my mind, whenever possible, I try to spend my money on experiences more than possessions, just because they're something that you will have forever, and things that you will be able to tell stories to your children, and grandchildren and great grandkids about for years and years and years.



Matt:
So, you touched on this a little bit, but tell me more about the use of game mechanics and structuring your environment to lock in, or put yourself on a path to actually be able to achieve some of these goals.

Steve:
Sure. There's two things in particular that I found were really helpful for me in starting to cross things off my list. The thing that I found most important was understanding that we are products of our environment. I didn't want to believe it, but after understanding and watching myself, and then doing as much research as I could on the subject and interacting with other people. Asking ourselves, "why is it that we know we should work out, but we can't get ourselves to do it?" We know that we shouldn't watch twelve episodes of a TV show on Netflix, and yet we can't get ourselves to stop. What is it with our environments that are setting us up to fail, and how can we rewire or reengineer the things around us so that we don't have to use willpower, we don't have to rely on motivation? 

What I've discovered, and in my experience have found to be absolutely true, I look at willpower as if it is a life bar in a video game. Every time you're forced to make a decision or spend any willpower on a new habit, that willpower bar starts to deplete and when that willpower bar is full depleted, the habit falls apart and you kind of have to start all over again. What most people do on January 1st, when they're trying to change their life, like "Oh, I'm going to start flossing, and running every morning, and eating better, and I'm going to write my book, and I'm going to learn to play an instrument." I honestly have no problem with all sorts of goals, however I do have a problem with the way people attack them. So for somebody that makes all these goals and has no structure in place, it's the equivalent of attacking ten different bad guys all at the same time. Sure enough, when you attack ten bad guys at the same time, you're going to get your ass kicked and you're going to die. Your willpower bar gets depleted when you have to make ten really difficult decisions to get yourself to start a new habit all at the same time. 

On top of that, let's say if you say "I'm going to write a book." You sit down, "Okay, I have to write this entire book soon." That's the equivalent of attacking a bad guy that's way too high of a level. Again, you get your ass kicked. What needs to happen is you need to attack each of these problems in a systematized way, so that you don't deplete your willpower bar, or you set yourself up so you don't even need to use willpower in the first place. Let's say you're trying to get fit and you want to eventually run a marathon. Well, what I would recommend people do is increase the number of steps between you and the habit you're trying to break, and decrease the number of steps between you and the habit you're trying to build. So sleep in your running clothes. Put your alarm clock across the room next to a glass of water, so when you wake up the next morning, you have to get out of bed because the alarm clock's across the room. You get up, you go over, you turn off, you're already dressed, you step into your running shoes, you quickly chug your glass of water and your phone is already set, which is in the other room so that way you're not lying in bed checking it. Your phone in the other room is already set to your workout playlist and you grab it and you tell yourself you only have to go out the door and run for five minutes. That's it. You are building a teeny tiny small habit that does not require a tremendous amount of willpower. You're structuring your environment around you to tell you success. And you've done it in a way so that the default activity for you once you've gotten out of bed, you're already in your clothes; the default behavior is to actually do the thing you're trying to build this new habit. I'll give you a few more examples. 

So, let's say I was trying to write the book "Level Up Your Life", and writing a book was so overwhelming to me that I just continually put it off because I told myself I don't have time to write this, and I'll write it when I'm more motivated, and I came to realize the idea of motivation is a terrible way to go about doing things you're interested in. I found a great answer that I talk about in the book, but somebody talks about they want to get motivated to write, or they want to get motivated to learn an instrument. The response to them was like "Screw motivation, cultivate discipline." I thought that was so profound and so helpful to me as somebody that was waiting to get motivated enough to write my book. Instead, what I did was I woke up and the first thing I did every morning was make a cup of coffee, then sat down at my computer, immediately turned on a program called Self Control at the time, now I use a program called Freedom. It blocks every time-wasting website on my computer so that even if I wanted to check them out, I can't, so I have to use zero willpower to not check them, because I can't even access them. I then have a playlist that I listen to to get me into the right mood, and then I had a daily goal, where every day I had to write a certain number of words. As long as I wrote those words, it didn't matter if the content was good or not, but I had to write a certain number of words. And every day that I did that was considered a check, a mission complete on this quest of writing a book. Because I had blocked out these websites, because I had canceled my cable, because I had a good playlist set up, I had structured my entire environment around the idea of "Steve is now a book writer, and every morning from around 6:30AM until 10AM, that is what he's going to do. He's going to write a book, he will not be distracted, his phone will be in the other room, all chat programs will be turned off." The environment was built in a way that I could pull those things off. 

I like to call this "building your Batcave". In the book, I refer to it as this concept that Bruce Wayne has his Batcave full of his tools and gadgets that allow him to defend the city of Gotham. So, for us, as regular real human beings, we are structuring our Batcave to help us succeed in whatever quest or mission we set forth for ourself. Another very basic example, let's say you're trying to eat better. Telling yourself "No, don't eat the ice cream in the fridge or the freezer" is a losing battle. It's all you're going to think about. I'm sure now everybody's thinking about ice cream now that I just mentioned it.

Matt:
I want some ice cream right now.

Steve:
Right? Everybody wants ice cream. I want some ice cream now too because I just said it. Fortunately, I don't keep ice cream in my apartment, because I know if I did, all I would do is eat it. The same thing goes for Sour Patch Kids and Goldfish crackers. You could give me one of those family sized tubs of Goldfish crackers and I could eat every single one of them in one sitting, and then be like "Okay, what else, what else can I eat at this point?" So it's almost like I have to enact a restraining order against those things. They cannot come within a certain number of yards of my existence, because if they're there, I know they exist and I can't focus on anything else other than those particular things. So rather than relying on willpower, I just don't keep them in my apartment. 

I couldn't get myself to stop watching TV or stop playing certain video games, so I got rid of them and I canceled my cable and unplugged my PlayStation when I had to get to these things. I just added as many steps between me and the challenging part as possible because I knew I couldn't... I'm weak minded in that I'm a human in that the things that bring us pleasures are often times the things -- or short term pleasure anyway -- are often the things that are keeping the things we actually want to do with our lives.

Matt:
So I think that's super relevant and you also had a great example in the book, just flossing one tooth, which I think a buddy of yours had suggested. 

Steve:
Yeah, James Clear. He was like "I'm just going to floss one tooth. That's it."

Matt:
I think that's genius. Because as soon as you floss one tooth, you're like "Alright, well I need to keep going."

Steve:
One, yeah, I'm not going to stop at one like an idiot. I think I call it "The Braveheart Technique", but William Wallace, Mel Gibson's character, his buddy, they're covered in war paint, and they have their kilts on, and they're ready to go to battle. They come back over, and the guy goes "Well, we didn't get dressed up for nothing." Okay, if you don't want to work out, that's fine. Just put on your workout clothes and walk into the gym and do a pushup. If you do that, you have succeeded. A hundred times out of a hundred, you're going to get in there and do the one pushup and be like "Well, crap, I'm already here. I already flossed the one tooth. I might as well just do the rest of it." But had you initially set out to say "I have to floss every tooth." You're like, that's not going to happen. But just do one. Just do the one thing. Very much like you can get hooked on negative things, this you can build addictive, healthy habits as well that structure your life in a way that you're consistently improving and making progress and finding a way to properly balance that with gratitude and things that remind you that hey, you're alive, and life's pretty good too.




Matt:
So, kind of a related concept that you talk about a little bit is people who have a fear of change, right? And sort of struggle with that. What are some of the strategies that you recommend for overcoming that?

Steve:
Sure. Fear... man. I'm guessing there are quite a few people that are listening to this can absolutely relate, but I can think myself into or out of any situation from talking to somebody, to going to something, to doing something versus not doing something. I will overanalyze the hell out of that thing until it is so terrifying in my head that I'm paralyzed at the thought of actually following through on it. So I have an entire chapter on fear busting and how to break through and how to overcome a lot of these, when we break it down, irrational fears that we have about something. It might be a fear of rejection, a fear of change, a fear of the unknown. So I encourage people to dig in and I draw from Bruce Wayne and Batman. Bruce Wayne falls down a well and, going off of the Christopher Nolan version of the movies, falls down a well and encounters this swarm of bats and it terrifies him, and he's afraid of bats for so long until he thinks about it. And as he is is becoming the Caped Crusader, as he's becoming Batman, he's building his suit and getting his life together, and he's thinking "Okay, well maybe these bats aren't out to get me. They're a species very much like I am. They're doing their thing, I'm doing mine." Once he kind of broke it down, he actually ended up using the bat as his symbol to strike fear in the hearts of his enemies. So he took this irrational or unknown fear that he had, he broke it down into its most base components, and when he did that, it became far less scary to him, so much so that he actually embraced and enacted and used that fear for himself. 

For anybody that is, let's say you're afraid of going up and talking to somebody, or you're afraid of publishing your first blog post and what somebody might say, or you're afraid of looking foolish at the gym if you try a new class, or you're afraid of something. What I encourage people to do is, and this is a tip I learned from Tim Ferriss, but define what that fear is, and really sit down and think about it. It's like "Okay, what is the worst thing that can happen in this situation? And what is it that I'm so afraid of? And if that worst possible thing were to happen, how would I fix it?" So okay, if I go up and talk to this person, and they say "go away" or "get out of here, creep" or whatever, okay. Then you go back to living your life as if you hadn't talked to them, and now you know that that person clearly was not somebody that you should have talked to, that you should be talking to or concerning yourself with. If you're worried about looking foolish in your first dance class or speaking a language and messing up. What's the worst that can happen? Somebody corrects you, somebody chuckles, you laugh at yourself and then you get up if you fell over. You laugh at yourself if you pronounce something incorrectly, and then you pronounce it correctly and you move on with your life. I found so many times that we're so afraid to get started with something, that if we just took a few minutes to talk to the worst possible scenario, write it down, and then put a plan in place. "If this were to happen, this is what I would do." It makes it so much less scary, and makes it far easier for us to actually carry, follow forward, and try the thing out and see what happens. 

I found a lot of the time that if I look at things as if I am a scientist conducting a hypothesis, then it removes a lot of the personal problems that I have where it's like "Oh, if this fails then it's a reflection on who I am as a person." Instead, it's like "Okay, that hypothesis didn't work, approaching this person in this way was incorrect, or opening my keynote speech with a joke about this did not go as well as I would have hoped. Okay, hypothesis tested, experiment conducted, I now know how to adapt for future things and I can move on." I think that's a big component of fear. I think another thing that I've loved to do when it comes to me being afraid of something is not giving myself a chance to back out of it. It might mean signing up for something before I can talk myself into saying no. It might be using or working with a friend or a colleague or something on something that scares me, so that I'm not attacking this giant fearful problem alone. 

Last but not least, I just love, there was a concept from the movie "We Bought A Zoo". It's this concept of using twenty seconds of courage. I think of it kind of like star power from Super Mario Brothers. You can be afraid before and you can be terrified after, but if there's something you know you need to do, .or there's something you want to sign up for, somebody you want to talk to, something that you cannot get yourself started on, very much like only flossing one tooth, tell yourself you only need twenty seconds of courage. More often than not, I have found those twenty seconds of courage is enough to get me to take that first step, to walk out onto a stage. 

I remember I took Swing Dance lessons, and I sat in my car for fifteen minutes before going in because I was so afraid of walking into this class alone, I had never done it before. I had to get myself mentally psyched up sitting in my car by myself in a parking lot, to walk in to take a Swing Dance class because I knew it would be good for me and I'd have fun, but I was just so afraid of looking foolish that I needed those twenty seconds to get me in the door. Once I was there, I didn't get dressed up for nothing, I might as well just start dancing. More often than not, any time I've followed through in that. 

There are some great stories throughout the book too of people that have overcome fears by implementing twenty seconds of courage or using a lot of these strategies as well. I know, just like we know we need to exercise more or eat better, there are so many instances where we are afraid of uncomfortable conversation, or afraid of looking foolish, and it's keeping us from doing the things that are going to help us move the most forward. And attacking fear like it's a hypothesis that you're attempting to question has really helped me from an analytical standpoint actually follow through on those things and start having more uncomfortable conversations and getting more comfortable with putting myself in uncomfortable situations.

Matt:
I love the idea of thinking about it like an experiment. That's actually something that we've talked about before on the podcast. We talked about a book called "Mindset" by Carol Dweck. I don't know if you've ever read that.

Steve:
I think I have? Maybe?

Matt:
But it's essentially kind of the idea of the difference between the fixed mindset as she calls it and the growth mindset.

Steve:
Oh yes, absolutely.

Matt:
And the fixed mindset is all about proving yourself, and the growth mindset is all about improving yourself. There's a bunch of other distinctions, and we drilled down in that episode in particular, but I think that dovetails perfectly with the concept you're describing.

Steve:
Absolutely. Well done, sir, high five.

Matt:
Internet high fives.

Steve:
Internet high five. I just high fived my computer.

Matt:
Okay, yes, I just did the same. So, as part of that, one of the things you talk about that's really important is the idea of accountability. How can we create that and how can we make ourselves more accountable?

Steve:
Sure. At our very... Not too in front of you, but at our very base level we try to move away from pain and move toward pleasure and happiness. When we're trying to get ourselves to do the things that we need to do, unfortunately we're up against so much resistance because it's so much easier for us to take the short term pleasure path. Like "Oh, I'm going to run a marathon" or "I'm going to start writing a blog post every day, but man, starting that habit's difficult, and the couch is right there, and the video games are right there, so instead of writing a blog post, I'm just going to play video games." At the moment, on a day to day basis, that works out great for you as a person. You're like "Oh man, instead of having to struggle through a blog post, I get to enjoy playing video games and have fun and whatever." So what I had to do until I could get myself to the point of truly enjoying the activities that I knew were helping me move forward -- for example, writing the book, exercising, playing violin and things of that nature -- I had to apply more video game mechanics, and that is the idea of rewards and accountability. So I had increase the pleasure and happiness associated with completing the healthy task, or the thing I wanted to do, and I had to increase the pain, or accountability, associated with not doing the task. 

So let's use the blog post for example. So I, as Nerd Fitness was growing, struggled to get myself to consistently write blog posts on time. So what I did was I actually gave five hundred dollars to one of my employees, and I said "For every day that a blog post is late, I want you to donate fifty bucks to the Westboro Baptist Church" or something. Or it was a political cause that I wasn't thrilled with. Because there was no way I wanted my money to go to a cause that I truly despised, I was like "I'll just have to write the stupid blog post" and sure enough, once I got started, "Oh I'm actually enjoying this and having fun with this" and so on and so forth. 

So introducing accountability and having somebody else help keep you accountable, especially in that first month of trying to build a new habit or move closer to something that is challenging to you, adding accountability up front is so important. In addition to that, I love the idea of building a reward system in. It's built into every video game out there, but the example I love the most is The Legend of Zelda. In every dungeon you enter, there is a big treasure chest that has a new weapon that makes your character stronger and allows you to explore a new location and move advance further in the game. 

So compare this with what most people do, "Oh I went for a run for four days this week, that means I can eat an entire cake on Friday and feel good about it because I quote unquote 'earned this' ." Or  "Oh, I did this one healthy thing and therefore I get to do this negative, unhealthy thing because it's my reward for being healthy." I instead like to build a reward system with things that reward me back. So if you are going for a run, you want to get better at running. If you run four days a week for a month straight, then you get to buy a new pair of running shoes. And when you buy a new pair of running shoes, you're then further incentivized to want to run even further, run more often, etcetera. If you are trying to lose weight and you get to a certain goal weight, then you can buy new healthy clothes, clothes that fit you, or you buy one shirt that is slightly smaller than the rest of them, again, which is further incentivizing you and pushing you and motivating you to continue down this path of a healthy lifestyle. I love the idea of building rewards and accountability into the things that you're trying to do. However, what I've found after a few months is that more often than not this habit that you used to have to rely on accountability and rewards to get done becomes a part of who you are and you're actually more driven by the enjoyment you get out of the activity itself. This is talked about quite a bit in the book "Drive".

Matt:
It's a great book.

Steve:
"Drive" talks about more from an economic standpoint, the idea of just rewarding people with money and punishing them with taking things away. If you were to incentivize them or just set them up in a way that they're working on things that are challenging to them that make them feel alive, that remind them why they're doing the things that they're doing, they're going to be more likely to do their best work. I've found through Nerd Fitness and community members, so many times people are like "Man, I've built this reward system, and I started leveling up, but I actually like exercising now, and I never thought I would say that, but I actually look forward to how I feel after I exercise." I'm absolutely at that point now. The feelings that I get from exercise, the feeling I got from finishing a great article or guest post, the feeling I get from practicing and feeling how the violin feels in my hands and these things, they all started with this reward system in place and structuring my environment so that I almost had to, there was no other option for me but to practice, but to succeed, but to exercise, but to read more. But as I'm doing these things more and more often, they become more and more a part of who I am, I get more and more excited about them. It sets you up in a way that's completely different from just waiting on extrinsic reward systems and instead becomes something that's intrinsic and excites you in an interior way. Your brain, your soul, what you get excited about, I've found that happens far more often than not, which is pretty cool.

Matt:
So, one of the things that kind of underlies your epic quest of awesome, and also one of the big themes in the book is the idea of the hero's journey. Tell me a little bit about that and how people can apply that to their lives.

Steve:
Sure. The hero's journey is a concept that every great story in history, from the bible, King Arthur, all the way up through to Lord of the Rings, Game of Thrones, Harry Potter, and pretty much every video game in between. Every great story in history follows a very similar story arc, and the story arc is the idea of a person, man or woman, or humble origins and normal beginnings, kind of feels like a fish out of water. There is some sort of call to action, either something takes place or they meet somebody or they do something, and they are then drawn into this extraordinary world, and in the extraordinary world, they find allies, they encounter enemies, they have to defeat a bad guy, they learn a lot about themselves, they find buried treasure, they rescue the prince, they rescue the princess, they save the world, and they return home a changed person. 

So, for example, Star Wars. Let's say, Star Wars. Luke Skywalker's journey -- I know George Lucas was a huge fan of the concept of the hero's journey, I think, and if he wasn't, then clearly he did his research on what makes a great story. Luke is that character; he was a guy on a farm, and after he lost his aunt and uncle, goes into this extraordinary world (AKA up in space) and gets into this amazing space opera scene and really, really cool environment. The reason I'm talking about Star Wars now is the next movie comes out in a few days and I can't focus on anything other than Star Wars at the moment. So every great story in history, from Star Wars all the way up to, all the way back to the bible, King Arthur, etcetera, they all follow this path. 

So I thought to myself, what if I'm a hero on my own journey as well? What would that look like, and how would it structure the decisions I make, and how would it mentally shift how I attack a certain problem? So if somebody is four hundred pounds, broke, living in their parents' basement and doesn't have a job, one way to look at that is life is over and everything sucks, and life is unfair and blah blah blah yada yada yada. Or you can look at it like "Okay, if I'm on a hero's journey, then I'm clearly at the beginning point of this journey, and a better future awaits me, because if I'm going to go on this path, something's going to happen. I need to take action. When I'm taking action, I need to identify a mentor, find allies, I need to complete quests and missions and things like that. I need to have an end goal that I'm working towards in place." 

When you start to put these things down on paper and think through them, it shifts how you look at problems. They're not things that have gone wrong; instead, they're obstacles that you need to overcome, a lesson that you need to learn, a plot twist that you need to attack. I realize that that sounds so hokey, but I don't know. As somebody that grew up loving these stories, it made so much sense to me. Once I shared this idea with other people and had them start thinking about it as well, it shifted how they attacked certain problems too. A thing I love about these stories is that they give us hope, and I think that hope is very important. It's the central theme in Shawshank Redemption, which is my favorite movie. But what you don't get, and what they don't tell you with the quotes in that movie is that hope without action is nothing. You're not getting very far is all you're doing is hoping. 

I think hope for a better future, I think expecting more of yourself is fantastic, but I also think you need to put a structure and a system in place that takes you further away from where you've been, and closer to where you want to go. That's where those game mechanics that I talked about earlier kick in. I felt like I went on a hero's journey when I traveled around the world in 2011. I felt like I went on another hero's journey when I wrote this book, and I'm excited to see every hero's journey is cyclical. We come home, and when you return home from your journey, you're a changed person and then you become a mentor to somebody else, or you get started on a bigger, better journey. There's a farther away mountain or a bigger dragon to slay. I'm excited. 

The way I see it, this whole book is actually structured and follows the path of the hero's journey. In my mind, the reader is the hero, the book is the call to action, and I get to be the mentor. I get to be Yoda, I get to be Morpheus, I get to be Dumbledore. That's so much fun for me. Years ago when I was getting started on my path, I found a book in a bookstore that changed my life; that was my call to action, and it was Tim Ferriss' "Four Hour Work Week". I'm hopeful that this book can be that call to action for other people too, where they're kind of drifting and heading through life, and they know they need to make some changes, they're not sure how, and they stumble across this book, they get it from a friend and there's a paradigm shift. They change how they attack every day, and they put a system in place that sets them up to win. Once they do so, they complete their hero's journey. They then pass it on to somebody else and hope the message spreads. We have a worldwide community of really fit, adventurous nerds that are living out the heroes' journeys and mentoring other people to do the same thing.

Matt:
I love that vision. That sounds amazing.

Steve:
Right? How much fun would that be? Plus, when the zombies start attacking, I think we're going to need that army of super-fit, adventurous nerds to keep us away from all the zombies.

Matt:
I have a fully built zombie survival plan.

Steve:
I love it. Absolutely love it. I think we used to think, number one, how to survive a zombie apocalypse. I put a whole plan in place on Nerd Fitness. If you were actually trapped in The Walking Dead, what would you do and how would you do it? Here's a step by step workout plan, here's how you should attack your diet, blah blah blah yada yada yada. You can never be too careful.

Matt:
Very true. So one of the things that you talk about in the book that I thought was a great analogy was if you're playing something like World of Warcraft, and you're looking for a group, you never want to join the group that is five levels too low and they're going to get their butts kicked when they go into the dungeon. You want to join the group that's totally badass, and that's going to crush everything and carry you along and make you better. So explain that a little bit, why that's important and how people can apply that to themselves.

Steve:
Sure. It's funny because it's something that so obvious in a video game, and so not obvious in real life.

Matt:
So true.

Steve:
Right? In a game, it's like "Oh, of course I want to play on the best team. I don't want to be on the losing team. If I partner up with these total kickass characters, we can go fight way bigger stuff, and we can go explore way farther in the game than I've ever been before, and they're going to make me better." And then in real life, often times we surround ourselves with people that are negative, that are very much not of the idea that they want to grow, that they are looking to improve themselves. They're the type of people that read a great story and say "Oh, must be nice" or "What an idiot" or "Why would somebody want to do that? I'm perfectly whatever." I've found a lot in my community at Nerd Fitness, that more often than not, we have people that are the one person in their group of friends that is interested in getting fit. They come home from a workout, like "Man, I just set a new deadlift record," or "I ran a mile the fastest I've ever run," or "I just rock-climbed, I hit a new personal best on the difficulty level of the wall that I was climbing." Their friends are like "Whatever man, we just need you for this raid," or "We need you for this battle, this guild war that we're about to partake in." They're not interested. 

I honestly believe this; I think we are the average of the people that we associate the most with. When we surround ourselves with negative people, and if you work in an office, more often than not the people that you spend a lot of your time with at that office, if they're not of the same mentality as you and they're not interested in getting fit, if they're not interested in running more often, or if they're not interested in the things that you're interested in, you're going to be less likely to want to do those things. That sounds so obvious, but nobody does it. We spend our time with the people that we think we should hang out with, or people that we have hanged out with that have long overstayed their welcome and it's just easier for us to just keep hanging out with them. Because we're an average of those people, it makes it such an uphill battle for us to live this life of growth and happiness and adventure and success and improvement, unless we're surrounded by other people doing those things. 

I don't mean to say "You need to fire all of your friends tomorrow, and then go out and find new ones solely for the purpose that they're going to make you better," but I think it is important to evaluate the relationships that you do have, and see if they are improving your life or if they're not. If they're not, I'd try to minimize time with those people, and if they are, I'd try to maximize time with those people. Whether it's emails back and forth on a regular basis, encouraging and pushing each other to keep each other accountable on a certain project or goal of mission. It's tough. It's tough, but it requires a conversation, personally with yourself, to ask yourself what's important to you, and what your goals are. If the people that are currently in your group are aiding or hurting you on your mission to pull those things off. So, for anybody that has an unsupportive system at home, and an unsupportive system at the office, then I highly recommend they have some sort of online support group of other growth like-minded individuals that are interested in leveling up their lives in the same way. 

I think that's probably been the most important part of what has made Nerd Fitness successful, and why I'm so proud of it: the community aspect of it. These are people from all walks of life that have succeeded in every different way possible and failed in every way possible. When you post on the message boards, you get in the Facebook groups, attend a live event, you're surrounded by these supportive, engaging, helpful people that just want to see you succeed. It's such a drastic departure from what everybody else usually runs into, and that's the people that try to drag other people back down because that's way easier than building themselves up. 

So, I find life as a multi-player game is so important, and it's something that we don't look at very often. Unfortunately, a lot of times, it's our own family members or a relationship that has gone on far too long. In the book, I say "Hey, I'm not telling you to fire your family, and I'm not telling you to get out of your relationship, but you got to be happy too, and you got to be surrounded by people that support you. If you're not getting that, then you need to have that conversation with them. Get them on your side. Tell them you're doing it as an experiment, and you need their help in supporting you. If it's a relationship that's run its course, you might need to call it quits and find somebody that does line up with the things that you're interested in. 

So it's a challenge, but man, life is truly multi-player. If you're not careful, that can be the thing that's sabotaging us the most if we're not aware of it.

Matt:
So, I think that's incredibly important, and I think the video game analogy is so powerful because in real life, people just don't do it, they don't see it so many times. But as soon as you think about it in the context of looking for a group in a video game, it's stupidly obvious.

Steve:
The idea of mastermind groups, I've found them to be incredibly helpful. I had a group of friends where every month, we'd have an online challenge. Like, "This month, you have to create your own cocktail, and next month you have to record a song, and the month after that..." It was so much fun trying to learn a new skill each month and see how other people did and whatever. It's tough to find, but when you can find a group of people that are pushing you in that way, it just makes every other aspect of life so much easier.

Matt:
So, Steve, for people like me who have read and enjoyed "Level Up Your Life", what further books or resources would you recommend checking out?

Steve:
Hmm, great question. From a business perspective, I can't say enough about "The Four Hour Work Week" from Tim Ferriss. It's a very practical book on if you were to build an online business, how would you do it? That was the book that got me started.

Matt:
That's the book that got me started too, so it's one of my favorite books of all time.

Steve:
Yeah, it's a book that I've gifted to more people than anybody. That, and I love Richard Branson's book "Losing My Virginity". His book changed my life as well. It made me shift my focus from "Oh, I just want to travel and play the guitar and whatever," to "I want to build something. I want to build something as powerful as we can make it." Because he's been able to build hundreds of companies and put it all into this idea as Virgin as a company, but he also has a lot of fun on the side, and he's done a lot of good for the planet, and he just seems like a good dude that has the planet and people's best interests at heart. He's done it all while also building a for-profit business; a lot of for-profit businesses. Plus, he owns an island in the Caribbean. If he can do it... It's a good aspirational book, I think, as well. It reads like an adventure novel, even though it's about his entrepreneurial journey. So, I love those two books specifically from a business perspective. 

I mean, I'm sure everybody if they haven't read it, books like "The Power of Habit" and as you mentioned earlier "Drive", what was the other? There are some other great books in that realm. But yeah, I would say those two probably in particular, "Power of Habit" and "Drive". I just loved the concepts in them and showing people how our brains are actually wired, and how they're working, and how to get us to do the things we always said we wanted to do but can't get ourselves to actually do. Digging into the psychology and physiology almost behind why those things are happening is just fascinating to me, and I think they're really helpful for anybody trying to make positive changes in their lives.

Matt:
So where can people find you and "Level Up Your Life" online?

Steve:
"Level Up Your Life" the book is available at Amazon or it's in bookstores Barnes and Noble. It comes out January 12th. I'm not sure when this will be going up. And then you can also learn way more about it at LevelUpYourLife.com. You can actually create a character there as well with experience points and missions to complete and actually level up your avatar. I spend most of my time hanging out at NerdFitness.com, where I'm publishing two articles a week. There's a message board community and we have live in-person events, things like that. So NerdFitness.com and LevelUpYourLife.com.

Matt:
Well, Steve, thank you so much for being on "The Science of Success". I know people are going to love this interview, I think it's great, and I think a lot of the topics you touched on are really going to resonate, about creating powerful habits, and leveraging game mechanics to transform your life. And I think everybody should absolutely check our Steve's new book "Level Up Your Life". You're really going to enjoy it.

Steve:
Thanks man, I was going to say, don't get me wrong, I still love video games, I still play them as often as I can, but that life has become the adventurous part. I do my best to stay nerdy and play the things that make me happy, but I'm also doing everything I can to level up myself personally and set a great example for everybody else. Appreciate the opportunity for having me on here. If I can answer anybody's questions, just hit me up on Twitter @SteveKamb or shoot us an email at Nerd Fitness and I'd love to get back to you.

 

January 12, 2016 /Austin Fabel
Focus & Productivity
8-TheNeuroscienceBehindBeingProductive,WithResearcherandAuthorJoshDavis-IG2-01.jpg

The Neuroscience Behind Being Productive, With Researcher and Author Josh Davis

January 05, 2016 by Austin Fabel in Focus & Productivity

On this week's episode of "The Science of Success", we speak with Columbia Ph.D. Josh Davis, who is currently the director of research for the NeuroLeadership Institute, a NeuroCoach and Master Practitioner of NLP. Josh is also the author of the recent international bestseller Two Awesome Hours, in which he shares science-based strategies to get your most important work done.

In today's episode you will learn:

  • Why working all the time means you actually get LESS done.

  • How to conquer overwhelm (using scientific findings, not advice)

  • How to snap out of auto-pilot and make effective use of your time

  • How to leverage negative emotion to be more productive

  • A surprising finding about how music impacts your work flow

  • And much more.

Thank you so much for listening!

Please SUBSCRIBE and LEAVE US A REVIEW on iTunes! (Click here for instructions how to do that!).  

EPISODE TRANSCRIPT

Welcome to the Science of Success. I’m very excited about the guest we have today. Josh Davis, Columbia PhD, who’s currently the director of research for the Neuroleadership Institute, a Neuro-coach, and a master practitioner of NLP. Josh is the author if the recent book, Two Awesome Hours, where he shares science-based strategies to get your most important work done. With that, let’s welcome Josh to the show. 

Josh:	Thanks so much for having me here, it’s really nice to be on the show.

Matt:	And we’re super excited to have you. Do you want to kind of tell readers or give them just a little bit of a kind of introduction to what Two Awesome Hours is about and what your story, your background?

Josh:	Yeah I’d love to. Where this came from was that I was realizing something that we were all realizing, but it just was feeling compelled to see what I could do about it. I was working all the time, my wife was working all the time, my friends were working all the time. And good people working hard, trying to get a lot of stuff done, really contributing to their jobs and yet, feeling bad at the end of the day. And feeling like we hadn’t done enough. And the sort of constant sense of overwhelmed. There’s no way to catch up. And when I saw that, I guess I really came to a point where I just thinking that’s not right, that’s not how to live a life. That’s not what I want for myself and for others. I want to create more o fa culture if I can where we have some of that balance. Where, when we put in that kind of hard work we can say “yeah, I accomplished something” and leave it alone, and not feel that sense of there’s this constant overwhelm. And of course it’s only continuing, it’s only getting worse as we’re so accessible. We’re going to be wearing our technology within the year, and maybe longer. But we’re - it’ll be implanted, who knows where it’s going. But we’re just going to be more and more accessible, and with that we have increased social pressures and social obligations to get back to people, because most of us are caring, thoughtful people and do want to help one another out and get back quickly. So there’s every reason to think that it’ll increase. So, what I wanted to find out was is there some way we can start to get back some of this work-life balance, some of this self-compassion, and the key that kind of launched the whole book idea was sort of identifying this idea that typically what we do when we get overwhelmed is we just think “alright I have to work every minute, I need to stay on task as much as possible, I have to work every hour, there’s just so much work, how am I going - how else am I going to do it?” It’s logical, but it’s actually based on a model of how a computer works, not of how a human being works. A computer, you get the same output every time you run it. So you should just run it as often as you can. You know, always keep it on and you'll get more done. But for a human being, a biologically based system, you’re not going to get nearly the same output every time. But you can quite unlike a computer, you can do a remarkable amount of unexpected things. You can be extremely effective for a very brief period of time - 1, 2, 3 hours. Now, I might be able to figure out how to map out a chapter of my book you know, you might be able to figure out just the right marketing strategy for a new podcast, solve that problem of how you’re going to have just the right team for the product line that’s going forward. The big, important stuff, the stuff that’s going to carry you for the rest of the week. Then we can have, I don’t know about you, I can have 2-3 days where I’m kind of worthless, I’m not kidding. So, then, what I started wondering was - can we set up the conditions for those brief periods of being highly effective. If that’s what happens naturally, then there must be something that leads to it. And what I started to learn as I dug into the psychology and the neuroscience research, because that’s my background, was that there are things that we can do to set it up, and those things that we can do to set it up are often the very same things that we integrate in our work-life balance. That we can really leverage this idea of being highly effective for short periods of time. It doesn’t mean we’re not going to work the rest of the time, it means we’ve recognized what really matters, set up the conditions to be highly effective for that, and then do the unimportant work at the other time, when we’re not so effective. And that’s the core, that’s kind of the core message of the book. And then it’s specific strategies based on the science about how we set up those conditions.

Matt:	And I love the distinction between - or I guess using the word “effectiveness”. That’s something I’m really passionate about as kind of the difference between efficiency and effectiveness, which I’m sure you’re familiar with that distinction.

Josh:	Yeah, I think it’s a critical distinction. Efficiency is about doing as much as we can in a short time. And so, in some sense, I suppose that’s what, when we’re highly effective we’re getting a lot done in a short period of time. But the base - the bigger idea, the idea the undercurrent when we’re talking about efficiency, is that we’re just trying to optimize the schedule, the calendar. Pack things in. And it doesn’t take into account how well the system is operating. How effective we are. But that is a huge variable for a human being. It’s such a big variable in fact that we probably, this is my hunch, I don’t yet have data to back this up. We probably actually get less out of ourselves when we try to work around the clock. It’s not just diminishing returns, but we probably actually get less useful work done, is my guess. When we just try to keep working all the time. 

Matt:	I think I heard about a study, and I guess I’d have to go and do some research but I feel like I remember hearing something that people who work more than 40-hours a week, they’re actually less productive. 

Josh:	That’s exactly what I’m suggesting. It would follow quite naturally based on what I’ve been learning and writing about in the book.

Matt:	So, one of the things that you mentioned before, and I love he comparisons of humans versus computers, because one of the things we talked about in an earlier podcast is the idea of the biological limits of the human mind, and sort of the hard constraints that evolution and biology have created for the way that we think, and the way that our mind works. 

Josh:	Cool.

Matt:	What do you tell to the busy executive, or the friend of yours. I have people like this in my life who say everything is important, and I’ve read 4-Hour Work Week, and I’ve read Two Awesome Hours, and I tell people, I’m like “Hey, you gotta refocus, you’ve gotta trim down what you’re doing, you’ve gotta prioritize and-“  you know, they have this kind of view that everything is a priority, and they just - this huge sense of overwhelm. What would you say, or how would you help people who maybe they’ve kind of understood this but they have some colleagues, or friends, or employees who are struggling with this distinction or kind of struggling to make a leap to really understanding this? 

Josh:	Yeah, there’s a couple things that I think can be helpful. One is that, one thing that I’ve had that you know, I’ve had the opportunity to enjoy is that when I share with people scientific findings, then it’s very different than just hearing advice, because while advice - I might be giving the exact same advice, and a couple times in the book you’ll see things that you’ve already heard. I might be giving the exact same advice at times as someone else, but when you hear advice there’s always the reasonable thing to wonder, which is “Did it just work for you?” or some context where it doesn’t fit. Do you have to have the right personality? You know, is there something else that I don’t know about it? But when you have the research so you can understand when and why something might work, then it’s very different, then it’s more of an experience of “hey, here’s how the brain works, do you want to work with that or not?” and so it’s much easier for someone to feel like it’s worthwhile to give it a chance. Much easier for someone to believe there’s something in it for them. And that little shift can make a huge difference. So that’s one thing that can definitely go a long way. 
	
	A second piece I think can be quite useful is to help people start with just one of the strategies, which will kind of create the space for all of the others. Everything on the schedule is there for a reason. It is important to someone, and it has some level of importance. It’s not like it’s just anything if we just got rid of it, it would have no consequences. So I think it’s worthwhile acknowledging that. However, there are over a handful of things that are on the agenda that are really going to matter for advancing your career, helping the company succeed, making you feel like you’re accomplishing something worthwhile. And one of the things that I’ll encourage people to do is to take advantage of what researches will call psychological distance. When we get some distance in time, or in space, or we imagine it pertains to someone else, or it isn’t that likely. That’s what we call psychological distance. When you have psychological distance, it’s much easier to recognize, just more automatically, your brain goes there. It’s much easier to recognize the big picture, the abstract, the desirable aspects of something. So, when you’ve got a weekend day, for example. Great to just have you know, lot of people if you manage to get away from work, probably don’t wanna think about work too much. But I would recommend just ten minutes of asking the question, when you are away from work, maybe relatively early in the day on a weekend day, you’ve got some good mental energy, what actually matters? And when I ask people that question when they’ve got some psychological distance, it’s usually not that challenging of a question. If you ask me for example, I should be writing papers. I should be writing books. And I should be presenting. These are - it’s a short list of things that are really going to matter, that are going to move things forward in my career with companies that I work for with that are going to matter a lot to me. And for any job, there’s - we can identify those things a little more easily with a little more distance. The trick, then, is how do we actually remember to focus on those things when we need to? And that’s strategy one in the book: recognize your decision points. They don’t come that often in a day. Most of the time we’re on auto pilot. It’s not that you're not conscious, but you're not consciously monitoring and choosing what to do. Right now, we’re in interview mode. You and I are pretty much focused on what we’re going to say to each other. We’re not in… we’re not thinking about all of the other things in our day, and what are options are for tasks to do. But, as soon as the interview ends, we’ve got a decision point. Unless you have something scheduled and you have no options, we’ve got a decision point. It’s a cross-roads. What do I do? And it’s at that moment we become highly aware. Self-aware. Aware of how uncomfortable we are that we’re not doing anything productive, aware of time passing. It only lasts for a couple of minutes, but it feels like an eternity, and it can be uncomfortable, and we can have the urge to just grab at whatever’s in front of us. Because of course there’s some importance to anything. But that’s the moment to recognize. Right before a task, right after a task, or right after you’ve been interrupted. That one’s a hard one to learn because we usually hate interruptions. But right after you’ve been interrupted. You created a crossroads, you’ve got to decide. Much more aware than you are when you’re on autopilot. You can’t just choose to snap out of auto pilot, but when you do get one of these decision points, you’ve gotta take it. Because that’s the moment in the day when you can actually decide what task to work on. When you’re capable of remembering what’s important as opposed to what’s urgent.

Matt:	I think that’s a critical - I think that’s a really important point, which is that: having the ability to monitor your own thoughts, and having a moment of kind of awareness of, hey, this is a decision point. This is a time when I can change direction. This is a time when I can step out of this pattern and refocus on what’s really important. And one of the tools that’s helped me personally be able to do that more frequently is meditation. And I know you talk about that in the book. Is that something that you use, or are there other tools or strategies that people may be able to implement to kind of recognize decision points more frequently.

Josh:	You’re exactly right, it’s the moment of being able to catch yourself. Those moments, they don’t come around all that often during the day. One of the things that, for example, mindfulness based meditation has been shown to be helpful with is to help people catch those moments. Or create a moment of actually checking in with yourself and saying “wait a second, am I doing the right thing?” because you can be more aware of how you’re feeling and what you’re thinking in that moment. So there’s every reason to think that that kind of a practice would help. I also don’t think that it’s necessary to have that kind of a practice to learn to take advantage of these moments. That there are other things that we can do if you’re someone who isn’t - doesn’t do a lot of meditation of that sort. There’s some great, simple planning ahead that we can do. If you plan ahead and put in what’s called an implementation intention - often described as an “If Then” plan - you can be more likely to actually capture the decision point when it comes. So, for example, I can think about my calendar. And I don’t know exactly what’s coming next week, some new things will be scheduled I’m sure, and some things will be cancelled. However, I do know that there’s going to be somedays when I arrive at the office. There’s going to be some days when I have phone calls and then I hang up the phone. There’s going to be some days when I have meetings with a group of people. There’s going to be some day when I’m more likely to be interrupted, and other days when it’s less likely to be interrupted. I can plan ahead and say, when a meeting ends, I’m likely to be at one of those crossroads. I’m going to plan for that. If a meeting ends, rather than pulling out my phone and looking at the list to see, oh yeah, what were all the things I’m supposed to do, what’s my name again? That moment, disorientation. Instead, I’m going to plan ahead and visualize myself actually taking a moment to, until my head is clear enough that I can remember what actually matters and why I do the job. What’s in it for me here, what’s the point of this work. At that point, it doesn’t need to take more than a minute. Could take two, maybe three minutes. When we indulge in these things, it’s not going to be a huge amount of the time of our day, but it can make a huge difference in choosing the right thing to do. Then I’m going to pull out my calendar and look at the list of things, it’s going to be much easier for me to sort having done that thinking. Because time doesn’t get wasted when we’re taking those moments of actually deciding. Time gets wasted when we choose the wrong task. When you choose the wrong task and get going on it, you can waste an hour, hour and a half no time. That’s where you end up with that feeling of the whole afternoon, “Where did it go?”

Matt:	Yeah, I think that’s a critically important distinction, which is that time isn’t wasted when you have a moment of decision. Time is wasted when you make the wrong decision or when you just on auto-pilot go and do something that’s not - it might be an efficient use of your time but it’s not an effective use of your time.

Josh:	Exactly.

Matt:	So, changing gears a little bit. One of the things in your book you mentioned Ben Franklin as an example of somebody who was tremendously effective. But at the same time, really cherished his downtime and lived a very full and rich life. Why did you choose him as an example and tell me a little of how that kind of plays into the idea of what the message of Two Awesome Hours. 

Josh:	Ben Franklin. I was so happy to come across that example because - who’s known as being the example of productivity like Ben Franklin? Around the world he’s known as well. To be honest, I want to influence people around the world. And so, some character that’s known around the world as a paradigm example of productivity. And when you look at his autobiography, he’s gone to great lengths actually to spell out his approaches. You find, you do find all of the things that he did to work on his career as a printer, which is how he made his fortune. But you also find all of this information about this schedule that he really tried to keep to on a regular basis that included a two hour lunch. He would give himself time to read books, and take care of his affairs. He had music and conversation and fun in the evening. He had all kinds of hobbies that, one of his hobbies, was a part of a book group that eventually led to everyone sharing their books and now we’ve got the great library. You know? These weren’t things that he was doing as part of his printing empire. He was doing things on the side, inventor, stove, and his scientific work with electricity. These were things that he did as hobbies, I would say. These were things that he did out of fun. He also spent a lot of time flirting, and being joking around. So this is a guy who you’re looking at this and it’s so tempting to say “Well, I have to choose. I have to choose. Do I want to be the guy who’s working all the time around the clock to get all my work done. Or do I want to be the guy who actually has some work-life balance?” But what Ben Franklin helps to show is that it’s a false choice. It’s a mistake in belief to actually see it as a choice, because those things that we can do to take care of ourselves, actually make us more effective when we’re working.

Matt:	I completely agree with that. Actually another example that I personally really like is Warren Buffet. I think he’s quoted as saying that he basically spends almost all of his time just sitting in his office reading.

Josh:	Is that right?

Matt:	Yeah. Which, if you look at how tremendously successful he’s been, he spends - and Charlie Munger, his business partner as well, they spend a vast majority of their time essentially reading and just kind of cultivating their minds. But I love the word false choice, because I think that’s a perfect description of how people kind of fall into this trap of - I need to cram every minute into every hour, and I have to answer the extra e-mail and be super productive, when the reality is as you’ve shown and the research shows - often it’s taking that down time and really taking the time to recharge and kind of pull your conscious mind away from some of the work when you really end up producing the most and doing the best work. 

Josh:	And this is on the short-term basis and a longer term basis, so just a few minutes of downtime when you find your mind drifting for example. There’s fantastic research about what happens in those minutes when our minds are drifting, as well as the longer-term downtime. What happens when you actually take a break, and have a half hour without just taking in lots of information, or get some exercise, or get a chance to have a full-night’s sleep. So the short and long term of it, both have been shown to be quite effective.

Matt:	That kind of segues. You mention in the book, fighting distractions, and you have some pretty counter-intuitive advice to sort of combat when your mind wanders and drifts. Can you tell us a little bit more about that?

Josh:	Yeah, so this is probably the most counter-intuitive thing in the book. You never hear a report card for a kid that says “Johnny’s really great in class, but he needs to daydream more”, right? It’s so antithetical to what we are encouraged in our lives. Daydreaming, mind wandering, it’s a bad thing, it’s something to scold ourselves for. And, correct me if I’m wrong, let me know if this has ever happened to you, that you’ve been working hard on something and after 15 or 20 minutes, your mind starts drifting. And what do you do? You yell at yourself. You try to beat yourself up to stay on task. What’s wrong with you? Stay focused. That kind of approach. I’ve done that too, I tried that approach for decades. Most people I know have tried that for many, many years. I’m going to go out on a limb here and suggest that we tried that experiment, and it failed. Despite yelling at us every time, we still do it. It’s because our attention systems are working quite well. When our minds drift after 15-20 minutes, that’s because our attention systems are doing what they’re supposed to do. They’re not meant to keep us focused, they’re meant to pick up on what’s changing. So they’re meant to pick up on what potential could be threatening, or exciting, or new, or interesting, or worthwhile. That’s what they’re for. If we didn’t have the ability to detect changing things in our environment, we’d just be sitting ducks. So, that’s what we have these systems for. So after a little while, our minds wander, they drift. we should expect that. If we just try to yell at ourselves, clearly that hasn’t worked. But an interesting thing happens if we try some of the alternatives. So basically, I think the two other alternatives are these.

	One is that you go and do something worthwhile or fun. Like you check your e-mail or you see who liked your post on Facebook, or something like that. You read the news, check up on the sports listings. There’s many different ways we might do that. All of those, though, involve tracking a lot of new information. And there’s lots of little exciting things that can grab our attention, positive or negative, but that’ll just keep us in a loop. So easy to get sucks in on auto-pilot and get lost for half hour or more.

Matt:	Easily, yeah. I think everybody’s had the experience of - you click one article and 30 minutes later you’re like “What have I been doing?”

Josh:	Exactly. But that’s not the only option we have. Compared to that option - it makes a little bit of sense to just yell at yourself to try to do anything to try to stay on task even if it’s not actually working. But there’s another option which is actually just to have your mind wander for a few minutes. What happens when our minds wander? Research has shown 3-4 different kinds of effects. One of which is that we integrate the neural circuitry that has to do with executive functions - staying focused on a goal. And the neural circuitry that has to do with thinking about ourselves and thinking about our social interactions. Usually it’s one or the other, neural network that’s more active. But when we’re mind wandering, meaning when our minds are just drifting not thinking about whatever it was we were doing before, then there’s an integration between these networks; they’re active at the same times. So we can find the ways that our goals and our social lives can be linked up together. Which is important, because it’s a single human being doing both. There’s also something called creative incubation. If you’ve been working on a creative puzzle, creative challenge: how am I going to work out this new brand issue? But also it could be something in a management space like “how am I going to choose the right team for a product?” in that case, you’re working on something creative. Then when your mind wanders, and you come back to the challenge. People have been shown to come up with more creative ideas and ideas that are more creative. So both rated more creative, and also more of them. There’s also —

Matt:	That’s fascinating, because that phenomenon. Creative incubation, I’ve never heard the term but I’m intimately familiar with the idea, which is essentially - you’re working on a problem and you step away or you get distracted, or you go have lunch. And you come back to it and suddenly you kind of immediately solve it. Your subconscious has essentially solved the problem for you when you stepped away from it consciously, or when you refocus on something else.

Josh:	Exactly, there’s background processing happening. There’s still things happening in your non-conscious mind. There’s a lot of neural activity going on. Associated with recognizing patterns and connecting the things together, that we can block - we can get in the way of that when we’re tracking new information. So, to most effectively mind wander, though you want to do is do something that will distract you from what you were thinking about, but that doesn’t require you to track new information because that will block the mind wandering. So that’s also been shown in research. We can learn how to effectively mind wander. How do be good at mind wandering.  So, some things that will do that well, are for example staring out the window and just watching the people go by. Or looking at some art on the wall. It's thing that holds some interest, but don’t require you to track information. And this is my favorite part of it. There’s a built-in end point. It gets boring. So after a few minutes, you’re going to drift back. So if your mind wants to wander, the thing to do is to let it wander. Facilitate that even by going and staring out the window. Taking that moment. After a few minutes, you’re likely to drift back, and when you do you’re going to be more effective at the work you’re doing, and you’re going to be back far quicker than any other method that you’ve got. So you'll be back to work quicker, and you’ll be more effective when you do. If you let your mind wander. So that’s why it’s so counter intuitive. Because really in that moment what we really need to do is have a little self-compassion and recognize: my mind is wandering for a reason, I’m going to let it and just wait until I’m back. Because that turns out to be the fastest way to get back in a really useful way. There’s a couple other things we can go into about what mind wandering enables, but those two examples may be enough for now.

Matt:	Yeah I think - let’s - I want to cover a few other topics as well but I think that’s an incredible important idea and I’m definitely going to do some more digging on the creative incubation topic, I’m glad now that I have kind of the buzzword for that phenomenon. 

Josh:	And it doesn’t make people more creative in general, it makes people more creative about what they were trying to solve right before the mind wandering.

Matt:	Fascinating. One of the other topics that I was interested in talking about - you mentioned a number of times in the book “working memory” and how important that is. I was curious, one if you could talk a little bit about why working memory is so important. And two, what are some ways that people can sort of train or improve their working memory? 

Josh:	So, working memory is a term for what we are able to hold consciously in mind at any one time. So those things, it’s memory in the sense that we’re actually retaining information, but it’s a very short term kind of thing. It’s what we’re working with in the moment. So, a lot of research on that pertains to productivity will have, as a dependent measure, how it effects working memory. Sometimes the dependent will be concentration, sometimes it’ll be attention, sometimes it’ll be emotional consequences, effects on anxiety. Sometimes it’s a general perceived sense of it being able to feel refreshed and be present, and feel focused. Working memory is definitely part of that. It’s an important part of what researchers will call the executive functions. The functions that we really rely on are uniquely human parts of our brains for that have a lot to do with the information that we’re consciously aware of in the moment. Now, there’s clearly as we were just talking about, mind wandering, lots of important stuff that happens in the background, not conscious. But your working memory, the more you’re able to hold in mind and kind of work within the moment - well, the more flexible you can be in the way that you solve problems. It definitely can be helpful. There are debates about whether or not a person can really change their working memory capacity, but what we can do is make it easier for us, for ourselves to really rely on to use our working memory. So if I’m highly distracted by being overly anxious by something. That’s going to make it hard. That’s going to make it harder for me to hold in mind those things that I need to hold in mine. Something that will really help me become less anxious is a little bit of exercise. One of the more reliable things we have for it. Also, it’s been shown that certain environmental factors like bright lights, especially lights that are more on the cool end of the spectrum, have some of the blue in them. Make it easier for people to do some of these executive functions, like making use of their working memory. Another thing that’s quite helpful for that and this one also similar to the anxiety example I was giving has a lot to do with sort of competing input - is sound. When there’s silence, it’s much easier to do tasks that require working memory. When there’s a little bit of noise in the background, sometimes that’s been shown to be helpful with very creative kinds of tasks, probably very - probably doesn’t really apply to writing. I’d like to see research that specifically looks at that just because that’s so verbal, so that should interfere with sound. But we have some creative tasks when it primes the concept of being free from constraints, then a little bit of noise has been shown to help. But for the most part, tasks that are going to require executive functions and rely on working memory for example, are going to be a lot harder for us to do when there’s noise in the background. And that’s noise of any kind, but the absolute hardest thing to work around is speech. 

Matt:	And that was one of the most surprising findings for me when I read the book, was the idea - I love kind of putting on some background music. It’s sad, but you can’t argue with the research that even a little bit of background music actually negatively impacts your productivity. 

Josh:	Yeah, it is sad. I felt the same way and also I love coffee shops. But the truth is - the research would suggest, and as I look at it, I guess my experience does seem to follow that too. I am less productive there with all that background noise. One thing I will say though is that we don’t need to be at our best all the time. And, we can’t be at our best all the time. So, when you’ve got that work that’s really important - you’ve decided this is a project I need to nail. I’ve got to pitch to the CEO. I really want to nail this. When you’re working on that, that would be an ideal time to give yourself a quiet space with good lighting and to maybe come to it after a little exercise, or at least not come to it right after doing something else that really depleted you. Then you’re likely to be highly effective. You don’t need to be at your absolute best for everything. There’s some things you can do where you're just doing an initial draft of some thoughts, and you know you’re going to clean it up the next day. Or you’re going through some paperwork, some reimbursements, or something you need to file that doesn’t really need your attention - you’ve done it a hundred times. Sure, put on some music, you will work more slowly, and you’re not going to pay as much attention to detail, but that won’t matter in that case. You might enjoy it a little bit more. So it doesn’t mean we have to never work with music on in the background, but just realize that for those periods, for those two awesome hours, then we want silence.

Matt:	So one of the kind of related question that I had about working memory and you may not have an answer to this because this is a little bit outside the scope of the book, but I’m curious. Do brain games, or brain training or anything like that, do those things work and do you think those things can help people improve working memory?

Josh:	Here’s what I’ve heard. I know that there’s been research independent of the companies, obviously when the companies are doing the research then they’re motivated to find things that will support them, which doesn’t mean it’s bad research. It’s still good research. It’s just you also want to have research from independent sources. So, some things I’ve seen. First of all, the training, it does seem to make people better at the specific thing that they’re working on. And we’re talking very specific. So, if someone’s trying to learn to control their responses on a Tetris-like game, a game where you need to quickly move a piece so it doesn’t fall into the wrong spot on the screen. Then that is - can definitely help them to improve the skill of visually moving pieces around and making sure they don’t fall into the wrong spot. Whether that’s going to then generalize though, is the piece that is not yet showing up. And it may. But at least one piece of research that I’ve seen was showing that self-control in one domain, training that, didn’t improve self-control in a different domain. Even though we know there’s a lot of overlap in the brain structures that are involved in self-control, let’s say for controlling your emotions and controlling what you eat. None the less, they must be different enough that the kind of brain training that can happen in these computer training things didn’t seem to carry over. Now that’s just one domain, that’s self-control, whether that would be the same for working memory and attention and various other things like that, remains to be seen. So, it’s an empirical question. A question for research, and I’m sure we’re going to see research on that over the next five years.

Matt:	Speaking of emotions. You have a pretty interesting take on how to handle and potentially use negative emotions to your advantage. Tell me a little bit more about that. 

Josh:	Oh, yeah. So, emotions are something that I think many people think of as something that just happens to them. That we’re a victim of our emotions, it’s like “Oh I wish I wasn’t feeling sad today”, or “I’m happy, I’m feeling confident, feeling really good today”, that it’s just something that happens to us. But, in fact, our emotions are adaptive. They are things that we use. They have utility. They don’t just exist in a vacuum. Our emotions are important parts of what motivates us. And different emotions motivates us in different ways. So anger is unique among the negative emotions and that’s the only negative emotion that motivates us to move towards something. So, anger is especially useful in a context where we need to move towards something that is unpleasant. If we’re moving towards something pleasant, say a pretty girl looks at you from across the room, well, yeah, you want to go and approach her, there’s no downside, presuming that you’re single and etc. but if you want to approach something that’s unpleasant, that maybe you need to raise prices and your clientele, psychotherapist needs to raise prices periodically. And my fear that in doing so, that’s going to drive some people away because they’ll feel like there was a verbal contract, an agreement, about what the cost of the services were. Every couple of years, anybody needs to do this, and so having a little bit of anger around, that might actually be helpful in motivating yourself to take that on. Saying, you know what, getting a little angry about the injustice of it. “I deserve this, I give so much.” That actually can be motivating, can help the person. It’s not the only way to motivate yourself, but recognizing that every emotion is there for a reason. It has value, it’s adaptive in certain consequences. Can actually help us look at our emotions differently, and rather than just trying to get rid of them, instead be aware of what your emotion is when you come to a decision point. “Hey I’m a little angry right now! I’m going to go ahead and take on that price increase idea that I was dealing with.” 
	
	Or sadness is an emotion where in fact we tend to pay more attention to the detail. We tend to be more likely to actually think about somebody’s arguments rather than just thinking about whether it’s an attractive person giving the argument. So, when you need to be really kind of prudent, a little sadness can be useful. Might be helpful to get yourself into a mood where you’re remembering something a little sad. Not the only way to do it, but it actually can be helpful in that context. Anxiety can help us focus. Now it’ll help us focus only on what we’re anxious about, but it can help us focus. Little bit of anxiety is also very energizing. Lot of energy, focused energy on particularly something that you want to avoid going wrong. And that can be just the right thing at certain times. So these are not necessarily bad things, and when you know that about anxiety, then perhaps you find yourself with a little anxiety, just taking a moment and saying to yourself, “Hey thanks! Thanks, self, thanks biological self. For helping to get me energized for this. You wouldn’t be anxious unless there was something to be energized about.” Maybe it feels a little negative, but that’s readiness. And when we don’t recognize that, and we try to just get rid of the anxiety, then we can get anxious about feeling anxious. And then it feels much more unpleasant. So with a negative emotion, if we think about the utility of it, and on the positive side, positive emotions - when you’re feeling good, you’re more likely to collaborate effectively. Because you’re more likely to see, you’re more likely to anticipate the collaboration going well. When you’re feeling good, you’re more likely to come to creative solutions. You’re more likely to just let the small things go, look at the big picture. Does this seem like a generally likable person? And not be so critical of the specific arguments they might be making. There are times when that’s exactly what you want. So, emotions are a great thing to check in on when you’re having a decision point. But there’s also - if you don’t want to get that granular with your emotions, you can just think in general, am I strongly emotional right now? Therefore, is it going to be hard for me to concentrate. Maybe this is not the time for me to take on preparing for that CEO pitch. Maybe I should wait an hour. Or, did I just do something that made me strongly emotional? Having a really tough conversation, or getting some really tough feedback. Maybe now is the time to go do something like get a little exercise to reset for the rest of the day. So we can really take into account our emotions at these decision points.

Matt:	I think that’s a fantastic idea and it’s such a useful tool to be able to harness those emotions instead of just being upset about them or not coping with them.

Josh:	Yeah, we can use them, we don’t have to just wish them away. 

Matt:	So, one of the other topics that you touch on in great detail in the book is the idea of mental fatigue, which I think, correct me if I’m wrong, is similar or the same as the concept of decision fatigue? Tell me a little bit about that and how that impacts our decision making process.

Josh:	I would consider decision fatigue a subset of mental fatigue. That essentially, we wear out, and in particular, we wear out our ability to control ourselves. And decision making is a part of that. We come, we made too many decisions. Each time you’re making decisions you’re essentially controlling yourself. You’re trying to - you know, not make all the other decisions in favor of just one. So, I’ve got to decide not to eat the Danish in the morning. I’ve got to decide not to have the cookie at lunch. I’ve got to decide not to have the cake when somebody’s got a birthday party at work, then finally at the end of the day just worn out with all of this trying to keep myself from doing that, and I have a  bunch of ice cream. We’re wearing that out as we go. Where the decision fatigue really comes in - we’re making decisions all the time, and it doesn’t matter how big or small they are, we’re still wearing out the same resource. When I say wearing out, it’s not that you couldn’t keep going if you were sufficiently motivated, you could keep going - like to think of it like running. If you just ran a half hour, you could keep going if you were sufficiently motivated if someone was chasing you. But you’re probably not all that interested in doing it at that point. Similar thing happens with our mental fatigue or decision fatigue. After we’ve been doing it for a while, we just don’t want to keep doing it. And there are consequences to this because we can’t get through the day without making a lot of decisions. Oftentimes, though, this is the piece that I think is really helpful for people to capture. Which is that, just because something’s important, doesn’t mean that we’re making more decisions. You can wear out your decision making abilities by making a lot of unimportant decisions, or by making decisions about things that are unimportant. So, for example, I like to pick on e-mail because it’s such a common experience. A lot of e-mails are not that important. Some, certainly are important. But a lot of e-mails are not that important. But still, you’ve gotta make decisions about whether this is the right time to send it, whether we’ve included the right people, whether we’ve said something in an offensive way. So many little decisions for each one. So, at the end of an hour, hour and a half of checking e-mail. You can pretty reliably expect that you’ve got some real decision fatigue. And it’s going to be a lot harder to actually then do some really effective work. You’re less likely to be good at doing effective work at that point, than if you had a half hour break between e-mail and effective work. Or if you just did the e-mail after the effective work. Because you won’t be fatiguing yourself. There’s consequences in this in legal arenas, medical arenas. When I say legal arenas, judges for example, by the end of the day to get to the afternoon, they’ve got decision fatigue. They’ve been making decisions all day long. So the kinds of decisions they hand down, they tend to resort to whatever their default is. If it’s a more conservative judge, the more conservative decisions, whatever their default is, they’re just sort of fatigues essentially. And they’re not necessarily aware. They’re not necessarily aware of making a different decision, but they are making different decisions. It’s just too hard to actually deliberate at that point.

Matt:	I think I’ve heard, and it may have been in the book of a study where they looked at judges kind of before each of their meal periods. I think they were more likely to sentence people to longer sentences right before they ate. Or I guess right before they got a break. It’s a fascinating study, but it’s pretty shocking when you think that even the judicial system is impacted by something like that.

Josh:	The biological consequences on decision making are what essentially what we’re talking about. What does it mean to have a human being making these decisions? It mean we need to optimize the human decision making machine. We need to try to find ways to get judges to be in a really good mental space when they’re making those decisions. And human beings are still the best at making complex, morally based decisions. We haven’t created a computer that can do that better than a human. So, what we can start to do though, is really focus on how do you do get a human being to be able to really give their best to the decisions that they’re making? And part of it is going to involve having a shift in the way that they organize their days. That was research that was not in my book, so you must have found it elsewhere, but it definitely fits.

Matt:	The most important take-away for me there is it’s not the importance of the decision that causes mental fatigue. You can make a bunch of totally irrelevant decisions and you’re still going to enter a state of mental fatigue regardless of how important the quality of those decisions were. 

Josh:	That’s right, you can be making decisions about what to wear, and when to schedule something on your calendar, what flight you want to take to go across the country. Those are decisions that are not going to have a major effect on your life, but it’s still fatigues. It still wears out that decision making ability. 

Matt:	So, changing directions a little bit. You’re a master practitioner of NLP. Tell me how does NLP play into Two Awesome Hours.

Josh:	That’s a different arena. The ways that it probably influences me when I was writing is that NLP, for those people who don’t know, is essentially a branch of psychotherapy that some people have adapted for other things as well. But in the late seventies, early eighties, there were some linguists who studied some very successful psychotherapists and looked at the language patterns they used. Then went around teaching those to psychotherapists, and teaching as well what those original therapists were paying attention to in the language of their clients. Eventually they also expanded it to non-verbal communication. So those patterns that they were detecting were very successful. They were in the realms of hypnotherapy, of family therapy and gestalt therapy primarily. So, it’s a collection of language patterns and non-verbal communication patterns that are associated with some very successful psychotherapists. Over time, people have adapted that to be relevant to marketing, and coaching, and various other things. So, for me, what NLP is quite helpful with is helping me to recognize in myself and in others, the ways that we’re actually thinking about the work that we do. So, if I hear someone talking about how they just have to get to a certain project by a certain time. That kind of feeling of overwhelm. I know it’s a very different experience for them than if they’re saying, well I get to do this project, or I want to do this project. I helped me to really tune into some of the challenges that were facing as well as some of the things that people are doing that are successful. Those served as hypothesis about what might be useful. How we might be able to set up the conditions for these brief periods of effectiveness. So that when I did go to the research, that could guide me towards things to start to look for. Then I might find the hypothesis sometimes come from there, it would sometimes come from other places, and then I’d go to the search and if the research didn’t back it up, then I would use that to color what I could say and try to bring that to the book. And if the research didn’t back that up, then I would leave it. Because it wasn’t a fruitful way to go. That’s kind of how the pieces fit together for me.

Matt:	Awesome, and that was a great description for NLP, thank you very much. That was probably helpful for the audience. That relates a little bit to one of the topics you talk about is the idea of priming, and obviously with NLP it’s about language and the non-verbals that prime you, but you talk about physical spaces and how they can prime us. I thought that was fascinating.

Josh:	Right, there’s three categories that I really focused on in the book that I chose because I wanted to just talk about things that anyone would have some ability to influence. There’s so many of us work in work spaces that we have no control over. Maybe it’s an open plan office, we have no say over the color of the walls or the lighting or anything like that, that’s coming from overhead. The sound in the space can be tough. I wanted to focus specifically on some of the things we do have control over within that that we could influence. This is also relevant for of course anyone who does have complete control over their environment or who works from home and uses part of shared space for their work and partly for something else. 

	The categories are these, and one of these we talked about before, which is sound. Which is noise. That understanding the importance of it for concentration, I think can help go a long way in terms of people making decisions about when they really want to carve out that time. I think it’s useful to come back to this idea for a moment, that we don’t need to be on and at our best all day long, and we can’t be. But what we can do is think about the work that really matters, then think about how can I set up a couple hours, maybe just one hour, maybe three hours. Nothing magic about two, it’s just that it’s achievable for anyone. How can I set up a brief period of time to really get to that work? One of the things that will matter is silence that will make a big difference. What we can do is, because it really makes a difference, is it actually is worth if you can doing it in the morning before you go into work and going in a little bit later. Reserving a conference room if you can in your workspace if you have an ability to shut a door and do it. Or actually getting noise cancelling headphones so you can put them on for that time period. And you could have music at other times, but during that time you’d have it silent. So this is speech, white noise, music, any of those things they all have been shown to be worse. There’s only a couple of exceptions. Some research for example with kids that have a  lot of trouble paying attention seem to perform a little bit better at some tasks when there is some background white noise, that just sort of nondescript sounds like a fan. But for most people, they’re having an easier time paying attention without noise, and the hardest one to tune out is speech. So if there’s no option but to have either speech or white noise, then yeah, better with white noise. But even better is silence. For those periods when it really matters, you’ll work more effectively, you’ll work more quickly, it’ll be easier to stay on task. 
	
	The second one is lighting. Now, you may not be able to influence the overhead lighting or whether you sit next to a window. One thing that has been shown is bright lights make it easier for people to stay focused and that light on the blue end on the spectrum. So apparently we have photo receptors in our eyes that are not part of vision. They were only discovered within the last 15 years. They had been hypothesized before that, but we finally know about them now, they’ve been identified. They don’t have to do with vision, what they have to do is resetting the circadian clock. The part of the brain that runs those 24-hour cycles. Those roughly daily cycles about when we’re hungry, when we’re alert, when we’re sleepy. Light at the blue end of the spectrum, the best example of that would be clear blue sky. Light at the blue end of the spectrum activates these receptors and helps to reset the circadian clock. So when we have access to that kind of light, cool light, they’re - you can look at when you go to the hardware store it’ll say whether it’s cool light or whether it’s warm light. It’s not for everything - we want warm light is nice when you’re having people over for dinner or you’re just relaxing. But when you want to focus, cool light has been shown to be more effective. And even more effective at things like the kind of mental rotation work that engineers or designers have to do, they seem to be more effective at it with that light. So really it does make a difference. You can have a lamp at your desk that adds some additional light just for brightness, or you get one of those bulbs that’s at the cool ends of the spectrum. Don’t have to have it on all the time, but when you really need to focus, that’s been shown to help. As with sound, dim lighting also can be helpful for creativity. One of the exceptions is creativity and what matters is whether the environment primes the idea of being free from constraints, and that might happen with dim lighting, it might happen with having a little noise in the background, it might happen by being by a window, or being out in nature. But if that idea is primed, people tend to be more creative. So that’s sort of a caveat, an exception. But for the most part with the work we’re trying to do, it’s helpful to have the bright light. 

	In the third piece with the environment has to do with the space you’re sitting at or standing at. There’s a couple of things that matter here. One of them is clutter. And for some people you can think, well you know I can get my work done well enough with all the clutter, I just don't have the time to get that out, I’ve got to get down to work. Somebody once did a study about what we leave on our desk when we leave stuff out. For the most part, it’s reminders, it’s things that are meant to be reminders of something, and if you take a moment and kind of just think about what we would be reminding ourselves of, well it’s the things we didn’t get to, because they were hard. Or because it was unpleasant, or because we didn’t know how to do it. So because of that, they’re probably going to continue to sit there for a couple of days, maybe more. And then what gets added to it is the negative association, this embarrassment, I haven’t gotten back to someone, the social obligation. It’s all the stuff that our attention systems are so well attuned to. Very important to us, things that pertain to social obligations, things that have weight, have some that are threatening in some way because we don’t know how to do them but they’re still pending, right? They are exactly what you don’t want to expose your attention system to when you’re sitting down to really do some work that you’ve already chosen what’s worth spending your time on. You can work at a cluttered desk when you’re doing the unimportant stuff, but when you’re sitting down to have a really good period, it’s worth it just to stack those things up and move it out of sight. What that also does, and this is the final thing I’ll say on it. It creates the opportunity to move more freely at your desk, to spread out, to have big expansive movements. To reach for that cup of water on the far-end of the desk or your phone at the other end of the desk. When we have bigger, more expansive movement, that activates, primes, the idea of power. Especially in western cultures. Bigger expansive movements. And that can put a person in an optimistic space, in a more comfortable taking risks - that kind of a space. There’s even some research to suggest that that can influence our hormone levels and put us in a more resilient hormonal space. So the consequence of that - there’s also then you can think about your workspace in terms of movement in the sense of how easy is it to get up and walk away? To step back for a minute and clear your head. Or to switch from a sitting down to standing desk, not everybody has that capacity but the ability to stand up and walk away, that’s going to create greater opportunities for mind wandering and for making use of your decision points. So those are some of the ways that I think - some of the ways that the environment can prime our thinking and therefore get us into a space to be really effective that I think anyone has some influence over.

Matt:	I think it’s really funny, there’s a quote, you’ve probably heard it. I think it’s Einstein that said it, “If a cluttered desk is a sign of a cluttered mind, what’s the sign of an empty desk?” Something like that. Which people use of course to kind of defend their messiness. But of course you can’t really argue with what the research says at the end of the day. 

Josh:	Right, yeah. I mean, yes it is a very full mind. A mind full of things that you have to keep track of when you’re trying to work on something. I think so, I think you have a very full mind when you’ve got lots of things, and we want to actually clear that out for the sake of the work. Just temporarily.

Matt:	For people like me who’ve read Two Awesome Hours, what further books or resources would you suggest checking out.

Josh:	There are a few authors who endorse my book on the back cover who I strongly recommend their work, you’ll see Heidi Grant Halverson, she’s written a number of books, her most recent one is No One Understands You, which is a dive into the science and practice of recognizing - not just how to communicate well, but also what it is we do that we’re not aware of about the ways we communicate and the messages we give off without even meaning to and how to correct that. David Rock is also one of the people who endorsed my book, Your Brain at Work, if you like what you’ve read here you’d probably love that. And also Peter Bregman, the author of both Eighteen Minutes and Four Seconds, really similar lines of thinking. For people who like to - you mention the book, The Art of Learning. In that space, there’s a work I’d also recommend by Art Markman, at the University of Austin Texas and has authored a couple of books that have essentially teaching people how to think. How to learn so they’re more likely to have smart solutions to new things that come their way. There’s a lot of great stuff out there right now. There’s also a book coming but it’s not out yet, keep an eye out for a book by Jamel Zaki, I don’t have the title to be able to give you just yet. Those are some of the things that I would recommend. Also, you can see my stuff, I write periodically blog posts that you’ll see on the Harvard Business Review or Huffington Post site today. If you want to take a look at what’s in Two Awesome Hours there’s also an excerpt available for it on the website for it, twoawesomehours.com 

Matt:	So where can people find you and the book online?

Josh:	The easiest way to do it is twoawesomehours.com, you’ll find links there to contact me, you’ll find links there excerpts there, links to the various bookstores, ways to find it, amazon.com directly of course too. Barnes N Noble, all the other main sources of ways to get it. Link too from there, and you can contact me there, contact my publicist there, I’d love to hear from you. So please stop by and visit the website or if you already know you want it, then of course you can get it right away. It also should be available in many bookstores in your area.

Matt:	Josh, thank you so much for being on the science of success, I know people are going to love this interview. I think everyone should absolutely check out Josh’s new book Too Awesome Hours, science based strategies to harness your best time and get your most productive work done. I think everyone will really enjoy that book.

Josh:	Thank you so much, it’s been great talking with you. 

 

January 05, 2016 /Austin Fabel
Focus & Productivity
  • Newer
  • Older